Recover frozen cryptocurrency assets and challenge wrongful account closures. California law protects your digital asset property rights against exchange misconduct.
4 Years
UCL Statute of Limitations
DFPI
California Crypto Regulator
$450
Demand Letter Fee
Crypto Exchange Account Issues in California
Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in California must comply with state money transmission laws and consumer protection statutes. When exchanges freeze accounts, restrict withdrawals, or close accounts without proper justification, California law provides remedies for affected users.
Critical: Your cryptocurrency is your property. While exchanges have legitimate compliance obligations, they cannot indefinitely hold your assets without legal justification. California's strong consumer protection laws apply to crypto exchanges operating in the state.
Common Crypto Exchange Account Problems
Issue Type
Description
Legal Basis for Recovery
Account Freeze
Exchange locks account citing "suspicious activity" or "review" with no timeline or explanation
UCL unfair practices, breach of implied covenant, conversion
Withdrawal Restrictions
Account active but withdrawals blocked or delayed indefinitely
Mandatory arbitration: Most exchanges require arbitration, limiting court options
Vague ToS: User agreements give exchanges broad discretion
Regulatory complexity: Overlapping state and federal oversight
Slow support: Customer service often unhelpful for serious issues
Asset volatility: Delays cause financial harm as prices move
Your Immediate Action Steps
Document everything - Screenshot account status, balances, all communications
Escalate formally - Request supervisor review in writing
Complete KYC promptly - Provide all requested verification documents
File regulatory complaints - DFPI and CFPB create leverage
Send demand letter - Formal legal demand often triggers resolution
Regulatory Environment: The California DFPI has been actively regulating cryptocurrency under the Digital Financial Assets Law (effective 2025). Exchanges must obtain licenses and comply with consumer protection requirements. This regulatory framework gives California consumers leverage that users in other states may lack.
California Legal Framework for Crypto Disputes
California provides multiple legal theories for challenging crypto exchange misconduct. The combination of consumer protection statutes, property law, and regulatory oversight creates strong leverage for California users.
Unfair Competition Law (UCL)
Business & Professions Code Section 17200
California's UCL prohibits any "unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice." This broad statute covers exchange practices that are unfair even if not technically illegal. Wrongful account freezes, arbitrary restrictions, and failure to return assets can all violate the UCL. Remedies include restitution of funds and injunctive relief. The 4-year statute of limitations provides ample time to pursue claims.
California Money Transmission Act
Financial Code Sections 2000-2185
Crypto exchanges operating in California must be licensed as money transmitters. Licensed transmitters have obligations regarding customer fund security, proper record-keeping, and timely processing of transactions. Violations can be reported to the DFPI, which has authority to investigate and take enforcement action.
Digital Financial Assets Law
Financial Code Sections 3100-3704
California's comprehensive crypto regulation law (effective 2025) requires exchanges to obtain DFPI licenses, maintain adequate reserves, and comply with consumer protection requirements. This law strengthens California consumers' position against exchange misconduct.
Conversion and Property Rights
Common Law / Civil Code
Cryptocurrency held in your exchange account is your property. Wrongful exercise of dominion over your property - such as refusing to return your assets - constitutes conversion under California law. You can recover the value of converted property plus consequential damages.
California Statutes of Limitations
Claim Type
Deadline
Code Section
UCL Claim
4 years
B&P Code Section 17208
Written Contract (User Agreement)
4 years
CCP Section 337
Conversion
3 years
CCP Section 338(c)
Fraud
3 years from discovery
CCP Section 338(d)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
4 years
CCP Section 343
Arbitration Clauses: Most crypto exchanges require binding arbitration and waive class actions. While arbitration can be faster than litigation, it limits certain remedies. However, DFPI complaints and UCL claims for injunctive relief may proceed despite arbitration clauses. I analyze each exchange's terms to identify the best enforcement strategy.
