What you get
Five concrete deliverables, written in plain English, reviewed and signed off by a California-licensed attorney. Not a slide deck. Not a checklist generator. An actual usable audit you can hand to your CEO, your board, or your incoming general counsel.
Document inventory and classification
Every document you send catalogued by type, role, counterparty, effective date, governing law, and renewal posture.
AI Legal Analyst issue map
Issue-by-issue map of every flag the AI Legal Analyst surfaces: missing clauses, weak language, conflicting terms, dated references.
Attorney-reviewed risk prioritization
I read the issue map, kill the false positives, and rank what remains as high, medium, or low risk with a one-paragraph rationale each.
30/60/90-day remediation list
Sequenced action list: what to fix in the next 30 days, what to plan for 60, what can wait until 90, with rough scope and price estimates for each.
Optional Zoom walkthrough
One-hour Zoom session with screen share to walk through the audit, answer questions, and confirm priorities. Included; opt out if you prefer written-only.
Process
Four steps, five business days from document delivery to final audit. Each step has a clear handoff so you know where the project stands.
Kickoff
Short intake email confirms scope, document categories, and any specific concerns. I send a secure intake link and the document checklist.
Document upload
You send the documents by encrypted email today (R2-presigned upload portal coming soon). I confirm receipt within one business day.
AI Legal Analyst audit run
The analyzer classifies, extracts, and issue-spots across the full document set. I review the raw output, kill false positives, and shape the issue map.
Attorney review and delivery
I write the risk prioritization and the 30/60/90 remediation list. Final audit delivered as a single PDF plus optional Zoom walkthrough.
Scope examples
Three common audit profiles. Your stack may look different; the $2,500 fee covers a typical mid-stage document set. Unusually large or complex stacks (50+ active contracts, multiple subsidiaries, multi-jurisdictional operations) get re-quoted.
SaaS startup
- Terms of Service
- Privacy Policy
- BAA (if any health data)
- Master Service Agreement
- Vendor stack (top 5-10)
- Employment and IP assignment templates
E-commerce business
- Terms of Service
- Privacy Policy
- Returns and refunds policy
- Dropship and supplier agreements
- Ad-claims and influencer disclosures
- Email marketing and SMS compliance
Funded startup
- Cap table documents
- Founder agreements and vesting
- Employment and contractor templates
- IP assignment coverage
- Vendor MSAs and customer order forms
- Side letters and investor commitments
What this is NOT
Not a litigation-readiness review.
The audit identifies legal-stack issues; it does not analyze active or threatened litigation, pending claims, or matters already in dispute. Those need separate scoping under the appropriate litigation or demand-letter tier.
Not a securities or regulatory enforcement defense.
If you have an open SEC, FTC, FDA, state AG, or other regulator inquiry, that is specialist counsel territory. I will flag any regulator-facing exposure I find but I do not represent businesses in enforcement matters.
Not a substitute for transaction counsel on actual deals.
If you are in the middle of a financing, acquisition, or major commercial transaction, the audit can inform the deal but cannot replace the deal counsel running it. The audit is a snapshot of your steady-state legal posture, not a live deal-room review.