📋 What is Despido Injustificado in California?
California is an "at-will" employment state, meaning empleadors can generally terminate empleados for any reason or no reason at all. Sin embargo, there are significant exceptions that make certain terminations unlawful. I help both empleados who have been wrongfully terminated and empleadors who need to respond to terminación claims.
Exceptions to At-Will Empleo
⚖ Public Policy (Tameny)
Terminación for refusing to violate law, performing statutory duty, exercising legal rights, or reporting legal violacións
📝 Implied Contract
Handbook policies, verbal assurances, longevity, and practices creating reasonable expectation of job security
👥 FEHA Violacións
Terminación based on race, gender, age, disability, religion, or other protected characteristics
📝 buena fe Exception
mala fe terminación to deprive empleado of earned benefits or commissions
Two-Sided Coverage
✅ For Empleados (Senders)
- Identify which despido injustificado theory applies
- Document the circumstances surrounding terminación
- Gather evidencia of pretext or discriminatory motive
- Calculate comprehensive daños including punitive
- Draft a demand that maximizes acuerdo leverage
📩 For Empleadors (Recipients)
- Evaluate the strength of each terminación theory claimed
- Document legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons
- Assess potential responsabilidad under multiple theories
- Identify defenses and weaknesses in the reclamación
- Develop strategic response and acuerdo position
⚠ Prescripción
California despido injustificado claims have varying deadlines. FEHA claims require filing with CRD within 3 años. Common law Tameny claims have a 2-year statute. Breach of implied contract has a 2-year statute (oral) or 4-year (written). Consult an abogado promptly.
⚖ Base Legal
California provides multiple legal theories for despido injustificado claims. I analyze which theories apply to maximize recuperación for empleados or assess exposure for empleadors.
Key Legal Authorities
Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980)
Landmark California Supreme Tribunal case establishing that despido injustificado in violación of public policy is actionable as a tort. Allows recuperación of compensatory and punitive daños when an empleado is fired for: (1) refusing to violate a statute, (2) performing a statutory obligation, (3) exercising a statutory right, or (4) reporting a violación of law.
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988)
California Supreme Tribunal recognized implied contract exception to at-will employment. Courts consider totality of circumstances: personnel policies, practices, longevity, promotions, commendations, assurances of continued employment, and industry practices. Contract claims limited to contract daños.
FEHA - Government Code 12940
Fair Empleo and Housing Act prohibits terminación based on protected characteristics: race, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, age (40+), pregnancy, and military status. No cap on daños. Abogado fees recoverable.
Covenant of buena fe and Fair Dealing
California recognizes that every contract includes an implied covenant of buena fe. In employment, this prevents terminación solely to deprive the empleado of earned benefits, tales como commissions about to vest, pension benefits, or bonuses. Limited to contract daños.
Public Policy Sources (Tameny Claims)
🚫 Refusing to Violate Law
▼Terminación for refusing to commit perjury, refusing to engage in price-fixing, refusing to falsify records, refusing to violate safety regulations, or refusing to participate in any illegal activity. The empleado's reasonable belief that the conduct is illegal is sufficient.
⚖ Performing Statutory Duty
▼Terminación for performing jury duty, cooperating with government investigations, reporting child abuse as a mandated reporter, or any other action required by law. These statutory duties must be performed regardless of empleador preference.
🛠 Exercising Legal Rights
▼Terminación for filing workers' compensación claims, taking family leave under CFRA/FMLA, voting, engaging in lawful off-duty conduct, or exercising any other right granted by statute. Empleadors cannot condition employment on waiving statutory rights.
📢 Reporting Violacións
▼Terminación for reporting empleador violacións to government agencies, including OSHA demandas, wage claims, environmental violacións, or fraude reports. Overlaps with whistleblower statutes (LC 1102.5) but provides tort remedies including punitive daños.
💡 Tort vs. Contract Daños
Tameny (public policy) claims sound in tort and allow punitive daños and angustia emocional recuperación. Implied contract and buena fe claims sound in contract and are limited to contract daños (lost salarios, benefits). I carefully evaluate which theories to pursue based on facts and potential recuperación.