California DFPI Complaints
The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) regulates crypto exchanges in California. Filing a DFPI complaint:
Creates official regulatory record of the dispute
May trigger exchange compliance review
Supports pattern evidence for enforcement action
Provides leverage for settlement negotiations
File online at dfpi.ca.gov/file-a-complaint
California Advantage: California's robust regulatory framework and strong consumer protection laws give California crypto users more leverage than users in most other states. The DFPI actively monitors crypto exchanges, and complaints can result in meaningful regulatory pressure.
Exchange Policies and User Agreements
Understanding each exchange's policies is essential for crafting effective demand letters. While exchanges write User Agreements to favor themselves, California law limits their ability to engage in unfair practices.
Common Exchange Policy Issues
Account Termination Clauses
Most exchanges reserve the right to terminate accounts "for any reason" or "at sole discretion." However:
California implied covenant of good faith limits arbitrary termination
Exchange must still return your assets
Termination cannot be pretextual or discriminatory
UCL applies regardless of contract terms
KYC/AML Requirements
Exchanges have legitimate compliance obligations, but cannot abuse KYC processes:
Requests must be reasonable and specific
Cannot demand irrelevant documentation
Must provide clear guidance on requirements
Endless verification loops may be unfair practice
Withdrawal Restrictions
Exchange policies on withdrawal limits and holds:
Must be clearly disclosed before account opening
Post-hoc restrictions may breach contract
Extended holds require justification
Cannot indefinitely prevent asset access
Dispute Resolution
Most exchanges mandate arbitration:
AAA or JAMS arbitration typical
Small claims court usually excepted
Injunctive relief may be court-available
Class action waivers generally enforced
Exchange-Specific Considerations
Exchange
Arbitration Provider
Key Policy Issues
Coinbase
AAA
30-day informal resolution required; Delaware law (but CA consumer laws still apply)
Kraken
AAA
90-day account closure process; SF-based (CA law applies)
Gemini
AAA
NY law specified; strict KYC requirements; DFPI licensed
Crypto.com
JAMS
Tiered account restrictions; international operations complicate jurisdiction
Binance.US
AAA
Heightened regulatory scrutiny; potential state restrictions
Choice of Law: Even when exchange User Agreements specify another state's law, California consumer protection statutes (UCL, CLRA) typically apply to California residents for transactions occurring in California. Choice of law clauses cannot deprive California consumers of fundamental statutory protections.
Terms of Service Limitations
California law limits certain exchange contract terms:
Unconscionable terms: Courts may refuse to enforce grossly unfair provisions
Penalty clauses: Liquidated damages must be reasonable
Waiver of statutory rights: Some consumer protections cannot be waived
Unilateral modification: Material changes may require notice and consent
Evidence and Documentation Checklist
Strong documentation is essential for crypto exchange disputes. Digital records, screenshots, and written communications create the evidence needed for demand letters, regulatory complaints, and potential arbitration.
Account Records
Screenshots of account dashboard showing status
Transaction history export (CSV or PDF)
Current balance and asset holdings
Deposit and withdrawal history
Account verification/KYC status
Any error messages when attempting actions
Communications
All emails from exchange (save full headers)
Support ticket history and responses
Chat transcripts with customer service
Any phone call notes with dates and rep names
Push notifications about account status
Letters or formal notices received
Verification Documents
Copies of all KYC documents submitted
Dates and methods of submission
Exchange requests for additional documentation
Proof of identity and address provided
Any rejected document notifications
Financial Impact
Value of assets at time of freeze
Current value of frozen assets
Price movement during restriction period
Missed trading opportunities (if documented)
Alternative transactions prevented
Any fees charged during restriction
For Specific Issue Types
Account Freeze Documentation
Exact date and time account was restricted
Notification received (or lack thereof)
Reason provided by exchange (if any)
Timeline of all communications about the freeze
Your responses and compliance efforts
Any deadlines given and whether met
Withdrawal Restriction Documentation
Screenshots of failed withdrawal attempts
Error messages displayed
Withdrawal limits shown vs. actual restrictions
Pending withdrawal status and duration
Any explanations provided by exchange
Account Closure Documentation
Termination notice with stated reason
Timeline for asset withdrawal (if provided)
Attempts to withdraw assets before/after closure
Any assets remaining on platform
Exchange's response to withdrawal requests
Blockchain Records: Unlike traditional financial disputes, cryptocurrency transactions are recorded on public blockchains. Document relevant wallet addresses, transaction hashes, and blockchain explorer links. This immutable record can prove deposits, ownership, and exchange custody of your assets.
