📋 What is Insurance Bad Faith?

Insurance bad faith occurs when an insurer unreasonably refuses to pay, delays payment, or fails to properly investigate a valid claim. California law imposes a duty of good faith and fair dealing on insurers, requiring them to act in the best interests of their policyholders. When insurers breach this duty, policyholders can recover not just their policy benefits, but also additional damages including attorney fees and potentially punitive damages.

When to Use This Guide

Use this guide if your California insurer has:

❌ Denied Your Claim

Unreasonably denied a valid claim without proper investigation or explanation

🕑 Delayed Your Payment

Unreasonably delayed processing or paying your legitimate claim

💰 Lowballed Your Settlement

Offered far less than your claim is worth without legitimate justification

🔍 Failed to Investigate

Did not conduct a thorough, timely, and fair investigation of your claim

Types of Bad Faith Under California Law

🔴 First-Party Bad Faith

▼

First-party bad faith occurs when your own insurance company acts in bad faith toward you, the policyholder. This includes claims under your homeowners, auto, health, disability, or life insurance policies. In first-party cases, you are seeking benefits owed directly to you under your policy.

Examples: Denying a homeowners claim for fire damage, refusing to pay uninsured motorist benefits, delaying payment on a disability claim, or undervaluing a theft claim.

🟡 Third-Party Bad Faith

▼

Third-party bad faith occurs when your liability insurer fails to properly defend or settle claims made against you by others. The insurer has a duty to defend you against covered claims and to settle within policy limits when reasonable to do so.

Examples: Refusing to defend you in a lawsuit, failing to settle within policy limits when liability is clear and damages exceed limits, or failing to inform you of settlement opportunities.

🟢 Unfair Claims Practices

▼

California Insurance Code Section 790.03 enumerates 16 specific unfair claims settlement practices. Violations of these standards, when done with sufficient frequency to indicate a general business practice, constitute grounds for regulatory action and can support bad faith claims.

Examples: Misrepresenting policy provisions, not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt settlements, compelling policyholders to initiate litigation to recover amounts due, or attempting to settle for less than a reasonable person would believe they are entitled to.

👍 What You Can Recover for Bad Faith

  • Policy benefits - The full amount owed under your policy
  • Consequential damages - Economic losses caused by the insurer's conduct
  • Emotional distress - Mental anguish caused by the bad faith
  • Brandt attorney fees - Fees incurred to obtain policy benefits
  • Punitive damages - Available when insurer acted with malice, oppression, or fraud

⚠ Statute of Limitations

California has strict time limits for filing bad faith claims:

  • Contract claims (policy benefits): 4 years from denial or breach (CCP 337)
  • Tort claims (bad faith): 2 years from the wrongful act (CCP 339)

Do not delay - the shorter tort limitation may apply to your damages claim.

🔍 Elements of Bad Faith

To prevail on a California insurance bad faith claim, you must prove specific elements established by the California Supreme Court in Gruenberg v. Aetna and subsequent cases.

Elements You Must Prove

  1. Existence of an insurance contract

    You had a valid insurance policy with the defendant insurer that was in effect at the time of the loss.

  2. Covered loss or claim

    The loss you suffered is covered under the terms of the policy. The insurer's denial of coverage must be unreasonable.

  3. Withholding of benefits

    The insurer withheld policy benefits - either by denying, delaying, or underpaying your claim.

  4. Unreasonable conduct

    The insurer's conduct in handling your claim was unreasonable under the circumstances. This is the key element - not every denial is bad faith, but unreasonable denials are.

  5. Damages

    You suffered damages as a result of the insurer's unreasonable conduct, beyond just the withheld benefits.

The "Genuine Dispute" Defense

⚠ When Insurers May Escape Liability

California recognizes the "genuine dispute doctrine" - if there is a genuine dispute about coverage or the value of a claim, the insurer's denial or low offer may not constitute bad faith, even if ultimately wrong. However, this defense fails if:

  • The insurer failed to properly investigate before denying
  • The insurer ignored evidence supporting the claim
  • The dispute was manufactured rather than genuine
  • The insurer relied on unreasonable interpretations of policy language

Common Bad Faith Conduct

🚫 Denial Without Investigation

Denying a claim before conducting a thorough, fair, and objective investigation

🕑 Unreasonable Delays

Failing to promptly process, investigate, or pay valid claims without justification

📝 Misrepresenting Coverage

Misquoting policy language or misrepresenting what the policy covers

🔒 Ignoring Evidence

Disregarding or failing to obtain evidence that supports the claim

💰 Lowball Settlements

Offering significantly less than the claim is worth without explanation

📢 Threatening Litigation

Attempting to force acceptance of inadequate settlements through litigation threats

Third-Party Bad Faith: Special Rules

When your liability insurer fails to properly defend or settle claims against you, additional elements apply:

  • Duty to defend: The insurer must defend you against any claim potentially covered by the policy
  • Duty to settle: The insurer must accept reasonable settlement offers within policy limits when liability is clear and damages likely exceed limits (Crisci v. Security Insurance Co.)
  • Excess judgment rule: If the insurer unreasonably fails to settle and you face a judgment exceeding policy limits, the insurer may be liable for the entire judgment

💰 Damages & Penalties

California bad faith law allows policyholders to recover far more than just their withheld policy benefits. Understanding the full range of available damages is crucial for valuing your claim.