📝 Elements to Prove
Each despido injustificado theory has different elements. I analyze which theories apply and what evidencia is needed to establish responsabilidad or mount a defense.
Tameny (Public Policy) Elements
- Empleo Relationship - Demandante was employed by demandado
- Terminación - Demandado terminated demandante's employment
- Public Policy Violación - Terminación violated fundamental public policy (statutory or constitutional)
- Causation - The public policy violación was a substantial motivating factor in terminación
- Daños - Demandante suffered harm as a result
Implied Contract Elements
- Empleo Relationship - Demandante was employed by demandado
- Implied Promise - Empleador made implied promise limiting terminación rights (handbook, practices, assurances)
- Breach - Empleador breached the implied promise by terminating without good cause
- Daños - Demandante suffered daños from the breach
FEHA Discriminación Elements
- Protected Class - Demandante is a member of protected class
- Qualified - Demandante was performing job competently
- Adverse Action - Demandado terminated demandante
- Circumstances - Circumstances suggest discriminatory motive (replaced by non-protected person, treated differently, etc.)
💡 "Substantial Motivating Factor" Standard
Under California law (Harris v. City of Santa Monica), the empleado need only prove that discriminación or protected activity was a "substantial motivating factor" in the terminación - not the sole or even primary reason. This standard is more favorable than federal law's "but-for" causation requirement.
Empleador Defenses
📄 Legitimate Business Reason
Poor performance, policy violacións, misconduct, restructuring, or economic necessity
📈 Documentation
Progressive discipline, performance reviews, warnings, and contemporaneous records
👥 Same Actor Inference
Same person who hired also fired - inference against discriminatory motive
🕑 After-Acquired Evidencia
Evidencia discovered after terminación that would have justified firing (limits daños)
💰 Daños and Multas
California despido injustificado claims can result in substantial daños. I calculate maximum recuperación for empleados and assess exposure for empleadors.
| Damage Category | Tameny (Tort) | FEHA | Contract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atrás Pay | Sí | Sí | Sí |
| Front Pay | Sí | Sí | Sí |
| Lost Benefits | Sí | Sí | Sí |
| angustia emocional | Sí | Sí | No |
| Daños Punitivos | Sí | Sí | No |
| Honorarios de Abogado | No | Sí | No |
| Damage Caps | None | None | Contract terms |
📊 Ejemplo de Cálculo de Daños
Example: FEHA Discriminación Case - Senior Manager
Servicios de Abogado
💰 No Caps on California Daños
Unlike federal Title VII (which caps daños based on empleador size), California's FEHA has no caps on compensatory or punitive daños. Juries can award whatever they believe is fair. Seven-figure verdicts in FEHA cases are not uncommon.
🖩 Despido Injustificado Calculadora de Daños
Use this interactive calculator to estimate potential daños in your California despido injustificado case. Enter your information below to get an estimate of back pay, front pay, lost benefits, and other recoverable daños.
📈 Desglose Estimado de Daños
Click any row for explanation
💡 Factors Affecting Your Recuperación
- Mitigation: You must make reasonable efforts to find new employment
- Evidencia: Strong documentation significantly increases acuerdo value
- Empleador Size: Larger empleadors may have higher punitive exposure
- Egregious Conduct: Malicious actions increase angustia emocional and punitive awards
✅ Lista de Evidencias
Gather these documents to strengthen your reclamación (empleados) or build your defense (empleadors). Click to check off items as you collect them.
📄 Empleo Documents
- ✓ Offer letter and employment agreement
- ✓ Empleado handbook and company policies
- ✓ Performance reviews and evaluations
- ✓ Terminación letter or documentation
📩 Comunicaciones
- ✓ Emails related to terminación
- ✓ Text messages with supervisors/HR
- ✓ HR demandas and investigation records
- ✓ Written warnings or disciplinary records
👥 Testigo Information
- ✓ Names of coworkers who witnessed events
- ✓ Contacto info for supportive colleagues
- ✓ Statements from witnesses
- ✓ Comparator empleados (similar situations)
📈 Daños Documentation
- ✓ Pay stubs showing salary, bonuses, benefits
- ✓ Job search records (applications, rejections)
- ✓ Medical records for angustia emocional
- ✓ Lost benefits documentation
🔒 Request Your Personnel File
Under código laboral Section 1198.5, you have the right to inspect and copy your personnel file dentro de 30 días of a written request. Request this immediately - your file may contain evidencia of your performance or reveal pretextual reasons for terminación.
