📋 Franchise Dispute Overview
Franchise disputes arise when franchisors breach their obligations to franchisees, whether through territorial encroachment, wrongful termination, or failure to provide required disclosures. California provides strong protections for franchisees through the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL), which supplements federal FTC Franchise Rule requirements. When franchisors violate these laws, franchisees can recover substantial damages and in some cases rescind the franchise agreement entirely.
When to Use This Guide
Use this guide if your California franchisor has:
🎯 Territorial Encroachment
Opened or permitted competing locations in your protected territory, diluting your customer base
❌ Wrongful Termination
Terminated or refused to renew your franchise without proper cause or required notice
📄 Disclosure Violations
Failed to provide required FDD disclosures or made material misrepresentations before you signed
💰 Fee Disputes
Improperly calculated royalties, advertising fund contributions, or imposed unauthorized charges
Types of Franchise Violations
🎯 Encroachment Claims
▼Encroachment occurs when a franchisor opens or permits another franchisee to open a location too close to your territory, violating express or implied territorial protections. Even without an exclusive territory clause, California courts have found implied duties of good faith prevent franchisors from destroying the franchisee's ability to profit from the franchise.
Examples: Franchisor opens a company-owned location 2 miles from your store despite promising "protected territory"; franchisor sells franchise to competitor across the street; franchisor establishes alternative distribution channels (online, grocery stores) that compete with you.
❌ Termination/Non-Renewal Violations
▼California Business and Professions Code Section 20020-20022 restricts franchise terminations and non-renewals. Franchisors must provide written notice and an opportunity to cure most defaults. Termination without good cause or failure to provide renewal opportunities may violate both California law and the franchise agreement.
Examples: Termination for minor violations without cure opportunity; pretextual termination to take over profitable location; refusal to renew after franchisee invested substantially in the business; termination based on fabricated compliance issues.
📄 Disclosure Violations
▼Both the FTC Franchise Rule and California Franchise Investment Law require franchisors to provide a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) at least 14 days before any payment or signing. The FDD must contain 23 specific items of information. Material omissions or misrepresentations create liability and may entitle the franchisee to rescission.
Examples: Failure to disclose prior litigation; understating initial investment costs; inflated financial performance representations (Item 19); failure to disclose required supplier rebates; not disclosing franchisor bankruptcy history.
💰 Fee and Royalty Disputes
▼Franchisors may improperly calculate royalties, impose unauthorized fees, or misuse advertising fund contributions. California law requires franchisors to act in good faith in administering the franchise relationship, including transparent fee calculations.
Examples: Royalties calculated on gross sales when agreement specifies net; advertising fund used for franchisor's general corporate purposes; mandatory supplier purchases at inflated prices with undisclosed rebates to franchisor; technology fees imposed after signing without consent.
👍 What You Can Recover for Franchise Violations
- Rescission - Full refund of all amounts paid to the franchisor
- Actual damages - Lost profits, investment losses, out-of-pocket expenses
- Consequential damages - Economic losses caused by the franchisor's conduct
- Attorney fees - Often recoverable under California franchise law
- Punitive damages - Available for fraud or intentional misconduct
⚠ Statute of Limitations
California has strict time limits for filing franchise claims. For more details on California contract claims, see our California Breach of Contract Statute of Limitations guide.
- CFIL claims (rescission): 4 years from sale or 1 year from discovery (Corp Code 31303)
- Fraud claims: 3 years from discovery (CCP 338(d))
- Contract claims: 4 years from breach (CCP 337)
Do not delay - the discovery rule may not apply in all situations.
⚖ Legal Basis
California provides comprehensive protections for franchisees through state and federal law. These statutes and regulations support your franchise dispute claim.
California Franchise Investment Law (Corp Code 31000+)
Corporations Code Section 31000-31516
The California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL) regulates the offer and sale of franchises in California. It requires registration of franchise offerings with the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), mandatory pre-sale disclosures, and provides civil remedies for violations including rescission and damages.
Corporations Code Section 31200
Prohibits the offer or sale of any franchise unless registered with the DFPI or exempt. Unregistered franchise sales are voidable at the franchisee's option, entitling the franchisee to rescission and recovery of all amounts paid.
Corporations Code Section 31300-31303
Creates civil liability for franchise law violations. Any person who offers or sells a franchise in violation of CFIL, or by means of untrue statements or material omissions, is liable to the franchisee for rescission or damages. This includes liability for offering materials that fail to comply with disclosure requirements.
Corporations Code Section 31119-31125
Specifies disclosure requirements including mandatory delivery of the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) at least 14 calendar days before any payment or execution of binding agreements. The FDD must contain specified information about the franchisor, the franchise system, financial disclosures, and contractual obligations.
FTC Franchise Rule (16 CFR Part 436)
FTC Franchise Rule - 16 CFR 436
The Federal Trade Commission's Franchise Rule requires franchisors to provide prospective franchisees with a Franchise Disclosure Document containing 23 specific items of information. The FDD must be provided at least 14 days before any payment. Violations constitute unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act.