Damage Type Description
Contract Damages The full amount of policy benefits wrongfully withheld, plus prejudgment interest at the legal rate (currently 10% per year under Civil Code 3289).
Consequential Damages Economic losses caused by the bad faith conduct - foreclosure costs, credit damage, lost business income, cost of alternative housing, etc. Must be foreseeable.
Emotional Distress Mental anguish, anxiety, depression, and emotional harm caused by the insurer's conduct. No physical injury required in first-party bad faith cases.
Brandt Fees Attorney fees incurred to obtain the policy benefits owed. Recoverable as contract damages under Brandt v. Superior Court. This is in addition to tort damages.
Punitive Damages Available under Civil Code 3294 when the insurer acted with malice, oppression, or fraud. No statutory cap. Can be substantial, especially for large insurers.

Brandt Fees Explained

💰 The Brandt Fee Doctrine

Under Brandt v. Superior Court (1985), attorney fees incurred to compel payment of insurance benefits are recoverable as an element of damages. This includes:

  • Fees for pre-litigation demand letters and negotiations
  • Fees for litigating the breach of contract claim
  • Fees must be apportioned if the case also includes non-contract claims
  • Proven by evidence of actual fees incurred, not lodestar calculation

Punitive Damages Requirements

To recover punitive damages, you must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the insurer acted with:

  • Malice: Conduct intended to cause injury or despicable conduct carried on with a willful and conscious disregard for rights and safety
  • Oppression: Despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of their rights
  • Fraud: Intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact

⚠ Corporate Ratification Required

Under Civil Code 3294(b), punitive damages against a corporate insurer require showing that an officer, director, or managing agent authorized or ratified the wrongful conduct. Evidence of systemic claims handling policies or practices can satisfy this requirement.

📊 Sample Damages Calculation

Example: Homeowners Fire Claim Denial

Withheld policy benefits $450,000
Prejudgment interest (10% x 2 years) $90,000
Additional living expenses during dispute $48,000
Credit damage and increased borrowing costs $15,000
Emotional distress damages $100,000
Brandt attorney fees $175,000
Compensatory subtotal $878,000
Punitive damages (if proven - no cap) $1,500,000+
POTENTIAL TOTAL RECOVERY $2,378,000+

💡 Punitive Damage Ratios

While there is no statutory cap on punitive damages in California, courts consider constitutional due process limits. Generally, ratios of punitive to compensatory damages exceeding 9:1 or 10:1 may raise concerns, though higher ratios are permitted when compensatory damages are low or conduct is particularly egregious.

✅ Evidence Checklist

Gather these documents before sending your demand letter. Click to check off items as you collect them.

📄 Policy Documents

  • ✓ Complete insurance policy (declarations page, all endorsements)
  • ✓ Policy renewal notices and amendments
  • ✓ Premium payment records

📩 Claims Communications

  • ✓ Initial claim report / notice of loss
  • ✓ All correspondence with the insurer (letters, emails)
  • ✓ Denial letter with stated reasons
  • ✓ Phone call logs and summaries
  • ✓ Reservation of rights letters

🔍 Investigation Records

  • ✓ Adjuster reports and notes (request via discovery)
  • ✓ Independent medical exams (IME) or expert reports
  • ✓ Recorded statements you provided
  • ✓ Photos, videos, damage assessments

💰 Damages Documentation

  • ✓ Proof of loss forms submitted
  • ✓ Repair estimates and contractor bids
  • ✓ Medical bills and records (health/disability claims)
  • ✓ Lost income documentation
  • ✓ Receipts for additional living expenses

📈 Consequential Losses

  • ✓ Credit reports showing damage
  • ✓ Foreclosure or eviction notices
  • ✓ Medical records for emotional distress
  • ✓ Business financial records (lost profits)

📖 Bad Faith Evidence

  • ✓ Claims handling guidelines (request in litigation)
  • ✓ Evidence of insurer ignoring your evidence
  • ✓ Timeline showing delays
  • ✓ Prior complaints or regulatory actions against insurer

🔒 Request Your Claim File

Under California law, you are entitled to a copy of your claim file. Send a written request to your insurer demanding all documents related to your claim. The file may contain internal notes, adjuster evaluations, and communications that reveal bad faith conduct.

📝 Sample Language

Copy and customize these paragraphs for your California bad faith demand letter.