Document Preservation
Send the exchange a formal document preservation demand requiring them to retain:
All internal communications regarding your account
Investigation notes and compliance review documents
System logs showing account actions and restrictions
Customer service records and ticket history
Any reports filed with regulators about your account
Sample California Crypto Exchange Demand Letter
Customize this template for your specific situation. Include all relevant facts and documentation specific to your exchange and issue.
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, CA ZIP]
[Your Email]
[Date]
[Exchange Name] Legal Department
[Exchange Address]
Via Email: [Exchange Legal Email]
Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested
Re: Demand for Account Access and Asset Return
Account Email: [Your Account Email]
Account ID: [If Known]
Assets Held: [Approximate Value]
Restriction Date: [Date Account Frozen/Restricted]
Dear Legal Department:
I write to demand immediate restoration of access to my [Exchange Name] account and/or return of my cryptocurrency assets. Your exchange has [frozen my account / restricted withdrawals / closed my account] since [Date], holding approximately [$ Value] in digital assets without legal justification.
ACCOUNT HISTORY
I opened my [Exchange Name] account on [Date] and have used it for [describe usage - trading, holding, etc.]. I completed all required identity verification (KYC) and have maintained the account in good standing. My account holds the following assets:
- [X.XX] BTC (Bitcoin)
- [X.XX] ETH (Ethereum)
- [Additional assets]
- Total approximate value: $[Amount] as of [Date]
RESTRICTION DETAILS
On [Date], I [discovered my account was frozen / received notice of account restriction / was unable to withdraw]. [Describe what happened - any notice received, error messages, communications with support].
Despite [describe your efforts - completing additional verification, responding to requests, contacting support], your exchange has failed to [restore access / process my withdrawal / return my assets]. I have received [no explanation / vague explanation citing "account review" / the following explanation: describe].
LEGAL ANALYSIS
Your exchange's conduct violates California law:
1. California Unfair Competition Law (B&P Code Section 17200)
Indefinitely freezing customer assets without clear justification or timeline constitutes an unfair business practice under California's UCL. Your conduct is:
- Unfair: Holding my property without legal basis causes substantial harm with no countervailing benefit
- Unlawful: Violates your obligations under California money transmission laws and your own User Agreement
- Fraudulent: Your representations about account security and asset accessibility were misleading
2. California Money Transmission Act (Financial Code Sections 2000-2185)
As a licensed money transmitter in California (License No. [if known]), your exchange has regulatory obligations including timely processing of customer transactions and proper handling of customer funds. Extended, unjustified asset holds violate these obligations.
3. Conversion
My cryptocurrency is my property. Your exercise of dominion over my property by refusing to return it upon demand constitutes conversion under California law. I am entitled to recover the value of my assets plus consequential damages.
4. Breach of Contract and Implied Covenant
Your User Agreement does not authorize indefinite asset freezes without cause. Even if termination is permitted, you must return my assets. California law implies a covenant of good faith and fair dealing that prohibits arbitrary account restrictions.
5. Digital Financial Assets Law (Financial Code Sections 3100-3704)
California's comprehensive crypto regulation requires licensed exchanges to maintain customer asset protections and comply with consumer protection requirements.
DEMAND
I demand that [Exchange Name]:
1. Immediately restore full access to my account and enable withdrawal of all assets; OR
2. If account closure is required, return all assets to the following wallet addresses within seven (7) days:
- BTC: [Your Bitcoin Address]
- ETH: [Your Ethereum Address]
- [Other assets and addresses]
3. Provide written explanation of any restrictions and the specific legal or regulatory basis;
4. Confirm deletion or return of my personal data per CCPA if account is closed.
DEADLINE AND CONSEQUENCES
If I do not receive my assets or full account restoration within fourteen (14) days, I will:
- File a complaint with the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)
- File a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
- Initiate arbitration per your User Agreement seeking:
- Return of all assets or their value
- Consequential damages for losses during the restriction period
- Statutory damages under California UCL
- Attorney fees and arbitration costs
- Report your conduct to the California Attorney General's office
I reserve all rights and remedies available under California law.
