Wrongful termination, FMLA / CFRA fired-on-leave, ADA / FEHA failure-to-accommodate, severance negotiation, wage claims, retaliation. I handle the pre-litigation and agency phases on flat fees. If your matter needs full trial litigation, I refer to a contingency plaintiff's firm at that point.
Fastest way to get a useful answer: send a one-page timeline, the termination or severance document, the key HR emails/texts, any leave or accommodation paperwork, and your goal: severance, reinstatement, accommodation, unpaid wages, CRD/EEOC filing, or a written case evaluation.
Every matter starts with a case-evaluation memo. After that you pick the package that fits your situation.
Written assessment of your employment claim. Identifies the statutes that apply, the recovery range, and the recommended path. The standard first step for every employment matter.
Attorney-drafted letter to your former employer. The goal is to create a serious pre-litigation record: specific statutes, specific facts, a defensible damages number, and a clear settlement deadline.
Draft and file your administrative charge. Required before lawsuit; preserves your right to sue.
Employer offered severance? I review, identify the leverage, and negotiate up.
You do not need to organize everything perfectly. The fastest way to evaluate the matter is to send the core documents and a short timeline.
Use this format when emailing your documents:
Many matters benefit from a pre-litigation phase before agency escalation or litigation. Flat-fee case evaluation first, then escalate as needed.
Email me the relevant documents (offer, termination, leave, severance offer, performance reviews) and a short timeline. No call required.
Within 5 business days you have a written memo: claims, statutes, recovery range, recommended next step.
Demand letter, agency charge, severance negotiation, or stop. Each is a separate flat fee with no obligation to continue.
"I had no idea whether my termination was legal or just unfair. Sergei's memo gave me a real answer in five days for $575. Saved me from spending months wondering."— Wrongful termination evaluation
"Severance offer was $18K. Sergei's negotiation came back at $42K plus an extended health-insurance period. The $1,500 fee paid for itself many times over."— Severance negotiation $24K severance bump
"Filed my CRD charge on a Friday and had a right-to-sue letter in eight weeks. Demand letter to the employer settled the matter for six figures before we ever filed a lawsuit."— CRD charge + demand letter combo six-figure pre-litigation settlement
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Employment recoveries depend on facts, documents, damages, deadlines, defenses, and collectability.
I have been a California-licensed business attorney since 2011 with a steady employment-law practice. My focus is the pre-litigation and agency phases — case evaluations, demand letters, CRD/EEOC charges, and severance negotiation. Many employment disputes are shaped before trial: in the deadline analysis, the agency charge, the demand letter, the severance release, and the employer's first serious risk assessment.
I run flat fees for everything I do. If a matter needs full trial litigation, I refer to a California contingency plaintiff's firm at that point.
California is one of the most protective states for employees, especially on discrimination, disability accommodation, protected leave, wage-hour, retaliation, and severance-release issues. Between the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), the Pregnancy Disability Leave Law (PDL), the Labor Code (which contains over 1,000 sections governing wage hour, leave, and workplace conduct), and the federal overlay of Title VII, ADA, FMLA, and FLSA, the rights structure is deep — and the remedies are substantial.
Many California employees lose leverage because they do not know which statutes apply, miss deadlines, fail to preserve documents, or sign severance agreements before understanding what claims they are releasing. The pre-litigation phase — case evaluation, demand letter, agency charge, severance negotiation — is where the claim is framed, documented, priced, and either positioned for resolution or prepared for litigation referral.
At-will employment is the default, but California recognizes more than fifteen exceptions: FEHA discrimination, FEHA retaliation, public-policy violations (Tameny claims), implied contract, FMLA / CFRA / PDL interference, Labor Code section 1102.5 whistleblower protection, wage-hour retaliation, and others. The case-evaluation memo identifies which exceptions apply to your facts.
FEHA prohibits employment decisions motivated by race, sex, age (40+), disability, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, and other protected categories. Harassment includes both quid pro quo (employment benefit conditioned on submission) and hostile environment (severe or pervasive conduct). Retaliation protects employees who report discrimination, request accommodation, or participate in investigations.
California Labor Code provides for minimum wage, overtime, meal and rest breaks, accurate pay statements, timely payment, expense reimbursement, and final paycheck rules. Common violations: misclassifying employees as exempt, missed meal breaks, off-the-clock work, late final paychecks (which trigger waiting-time penalties up to 30 days' wages), and unreimbursed business expenses.
FMLA, CFRA, PDL, ADA, and FEHA all govern protected leave and reasonable accommodation. A termination during or shortly after protected leave can create interference, retaliation, restoration, and accommodation issues, but the analysis still depends on eligibility, notice, leave designation, timing, and whether the employer can prove a leave-independent reason. Failure to engage in the interactive process for accommodation can be a separate FEHA violation. Defective leave notices can strengthen an interference theory, especially if the defect caused confusion, discipline, lost leave rights, or termination.
Severance offers are often negotiable when the employee can identify claims the release would waive. The counteroffer should tie the requested increase to specific legal exposure (FEHA, CFRA/FMLA, wage-hour, retaliation, accommodation issues), not just a generic request for more money. Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) requires a 21-day consideration period (or 45 days for group separations), giving you time to get the agreement reviewed.
The economics of California employment law strongly favor pre-litigation resolution:
Every California employment claim has a deadline. Miss it and the claim is gone. Here are the major ones:
Tolling, continuing-violation, and discovery-rule doctrines can extend these dates. The case-evaluation memo includes a fact-specific deadline calendar.
Pre-litigation phases often determine whether an employment matter resolves before trial, escalates to an agency, or needs a contingency-fee referral. Flat-fee pre-litigation work is faster and cheaper for the employee than a 33-40% contingency. If your matter does need to go to trial, I refer to a contingency firm at that point.
Yes. I am California-licensed and focus on CA employment law (FEHA, CFRA, PDL, Labor Code). I can also handle federal claims (Title VII, ADA, FMLA, FLSA) for matters with significant California connections.
Varies by claim. FEHA discrimination/retaliation: 3 years to file with CRD. EEOC: 300 days. FLSA wage claims: 2-3 years. CA Labor Code wage claims: typically 3 years. The case evaluation memo includes a written deadline calendar specific to your facts.
No. The AI Legal Analyst on this site provides general information to help you understand your situation. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. When you are ready for attorney-level work, I take over personally.
CRD: 1-2 years for full investigation, but you can request immediate right-to-sue (typical for serious claims). EEOC: 6 months minimum before right-to-sue, 1-2 years for full investigation. Most plaintiffs request immediate right-to-sue and proceed with demand letter / litigation rather than waiting for agency investigation.
That's exactly what the $575 case evaluation memo is for. You get a written legal assessment with no obligation to continue. About 30% of evaluations end at "you don't have a viable claim" — which is itself useful, because you can stop wondering and move on.
Three calculators for the questions every employee asks first. All free and no login required. The case-evaluation memo packages above use the same framework but go deeper with attorney analysis.
Find every filing deadline that applies to your termination, based on the actual statutes (FEHA 3-year, EEOC 300-day, FMLA 2-3 year, FLSA 2-3 year).
Estimate your back pay, front pay, and emotional-distress recovery range using the same framework I use in my case-evaluation memos.
10 quick yes/no questions to gauge whether your case is strong (proceed to demand letter), moderate (case-eval memo first), or weak (probably not viable).
Enter your termination date. I will compute every relevant filing deadline.
Quick estimate of your potential recovery. Final numbers depend on facts the case-evaluation memo would surface.
Answer 10 yes/no questions. The score tells you whether your case is strong, moderate, or weak.
For wrongful-termination matters specifically.
For terminations during medical leave.
For ADA / FEHA failure-to-accommodate.
My deep guide to filing process, deadlines, mediation, settlement values.
Free guide to CA at-will exceptions, FEHA claims, and damages calculator.
For unpaid wages, overtime, meal/rest break, and final-paycheck claims.
Email me your documents. You will have a written memo in 5 business days telling you whether you have a claim, what it's worth, and what to do next.
Email owner@terms.law with: (1) your termination, leave, or HR timeline, (2) the key documents, and (3) what result you want — severance, reinstatement, accommodation, unpaid wages, or right-to-sue positioning.
I will tell you whether the $575 case-evaluation memo is the right first step or whether the matter is not a fit for my flat-fee pre-litigation model.
Email the timeline and documents →