Receiving a dog bite demand letter can be stressful and overwhelming, especially if you were not expecting it or believe the claim is unfounded. How you respond in the first 72 hours can significantly impact the outcome of the case. Acting quickly and strategically will protect your rights, preserve evidence, and position you for the best possible resolution.
Your immediate action checklist:
Many dog owners make critical errors in the first few days after receiving a demand letter that undermine their defense and increase their exposure. Here are the most common mistakes and how to avoid them:
Why it's bad: Anything you say can be used against you. Offers of payment can be interpreted as admissions of liability.
What to do instead: Refer all communication to your insurance carrier. Never discuss settlement or liability with the claimant or their attorney.
Why it's bad: Spoliation (destruction of evidence) can result in sanctions, adverse inferences, or even punitive damages.
What to do instead: Preserve all photos, videos, texts, emails, and documents. Even if you think they hurt your case, do not delete them. Your attorney can determine what is relevant.
Why it's bad: Claimants' attorneys regularly search social media for posts about the incident, the dog, or your state of mind. Even seemingly innocent posts can be misconstrued.
What to do instead: Stop posting about the dog, the incident, or anything related to the claim. Set your social media accounts to private and avoid discussing the case online.
Why it's bad: Most homeowners and renters policies require prompt notice of claims. If you wait too long, the carrier may deny coverage, leaving you personally liable for the entire claim.
What to do instead: Call your insurance carrier within 24-48 hours of receiving the demand letter. Provide them with a copy of the letter and all relevant information.
Evidence is often lost or destroyed in the days and weeks following an incident. To protect your defense, take immediate steps to preserve all relevant evidence. Use this checklist to ensure nothing is overlooked:
Your homeowners or renters insurance policy is your first line of defense in a dog bite claim. Most policies include liability coverage that will pay for the claimant's damages and provide you with a defense attorney if a lawsuit is filed. However, to trigger this coverage, you must notify the carrier promptly and follow their procedures.
How to notify your insurance carrier:
Homeowners and renters insurance policies typically include liability coverage for injuries caused by your dog, but there are important exclusions and limitations you need to understand. Here's what to look for in your policy:
| Coverage Type | What It Covers | Typical Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Liability Coverage (Coverage E) | Bodily injury and property damage caused by you or members of your household, including injuries caused by your pets. | $100,000 - $500,000 |
| Medical Payments (Coverage F) | Immediate medical expenses for injured persons, regardless of fault. Paid without admission of liability. | $1,000 - $5,000 |
| Defense Costs | Attorney's fees, expert fees, court costs to defend you in a lawsuit. Typically covered in addition to policy limits. | Unlimited (in addition to limits) |
| Settlement Payments | Payments to settle the claim without going to trial. Paid up to policy limits. | Up to liability limit |
Common exclusions that may deny coverage:
Once you notify your carrier, they will assign a claims adjuster to investigate the incident. The adjuster's job is to determine whether the policy covers the claim, whether you are liable, and if so, what the claim is worth. Here's what to expect:
The adjuster will ask you to provide a recorded statement describing the incident. Be honest and accurate, but do not speculate or volunteer information not asked. If you are unsure about something, say so.
The adjuster will request photos, videos, vet records, animal control reports, and any other evidence related to the incident. Provide these promptly to avoid delays.
The adjuster may visit your property to inspect fencing, gates, signage, and the area where the incident occurred. Cooperate with this inspection.
The adjuster may contact witnesses to get their version of events. If you have favorable witnesses, provide their contact information to the adjuster.
Tips for your recorded statement:
Whether you are liable for the claimant's injuries depends on your state's dog bite laws, the circumstances of the incident, and the claimant's conduct. Understanding the legal framework and potential defenses is critical to evaluating the claim and determining your response strategy.