Item 19 Financial Performance Representations
If a franchisor makes any claims about potential earnings or financial performance, these must be included in Item 19 of the FDD with a reasonable basis and material assumptions. Verbal earnings claims not in Item 19 violate the FTC Rule and may constitute fraud under California law.
California Franchise Relations Act
Business & Professions Code Section 20000-20043
The California Franchise Relations Act (CFRA) regulates the ongoing franchise relationship. It restricts terminations and non-renewals, requires good cause and notice for termination, and mandates reasonable opportunity to cure defaults. Violations create civil liability for damages.
Business & Professions Code Section 20020
Prohibits franchise termination except for "good cause" which must be based on franchisee's failure to substantially comply with material franchise requirements that are reasonable and applied uniformly. Terminations require written notice specifying the grounds and reasonable time to cure if the default is curable.
Key California Cases
📖 Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. Sealy (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1704
Established that franchise agreements contain an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing that prevents franchisors from acting to destroy the franchisee's right to enjoy the fruits of the contract. Encroachment that destroys franchise value may breach this implied covenant.
📖 Boat & Motor Mart v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc. (1998) 825 F.2d 1285
Even without an exclusive territory clause, franchisors may breach the implied covenant of good faith by establishing competing locations that unreasonably interfere with the franchisee's ability to recoup its investment and earn a fair return.
📖 Camp v. Parrott (E.D. Cal. 2019) 2019 WL 3802209
FDD disclosure violations, including material omissions about litigation history and financial performance, entitled franchisee to rescission under CFIL. The court emphasized that the disclosure requirements are strictly construed in favor of franchisees.
📖 Neilson v. Union Bank of California (1996) 290 F.Supp.2d 1101
Franchisors have a duty to disclose material facts that would affect a prospective franchisee's decision to purchase. Failure to disclose known system problems, franchisor financial difficulties, or changes to the franchise program may constitute fraud.
💡 No Private FTC Action - But State Claims Available
While the FTC Franchise Rule does not create a private right of action for franchisees, FTC Rule violations evidence fraud and unfair business practices actionable under California's Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200), the CFIL, and common law fraud. The FTC can also bring enforcement actions that may benefit injured franchisees.
🔍 Evidence Checklist
Gather these documents before sending your demand letter. Click to check off items as you collect them.
📄 Franchise Documents
- ✓ Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) with all exhibits
- ✓ Signed franchise agreement and all amendments
- ✓ Territory map or description from FDD/agreement
- ✓ Operations manual (if available)
📩 Communications
- ✓ Pre-sale communications (emails, texts, call notes)
- ✓ Earnings claims or performance projections made verbally
- ✓ Correspondence about territory or encroachment
- ✓ Termination or default notices received
- ✓ Your responses and cure attempts
💰 Financial Records
- ✓ Initial franchise fee payment records
- ✓ Royalty and advertising fund payment history
- ✓ Total investment documentation (buildout, equipment, inventory)
- ✓ Profit and loss statements for your franchise
- ✓ Sales data before and after encroachment (if applicable)
🎯 Encroachment Evidence
- ✓ Maps showing your location and competing locations
- ✓ Sales decline data correlated with new openings
- ✓ Customer surveys or complaints about confusion
- ✓ Announcements of new locations in your area
📄 Disclosure Violation Evidence
- ✓ Proof of when you received the FDD (or didn't)
- ✓ Evidence of misrepresentations made before signing
- ✓ Undisclosed litigation or bankruptcy records
- ✓ Comparison of actual costs to FDD estimates
❌ Termination Evidence
- ✓ All default and termination notices
- ✓ Your compliance history and cure efforts
- ✓ Evidence of pretextual reasons for termination
- ✓ Treatment of similarly-situated franchisees
🔒 Request Your Franchise File
Under California law, you may be entitled to records the franchisor maintains about your franchise. Request copies of all inspection reports, compliance reviews, correspondence, and internal notes about your franchise. These records may reveal pretextual termination grounds or inconsistent treatment.
💰 Damages & Remedies
California franchise law provides robust remedies for franchisees harmed by franchisor misconduct. Understanding your potential recovery is essential for settlement negotiations.
