📋 Overview: California Rear-End Collisions
Rear-end collisions are the most common type of car accident in California, and they carry a significant legal advantage for victims: a presumption of negligence against the following driver. Under California Vehicle Code Section 21703, the driver who strikes another vehicle from behind is presumed to have violated the law by following too closely.
Why Rear-End Cases Are Strong Claims
In most car accident cases, the injured party must prove the other driver was negligent. In rear-end collisions, this burden is effectively shifted. The following driver must explain why they could not stop in time, which is rarely a winning argument. California courts have consistently held that drivers must maintain sufficient distance to stop safely regardless of unexpected circumstances.
Presumption of Negligence
The rear driver is presumed at fault. They must prove sudden, unexpected circumstances to overcome this presumption.
Whiplash Injuries
Soft tissue neck injuries from rear impacts are extremely common. Symptoms may not appear for 24-72 hours.
Hidden Damage
Both vehicle and bodily injuries may be worse than initially apparent. Always get checked by a doctor.
Insurance Tactics
Insurers often try to minimize rear-end claims despite clear liability. A strong demand letter changes the dynamic.
Common Rear-End Collision Scenarios
- Stop-and-go traffic - Driver fails to notice traffic stopping ahead
- Distracted driving - Driver looking at phone, eating, or otherwise not watching road
- Tailgating - Driver following too closely to stop safely
- Red light/stop sign - Driver fails to stop for stopped traffic at intersection
- Freeway merging - Driver misjudges distance during lane changes
- Weather conditions - Driver fails to adjust following distance for rain, fog, or wet roads
Seek Medical Attention Immediately
Even if you feel fine after a rear-end collision, seek medical evaluation within 24-48 hours. Whiplash and other soft tissue injuries often have delayed onset. Medical documentation from immediately after the accident is critical for your claim. Insurance companies will use gaps in treatment against you.
What You Can Recover
A successful rear-end collision demand can include:
- Medical expenses - Past, present, and future treatment costs
- Lost wages - Time missed from work during recovery
- Loss of earning capacity - If injuries affect future work ability
- Pain and suffering - Physical pain and emotional distress
- Property damage - Vehicle repair or replacement
- Loss of enjoyment of life - Impact on daily activities and hobbies
⚖ Legal Basis
California law strongly supports rear-end collision victims through the Vehicle Code and established case law creating a presumption of negligence.
Key California Statutes
Vehicle Code Section 21703 - Following Too Closely
"The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway." Violation of this section creates a presumption of negligence.
Vehicle Code Section 22350 - Basic Speed Law
"No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway." Applicable when rear driver was traveling too fast for conditions.
Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1 - Personal Injury Limitations
Actions for personal injury must be brought within two years from the date of injury. This is the deadline to file a lawsuit if your demand is not resolved.
Code of Civil Procedure Section 338 - Property Damage
Actions for property damage have a three-year statute of limitations. Vehicle damage claims have a longer window than personal injury.
The Presumption of Negligence
How the Presumption Works
California courts have consistently held that a rear-end collision creates a presumption that the following driver violated Vehicle Code 21703. This is not absolute proof of negligence, but it shifts the burden to the rear driver to explain why they could not stop. Valid explanations are rare and typically limited to:
- Sudden and unexpected stop by lead vehicle with no warning
- Lead vehicle cut in front with insufficient space
- Mechanical failure that was not foreseeable
- Third party pushed rear vehicle into lead vehicle
Key California Case Law
Solis v. Kirkwood Resort Co. (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 354
Established that a rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a presumption of negligence. The following driver must present evidence of an extraordinary circumstance to rebut this presumption.
Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 508
Affirmed that violation of a statute (like VC 21703) constitutes negligence per se when the violation proximately causes injury to someone in the class the statute was designed to protect.
Critical: 2-Year Deadline
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1 gives you only two years from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit. If your demand letter does not result in settlement, you must file suit before this deadline or lose your claim forever. Do not wait until the last minute - investigations take time.
📝 Elements to Prove
To recover damages in a rear-end collision case, I establish the following elements in your demand letter.
Four Elements of Negligence
1. Duty of Care
Every driver owes a duty to operate their vehicle safely and follow traffic laws, including maintaining safe following distance under VC 21703.