DOCUMENT PRESERVATION
This letter constitutes a litigation hold notice. Preserve all documents related to my account, including internal communications, compliance reviews, investigation notes, and system logs.
Please direct all correspondence to [Your Email] and the address above.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
Enclosures:
- Account screenshots showing restricted status
- Transaction history
- Communications with customer support
- KYC documents submitted
- Timeline of events
Important: Send your demand via certified mail AND email to the exchange's legal department. Keep copies of everything. The 14-day deadline creates urgency while allowing reasonable response time. If the exchange requires informal dispute resolution before arbitration, follow those procedures.
Customization Notes
Account takeover claims: If your account was hacked and the exchange froze it, emphasize you are the victim and should not be penalized
KYC disputes: Document all verification attempts and emphasize compliance with reasonable requests
Regulatory holds: If the exchange cites regulatory requirements, request specific legal basis and estimated timeline
Business accounts: Additional considerations may apply for commercial or institutional accounts
How I Handle California Crypto Exchange Cases
I personally handle crypto exchange account disputes for California users. These cases require understanding both cryptocurrency technology and California's regulatory framework for digital assets.
Case Evaluation
Review exchange User Agreement and arbitration terms
Analyze your documentation and communications
Assess strength of UCL and contract claims
Identify regulatory complaint opportunities
Evaluate asset values and potential damages
Demand Letter Strategy
Comprehensive demand citing California law
Exchange-specific policy analysis
Document preservation demands
Clear deadlines and consequences
Professional presentation that gets attention
Regulatory Complaints
California DFPI complaint preparation
CFPB complaint for lending/payment issues
State Attorney General consumer complaints
Strategic timing for maximum leverage
Escalation Options
AAA/JAMS arbitration demand preparation
Small claims court for amounts under $12,500
California Superior Court for larger claims
Referral network for complex litigation
Crypto Assets Frozen by an Exchange?
I help California users recover frozen cryptocurrency and challenge wrongful account restrictions. Contact me for a case evaluation.
I handle crypto exchange cases on several fee arrangements:
Flat fee: $450 for demand letter preparation and initial exchange response
Hourly rate: $240/hour for complex matters, regulatory complaints, and arbitration preparation
Contingency: 33% of recovery for cases proceeding to arbitration or litigation
Free Initial Review: I review crypto exchange account disputes at no charge to assess whether a demand letter is likely to succeed. Send your documentation to owner@terms.law with "Crypto Exchange" in the subject line. Include screenshots of your account status, relevant communications with the exchange, and a brief description of the issue.
What Makes These Cases Succeed
Based on my experience with crypto exchange disputes, the strongest cases typically involve:
Clear compliance: You completed KYC and followed exchange rules
Documented communications: Written record of exchange promises or failures
Regulatory pressure: DFPI complaint combined with demand letter
California residency: Access to strong state consumer protections
Time Sensitivity: Cryptocurrency values fluctuate significantly. Extended account freezes can cause substantial financial harm beyond the nominal asset value. Document price movements during the restriction period to support consequential damage claims.
🖩 Crypto Exchange Damages Calculator
Use this interactive calculator to estimate potential damages in your case. Enter your information below to get an estimate of recoverable damages.
📈 Estimated Damages Breakdown
Direct Damages$0
Consequential Damages$0
Emotional Distress (Est.)$0
Statutory Penalties (Est.)$0
TOTAL ESTIMATED DAMAGES$0
Disclaimer: This calculator provides rough estimates for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Actual damages vary significantly based on specific facts, evidence strength, and many other factors. Consult with a qualified California attorney for an accurate case evaluation.
📝 Create Your Demand Letter
Generate a professional demand letter, CA court complaint, or arbitration demand