Federal FMLA, California CFRA, and California Pregnancy Disability Leave all prohibit termination because of protected leave. Most "we just decided to let you go" terminations during medical leave are illegal interference. Flat-fee case evaluation, demand letter, or DFEH charge.
Most fired-on-leave matters start with a case evaluation memo, then escalate to a demand letter once we have the leverage mapped.
Written assessment of your medical-leave termination. Identify which protected-leave statutes apply, what your employer did wrong, and the realistic recovery range.
Attorney letter to your former employer citing the specific protected-leave violations. Most cases resolve here with severance or reinstatement.
File the formal administrative charge required before lawsuit. Preserves the right-to-sue and triggers the agency investigation.
Fired-on-leave cases have built-in leverage because the timing creates an inference of unlawful interference. Most resolve quickly once the employer's counsel sees the demand.
Email me your leave paperwork (FMLA designation notice, doctor's certifications, leave extension letters), termination notice, and a brief timeline. No call required.
Within 5 business days I deliver a written memo: which leave statutes apply, what your employer violated, and the recovery range.
Based on the memo, you choose: demand letter, DFEH/EEOC charge, or stop. Each next step is a separate flat fee.
"I was fired one week after my doctor extended my medical leave. Sergei's memo identified three FMLA interference theories I had no idea existed. Demand letter went out and the employer settled at six months' pay."— Manager fired during extended FMLA 6 months' pay settlement
"Sergei's evaluation said I had a strong CFRA interference claim because my employer never sent the required CFRA designation notice. That detail alone tripled the leverage."— CFRA designation-notice case
"My HR told me I was being "let go now and rehired when cleared." Sergei explained that's legally a termination, not a leave hold. Demand letter resulted in reinstatement plus back pay."— Pretextual termination during leave reinstated with back pay
I have been a California-licensed business attorney since 2011 with a steady employment-law practice focused on FMLA, CFRA, and disability-related terminations. Fired-on-leave cases have a built-in narrative of unlawful interference, and most resolve at the demand-letter stage without litigation.
I run flat fees for the pre-litigation phases. If your matter needs full litigation through trial, I refer to a contingency plaintiff's firm at that point.
California employees who take protected medical leave are covered by three overlapping statutes: the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), and the California Pregnancy Disability Leave Law (PDL). Each has different eligibility thresholds, different protected reasons for leave, and different remedies for violation. Most "fired during medical leave" cases involve more than one of these statutes operating simultaneously.
FMLA, codified at 29 U.S.C. section 2601 et seq., provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per 12-month period for eligible employees. Eligibility requires:
FMLA leave is available for the employee's own serious health condition, to care for a family member with a serious health condition, for the birth or adoption of a child, or for qualifying military exigency.
CFRA, codified at California Government Code section 12945.2, parallels FMLA but is more protective in several important ways. CFRA applies to employers with 5 or more employees (vs FMLA's 50-or-more). CFRA covers a broader range of family relationships, including grandparents, grandchildren, siblings, parents-in-law, and designated persons. CFRA leave does not run concurrently with PDL (so a pregnant employee can stack CFRA baby-bonding leave on top of PDL pregnancy-disability leave). Importantly, CFRA prohibits both interference with leave rights and retaliation for taking leave, with the same strict-liability standard as FMLA.
PDL, codified at California Government Code section 12945, provides up to 4 months of unpaid, job-protected leave for disability arising from pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. PDL applies to employers with 5 or more employees. PDL is independent of CFRA, which means a pregnant employee can take PDL during pregnancy disability and then take CFRA leave for baby-bonding after birth — up to 7 months of stacked leave in some cases.
Both FMLA and CFRA prohibit two distinct forms of unlawful conduct:
Because interference is a strict-liability standard, "fired during FMLA / CFRA" cases are among the easiest employment cases to prove. The employer's subjective motive is largely irrelevant; what matters is whether the termination interfered with the employee's right to leave and restoration.
Both FMLA and CFRA require employers to designate qualifying leave as protected leave and to provide written notice of the designation. Many employer violations begin with a failure to designate. If your employer never sent you a CFRA designation notice or an FMLA Notice of Eligibility within five business days of learning about your need for leave, that failure is itself a violation and can extend the protected leave period or strengthen an interference claim.