2. Breach of Duty
The at-fault driver breached this duty by following too closely, failing to pay attention, or otherwise driving negligently.
3. Causation
The breach of duty (the rear-end collision) directly caused your injuries and damages. This is usually straightforward in rear-end cases.
4. Damages
You suffered actual damages including medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage as a result.
Why Rear-End Cases Are Easier to Prove
In a typical rear-end collision, the presumption of negligence under VC 21703 effectively satisfies the first two elements. This means I focus your demand letter on documenting:
- The collision occurred - Police report, photos, witness statements
- You were struck from behind - Damage patterns, impact descriptions
- You suffered injuries - Medical records, diagnosis, treatment
- Your damages are quantifiable - Bills, receipts, wage loss documentation
Comparative Fault Consideration
California follows pure comparative negligence. Even if you bear some responsibility (e.g., brake lights not working, sudden lane change), you can still recover damages reduced by your percentage of fault. The insurance company may try to assign you partial blame - I address these arguments preemptively in demand letters.
💰 Calculating Your Damages
Rear-end collision damages typically include both economic (calculable) and non-economic (pain and suffering) components.
Categories of Damages
| Category | Description | How to Calculate |
|---|---|---|
| Past Medical Expenses | ER visits, doctors, physical therapy, imaging, medications | Total of all bills incurred |
| Future Medical Expenses | Ongoing treatment, surgery, rehabilitation | Doctor's estimate of future care costs |
| Lost Wages | Time missed from work during recovery | Pay rate x hours/days missed |
| Loss of Earning Capacity | Reduced ability to work in the future | Expert vocational analysis |
| Property Damage | Vehicle repair or total loss value | Repair estimates or fair market value |
| Pain and Suffering | Physical pain, emotional distress | Multiplier of 1.5-5x medical bills |
| Loss of Enjoyment | Impact on daily activities, hobbies | Part of general damages calculation |
Sample Damages Calculation
Example: Moderate Whiplash with 3 Months Treatment
Typical rear-end collision with soft tissue injuries requiring physical therapy
Pain and Suffering Multipliers
Insurance adjusters commonly use a multiplier of medical expenses to calculate pain and suffering:
- 1.5-2x - Minor injuries, full recovery expected
- 2-3x - Moderate injuries, several months treatment
- 3-4x - Serious injuries, long-term effects
- 4-5x - Severe injuries, permanent impairment
I calculate the appropriate multiplier based on injury severity, treatment duration, and impact on daily life.
📂 Evidence Checklist
Strong documentation is essential for a successful demand. I recommend gathering these materials.
📄 Accident Documentation
- ✓Police report (Traffic Collision Report)
- ✓Photos of vehicle damage (all angles)
- ✓Photos of accident scene
- ✓Photos of visible injuries
- ✓Witness contact information
- ✓Dashcam footage (if available)
💉 Medical Documentation
- ✓ER records and discharge summary
- ✓Primary care physician records
- ✓Specialist records (orthopedic, neurologist)
- ✓Physical therapy records
- ✓Imaging reports (X-ray, MRI, CT)
- ✓All medical bills
💰 Financial Documentation
- ✓Pay stubs showing lost wages
- ✓Employer letter confirming missed work
- ✓Vehicle repair estimates (multiple)
- ✓Rental car receipts
- ✓Out-of-pocket expense receipts
📝 Insurance Information
- ✓At-fault driver's insurance info
- ✓Your own policy declarations page
- ✓Claim numbers (all claims)
- ✓Adjuster contact information
- ✓Written correspondence with insurers
Do Not Give Recorded Statements
The at-fault driver's insurance company may call and ask for a recorded statement. You are not obligated to provide one. Politely decline and refer them to your attorney or state that you will respond in writing. Recorded statements are used to find inconsistencies and minimize your claim.
📝 Sample Demand Language
I use these frameworks when drafting rear-end collision demand letters. Customize with your specific facts.
Medical Expenses:
Emergency Department: $[AMOUNT]
[Provider Name] - Chiropractic: $[AMOUNT]
[Provider Name] - Physical Therapy: $[AMOUNT]
Diagnostic Imaging: $[AMOUNT]
Medications: $[AMOUNT]
Total Medical: $[TOTAL]
Lost Wages: $[AMOUNT] ([X] days at $[DAILY RATE])
Property Damage: $[AMOUNT]
Pain and Suffering: $[AMOUNT]
TOTAL DEMAND: $[TOTAL]
Please note that the statute of limitations under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1 will expire on [DATE - 2 years from accident]. If this matter is not resolved, my client is prepared to pursue litigation to recover the full measure of damages, including any additional damages that accrue.
I look forward to your prompt response.
🚀 Next Steps
After sending your demand letter, here is what to expect and how to proceed.
Expected Timeline
Days 1-7
Insurance company receives and logs demand, assigns to adjuster for review
Days 7-21
Adjuster reviews medical records, evaluates liability, calculates reserve
Days 21-30
Initial response - acceptance, counteroffer, or request for more information
Days 30-60
Negotiation period - back and forth on settlement amount
If Insurance Responds with Low Offer
Do not accept the first offer. Insurance adjusters are trained to start low. I typically:
- Analyze why the offer is lower than demanded
- Address any stated reasons for reduction
- Submit a written counteroffer with supporting argument
- Continue negotiating until reaching fair settlement or impasse
If No Response or Denial
File Lawsuit
If insurance refuses to negotiate fairly, filing suit in California Superior Court forces their hand. Many cases settle shortly after filing.
Uninsured Motorist Claim
If the at-fault driver has no insurance or insufficient coverage, you may have a claim under your own UM/UIM policy.
Do Not Miss the Deadline
California's statute of limitations for personal injury is 2 years from the accident date (CCP 335.1). If you do not file suit before this deadline, your claim is barred forever. Always leave enough time for filing - do not wait until the last month.
📥 For Insurance Companies: Responding to Rear-End Claims
If you are an insurance adjuster or claims professional evaluating a rear-end collision demand, here is what you need to know.
Liability Is Clear
Rear-end collision liability is almost never defensible in California. The presumption of negligence under VC 21703 places your insured in a difficult position. Contesting clear liability wastes resources and may result in bad faith exposure. Focus negotiations on damages.
Evaluating the Demand
- Verify the collision - Review police report, photos, insured's statement
- Confirm coverage - Active policy, applicable limits, any coverage defenses
- Review medical records - Diagnoses, treatment, causal connection to accident
- Assess treatment reasonableness - Is the treatment appropriate for the injuries?
- Verify economic damages - Bills, wage loss documentation, property damage
- Calculate general damages - Pain and suffering based on injury severity
Common Defenses (and Their Limits)
Pre-Existing Condition
The "eggshell plaintiff" rule means you take the victim as you find them. Pre-existing conditions do not eliminate liability - you may owe for aggravation.
Treatment Gaps
Gaps in treatment may reduce pain and suffering, but whiplash symptoms can fluctuate. Focus on documented complaints, not treatment frequency.
Low Property Damage
"Minor impact" defenses are weak in California. Injury severity does not correlate reliably with vehicle damage. Courts reject this argument.
Sudden Stop
Your insured claiming the victim "stopped suddenly" is not a defense. Drivers must maintain distance to stop for any reason. VC 21703 controls.
Bad Faith Exposure
Unreasonably delaying or denying a clear liability rear-end claim may expose your insurer to bad faith liability under California law. If policy limits are at issue, consider tendering limits early to protect your insured from excess exposure.
⚖ Attorney Services
I assist individuals injured in rear-end collisions and occasionally consult with insurance professionals on claim evaluation. Here is how I can help.
For Injured Victims
- Evaluate your case and calculate full damages including pain and suffering
- Gather and organize medical records and evidence
- Draft a professional demand letter citing applicable law
- Negotiate directly with insurance adjusters
- File suit if settlement cannot be reached
For Insurance Professionals
- Case evaluation and settlement recommendations
- Medical record review and damages analysis
- Coverage opinions on complex claims
Injured in a Rear-End Collision?
Get a 30-minute strategy session to evaluate your claim and discuss your options.
Book Consultation - $240/hrHourly Consultation
$240 per hour for case evaluation, strategy sessions, and hourly legal work.
Flat Fee Demand Letter
$450 flat fee for professional demand letter drafting with all supporting documentation.
Contingency Fee Representation
33-40% contingency for full representation through settlement or litigation. No fee unless you recover.
Contact Information
Email: owner@terms.law
Book Online: calendly.com/sergei-tokmakov/30-minute-zoom-meeting