Live · attorney-built AI stack

The legal infrastructure behind Terms.Law,
attorney-built and AI-enhanced.

I'm Sergei Tokmakov, a California attorney (CA Bar #279869). Over more than a decade I've built the infrastructure behind this practice: 13 intake tools, 6 interactive tools, 30 demand-letter pages wired to flat fees, and a sitewide attorney voice that survives audit. AI runs the operational layer; I do the legal work.

0 HIGH-severity legal findings ~1.3s average tool latency $0.05 per AI tool call
live-demo // proof-posture
Landlord-tenant
"My landlord changed the locks while I was at work last Tuesday. I have a written lease and texts where they admit they were trying to force me out."
Reading the facts and classifying the matterextract_facts()
Locating the controlling California statutecheck_statute()
Classifying the proof posture, flagging missing evidence for attorney reviewassess_strength()
Drafting a sample attorney-letter paragraph (after retention)generate_dl_preview()
Proof posture: Strong · Wrongful lockout
Cal. Civ. Code § 789.3 TPA 2019

Written lease establishes tenancy. Contemporaneous texts admitting motive are a near-perfect § 789.3(c) evidence pattern. $100/day statutory penalty plus mandatory attorney's fees. Tier fit: $575 attorney letter.

Breach of contract
"We paid a California surrogacy agency $42,000 in March. They confirmed receipt. They stopped responding in May. No services delivered. We have wire records and the contract."
Reading the facts and classifying the matterextract_facts()
Mapping every plausible California cause of actionsearch_graph()
Classifying the proof posture and defendant solvency riskassess_strength()
Drafting a sample attorney-letter paragraph (after retention)generate_dl_preview()
Proof posture: Very strong · Breach + fraud + UCL
Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1549, 3300 CCP § 337 Bus. & Prof. § 17200

Documented payment, no consideration delivered, signed agreement. Fraud and conversion theories survive bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). Tier fit: $1,200 letter + draft complaint.

Insurance bad faith
"Homeowners insurer denied my $87,000 water-damage claim citing 'gradual seepage' but I have a plumber's report it was a sudden pipe burst."
Reading the facts and classifying the matterextract_facts()
Flagging Moradi-Shalal: no private § 790.03 actionflag_legal_risk()
Classifying the proof posture + expert-report leverageassess_strength()
Drafting a sample attorney-letter paragraph (after retention)generate_dl_preview()
Proof posture: Strong · Bad-faith + Brandt fees
Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Brandt v. Superior Ct.

Independent expert directly contradicting the carrier is the strongest fact in a bad-faith case. DOI complaint preserves an agency record. Tier fit: $1,200 letter + draft complaint.

0+
Contracts drafted across 14 years of California practice
0+
Upwork reviews · 100% job-success score
0+
Years licensed in California (Bar #279869, since 2011)
The practice infrastructure

What's actually been built into this site.

Most lawyer sites have a chat widget bolted to a brochure. Mine runs on real practice infrastructure: tool-calling, content-graph aware, statute-grounded, voice-audited, and connected to my live calendar and payments. Here's the inventory.

Before / after

What the upgrade looks like, one page at a time.

Across 30 demand-letter pages, the same playbook: live PayPal $575/$1,200 tiers, statute-grounded headlines, trust block, and zero "$240 Written Attorney Consultation" language. Drag the slider to compare.

Before (Jan 2026) After (May 2026) Drag the bar →
Before

California Security Deposit Demand Letter

/Demand-Letters/Landlord-Tenant/security-deposit/

If your landlord didn't return your deposit, you might have a claim. Send a demand letter and request a refund.

A demand letter usually works, more often than not, because landlords don't want a lawsuit.

$575

Old version: generic call-first language, no clear price, no legal leverage.

Schedule a call

No tier table. No statute citation. No trust block. Em-dashes throughout. Stale price.

After

California Security Deposit Demand Letter (Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5)

/Demand-Letters/Landlord-Tenant/security-deposit/

If your landlord kept your deposit past the 21-day window in Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(g), the statute lets me ask for up to 2x the withheld amount as bad-faith damages, plus interest and attorney's fees.

Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. · CA Bar #279869 · 14+ years · 700+ Upwork reviews · 100% job-success
TierWhat's includedPrice
Letter onlyUSPS certified + email, statute-cited$575
Letter + draft lawsuitAbove + small-claims/Superior packet$1,200

Statute-grounded headline · live PayPal tier table · trust block with bar number · em-dashes removed sitewide.

Interactive tools

Six free AI tools, each one a working demo on its own.

Every tool takes free-text input from a real user and returns structured legal analysis, and I check every California citation against its source before it becomes legal work product.

The unified AI chatbox

Watch the chatbox route a real intake.

The chatbox on every page of this site runs production-grade AI with 13 tools. It reads the page you're on, extracts facts from your message, looks up the statute, classifies the proof posture, picks a tier, and gives you a live PayPal button. Below is a static replay so the scripts on this page don't collide with the real one.

AI
AI Legal Analyst
attorney-directed
frontier model
Legal accuracy guarantee

Every California citation, reviewed by a California attorney.

Three layers of guardrails between the AI and the user, and I review every citation before it becomes legal work product.

0
HIGH-severity legal findings across the last audit
L1

Legal-risk pre-reply audit

Every chatbox reply runs through a `flag_legal_risk` self-check. Catches attorney-client implications, outcome guarantees, conclusory legal opinions before the message ships.

L2

Safety sanitizer

A regex-pass Worker-side sanitizer strips em-dashes, "we/our" voice, "AI Lawyer" or "AI Attorney" brand drift, and "$240 Written Attorney Consultation" language as belt-and-suspenders.

L3

URL sanitizer

Every link the AI suggests is validated against the site's actual content graph. The chatbox cannot send a user to a 404 or a hallucinated page.

L4

California-only gate

A `check_outside_scope` tool blocks the AI from giving advice on out-of-state, criminal, immigration, or family-law matters. Out-of-scope users get a polite redirect, not a hallucinated answer.

Real numbers, May 2026

What the rebuild moved.

Three rounds of upgrades. The numbers below come straight from the audit CSVs in /audit/.

0
Demand-letter pages wired with tier tables
0
Practice-area hubs standardized
0
Voice-violation files auto-fixed
0
Em-dashes killed sitewide
0
Blog posts upgraded with tier CTAs
0
Pages enriched in the content graph
0
Tools registered with the chatbox
0
Interactive AI-powered tools

Want this for your firm?

I build California-grounded AI stacks for law firms and legal teams. The same AI architecture you just saw, applied to your practice. Flat-fee $2,500 implementation, custom-scoped extensions billed at $300/hr.

Built by Sergei Tokmakov, Esq., California Bar #279869, J.D. Boston University School of Law.
Email owner@terms.law for scoping. Written intake only.