Not a chatbot. Each room interviews the client, collects documents, classifies the proof posture, flags the risks, and hands a clean file to a named California attorney who reviews and signs the legal work. Click through the live showroom below.
An AI legal workroom is a private client portal where a legal engagement is delivered: documents generated from intake, clause-level comments and suggested edits, a color-coded risk register, attorney review states, and final execution, all supervised by me, a California attorney. This page shows six task-specific workroom lanes with live, fully synthetic demos anyone can click through. I build these for my own clients and, as a paid engagement, for other law firms and professional-services businesses.
Sergei Tokmakov, Esq., California Bar #279869. Last attorney review: July 2026.
Not for free. I do not jump on quick calls, and I do not give free initial consultations, case evaluations, or reviews of your documents or materials, even for large or ongoing work. To talk, book the $400 Zoom strategy session; for written analysis, the $240 consultation.
For founders, lawyers, consultants, and SaaS or AI builders who want to work through AI-assisted legal workflows, workroom structure and architecture, legal intake design, or implementation strategy. I am happy to discuss this in a paid engagement. I do not do unpaid architecture calls, product-feedback calls, or quick chats about how to build competing systems. It is priced above a standard legal consult because implementation and architecture talk can leak the moat.
No unpaid architecture or product-feedback calls.
Unpaid invoice, contract dispute, vendor or partner fight, or pre-litigation leverage. I build you a private workroom with the evidence organized, the amount documented, a demand letter, and a draft complaint as leverage, all reviewed and signed by me.
Build this for my dispute →I build attorney-directed AI client workrooms and law-firm sites for solo and small firms, on your brand and your domain: guided intake, proof-posture classification, evidence tracking, and an attorney-review layer you stay in control of.
Build one for my firm →The AI organizes the matter. I review and sign the legal work.
Every room is a working mockup of what I build and run for clients: the same architecture I use in real matters, with sample facts. Four are fully clickable live demos: the Settlement Workroom, the Contract & Package Workroom (a real document generator with a live preview and a built-in collaboration layer: comment on any clause, suggest exact wording, and see who changed what and when), the Demand Letter + Complaint Workroom (a locked attorney demand letter and draft arbitration demand, an evidence ledger, and a litigation-readiness risk register, with the same comment and suggest-an-edit layer), and the AI Governance Workroom (an AI-adoption engagement room: a locked AI Use Policy with visible attorney redlines, a red / amber / green AI vendor matrix, weighted readiness checklists, and a phased rollout roadmap); pick a lane below to tour the others.
The workroom is the preview. These public workrooms show the structure, quality, and workflow of my legal services before you hire me. A workroom built around your own documents, facts, or legal questions requires a paid engagement.
See how a business dispute becomes a settlement-ready proof room: documents, evidence matrix, payment analysis, litigation timeline, and attorney-reviewed strategy in one private portal.
For unpaid invoices, contract disputes, service-fee claims, vendor disputes, partner disputes, and pre-litigation leverage. Upload the documents, and the workroom organizes the case into a settlement-ready proof stack: claim theory, evidence matrix, document highlights, amount calculation, deadline calendar, and attorney-reviewed next steps.
Not just Word files: a live document generator. Edit a field on the left and the agreement redrafts itself on the right, with only the changed words highlighted.
For startups and growing companies that need a coordinated set of agreements (NDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, order forms, and more) instead of one-off documents. Each document is a guided generator with a live preview, a built-in risk panel that flags terms like uncapped liability, and one-click drafts. New: a collaboration layer on every document. Click any clause to add a comment or suggest exact replacement wording, and watch it render as Word-style track changes with your name, a timestamp, and a pending / accepted / rejected status, exactly the review trail my clients get. This is the same engine I use to deliver multi-document packages for clients. A second sample on the same engine, a healthcare SaaS legal-ops workroom (HIPAA BAA, PHI boundary, state privacy, GDPR), is also live.
See how a payment-processor hold becomes an attorney demand letter with a draft arbitration demand attached as leverage: locked work product, an evidence ledger, and a litigation-readiness risk register.
For unpaid invoices, contract disputes, frozen payment-processor funds, and any matter serious enough to back a demand letter with a real litigation threat. Work the evidence ledger, sort the litigation-readiness risk register, and open the locked demand letter and the draft AAA arbitration demand attached to it as settlement leverage. Click any paragraph in either document to comment or suggest wording, the same collaboration layer used across every workroom I build.
See how an AI-adoption engagement runs for a small firm: a locked AI Use Policy with my redlines visible, engagement-letter disclosure language, a red / amber / green AI vendor matrix, and a phased rollout roadmap.
For professional-services firms adopting AI faster than their safeguards. Sort the AI vendor matrix and flip a tool's account type or training posture to watch its rating react in real time, work the confidentiality and citation-verification checklists that feed a weighted readiness gauge, sort the risk register, and follow the assess, policy, training, monitoring roadmap. Then open the locked AI Use Policy: my redlines from the current revision round are baked in with margin notes explaining each change, and you can click any paragraph to comment or suggest wording, the same collaboration layer used across every workroom I build. The professional-responsibility baseline is the one this site already covers: CA RPC 1.1, 1.6, 5.1, 5.3, and 1.4, ABA Formal Opinion 512, and the State Bar's Practical Guidance on generative AI.
See how a SaaS or AI company answers recurring customer trust, security, privacy, and AI questions from a fact registry and counsel-approved positions, with an AI draft queue that routes legal and high-risk answers to me for review before anything is sent.
For SaaS and AI companies fielding security questionnaires, DPA and subprocessor questions, and data-use and AI-governance questions from customers. The workroom pairs AI-assisted drafting with an attorney review panel, so nothing reaches a customer until I have approved it. The Trust Response Workroom vertical explains the packages and pricing.
Pick a lane above to see what each workroom does, what it includes, and the build range. Each one is attorney-built and attorney-reviewed, on your brand and your domain.
Big Law is proving the direction: legal knowledge is becoming client-facing software. The small-firm edge is narrower, sharper workflows with a named lawyer who remains personally accountable for the legal work.
Build my AI law firm website →Demo workrooms use illustrative facts. This page provides general information about website and software implementation services, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Building a workflow system for a firm does not make me counsel to that firm's clients; each firm's attorneys remain responsible for their own legal advice. Past results do not predict future outcomes. No matter is undertaken until conflict clearance and a written engagement. Sergei Tokmakov is licensed in California (Bar #279869).