Cross-Border Teams & Foreign Contributors
Navigate international equity-for-services arrangements with global teams
Foreign Founders Getting US Equity
Common Scenario: Non-US Founder in US C-Corp
Foreign nationals founding US Delaware C-Corps face unique challenges:
- No ITIN or SSN required to receive founder shares
- 83(b) election still recommended but filing logistics differ
- May need to file with IRS using Form W-7 (ITIN application) along with 83(b)
- Tax treaty benefits may reduce or eliminate US tax on equity gains
- Home country may tax US equity differently than US residents
- Consider dual structure for tax optimization (US operating + foreign holding)
Structuring for Non-Resident Founders
- Direct ownership: Simplest but may have adverse home-country tax implications
- Through foreign holding company: Adds complexity but may optimize taxes
- Through US LLC (disregarded): Creates US tax filing obligations
- Consider Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) benefits - may not apply to non-residents
- Exit planning: Where will you be tax resident at time of sale?
Non-US Service Providers
Key Considerations for Foreign Contractors
When granting equity to service providers located outside the US:
- Securities laws: US exemptions apply, but home country laws may also apply
- Employment law: Local law may characterize contractor as employee
- Benefits: Some countries mandate benefits even for contractors
- Currency: Equity value may fluctuate with exchange rates
- Communication: Time zones and language barriers affect negotiations
Documentation for Foreign Recipients
- W-8BEN form (not W-9) to document foreign status
- Proof of foreign residence for treaty claims
- Local language translation may be required
- Notarization/apostille for some jurisdictions
- 83(b) election if purchasing restricted stock
Rule 701 for Foreign Contractors
- Rule 701 exemption applies regardless of recipient location
- Must still be "bona fide" consulting relationship
- Cannot be for capital-raising services
- Home country securities exemption may also be needed
- Document relationship carefully
Withholding Tax Obligations
When US Withholding Applies
The US company may have withholding obligations on payments to non-residents:
- FDAP income (fixed, determinable, annual, periodic): 30% default withholding
- Equity compensation: Generally not subject to withholding if properly structured
- Services performed in US: May trigger withholding regardless of residence
- Treaty rates may reduce withholding (e.g., to 15% or 0%)
- W-8BEN required to claim treaty benefits
Equity Grants vs. Cash Payments
Treatment differs based on what you are paying:
- Stock grants: Generally no withholding at grant or vesting for non-residents
- Option exercise: Spread may be subject to withholding if services performed in US
- RSU settlement: Similar to option exercise - depends on where services performed
- Cash payments for services: 30% withholding unless treaty or exemption applies
- Dividends on stock: 30% withholding (reduced by treaty)
| Payment Type | Default Rate | Treaty Rate (Typical) | Required Form |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividends | 30% | 5-15% | W-8BEN |
| Interest | 30% | 0-10% | W-8BEN |
| Royalties | 30% | 0-10% | W-8BEN |
| Services (in US) | 30% | 0% if exempt | W-8BEN or W-8ECI |
| Services (outside US) | 0% | N/A | W-8BEN |
| Capital Gains (non-USRPI) | 0% | N/A | None required |
Entity Choice for Cross-Border Deals
US Delaware C-Corp (Most Common)
- Standard for VC-backed startups
- Foreign shareholders treated same as US shareholders
- QSBS benefits generally not available to non-residents
- Dividends subject to withholding (treaty rates available)
- Capital gains on stock sale often exempt from US tax for non-residents
US LLC Considerations
- Pass-through creates US tax filing obligations for all members
- Foreign members must file US returns and pay US tax on US-source income
- Withholding required on distributions to foreign members
- ECI (effectively connected income) taxed at regular rates
- Not recommended for foreign passive investors
Dual Structure Options
- US operating company + foreign holding company
- Transfer pricing and intercompany agreements required
- May optimize for exit (seller's tax residence)
- Common jurisdictions: Cayman, BVI, Netherlands, Ireland
- Adds significant complexity and cost
IP Assignment Enforceability Abroad
Key IP Assignment Challenges
- Moral rights: Many countries give creators inalienable rights US does not recognize
- Work for hire: Concept may not exist or work differently abroad
- Future works: Assignment of not-yet-created IP may be unenforceable
