[Name],
Thank you for agreeing to include a residuals provision. However, after reviewing your proposed language, we have concerns that it is too narrow to provide meaningful protection.
SPECIFIC CONCERNS:
1. "General skills, knowledge, and experience of a type normally acquired in the industry" - This language is circular and vague. What counts as "normally acquired"? This invites disputes and provides little practical guidance.
2. Extensive Exclusions - Your exclusion list (trade secrets, technical specifications, customer lists, pricing, anything designated "Highly Confidential") could encompass virtually all of the information we would receive. The practical effect is no residuals protection at all.
3. "Intentional memorization" Restriction - We accept this limitation in principle, but need clarification. Is it "intentional memorization" if an engineer naturally remembers an interesting technical approach? The provision needs to focus on bad-faith conduct, not normal cognitive function.
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS:
1. Clearer Definition: "Residuals means general ideas, concepts, methodologies, techniques, and know-how retained in the unaided memories of individuals, excluding specific data, formulas, source code, and detailed designs."
2. Limited Exclusions: Limit exclusions to: (a) information meeting the legal definition of trade secret under applicable law, and (b) specific documents or materials that you designate in writing at the time of disclosure as "Not Subject to Residuals" (with such designations to be used sparingly).
3. Good Faith Standard: Revise the intentional memorization restriction to: "This provision does not permit the intentional study or memorization of Confidential Information for the purpose of using such information after the termination of this Agreement."
This provides real protection for your most sensitive information while giving us workable protection for our business operations. Can we discuss?
Best regards,
[Your Name]