Upon return from FMLA or CFRA leave, you are entitled to be restored to the same position you held when leave began — same pay, same benefits, same terms — or to an equivalent position. "Equivalent" means substantially similar in duties, status, and pay. An employer that restores you to a lesser position, or terminates you upon return claiming the prior position is no longer available, generally violates the restoration right unless they can prove an independent, non-leave-related basis (a documented RIF affecting similarly situated employees, for example).
An employer can defend an interference claim by proving they would have terminated the employee for an independent reason regardless of leave. This defense is hard to win and requires contemporaneous documentation of performance issues predating the leave. Most employers asserting this defense have manufactured the documentation post hoc and the timing reveals the manufacture.
Direct statement of termination during leave is the cleanest fact pattern. Forward the text to a personal device, save the metadata, and the case essentially proves itself.
Most "paperwork failure" terminations during leave are pretextual. The case-evaluation memo looks at the actual communications. Often the employer was sending notices to the wrong address, accepted prior extensions without issue, or refused to acknowledge the extension despite receiving it.
Position elimination during leave is presumptively interference unless the employer can prove the elimination was unrelated to leave and would have happened to a non-leaving employee. RIF documentation that magically appears immediately before your return raises the inference of pretext.
Restoration to a position with reduced pay, fewer responsibilities, or worse terms is a restoration violation. The position must be the same or an equivalent — not "similar."
Termination within 7-14 days of returning from FMLA / CFRA is almost always interference or retaliation. The temporal proximity creates an inference of unlawful motive that is very hard for the employer to rebut.
This is a termination dressed up as a leave-of-absence offer. Protected-leave statutes generally require the employer to hold the position; a "termination with rehire eligibility" is a termination, and the courts treat it as such.
FMLA is federal: applies to employers with 50+ employees within 75 miles, requires 12 months and 1,250 hours of employment, and provides 12 weeks of unpaid protected leave. CFRA is California: applies to employers with 5+ employees, similar eligibility, and provides 12 weeks of unpaid protected leave with broader family definitions. CFRA is generally more protective than FMLA for California employees.
Sometimes, but rarely as clean as employers claim. If your doctor faxed paperwork with an incorrect date, or the employer accepted prior extensions without issue, the "paperwork failure" is often pretext. The case evaluation looks at the actual paper trail and identifies whether the employer manufactured the issue.
No, not because of FMLA leave. FMLA prohibits both interference (denying or restricting leave) and retaliation (terminating because of leave). Most "fired during FMLA" cases trip the interference standard, not just retaliation, which is easier to prove.
Usually no. Protected leave (FMLA, CFRA, PDL) generally requires the employer to hold your position or an equivalent position open for the duration of the leave. "Termination with rehire when cleared" is functionally the same as terminating you for taking leave, which is unlawful interference.
Interference: the employer prevents you from exercising or attempting to exercise an FMLA right (denying leave, shortening leave, terminating during leave). Retaliation: the employer takes adverse action because you took FMLA leave (terminating after return, demoting, harassment). Both are illegal; interference is generally easier to prove because intent isn't required.
Lost wages (back pay) plus reinstatement or front pay plus lost benefits plus liquidated damages (FMLA) plus attorney fees. CFRA also allows emotional distress damages. Settlement ranges in pre-litigation FMLA/CFRA termination cases typically run from $25K to $200K depending on the employee's salary, the strength of the interference theory, and the employer's exposure.
Three calculators for the questions every employee asks first. All free and no login required. The case-evaluation memo packages above use the same framework but go deeper with attorney analysis.
Find every filing deadline that applies to your termination, based on the actual statutes (FEHA 3-year, EEOC 300-day, FMLA 2-3 year, FLSA 2-3 year).
Estimate your back pay, front pay, and emotional-distress recovery range using the same framework I use in my case-evaluation memos.
10 quick yes/no questions to gauge whether your case is strong (proceed to demand letter), moderate (case-eval memo first), or weak (probably not viable).
Enter your termination date. I will compute every relevant filing deadline.
Quick estimate of your potential recovery. Final numbers depend on facts the case-evaluation memo would surface.
Answer 10 yes/no questions. The score tells you whether your case is strong, moderate, or weak.
My free guide to protected leave eligibility, designation, and termination protections.
Sample CFRA / PDL demand letters and the citations behind them.
For employers responding to an employee FMLA claim.
For wrongful-termination matters not specifically tied to medical leave.
For ADA / FEHA failure-to-accommodate matters.
Filing process, deadlines, mediation, settlement values.
$349 flat fee for the case evaluation memo. You will know which protected-leave statutes apply, what your employer violated, and what to do next.