- Formalities: Some countries require notarization, registration, or specific language
- Language: Assignment may need to be in local language to be enforceable
Best Practices for International IP Assignment
- Use local counsel to review assignments for each jurisdiction
- Include broad present assignment + obligation to assign in future
- Get moral rights waivers where legally possible
- Require cooperation in IP filings and proceedings
- Consider having IP created in US (stronger protection)
- Document chain of title thoroughly for due diligence
Payment Mechanics for International Teams
International Wire Transfers
- SWIFT network standard for international payments
- Fees: $25-50 per transfer plus intermediary fees
- Time: 2-5 business days typically
- Currency conversion at bank rates (often unfavorable)
- Compliance checks may delay transfers
- Keep records for tax documentation
Alternative Payment Methods
- Wise (TransferWise): Lower fees, better FX rates
- PayPal: Convenient but high fees for large amounts
- Payoneer: Good for contractor payments
- Deel/Remote: Handle compliance + payments together
- Cryptocurrency: Potential but regulatory uncertainty
Cryptocurrency Considerations
Some startups pay contractors in crypto. Issues to consider:
- Tax treatment: Generally taxable as ordinary income at receipt FMV
- Volatility: Value may change significantly before recipient converts
- Regulatory: Many countries have unclear or restrictive crypto rules
- Documentation: Record FMV at transfer for tax purposes
- Equity payments: Cannot easily pay equity in crypto (still issuing stock)
Dispute Forum Selection
Choosing the Right Forum
Cross-border disputes are expensive. Choose your forum carefully:
- US courts: Familiar law but may be hard to enforce abroad
- Local courts: Easier enforcement but unfamiliar procedures
- Arbitration: Often preferred for international disputes
- Mediation: Non-binding but can resolve disputes faster
Arbitration Advantages
- New York Convention: 170+ countries enforce arbitral awards
- Neutral forum for both parties
- Confidential proceedings
- Arbitrators can be selected for expertise
- Faster than many court systems
Common Arbitration Forums
- AAA/ICDR: American Arbitration Association
- JAMS: Popular for US commercial disputes
- ICC: International Chamber of Commerce
- SIAC: Singapore (neutral Asian forum)
- LCIA: London Court of International Arbitration
Country-Specific Considerations
🇮🇳 India
- RBI approval may be needed for share issuance
- FEMA regulations on foreign securities
- High personal income tax on equity gains (30%+)
- TDS (withholding) on payments to Indian residents
- IP assignment enforceable but get local counsel review
🇨🇳 China
- SAFE registration required for overseas equity
- Repatriation of funds is restricted
- VIE structures may be needed for certain sectors
- IP assignment requires registration with CNIPA
- High scrutiny on cross-border payments
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- Generally straightforward for equity grants
- EMI scheme for UK employees (tax advantaged)
- No exchange controls
- Strong IP protection and assignment enforcement
- US-UK tax treaty reduces withholding
🇩🇪 Germany
- Strict employment law (contractors may be reclassified)
- Co-determination requirements for larger operations
- Moral rights strong - cannot fully waive
- High tax rates on equity compensation
- German language may be required for contracts
🇧🇷 Brazil
- Complex labor law - high reclassification risk
- Equity plans may need local registration
- Heavy taxation on foreign income
- Central Bank registration for inbound investment
- Portuguese language contracts recommended
🇮🇱 Israel
- Section 102 trustee plans (tax advantaged)
- Strong tech ecosystem familiar with US equity
- No exchange controls
- Good IP protection and enforcement
- Many startups use Delaware + Israel structure
Common Cross-Border Issues
Misclassification Risk
Many countries have stricter rules on who qualifies as a contractor. Long-term exclusive arrangements often trigger employee status, with associated benefits, taxes, and termination protections.
Exchange Controls
Some countries (China, India, Brazil, Argentina) restrict the ability to hold foreign securities or repatriate sale proceeds. Recipients may face significant delays or limitations getting their money out.
Double Taxation
Without proper planning, equity income may be taxed in both the US and the recipient's home country. Tax treaties and foreign tax credits can mitigate but not always eliminate double taxation.
Local Securities Laws
While US exemptions apply to the US offering, the recipient's country may have its own securities registration requirements for receiving foreign equity.