| Remedy Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Rescission | For CFIL disclosure violations, you may be entitled to void the franchise agreement and recover all amounts paid to the franchisor, including franchise fees, royalties, advertising contributions, and required purchases. This is the most powerful remedy available. |
| Lost Profits | Profits you would have earned but for the franchisor's conduct. For encroachment, this includes the profit decline attributable to the competing location. For termination, this includes profits through the end of the franchise term. |
| Investment Losses | Your unrecovered investment in the franchise, including buildout costs, equipment, inventory, leasehold improvements, and working capital losses. Measured by what you invested minus what you recovered. |
| Consequential Damages | Out-of-pocket losses caused by the violation, including lease termination costs, employee severance, loan prepayment penalties, personal guarantee exposure, and credit damage. |
| Attorney Fees | Under Corp Code 31300, prevailing franchisees in CFIL actions may recover attorney fees and costs. Many franchise agreements also contain fee-shifting provisions that may favor the franchisee in breach cases. |
| Punitive Damages | Available for fraud, intentional misrepresentation, or malicious conduct under Civil Code 3294. Requires clear and convincing evidence of oppression, fraud, or malice. |
Rescission Under CFIL
💰 The Power of Rescission
Under Corporations Code Section 31300, if the franchisor sold the franchise through material misrepresentations or omissions, or failed to comply with registration and disclosure requirements, you may rescind the franchise and recover:
- The full franchise fee paid
- All royalties and advertising fund contributions
- Required equipment and inventory purchases (at cost)
- Interest from the date of payment
- Attorney fees and costs
Calculating Lost Profits
Lost profits require proving both the fact of damages and the amount with reasonable certainty:
- Before/after comparison: Compare your profits before and after the encroachment or breach
- Yardstick method: Compare your performance to similar franchises unaffected by the violation
- Expert testimony: A damages expert can project future lost profits based on historical performance
- Profit margins: Document your actual profit margins to calculate the dollar impact of lost sales
📊 Sample Damages Calculation
Example: Encroachment and Disclosure Violations
💡 Mitigation of Damages
You have a duty to mitigate your damages. This means taking reasonable steps to minimize your losses, such as attempting to sell the business, reducing expenses, or finding alternative employment. However, you need not accept unreasonable franchisor settlement demands or abandon valid legal claims.
📝 Sample Language
Copy and customize these paragraphs for your California franchise dispute demand letter.
1. Return of franchise fee: $[AMOUNT]
2. Return of royalties and fees paid: $[AMOUNT]
3. Lost profits / Investment losses: $[AMOUNT]
4. Consequential damages: $[AMOUNT]
5. Prejudgment interest: $[AMOUNT]
6. Attorney fees incurred to date: $[AMOUNT]
TOTAL DEMAND: $[TOTAL]
This demand does not include punitive damages, which my client reserves the right to pursue if this matter proceeds to litigation.
Please also be advised that my client may file a complaint with the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), which has authority to investigate franchise law violations and take enforcement action. We strongly encourage resolution of this matter before such steps become necessary.
Please direct all further communications to the undersigned.
🚀 Next Steps
What to do after sending your demand letter.
Expected Timeline
Days 1-14
Franchisor receives and reviews demand letter with legal counsel
Days 14-30
Response with settlement offer, counteroffer, or rejection of claims
Days 30+
If no satisfactory response, prepare to file complaint and lawsuit
If They Don't Pay or Respond
-
Consult a Franchise Attorney
Franchise disputes are complex and often involve significant damages. Many franchise attorneys offer free consultations and take cases on contingency or hybrid fee arrangements. Given the potential for rescission, fee-shifting, and substantial damages, strong cases are attractive to plaintiffs' attorneys.
-
File a Complaint with the DFPI
The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) regulates franchise sales in California. Filing a complaint creates a regulatory record and may prompt investigation. Visit dfpi.ca.gov to file online.
-
File a Lawsuit in California Superior Court
Franchise disputes are typically filed in the Superior Court of the county specified in the franchise agreement's venue clause, or where you operated the franchise. Most cases are unlimited civil (over $25,000). You can pursue CFIL claims, CFRA claims, fraud, and breach of contract.
-
Consider Arbitration Requirements
Many franchise agreements contain mandatory arbitration clauses. Review your agreement carefully. Note that some arbitration clauses may be unenforceable under California law if they waive statutory rights or are unconscionable. Consult with an attorney about enforceability.
⚠ Watch the Statute of Limitations
For more information on California contract claims and deadlines, see our California Breach of Contract Statute of Limitations guide.
- CFIL claims: 4 years from sale or 1 year from discovery (Corp Code 31303)
- Fraud claims: 3 years from discovery (CCP 338(d))
- Contract claims: 4 years from breach (CCP 337)
- CFRA claims: Follow contract limitations periods
Do not delay in taking action to preserve all your rights.
Need Legal Help?
Franchise disputes can be complex and require specialized expertise. Get a 30-minute strategy call with a franchise attorney to evaluate your case and discuss next steps.
Book Consultation - $125California Resources
- CA Dept. of Financial Protection and Innovation: dfpi.ca.gov - File complaints and search franchise filings
- FTC Franchise Rule Information: ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/franchise-rule - Official FTC guidance
- California Courts Self-Help: selfhelp.courts.ca.gov - Free forms and filing guides
- State Bar Lawyer Referral: calbar.ca.gov - Find a franchise law specialist
- American Association of Franchisees & Dealers: aafd.org - Franchisee advocacy organization