CLRA | UCL | Automatic Renewal Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17600) | Consumer Protection
| Issue Type | Description | Primary Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-Renewal Disputes | Charged for renewal without proper notice or consent | Bus. & Prof. Code 17600-17606 |
| Feature Removal/Changes | Core features removed or significantly altered after purchase | CLRA (Civil Code 1750-1784) |
| Service Degradation | Performance, uptime, or quality substantially reduced | Breach of Contract, UCL |
| Cancellation Issues | Difficulty canceling or continued charges after cancellation | Bus. & Prof. Code 17602 |
| Bait-and-Switch | Advertised features not delivered as promised | CLRA, UCL, FAL |
| Hidden Fees | Undisclosed charges added to subscription | CLRA, UCL |
| Requirement | What the Law Requires | Code Section |
|---|---|---|
| Clear Terms | Auto-renewal terms must be presented "clearly and conspicuously" before purchase | 17602(a)(1) |
| Affirmative Consent | Consumer must affirmatively consent to automatic renewal terms | 17602(a)(2) |
| Acknowledgment | Provider must give consumer a copy of auto-renewal terms in a "retainable form" | 17602(a)(3) |
| Cancellation Mechanism | Must provide "cost-effective, timely, and easy-to-use" cancellation method | 17602(b) |
| Renewal Reminders | For free trials or subscriptions over 1 year, must send reminder before charging | 17602(a)(1) |
The CLRA prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices in consumer transactions. It applies to SaaS subscriptions as "services" under Civil Code 1761(a).
| Prohibited Practice | How It Applies to SaaS | Code Section |
|---|---|---|
| Misrepresenting qualities | Advertising features that don't work as described | 1770(a)(5) |
| Deceptive pricing | Hidden fees, price increases without notice | 1770(a)(13) |
| Advertising unavailable goods | Bait-and-switch with features or pricing | 1770(a)(9) |
| False statements about services | Misrepresenting uptime, security, or capabilities | 1770(a)(4) |
| Representing goods are of particular standard | Claiming enterprise-grade when consumer-grade | 1770(a)(7) |
California's UCL is a "catch-all" statute that prohibits any business practice that is:
Even without statutory violations, you may have breach of contract claims:
If the SaaS company made false or misleading advertising claims about their service, the FAL provides additional remedies:
Before writing your demand letter, gather all evidence:
| Your Situation | Primary Legal Claims | Key Citations |
|---|---|---|
| Charged without proper renewal notice | Automatic Renewal Law violation | Bus. & Prof. Code 17602, 17603 |
| Features removed after purchase | CLRA violation, Breach of Contract | Civil Code 1770(a)(5), 1770(a)(16) |
| Service quality significantly degraded | Breach of Contract, UCL | Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 |
| Cannot cancel subscription | Automatic Renewal Law violation | Bus. & Prof. Code 17602(b) |
| Advertised features don't work | CLRA, FAL, UCL | Civil Code 1770(a)(4), Bus. & Prof. Code 17500 |
| Hidden fees charged | CLRA, UCL | Civil Code 1770(a)(13), 1770(a)(14) |
| Component | What to Include |
|---|---|
| Header | Your name, address; company's legal name, address; date |
| Subject Line | "DEMAND FOR REFUND - CLRA 30-Day Notice" |
| Account Details | Account email, subscription ID, dates of service |
| Factual Background | What you subscribed to, what was promised, what went wrong |
| Legal Violations | Specific California statutes violated with citations |
| Demand Amount | Total refund sought with itemization |
| CLRA Notice | Explicit statement this is 30-day CLRA notice |
| Deadline | 30 days for response (required by CLRA) |
| Consequences | Legal action, including attorney fees and statutory damages |
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Time Limit | 60 days from statement date (but some issuers extend this) |
| Grounds | Services not rendered, unauthorized charge, quality dispute |
| Process | Call your card issuer or submit dispute online |
| Documentation Needed | Your demand letter, cancellation attempts, service issues |
| Provisional Credit | Often issued while dispute is investigated |
For amounts up to $12,500, small claims court offers a fast, low-cost option:
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Maximum claim (individual) | $12,500 |
| Maximum claim (business) | $6,250 |
| Filing fee | $30-$75 depending on amount |
| Attorney allowed? | No (self-representation only) |
| Typical timeline | 30-70 days from filing to hearing |
| Venue | County where company does business in California |
After the 30-day notice period expires, you can file a CLRA lawsuit:
File complaints with regulatory agencies to create additional pressure:
| Agency | What They Handle | How to File |
|---|---|---|
| CA Attorney General | Consumer protection, unfair business practices | oag.ca.gov/consumers/general |
| FTC | Deceptive practices, subscription traps | reportfraud.ftc.gov |
| Better Business Bureau | Business disputes, reputation pressure | bbb.org |
| Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | If payment processing is involved | consumerfinance.gov/complaint |
Sometimes, public visibility motivates faster resolution:
Many SaaS Terms of Service include arbitration clauses. Consider:
I help California consumers recover refunds from SaaS companies that violate consumer protection laws. Whether you are dealing with unauthorized auto-renewals, feature removal, service degradation, or cancellation difficulties, I can help you pursue your legal rights.
Book a call to discuss your SaaS subscription dispute. I will review your situation, explain your legal options, and recommend the most effective strategy to recover your money.
Email: owner@terms.law
California law provides strong protections for consumers against auto-renewal traps, feature removal, and service degradation. I can help you recover your refund and hold the company accountable.
Schedule a ConsultationCalifornia consumers have powerful legal protections when SaaS companies engage in unfair subscription practices. The Automatic Renewal Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17600-17606), Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code 1750-1784), and Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200) provide multiple avenues for recovering refunds and holding companies accountable.