📄 Texto Modelo
I use these templates when drafting despido injustificado carta de demandas. Copiar and customize for your situation.
👥 Cuándo Contratar a Despido Injustificado Abogado
despido injustificado cases are among the most complex employment claims. Understanding when professional help is essential can make the difference between a successful recuperación and a lost case.
Maneje Usted Mismo Cuando:
✅ Simple Final Paycheck Issue
If your only reclamación is unpaid final salarios (not despido injustificado itself), usted podría use DLSE
✅ Negotiating Severance
If the empleador is offering severance and you just need help reviewing terms (though an abogado review is still valuable)
Contrate un Abogado Cuando:
⚠ FEHA Discriminación Reclamación
FEHA discriminación requires proving protected characteristic, adverse action, and causation - complex legal elements
⚠ Represalia for Protected Activity
Whistleblower and represalia claims require establishing the protected activity and proving causal connection
⚠ Public Policy Violación
Tameny claims for despido injustificado in violación of public policy are fact-intensive and legally complex
⚠ Significant Daños
despido injustificado daños can include years of lost salarios, angustia emocional, and punitive daños
Why You Almost Always Need an Abogado
- Complex Legal Elements: despido injustificado requires proving specific legal elements that vary by reclamación type
- Fee-Shifting: FEHA allows prevailing demandantes to recover abogado fees - making representation economically viable
- Administrative Exhaustion: FEHA claims require filing with DFEH/CRD first - abogados ensure proper procedures
- Empleador Has Counsel: Empleadors always hire abogados for despido injustificado claims - you should too
- Acuerdo Leverage: Represented empleados receive significantly higher acuerdos on average
- Prescripción: FEHA has strict filing deadlines - an abogado ensures you don't miss them
Not Sure If You Have a Case?
Take our free 2-minute assessment to evaluate your despido injustificado reclamación.
Tomar Evaluación Gratuita⚠ Time Is Critical
FEHA discriminación claims must be filed with the Civil Rights Department within 3 años of the terminación. Whistleblower claims have varying deadlines. Evidencia and testigo memories degrade quickly. Consult an abogado immediately after terminación.
🚀 Próximos Pasos
Whether you're an empleado sending a despido injustificado reclamación or an empleador responding to one, I can help you navigate the process.
For Empleados (Senders)
Step 1: Gather Evidencia
Request personnel file, collect communications, identify witnesses and comparators
Step 2: Enviar Carta de Demanda
I draft comprehensive carta de demandas for Tarifa fija de $575 that maximize acuerdo value
Step 3: File CRD Demanda
For FEHA claims, file with California Civil Rights Department within 3 años
Step 4: Litigate if Necessary
File demanda judicial in Superior Tribunal if acuerdo not reached
For Empleadors (Recipients)
Step 1: Preserve Evidencia
Issue litigio hold immediately to preserve all relevant records
Step 2: Investigate Reclamación
Gather documentation of legitimate terminación reasons
Step 3: Assess Exposure
Evaluate reclamación theories and calculate potential responsabilidad
Step 4: Respond Strategically
I help empleadors craft responses that protect interests and explore resolution
📌 CRD/DFEH Filing Process
For FEHA claims, you must file a demanda with California's Civil Rights Department (formerly DFEH) within 3 años of the discriminatory act. puede presentar online at calcivilrights.ca.gov. You can request an immediate "Right to Sue" notice or have CRD investigate. Tameny claims can be filed directly in tribunal.
¿Necesita Ayuda Legal?
I help both empleados and empleadors with California despido injustificado claims. Agendar una consulta to discuss your situation.
Recursos de California
- CA Civil Rights Department (CRD): calcivilrights.ca.gov - File FEHA demandas
- CRD Hotline: 1-800-884-1684 (voice), 1-800-700-2320 (TTY)
- California Labor Commissioner: dir.ca.gov/dlse - Wage and represalia claims
- Referencia de Abogado del Colegio de Abogados: calbar.ca.gov - Find employment abogados