I am Sergei Tokmakov, a California attorney. I build the general-SaaS contract stack: Master Subscription Agreement, Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, DPA with EU SCCs, Acceptable Use Policy, and an AI Use Addendum if you ship AI features. Flat fees. PHI-handling SaaS goes to my Healthcare-SaaS Hub instead.
Most SaaS clients need a coordinated stack rather than one isolated document. Pick the tier that fits where you are. If your product handles PHI, the Healthcare-SaaS Hub is the correct page instead.
One business contract drafted or redlined by an attorney. For when an enterprise customer sent back your MSA with markup, or you need a standalone DPA, AI Addendum, or Privacy Policy reviewed.
The full general-SaaS document stack drafted around your product. Fits pre-launch founders and SMB-focused SaaS without heavy enterprise procurement processes.
If your SaaS touches PHI or sells into healthcare-regulated buyers, this stack adds HIPAA BAA, narrow PHI scoping, 42 CFR Part 2 schedule, CMIA-aware Privacy Policy, and a compliance-gap memo. Handled on a separate hub because the regulatory work is materially heavier.
If you would rather answer a short questionnaire than write an email, the structured intake gathers the product, customer, data, and AI footprint I need to scope and quote a SaaS stack accurately.
Healthcare-regulated SaaS needs HIPAA BAA + 42 CFR Part 2 schedule + CMIA-aware Privacy Policy + a compliance-gap memo. I keep that work on a separate hub so the contract drafting, BAA negotiation, and regulatory analysis stay coordinated. If you sell into hospitals, payers, providers, or healthtech, start there instead.
Healthcare-SaaS Hub →A SaaS stack only works if it is built around your product. I do the structured intake first, then draft, then revise.
Short questionnaire by email. Pricing model, customer profile, data flow, AI usage, sub-processors, jurisdiction, and what your enterprise customers are likely to push back on.
Within 10 business days I deliver the documents in coordinated form. Defined terms align across MSA, DPA, Privacy, AUP, and AI Addendum so there are no internal contradictions.
You review, send markup, and I roll the changes. Single-document overflow billed at $240 / hour. Enterprise redline negotiations can be scoped separately.
Founder is launching a SaaS and needs the full stack before going live. The right approach is to build all the documents at once with a consistent commercial position so MSA, ToS, DPA, Privacy, AUP, and AI Addendum line up. Ad hoc piecemeal documents create internal contradictions that fail audit, diligence, or contract negotiation.
Customer legal team returns the MSA with extensive redlines: liability caps, IP carve-outs, audit rights, MFN clauses, source-code escrow, increased indemnification. The work is to identify deal-breakers, negotiable items, and acceptable-as-is changes. The $575 Single Document Redline tier handles a single MSA pass; broader negotiation scopes separately.
SaaS has been operating without a proper DPA, sub-processor list, breach-notification mechanism, or California-specific Privacy Policy. Risk is regulatory action plus customer-contract breach. The fix is bringing the stack up to standards: DPA template with EU SCCs, sub-processor list, breach response plan, updated Privacy Policy with state-by-state coverage.
The SaaS now uses customer data to train models, integrates with OpenAI / Anthropic / Google, or generates AI output. The existing MSA and ToS do not cover AI inputs, outputs, training restrictions, or AI-related indemnification. The AI Use Addendum is bolted on; Privacy Policy and DPA need updates for AI processing.
Acquirer counsel reviews the SaaS stack and finds gaps: no DPA, no AI Addendum, inconsistent customer terms, missing sub-processor list, weak indemnification. Closing is delayed while gaps are remediated. The fix is pre-acquisition cleanup so the company is acquisition-ready.
No. PHI-handling SaaS, HIPAA Business Associate work, 42 CFR Part 2 (substance-use-disorder programs), and California CMIA-aware Privacy Policies are scoped through the Healthcare-SaaS Hub, not this general-SaaS page. The two stacks share a base but the healthcare overlay materially changes contracting and pricing.
Attorney drafting or redline review of one business contract, up to three rounds of email-based revisions. Use cases: an enterprise customer sent back a redlined MSA; you need a standalone DPA built; you have a single Privacy Policy or AI Addendum that needs a check. Overflow at $240 / hour. This is the $575 Create or Redline tier (PayPal NCP FN8BR2VDZT6YA).
MSA, ToS, Privacy Policy, DPA with the 2021 EU SCCs and a UK addendum, Acceptable Use Policy, an AI Use Addendum if you ship AI features, and an order form template. One coordinated revision round. Standard turnaround is 10 business days. Enterprise redline negotiation is a separate scope.
Training-data restrictions (whether customer data trains your or your vendors' models), output ownership, hallucination risk language, customer review obligations, AI sub-processor disclosure, and an opt-out for customers who do not want their data near AI features. Enterprise procurement is asking about each of these by 2026.
The DPA is GDPR and CCPA-aware out of the box and includes the EU SCCs (Commission Implementing Decision 2021/914) plus the UK IDTA. The MSA defaults to California law but is easy to swap. For pure EU / UK SaaS, an additional jurisdictional review may be appropriate and is quoted separately.
The General SaaS Stack covers drafting your baseline documents and one revision round. Active enterprise-redline negotiation across multiple back-and-forths is a separate scope; I quote it once I see the markup. The $575 Single Document Redline tier handles a single MSA pass.
I deliver finished Word documents. Wiring them into your signup flow, marketing site, or e-signature tool is on you (or your developer). I can recommend tools but I do not do the implementation.
PHI-handling SaaS: HIPAA BAA + 42 CFR Part 2 + CMIA-aware Privacy Policy + compliance gap memo.
AI Use Addendum drafting, vendor contract review, training-data audit for SaaS adding AI features.
9-question self-diagnostic that routes you to the right flat-fee tier in two minutes.
Paste any contract clause; AI flags risk and suggests redlines.
Email me a short paragraph about your product, customer profile, and what enterprise procurement is asking for. I respond same business day with a scoped flat-fee quote.
Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. · California Bar #279869