Key questions to assess your liability:
Even in strict liability states, several defenses can reduce or eliminate your liability. If your state follows common law negligence principles, these defenses are even more powerful. Here are the most common defenses and when they apply:
| Defense | Description | When It Applies |
|---|---|---|
| Trespass | The claimant was on your property without permission or in an area where they were not invited. | Claimant jumped a fence, ignored "No Trespassing" signs, or entered property after being told to leave. In strict liability states, this is often a complete defense. |
| Provocation | The claimant intentionally or recklessly provoked the dog, causing it to bite. | Claimant hit, kicked, teased, cornered, or disturbed the dog while eating or sleeping. Can be a complete defense or reduce recovery under comparative fault. |
| Assumption of Risk | The claimant voluntarily assumed the risk of being bitten (e.g., veterinarian, groomer, dog trainer). | Claimant was a professional working with the dog. Often a complete defense unless the owner concealed a known dangerous propensity. |
| Comparative / Contributory Negligence | The claimant's own negligence contributed to the incident. | Claimant ignored "Beware of Dog" sign, failed to supervise child, or approached dog despite warnings. In comparative negligence states, reduces recovery in proportion to fault. |
| No Ownership or Control | You did not own, harbor, or control the dog at the time of the incident. | The dog belonged to someone else, you were dog-sitting temporarily, or you had no control over the dog. May shift liability to the actual owner. |
Your potential liability depends heavily on your state's dog bite laws. Approximately 30 states have strict liability statutes, while the remaining states follow common law "one-bite rule" principles. The difference is significant:
Examples: California, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, Illinois, Ohio
Standard: Owner is liable for any bite regardless of prior knowledge of the dog's dangerous propensity. No need to prove negligence.
Defense Strategy: Focus on trespass, provocation, and comparative fault. Challenge whether a "bite" occurred (vs. scratch or knock-down).
Examples: Texas, Virginia, Maryland, New York (mixed), Georgia
Standard: Owner is liable only if they knew or should have known the dog had dangerous propensities (prior bites, aggressive behavior, breed reputation).
Defense Strategy: Emphasize lack of prior knowledge, no prior incidents, and the dog's generally friendly temperament. Argue the claimant cannot prove you knew the dog was dangerous.
The demand letter will present the claimant's version of the incident, which may differ significantly from your recollection. Carefully compare the claimant's account with your own notes, witness statements, and any objective evidence (photos, videos, animal control reports). Look for inconsistencies or exaggerations that undermine the claimant's credibility.
Red flags that may indicate a weak or exaggerated claim:
The strength of your defense depends on the quality and quantity of evidence you can present to support your version of events and challenge the claimant's allegations. The sooner you gather and preserve evidence, the better your chances of a favorable outcome.
Categories of evidence you should collect:
Different defenses require different types of evidence. Here's what to look for based on your potential defenses:
| Defense | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|
| Trespass | Photos of "No Trespassing" signs, locked gates, fences. Witness statements that claimant was not invited. Video showing claimant entering property without permission. Text or email showing you told claimant not to come over. |
| Provocation | Witness statements describing claimant hitting, kicking, teasing, or cornering the dog. Video showing provocation. Your contemporaneous notes describing what the claimant did before the bite. Animal control report noting provocation. |
| Assumption of Risk | Service agreement or invoice showing claimant was hired as groomer, vet, or trainer. Photos of claimant working with the dog. Claimant's professional license or business cards. Evidence that claimant was warned of dog's behavior. |
| Comparative Negligence | Photos of "Beware of Dog" signs claimant ignored. Witness statements that claimant was warned about the dog. Text or email warnings. Video showing claimant approaching dog against your instructions. |
| No Bite Occurred | Medical records showing no puncture wounds or teeth marks (only scratches or bruising). Photos of claimant's injuries showing no bite. Animal control report concluding no bite occurred. Vet records showing dog's teeth could not have caused the injury pattern. |
One of the most effective ways to counter claims that your dog is dangerous or that you should have known it would bite is to present evidence of the dog's friendly, non-aggressive temperament. Even in strict liability states, evidence of the dog's good character can influence settlement negotiations and jury perceptions.