Opening Paragraph
I am writing to formally demand payment for the bad faith handling of my insurance claim under Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER]. As detailed below, [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME] has breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing as established by the California Supreme Court in Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 566, and has violated the standards set forth in California Insurance Code Section 790.03.
Policy and Claim Background
On [POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE], I obtained a [TYPE OF POLICY] insurance policy from [INSURANCE COMPANY], Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER]. I have paid all premiums and fully complied with all policy conditions. On [DATE OF LOSS], I suffered a covered loss when [DESCRIBE THE LOSS]. I timely reported this claim on [DATE OF CLAIM], Claim No. [CLAIM NUMBER].
Bad Faith Conduct Description
Despite the clear coverage provided by my policy, your company has engaged in bad faith claims handling by: (1) [DESCRIBE SPECIFIC BAD FAITH CONDUCT - e.g., denying my claim without conducting a proper investigation]; (2) [DESCRIBE SECOND ACT - e.g., failing to respond to my inquiries for over 60 days]; and (3) [DESCRIBE THIRD ACT - e.g., misrepresenting the policy coverage to justify the denial]. This conduct violates California Insurance Code Section 790.03(h), which prohibits unfair claims settlement practices.
Legal Basis - California Law
Under California law, an insurer owes a duty of good faith and fair dealing to its insured. Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 566. This duty requires the insurer to give at least as much consideration to the interests of the insured as it gives to its own interests. Your company's conduct in handling my claim demonstrates an unreasonable failure to properly investigate, evaluate, and pay my valid claim. This conduct constitutes actionable bad faith under California law and entitles me to recover not only my policy benefits, but also consequential damages, emotional distress damages, Brandt attorney fees pursuant to Brandt v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 813, and punitive damages pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3294.
Damages Demand
I hereby demand payment of the following amounts within [30 DAYS] of the date of this letter:

1. Withheld policy benefits: $[AMOUNT]
2. Prejudgment interest at 10% per annum: $[AMOUNT]
3. Consequential damages: $[AMOUNT]
4. Emotional distress damages: $[AMOUNT]
5. Attorney fees incurred to date: $[AMOUNT]

TOTAL DEMAND: $[TOTAL]

This demand does not include punitive damages, which I reserve the right to pursue if this matter proceeds to litigation. Given the willful nature of your company's conduct, punitive damages could be substantial.
Deadline and Consequences
If I do not receive full payment of the above amount by [DEADLINE DATE], I will have no choice but to file a lawsuit in the California Superior Court for breach of contract and insurance bad faith. In addition to the damages described above, I will seek punitive damages pursuant to Civil Code Section 3294, recovery of all Brandt fees incurred through trial, and any other relief to which I may be entitled. Your company will also be liable for all court costs and post-judgment interest.

I urge you to resolve this matter promptly and avoid unnecessary litigation. Please direct all further communications to [YOUR NAME OR ATTORNEY NAME AND ADDRESS].
Insurance Department Complaint Reference
Please be advised that I am also filing a complaint with the California Department of Insurance regarding your company's unfair claims settlement practices. The Department has authority under Insurance Code Sections 790-790.10 to investigate and take action against insurers who engage in the conduct described in this letter. A copy of this demand will be included with my complaint.

🚀 Next Steps

What to do after sending your demand letter.

Expected Timeline

Days 1-14

Insurer receives and reviews your demand letter with legal counsel

Days 14-30

Response with payment, settlement offer, or denial of bad faith claims

Days 30+

If no response, prepare to file complaint and lawsuit

If They Don't Pay or Respond

  1. Consult an Insurance Bad Faith Attorney

    Many California bad faith attorneys offer free consultations and take cases on contingency. Given the potential for Brandt fees, punitive damages, and significant compensatory damages, strong cases are attractive to plaintiffs' attorneys.

  2. File a Complaint with the California Department of Insurance

    Visit insurance.ca.gov to file a complaint online. The Department investigates unfair practices and may take action against the insurer. While this does not replace a lawsuit, it creates a regulatory record.

  3. File a Lawsuit in California Superior Court

    Bad faith cases are filed in the Superior Court of the county where you reside or where the loss occurred. Most cases are unlimited civil (over $25,000). You can pursue both contract claims (policy benefits) and tort claims (bad faith damages).

  4. Consider Mediation

    Many insurance disputes settle in mediation. A skilled mediator can help bridge the gap between the parties. Some policies require mediation or arbitration before litigation.

⚠ Watch the Statute of Limitations

  • Contract claims: 4 years from breach (CCP 337)
  • Tort claims (bad faith): 2 years from wrongful act (CCP 339)

The 2-year tort limitation applies to your bad faith damages claims. Do not delay in taking action to preserve all your rights.

Need Legal Help?

Insurance bad faith cases can be complex and require expertise. Get a 30-minute strategy call with an insurance attorney to evaluate your case and discuss next steps.

Book Consultation - $125

California Resources