In some cases, investigating the claimant's background and social media activity can reveal evidence that undermines their claim or supports your defenses. While you should not harass or contact the claimant directly, there is nothing improper about reviewing publicly available information.
What to look for:
Once you have notified your insurance carrier, preserved evidence, and analyzed liability, the next step is to develop a response strategy. In most cases, your carrier will handle the response on your behalf, but it is important to understand the options and provide input where appropriate.
Four response options:
Deciding whether to settle or fight a dog bite claim depends on the strength of your defenses, the severity of the claimant's injuries, and the cost and risk of litigation. Here are the key factors to consider:
| Factor | Settle | Fight |
|---|---|---|
| Liability | You live in a strict liability state, claimant was lawfully present, no provocation or other defenses. | Strong evidence of trespass, provocation, or other complete defense. Claimant's version of events is contradicted by witnesses or video. |
| Injuries | Claimant has severe, permanent injuries (facial scarring, disfigurement) with high medical bills. Demand is within or below policy limits. | Claimant's injuries are minor or not well-documented. Demand is grossly excessive compared to actual damages. Evidence suggests claimant is exaggerating. |
| Cost of Defense | Defense costs (attorney's fees, expert fees) are likely to exceed the settlement value. Carrier wants to settle quickly to minimize expense. | Defense costs are reasonable compared to the demand, or your policy covers defense costs in addition to limits. You want to avoid setting a precedent or admitting fault. |
| Risk of Excess Judgment | If the case goes to trial and you lose, the judgment is likely to exceed your policy limits, exposing your personal assets. | Even if you lose at trial, the judgment is unlikely to exceed policy limits. You have limited personal assets at risk. |
Some demand letters include settlement amounts that are grossly excessive compared to the actual injuries and damages. If the demand is unreasonable, your carrier will likely reject it or make a much lower counteroffer. Here's how to respond:
Request copies of all medical records and bills. Verify that the charges are reasonable and related to the dog bite (not pre-existing conditions). Challenge inflated pain and suffering multipliers.
If the claimant alleges permanent scarring or disability, your carrier may arrange for an independent medical examination (IME) by a neutral physician to assess the true extent of the injury.
If you have defenses (trespass, provocation), emphasize these in your response. Explain that even if some liability exists, comparative fault will reduce the recovery significantly.
Respond with a counteroffer that reflects what you believe the case is actually worth based on the medical evidence and local settlement trends. This signals that you are willing to negotiate but will not overpay.
If the claimant's damages exceed your policy limits, you could be personally liable for the excess. This is a serious concern if the claimant has catastrophic injuries (permanent disfigurement, disability) and your policy limits are low ($100,000 or less). Here's how to protect yourself:
In most dog bite cases, your insurance carrier will provide a defense attorney at no cost to you, and you do not need to hire your own counsel. However, there are situations where your interests diverge from the carrier's, and you should consult with your own attorney to protect your rights.
Situations where you should hire your own attorney:
If your carrier denies coverage or issues a "reservation of rights" letter stating that it may deny coverage later, you need to take immediate action to protect yourself. A coverage denial means the carrier will not pay for your defense or any settlement/judgment, leaving you personally liable for the entire claim.
Common reasons carriers deny coverage for dog bite claims:
What a "reservation of rights" means:
A reservation of rights letter means the carrier will provide a defense for now, but reserves the right to deny coverage later if certain facts are established. For example, the carrier might say: "We will defend you, but if it is proven that your dog's breed is on our excluded list, we reserve the right to withdraw coverage."
If you receive a reservation of rights letter, you should:
If the claimant's injuries are catastrophic and your policy limits are insufficient, you face the risk of an "excess judgment"—a court judgment that exceeds your insurance coverage. If this happens, the claimant can pursue your personal assets (home, bank accounts, wages) to satisfy the judgment.
How to minimize excess judgment risk: