Evidence Checklist: What You Should Gather Before Sending a Demand Letter

A demand letter is only as strong as the evidence supporting it. You can write the most legally sophisticated letter citing every relevant statute and case, but if you cannot back up your claims with documentation, the recipient will likely ignore it. Conversely, a straightforward demand letter supported by clear, organized evidence often resolves disputes quickly because the other side recognizes they are dealing with someone who has their facts in order and is prepared to escalate if necessary.

This guide explains what evidence to gather before sending a demand letter, why each category matters from both a practical and legal perspective, and how to organize and preserve documentation so that it remains useful whether your dispute settles through negotiation or eventually requires litigation. The principles apply across dispute types, from consumer refund demands to contractor payment disputes to small business collection letters.

Why Evidence Gathering Matters Before You Write

Many people approach demand letters as primarily persuasive documents, focusing on crafting compelling language and strong legal arguments. While those elements matter, the most effective demand letters are built on a foundation of solid documentation that transforms the letter from rhetoric into a preview of what a judge or jury will see if the matter proceeds to litigation.

The evidence file you assemble serves multiple strategic purposes. First, it forces you to honestly assess the strength of your case before committing to a position in writing. If you struggle to find documentation supporting a key claim, that claim may need to be modified or abandoned. Second, attaching or specifically referencing evidence in the demand letter signals to the recipient that you are serious and prepared, not just making vague threats. Third, organized documentation streamlines any subsequent litigation or arbitration by ensuring you can quickly locate and produce what you need.

From an evidentiary standpoint, the documents and other materials you gather now will eventually need to satisfy various rules of evidence if your case goes to trial. Understanding these rules in advance helps you collect evidence in ways that make it admissible and persuasive later. The Federal Rules of Evidence and their state equivalents impose requirements around relevance, authentication, hearsay exceptions, and best evidence that sound technical but boil down to common sense: evidence must be genuinely connected to the issues in dispute, you must be able to prove it is what you say it is, and you need the actual document or a reliable copy rather than someone’s vague recollection.

Even if your dispute will be resolved in small claims court where evidentiary rules are relaxed, judges still heavily rely on documents over oral testimony. A small claims judge hearing twenty cases in a morning wants to see clean copies of the contract, the invoice, the text messages, and the photos. Litigants who show up with organized evidence in labeled folders or binders have a significant advantage over those who try to explain everything verbally or shuffle through disorganized papers.

Contracts, Terms of Service, and Policy Documents

The starting point for nearly any demand letter is the agreement that governs the relationship between the parties. This might be a formal written contract signed by both sides, an online terms of service agreement accepted through a click-wrap interface, an unsigned proposal or quote that both parties treated as binding, or even an oral agreement that you can corroborate through emails and conduct.

Written Contracts and Formal Agreements

For traditional written contracts, obtain the fully executed version showing signatures from all parties. If the contract was signed electronically, save a PDF showing the signature pages with any electronic signature metadata or confirmation emails from DocuSign, Adobe Sign, or similar platforms. Do not rely on draft versions or unsigned copies unless you can demonstrate that the parties proceeded as if those terms were binding.

Pay attention to amendments, addenda, change orders, and side letters that modified the original agreement. A common mistake is citing the original contract terms when subsequent written modifications changed the relevant provisions. If your dispute involves ongoing services or a long-term relationship, compile a chronological set of all written agreements starting with the master agreement and including every amendment or work order.

Ancillary documents that may be part of the contractual relationship include statements of work, project scopes, detailed specifications, rate sheets, delivery schedules, and acceptance criteria. Even if these are not technically part of the “contract,” they often define the specific obligations at issue in a dispute and should be treated as core documentation.

Online Terms of Service and Click-Wrap Agreements

Disputes involving online platforms, software as a service, e-commerce purchases, and digital marketplaces frequently turn on terms of service that users accepted electronically. Courts have developed detailed standards for when these online contracts are enforceable, focusing heavily on whether users had adequate notice of the terms and meaningful opportunity to review them before accepting.

If your dispute involves an online agreement, capture evidence of the acceptance process itself. Take screenshots showing the signup flow, where the terms of service link appeared, what language was used to indicate acceptance, and whether users could complete signup without affirmatively clicking an “I agree” button. If possible, use your browser’s “print to PDF” function to preserve the webpage with URL and date visible, which is generally more trustworthy than screenshots that could theoretically be manipulated.

The terms of service as they existed at the time you entered the agreement are what matter. Companies frequently update their terms, and the current version on the website may differ from what applied when you signed up or made your purchase. For this reason, capturing historical versions is critical. The Wayback Machine at archive.org often preserves snapshots of websites including terms of service pages, and you can search by URL and date to find the version that was published when your relationship began. While Wayback Machine captures are not always admissible in court without proper foundation, they serve as excellent starting points for identifying the relevant terms and can sometimes be authenticated through expert testimony about how the service works.

Platform policies beyond the main terms of service may also be relevant. If your dispute involves a payment processor like Stripe or PayPal, their acceptable use policies, seller agreements, and buyer protection policies all potentially apply. For marketplace platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, Etsy, or Amazon, review the platform rules about refunds, chargebacks, dispute resolution, and account termination. These policies often contain specific procedures you must follow or timeframes for asserting claims.

Why Contract Documentation Matters Legally

From an evidentiary perspective, contracts fall under the best evidence rule, which requires that to prove the contents of a writing, you must produce the original or a reliable duplicate unless the original is lost or destroyed through no fault of your own. In modern practice, clean copies are generally acceptable and electronic versions are treated as originals, but you want the most complete and cleanest copy available.

The parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing evidence of prior negotiations or contemporaneous oral agreements to contradict the terms of a fully integrated written contract. However, this rule has important exceptions. Evidence outside the four corners of the contract remains admissible to prove fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, ambiguity in contract terms, subsequent modification, or whether the written document was intended to be a complete integration of the agreement. For this reason, you should preserve pre-contract communications even when you have a formal written agreement, as they may become relevant to explain what the parties understood certain terms to mean or to prove misrepresentation.

Invoices, Receipts, Payment Records, and Financial Documentation

Your damages calculation depends on clear records of what was paid, what was owed, and what remains in dispute. Financial documentation transforms a dispute from “they did something wrong” to “they did something wrong and I can prove exactly how much it cost me.”

Basic Payment Documentation

Start with invoices showing the date, invoice number, description of goods or services, quantity, unit price, subtotal, applicable taxes, and total amount due. If you are the party who issued invoices, provide copies showing when they were sent and any payment terms such as net 30 days. If you are challenging invoices you received, obtain copies showing what you were billed and compare them against what you agreed to pay under the contract.

Receipts and payment confirmations prove that payment actually occurred. For online payments, save confirmation emails from payment processors showing the transaction ID, date, amount, and parties involved. Download transaction details from your Stripe, PayPal, Venmo, or other payment account showing the complete payment history. For credit card or bank payments, obtain statements showing the charge with the merchant name and date clearly visible.

If partial payments, credits, refunds, or chargebacks occurred, document each adjustment with supporting records. Payment disputes often involve disagreements about what has already been paid or credited, and having a clear accounting prevents the other side from claiming you still owe amounts you have already satisfied.

Ongoing Relationship Records

For disputes arising from ongoing business relationships rather than one-time transactions, more detailed financial records may be necessary. Account statements showing running balances, aging reports categorizing invoices by how long they have been outstanding, and ledgers tracking debits and credits all help establish the complete financial picture.

If the dispute involves billable hours, provide timesheets or time tracking records supporting the invoiced amounts. If you are challenging another party’s time billing, compare their invoices to any contemporaneous status updates, project management records, or deliverables that suggest the claimed hours are inflated or unsupported.

For construction, contracting, or professional services disputes, document progress payments, retention amounts held pending completion, and final payment reconciliation. These disputes often involve complex payment schedules tied to milestones, and you need to show which milestones were achieved and what payments were triggered.

Business Records Exception to Hearsay

While the evidentiary technicalities may seem removed from the practical work of gathering evidence, understanding one key rule helps explain why organized financial records are so powerful in litigation. Under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, documents created in the regular course of business and kept in the normal course of operations can be admitted as evidence even though they are technically out-of-court statements being offered to prove the truth of their contents.

This exception exists because courts recognize that businesses create invoices, receipts, and account statements not to prepare for litigation but because they need accurate records to operate. The reliability comes from the routine nature of the record-keeping. When you maintain organized financial records and document payments and billing systematically, you are not only helping yourself track the business relationship but also creating records that will be readily admissible if you end up in court.

Emails, Text Messages, Direct Messages, and Chat Transcripts

Modern disputes live or die on electronic communications. Emails and text messages often contain the most direct evidence of what the parties agreed to, what promises were made, what complaints were raised, and how each side responded. In many cases, a clear email thread makes the difference between winning and losing.

Email Documentation

For emails related to your dispute, preserve complete threads rather than individual messages taken out of context. Include headers showing the from address, to address, date and time, and subject line. Do not rely solely on screenshots of email body text, as those lack headers and can be dismissed as incomplete or potentially altered.

Modern email systems make it easy to export messages as PDF or EML files that preserve all metadata. If you need to submit emails as evidence, providing clean PDFs of complete threads is far more credible than forwarding messages or showing screenshots. For Gmail, you can use the print function and select “save as PDF” to create a complete record of a thread. For Outlook, you can save individual messages as MSG files or print to PDF.

Pay attention to emails that document key moments in the relationship such as the initial agreement or proposal, change orders or modifications to scope, complaints about performance or quality, promises about remedies or refunds, and final demands or ultimatums before the relationship broke down. These emails form the narrative spine of your demand letter and eventual case.

Text Messages and SMS Evidence

Text messages present particular challenges because they exist on mobile devices rather than in easily exported formats. The worst approach is taking photos of your phone screen showing individual messages, which look unprofessional and raise questions about what messages were left out. Instead, use your phone’s built-in features or third-party apps to export message threads in formats that preserve the complete conversation with timestamps.

For iPhones, you can use the built-in export feature or third-party apps like TouchCopy or iMazing to create PDF exports of message threads showing all messages, times, and phone numbers. For Android, apps like SMS Backup & Restore can export messages as XML or PDF files. The goal is to produce a document that shows the complete back-and-forth rather than selected messages that favor your position.

When presenting text message evidence, make clear whose phone number is whose. If the messages include group texts or conversations with multiple people, identify all participants. Text messages often use informal language, abbreviations, and emoji that can be ambiguous out of context, so be prepared to explain what certain messages mean if their significance is not obvious.

Platform-Based Messages and Support Chats

Many business relationships occur entirely through platform messaging systems such as Upwork messages, Etsy conversations, eBay messages, or in-app support chats with companies like Stripe, PayPal, or Amazon. These messages are often as important as email but exist only within the platform.

Most platforms allow you to download or export message history. Look for settings or account options that let you export conversations as PDF or download message data. If no export function exists, methodically screenshot the entire conversation ensuring that timestamps, usernames, and all messages are visible. Use scrolling screenshots if your phone supports them to capture long conversations without dozens of individual images.

For customer support interactions through live chat, email the transcript to yourself immediately after the conversation ends. Many support systems offer this option automatically. Support chat transcripts are particularly valuable when your dispute involves how the company responded to your complaints or what promises their representatives made about refunds, repairs, or resolution.

Legal Standards for Electronic Communications

Courts routinely admit emails, texts, and other electronic messages when properly authenticated. Authentication means showing that the evidence is what you claim it is, which for electronic communications typically requires testimony that these are the messages you exchanged with the other party, that you recognize the phone numbers or email addresses, and that the messages accurately reflect what was sent and received.

The authentication burden is not high, but it exists. Keep records that help you authenticate messages later. Note the phone numbers or email addresses involved, save any profile information or screenshots that connect usernames to real people, and preserve messages that reference facts only the actual parties would know. If a message includes references to specific details of your transaction, dates that match up with other evidence, or facts that were not publicly known, those details help prove the message is genuine.

One critical point about electronic evidence is spoliation, meaning destruction or alteration of evidence. Once a dispute is reasonably anticipated, you have an obligation to preserve relevant evidence. Deliberately deleting text messages, clearing chat history, factory resetting devices, or allowing messages to be automatically deleted can lead to serious consequences in litigation including adverse inferences, evidentiary sanctions, or even dismissal of claims. The practical rule is simple: once a dispute becomes serious enough that you are considering a demand letter, stop deleting anything related to the matter and back up all electronic communications.

Screenshots and Screen Recordings

Much of modern commerce occurs through websites, mobile apps, and online platforms where relevant evidence exists as digital interfaces rather than traditional documents. Screenshots and screen recordings capture this ephemeral evidence before it changes or disappears.

What to Screenshot

Take screenshots of product pages, service descriptions, and pricing information as they appeared when you made your purchase or entered the agreement. Companies frequently update their websites, and the specific claims, specifications, or terms visible when you bought may differ from what appears later. If your dispute involves whether a product met advertised specifications or whether you received what was promised, screenshots of the original listing are essential.

Capture any online advertisements, social media posts, or promotional materials that influenced your decision. If you clicked on a Facebook ad promising a specific discount or saw an Instagram post making particular claims about a product, screenshot those ads and posts with dates and URLs visible.

For platform or account status issues, screenshot error messages, suspension notices, payment hold notifications, and any system-generated messages explaining what happened. If you are disputing a Stripe account hold, PayPal limitation, or marketplace suspension, the platform’s own explanation of why they took action becomes important evidence.

Take screenshots of refund policies, return procedures, and warranty terms as they existed when relevant to your transaction. Companies sometimes change policies to become more restrictive, and proving what the policy said when you purchased can be critical to a refund demand.

Screen Recordings for Complex Interactions

For issues that cannot be adequately captured in static screenshots, screen recordings show the full context. Use screen recording to document how a defect manifests in software or an app, how a website’s checkout flow worked and what disclosures were or were not shown, or navigation through a platform’s settings and options to prove that a certain feature does or does not exist.

Most computers and phones now have built-in screen recording functionality. On Mac, Command-Shift-5 opens screen recording controls. On Windows, Windows Key-G opens the Game Bar which includes screen recording. iPhones include screen recording in the Control Center, and Android devices generally have built-in or easily downloadable screen recording apps.

When creating screen recordings, narrate what you are doing to make the recording self-explanatory. Show the date and time on screen, include the URL in the browser’s address bar for web-based recordings, and use scrolling or navigation to demonstrate that you are showing the complete and unedited interface.

Preservation and Authentication

The legal challenge with screenshots is authentication, meaning proving that they are genuine rather than fabricated or altered. To strengthen authenticity, take screenshots using your device’s native screenshot function rather than cropping images in photo editing software, which creates metadata suggesting manipulation. Include the full browser window showing the URL, date, and time rather than cropping tightly to just the relevant text or image.

For web pages, use the print-to-PDF function to create a more formal record. Most browsers allow you to print a page and select “save as PDF,” which creates a document that includes the URL and date in the header or footer. Courts tend to view PDF captures as more reliable than screenshots.

Consider using timestamping services or browser extensions designed for capturing web evidence if you anticipate the authenticity of your screenshots will be challenged. While these add complexity, they can be worthwhile for high-value disputes or situations where the other side is likely to claim your screenshots are fake.

Call Logs, Voicemail, and Call Notes

Despite the prevalence of written digital communication, important discussions often still happen by phone. While phone conversations lack the self-documenting nature of emails and texts, you can create records that corroborate your version of what was said and demonstrate your attempts to resolve the dispute.

Phone Call Records

Your phone’s call log shows outgoing and incoming calls with phone numbers, dates, times, and durations. This information proves that calls occurred and can corroborate your account of trying repeatedly to reach someone or receiving multiple calls from a debt collector. Most phones allow you to export or screenshot call history. Make sure the phone numbers are clearly visible so they can be matched to the other party.

For business lines or VoIP systems like Google Voice, download call logs showing your complete call history during the relevant time period. These logs are often more detailed than cell phone records and may include additional metadata like caller ID names and call disposition.

Voicemail Messages

If the other party left voicemail messages that are relevant to your dispute, preserve those recordings. Voicemail systems often automatically delete messages after a period of time, so take action to save important messages before they are purged. Most phones allow you to export or share voicemail recordings as audio files. For business phone systems, work with your IT department or phone service provider to retrieve and preserve specific voicemail messages.

Voicemail messages from debt collectors are particularly important to preserve as they may contain FDCPA violations such as failing to identify themselves, threatening illegal actions, or calling at inappropriate times. Similarly, voicemails from contractors, service providers, or customers may contain admissions, promises, or threats relevant to your dispute.

Call Recordings: Know Your State’s Law

Some people want to record their phone conversations for evidentiary purposes. Whether you can legally do so depends on state law. States are divided between one-party consent and two-party consent jurisdictions. In one-party consent states, you can record a conversation as long as you are a party to it, without informing the other person. In two-party consent states like California, all parties to a confidential communication must consent to the recording.

California’s law is particularly strict. California Penal Code Section 632 makes it a crime to record confidential communications without the consent of all parties. Confidential generally means a conversation where participants have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Using a recording made in violation of Section 632 can result not only in criminal liability but also civil liability and exclusion of the recording from evidence.

If you are in a one-party consent state and choose to record calls, inform the other party at the beginning of the call that you are recording. While not legally required in those states, providing notice is professional and prevents disputes about whether the recording was lawful. For business calls, you can follow the practice of customer service lines by stating at the outset “This call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes.”

If you cannot or choose not to record calls, the next best practice is to take contemporaneous notes during or immediately after the call and then send a follow-up email or text summarizing what was discussed. For example: “Thanks for our call today. To confirm, you agreed to provide a refund of $500 by Friday, and you will email me the confirmation by end of day tomorrow. Please let me know if I misunderstood anything.” If the other party does not correct your summary, their silence can support that your account is accurate.

Why Call Evidence Matters

While call records and notes are less definitive than written communications, they serve important corroborative functions. Call logs prove you made reasonable attempts to resolve the dispute before sending a demand letter, which strengthens your position as someone who tried to work things out informally. Detailed contemporaneous notes demonstrate that you kept records systematically and did not fabricate your account after the fact to suit litigation needs.

In small claims court and other informal proceedings, judges understand that not every conversation happens in writing. If you can show a pattern of calls at times that match your account of the dispute, combined with written notes taken immediately after calls, many judges will find that evidence persuasive even without recordings.

Photos, Videos, and Physical Evidence

For disputes involving defective products, property damage, construction defects, personal injury, or any situation where the physical condition of something is at issue, photographic and video evidence becomes critical.

What to Photograph

Take clear, well-lit photos of the defective product, damaged property, incomplete work, or injury from multiple angles. Include close-up shots showing specific defects and wider shots showing context and scale. If the item has serial numbers, model numbers, labels, or identifying marks, photograph those details clearly.

For products, photograph the item in its packaging if possible, especially if packaging contains lot numbers, batch codes, expiration dates, or manufacturing information that might become relevant to identifying whether your item was part of a recalled batch or defective production run.

Document the progression of damage or defects over time if applicable. For construction defects or property damage that worsened over time, take photos when you first notice the problem and then additional photos as conditions change. Timestamps on photos help establish this progression.

If your dispute involves work that was supposed to be performed, take before and after photos. For home repairs, photograph the condition before work began, during the work if you have access, and after the contractor claims the work is complete. These photos make it much harder for the other side to claim they left things in good condition or completed work that is obviously unfinished.

Video Documentation

Video is particularly effective for showing how a defect manifests in use. A video of a car making strange noises, a appliance failing to function properly, or a ceiling leak actively dripping can be far more persuasive than describing the problem in words. Keep videos short and focused, narrating what you are showing to make the evidence self-explanatory.

For property and construction disputes, walk-through videos document the overall condition of a space in ways that photos cannot fully capture. Slowly pan through rooms showing the scope of work that was or was not performed, pointing out specific problems as you go.

Preserving Physical Evidence

Whenever possible, retain the actual item that is the subject of the dispute. For defective products, keep the entire item including all parts, packaging, instructions, and receipts. Do not attempt repairs that will alter or destroy the defect before documenting it thoroughly and, if the dispute value warrants it, having an expert inspect the item.

For disputes involving vehicles, contractors replacing components, or medical devices, ask to keep the old parts or have them available for inspection. A mechanic who replaces your brake pads but will not show you the old pads may be performing unnecessary work. Similarly, contractors removing and replacing building components should be willing to show you what they removed and explain why replacement was necessary.

The concept of chain of custody, while mainly relevant in criminal cases, has civil applications when physical evidence is central to a dispute. If you need to ship an item for inspection or repair, document its condition before shipping with photos, use trackable shipping methods, and obtain receipt documentation from whoever receives it. This creates a record proving that any subsequent damage or alteration did not occur while in your possession.

Metadata and Authentication

Digital photos and videos contain metadata including the date and time the photo was taken, the device used, GPS coordinates if location services were enabled, and in some cases the specific settings used to capture the image. This metadata helps authenticate that photos are genuine and were taken when you claim they were. Avoid editing photos beyond basic cropping and brightness adjustments, as editing creates metadata suggesting manipulation.

When preparing photos for use in a demand letter or litigation, organize them clearly with descriptive file names and consider creating a simple photo log: Photo 1, Item 14 damage to front panel, taken June 15, 2024 with iPhone 12. This type of documentation shows attention to detail and makes it easy for judges or arbitrators to reference specific photos.

Third-Party Records and Expert Evaluations

Breaking out of the “he said, she said” dynamic often requires bringing in independent third-party records or professional opinions that corroborate your version of events and the scope of damages.

Independent Professional Assessments

When disputing defective work or products, obtain evaluations from independent professionals in the relevant field. A mechanic disputing an auto repair shop’s work should get a second opinion from another mechanic who can document what was done wrong and what is needed to correct it. A homeowner disputing a contractor’s work should hire a different contractor or inspector to assess the quality and provide an estimate for corrections.

These independent assessments serve multiple purposes. They provide objective evidence that your complaint has merit beyond your subjective dissatisfaction. They quantify damages by estimating the cost to repair or replace. They may identify problems you were not aware of, strengthening your case. And they demonstrate that you took reasonable steps to understand the full scope of the problem before making demands.

For medical and cosmetic treatment disputes, obtain records from subsequent treating physicians who can document injuries, complications, or substandard results. A patient disputing a med spa’s laser treatment should see a dermatologist who can examine the injuries, document them with medical photography, and provide an opinion about causation and necessary treatment. These medical records become foundational evidence in any demand letter or subsequent claim.

Manufacturer and Warranty Service Records

For product defects, gather any service records from manufacturer warranty programs or authorized service centers. If you brought a vehicle in for warranty repairs multiple times for the same issue, those service records establish a pattern of defects critical to lemon law claims. If you reported a product defect to the manufacturer and they attempted repairs that failed, their own service records corroborate your account.

Many manufacturers maintain databases of service records tied to serial numbers or VIN numbers. Request complete service history for your specific unit, which may reveal that similar defects were reported by other customers or that your item was subject to technical service bulletins or recall campaigns.

Regulatory and Recall Information

Public information about recalls, warnings, enforcement actions, and safety reports can significantly strengthen demand letters when relevant to your specific situation. If your product is subject to a Consumer Product Safety Commission recall, a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration defect investigation, or an FDA warning, obtain and attach the official notice or report. These documents from regulatory agencies carry significant weight and show that your complaint is not isolated.

The CPSC maintains SaferProducts.gov where consumers can search for recalls and safety reports on specific products. NHTSA maintains a database of vehicle recalls, investigations, and consumer complaints searchable by VIN or make and model. For medical devices, the FDA maintains databases of recalls and adverse event reports. Spending time searching these databases before writing your demand letter can uncover powerful supporting evidence.

Why Third-Party Evidence Is Powerful

Courts and judges give significant weight to disinterested third-party evidence because it lacks the bias inherent in evidence created by the parties to the dispute. When an independent mechanic who has never met either party examines a vehicle and concludes that prior repairs were performed negligently, that opinion is far more credible than the customer’s complaint or the original mechanic’s denial.

From a settlement perspective, independent expert evaluations also change the dynamics of negotiation. The other side can more easily dismiss your personal opinion that work was defective, but they must take seriously a licensed professional’s written opinion that identifies specific deficiencies and quantifies correction costs. Many disputes settle once one party presents a credible independent evaluation because the other side recognizes the challenge they will face defending against expert testimony.

Regulatory Complaints and Agency Records

If you have already filed complaints with government agencies, consumer protection organizations, or industry regulators before sending your demand letter, those filings and any responses become part of your evidence file.

Types of Regulatory Complaints

Depending on the nature of your dispute, relevant regulatory or complaint channels might include Better Business Bureau complaints and responses, state attorney general consumer complaint filings, specialized licensing board complaints against professionals or contractors, financial services complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or state financial regulators, auto repair complaints with state bureaus of automotive repair, and complaints to agencies like the FTC, CPSC, or industry-specific regulators.

When you file these complaints, you typically receive a case number or reference number and eventually a response or closure letter. Keep copies of all complaint filings, reference numbers, and responses. These documents prove that you exhausted informal resolution attempts and escalated through proper channels before resorting to legal demands.

How to Reference Regulatory Complaints in Demand Letters

Mentioning that you have filed or will file regulatory complaints can add pressure to a demand letter, but you must be careful about how you frame this. The appropriate approach is to state factually what you have done and what you may do as part of pursuing your remedies, not as a conditional threat tied to whether they meet your demands.

Acceptable language includes stating that you have filed a complaint with a specific agency and reference number, explaining that you are simultaneously pursuing remedies through agency complaints and civil demand, or noting that if the matter is not resolved, you will escalate to formal complaints with relevant regulators. What to avoid is language that suggests you will file or withdraw complaints based on whether they pay you, which can be characterized as extortion or blackmail especially in California following cases interpreting threats of regulatory action.

The distinction is between saying “I have filed a CFPB complaint and will pursue all available remedies including this demand” versus “Pay me and I will withdraw my CFPB complaint.” The first is proper advocacy. The second creates unnecessary legal risk.

Public Enforcement Actions and Recall Data

Beyond your own complaints, publicly available information about enforcement actions, recalls, and regulatory investigations involving the other party can strengthen your position. If you are disputing a product defect and the manufacturer has been subject to CPSC enforcement action for the same issue, that public record is fair game to include in your demand letter. Similarly, if you are disputing practices by a financial services provider and the CFPB has taken public action against them for similar practices, that information provides context for your claims.

These public records are searchable through agency websites and databases. The advantage of citing public enforcement actions is that you are not making unproven accusations; you are pointing to adjudicated or officially documented problems that lend credibility to your specific complaint.

Evidence Preservation and Spoliation Considerations

Once you anticipate a dispute may lead to litigation, you have a legal obligation to preserve relevant evidence. Understanding preservation obligations helps you avoid costly mistakes that could undermine your case or even result in sanctions.

When Does the Duty to Preserve Begin

The duty to preserve evidence generally arises when litigation is reasonably anticipated. This does not require that a lawsuit has been filed, only that based on the circumstances, a reasonable person would understand that a claim is likely. Sending or receiving a demand letter clearly triggers preservation obligations, as demand letters explicitly threaten litigation if demands are not met.

Some situations create preservation duties even earlier. If you are in a contract requiring binding arbitration, the duty may arise when you notify the other party of a dispute under the contract’s dispute resolution procedures. For personal injury cases, the duty begins when the injury occurs and the potential for a claim becomes apparent. For employment disputes, the duty may begin when an employee is placed on a performance improvement plan or when they engage in protected activity like whistleblowing.

What Must Be Preserved

The scope of preservation covers all potentially relevant evidence, not just documents that support your position. This includes contracts and written agreements, emails and electronic communications on all platforms and devices used for business purposes, text messages and chat logs, financial records and invoices, photos and videos, physical items that are the subject of the dispute, and computer files and electronic data that might be relevant.

The obligation extends to electronic information that you might not think of as “documents.” Metadata showing when files were created, edited, or accessed can be important evidence. Web browsing history might show when you researched certain information. Calendar entries and task lists might corroborate your timeline. For businesses, preservation includes backing up relevant server data, email archives, and databases.

Avoiding Spoliation

Spoliation means destruction, alteration, or failure to preserve evidence that is relevant to anticipated litigation. Courts take spoliation seriously because it undermines the judicial process and prevents the other side from accessing evidence they are entitled to discover. Sanctions for spoliation can range from adverse inference instructions, meaning the jury is told to assume that destroyed evidence was unfavorable to the party who destroyed it, to monetary sanctions, exclusion of certain evidence or witnesses, or in extreme cases dismissal of claims or entry of default judgment.

Practical steps to avoid spoliation problems include suspending any automatic deletion policies for emails, messages, or files once a dispute arises; backing up devices containing relevant data before routine upgrades or replacements; instructing employees or family members who have relevant information not to delete or alter anything; maintaining physical evidence in secure storage rather than discarding items or allowing them to deteriorate; and documenting any unavoidable changes to evidence, such as emergency repairs needed for safety reasons.

If you must make repairs or alterations to items that are the subject of the dispute before litigation concludes, document the condition thoroughly before making changes. Take extensive photos and videos, obtain independent inspections, and keep any parts or components that are removed. If practical, notify the other side before making irreversible changes so they have an opportunity to inspect the evidence in its original condition.

Special Considerations for Electronic Evidence

Electronic information requires special attention because it can be altered or deleted easily and often without obvious traces. Text messages can be deleted from phones but may still exist in carrier records. Emails can be deleted from inboxes but may remain on servers. Social media posts can be deleted but may survive in caches or screenshots others captured.

The worst thing you can do once a dispute arises is to start deleting messages, resetting devices, or clearing history because you are worried about what the other side might find. Courts view such conduct as consciousness of guilt and spoliation sanctions often follow. The better approach is to preserve everything and work with your attorney to determine what must be produced in discovery and how to protect privileged or irrelevant information through proper legal procedures.

For businesses, implementing a litigation hold is the formal process of suspending normal document retention policies and instructing employees to preserve all potentially relevant information once litigation is anticipated. While this may seem like overkill for small disputes, the principle applies at any scale: once serious conflict arises, stop the normal process of deleting old files and messages, and affirmatively preserve anything that might matter.

Organizing Your Evidence File

Having all the right evidence does not help if you cannot find it when needed or if it exists in such disorganized form that you cannot effectively present it. Taking time to organize your evidence before writing the demand letter pays dividends throughout the dispute resolution process.

Creating a Logical Structure

Organize evidence chronologically when the timeline matters, or topically when different types of claims or issues are involved. For most disputes, a combination works well: organize materials into categories such as contracts and agreements, payment records, communications, photographs and videos, expert reports, and regulatory filings, then arrange items within each category chronologically.

Use clear, descriptive file names for electronic documents. Instead of IMG_4387.jpg, rename the file to “2024-06-15_Defect_Front_Panel.jpg” so that you can identify what each file shows without opening it. For PDFs of documents, include the document type and date in the filename: “Contract_Signed_2024-03-10.pdf” or “Invoice_0045_2024-05-22.pdf.”

Creating an Evidence Index

For any dispute significant enough to warrant a demand letter, consider creating a simple evidence index or log that lists each piece of evidence with a brief description and where it can be found. This index serves as your table of contents and makes it easy to locate specific items quickly when drafting the demand letter, responding to questions, or preparing for litigation.

A basic evidence index might include columns for item number, description, date, type of evidence, and file location or physical storage location. You can maintain this in a simple spreadsheet or even a word processing document. The goal is to create a single place where you can see everything you have and locate it easily.

Making Copies and Backups

Never send original documents in a demand letter or produce them in discovery without keeping copies. For physical documents, scan them to create digital backups before mailing originals. For electronic evidence, maintain copies in multiple locations such as your computer, an external hard drive, and cloud storage. Redundancy protects against hard drive failures, accidental deletion, and technical problems.

When you do send evidence with a demand letter, typically you send copies rather than originals unless specifically requested. The main exceptions are situations where return of physical items is part of your demand, such as returning a defective product while seeking a refund, or contractually required return of confidential materials. Even then, document the condition and contents before sending.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

If I cannot find my copy of the contract, can I still send an effective demand letter?

Not having a copy of the written contract significantly weakens your position but does not necessarily make a demand letter futile. Your first step should be to attempt to obtain a copy from the other party, which they are often willing to provide. You can also check whether you have emails that attach the contract or that reference specific terms, which can help reconstruct the agreement even without the formal document.

If you truly cannot obtain a copy, focus your demand letter on what you can prove through other evidence. Emails discussing the agreement, invoices that reference contract terms, text messages where parties discuss their obligations, and your own conduct showing what you understood the agreement to be can collectively establish the essential terms. Courts recognize that contracts can be proven through the parties’ course of dealing and performance even when the writing itself is unavailable.

The legal standard for proving a contract without the actual document involves showing that an agreement existed, that both parties understood and accepted the essential terms, and that you performed your obligations or were prevented from performing by the other party’s breach. Evidence like payment records showing you paid what was invoiced, communications referencing deadlines and deliverables, and the other party’s conduct treating the arrangement as binding all support the existence and terms of the contract.

That said, a missing contract creates an obvious weakness that the other party will exploit. They may claim different terms than what you remember or deny that certain obligations existed at all. If the dispute value justifies it, you might need to proceed quickly to formal litigation where you can use discovery to compel the other party to produce their copy of the contract. In small claims court, bringing all the circumstantial evidence showing what the agreement was can still be effective, as judges understand that not everyone keeps perfect records and will look at the totality of the evidence to determine what the parties agreed to.

How do I handle a situation where I have text messages showing the other party admitted fault, but they later deleted those messages from their phone?

This is actually a common and advantageous situation for you. The fact that you preserved the messages while they deleted theirs does not make your evidence less credible; if anything, it demonstrates that you maintained records while they attempted to destroy evidence. As long as you can authenticate the messages by testifying that these are the texts you exchanged, showing the phone numbers involved, and explaining how you preserved them, courts will generally admit them.

The other party deleting their copies does not prevent you from using yours. They may try to claim the messages are fabricated, but if you have a complete thread with timestamps, message context that references specific facts only the parties would know, and phone numbers that match the other party’s known number, authentication is straightforward. You are not required to prove that they still have their copies, only that these are genuine messages that were actually exchanged.

If they deny sending the messages or claim they have been altered, you have several responses. Point out that the messages include context and details that would be impossible to fabricate, such as references to specific dates, amounts, or other facts that match documentary evidence. Explain that you preserved the messages using standard phone features or export tools, not by editing or manipulating images. If you exported the messages shortly after they were sent and can show when the export file was created through metadata, that supports their authenticity.

From a spoliation perspective, if they deleted messages after the dispute arose and litigation became foreseeable, their deletion may constitute spoliation of evidence. You can argue that the court should infer the deleted messages would have been harmful to their position, which is why they destroyed them. Depending on the jurisdiction and circumstances, you might seek sanctions or adverse inference instructions against them for destroying relevant evidence.

The practical lesson is that this scenario illustrates why preserving your own communications is so critical. The party who maintains complete records has a significant advantage over one who deletes messages hoping to eliminate inconvenient evidence. Your text messages showing admissions of fault can be powerful evidence regardless of whether they still have their copies.

What should I do if the other party claims my screenshots of their website or social media posts are fake?

Authentication challenges to screenshots are increasingly common as people become more aware that images can be manipulated. The key to defending against these challenges is demonstrating through multiple means that your screenshots are genuine and accurately represent what was actually displayed.

Start with metadata. Screenshots taken using native device screenshot functions contain metadata showing when they were captured and on what device. Avoid cropping or editing screenshots in photo editing software, as that creates new metadata that looks suspicious. If you must highlight or annotate a screenshot to point out specific elements, do so in a way that clearly shows the original underneath your annotations.

Corroborate screenshots with other evidence. If you screenshotted a product page, also print the page to PDF using your browser’s print function, which captures the URL and date. If you screenshotted social media posts, note the direct URL to the post if possible, and check whether the post can be accessed through web archives. If multiple people saw the same content, their independent screenshots or testimony corroborates that your screenshot is accurate.

For website content, the Wayback Machine at archive.org can provide independent verification that content appeared as you claim at a specific date. While Wayback Machine captures are not automatically admissible in court without proper foundation, they serve as powerful corroborating evidence when they confirm what your screenshots show. You can testify that you took the screenshot on a certain date, and the Wayback Machine archive from that date or a nearby date shows identical content.

Consider timestamping services for high-value disputes. Services like Timestamp.io or blockchain-based timestamping create cryptographic proof that a specific file existed at a specific time without alteration. While this adds complexity and cost, it can be worthwhile when you anticipate serious authentication challenges or when the dispute value justifies extra precautions.

If the other party simply denies that their website or posts ever said what your screenshots show, that claim often lacks credibility when you have multiple forms of corroborating evidence. The burden is on them to explain why your screenshots, PDFs, Wayback Machine archives, and possibly other witnesses’ accounts all consistently show the same content if it was never actually there. In practice, defendants who claim screenshots are fake rarely provide credible evidence supporting that claim beyond bare denials.

The strongest defense against authentication challenges is redundancy: capture the same evidence in multiple formats, preserve metadata, obtain corroborating evidence from independent sources, and document when and how you captured each piece of evidence. When you can present not just a screenshot but also a PDF export, a Wayback Machine capture, and testimony from others who saw the same content, claims that the evidence is fabricated become untenable.

Should I wait to gather all possible evidence before sending a demand letter, or send the letter quickly even if my evidence is incomplete?

This depends significantly on your strategic goals and the specific circumstances of the dispute. The advantage of waiting to gather comprehensive evidence is that you can send a demand letter with maximum supporting documentation, which increases credibility and settlement leverage. The disadvantage is that delay can allow the other party to strengthen their position, destroy evidence, dissipate assets, or let time-based defenses like statutes of limitations become concerns.

For most disputes, a middle ground works best. Gather the core evidence that establishes your strongest claims and quantifies your primary damages, then send the demand letter without waiting to obtain every possible piece of supporting documentation. You can continue gathering additional evidence while negotiations occur, and if the matter proceeds to litigation, you will have discovery tools to compel production of evidence you cannot obtain pre-suit.

Core evidence that should typically be gathered before sending a demand letter includes the contract or agreement governing the relationship, key communications showing what each party promised or complained about, payment records proving what you paid or what you are owed, and basic documentation of damages such as photos of defects or invoices for repair costs. If you have these categories covered, you have enough to send a credible demand even if you have not yet obtained everything that might eventually be useful.

Situations where speed matters more than completeness include approaching statutes of limitations where delay could bar your claims, risk that the other party will dissipate assets or close accounts making collection impossible, or perishable evidence such as witnesses who are moving away or physical items deteriorating. In these cases, send the demand letter promptly with whatever evidence you have, noting that you are continuing to gather additional documentation and reserve the right to supplement your claims as new information comes to light.

Conversely, situations where thorough evidence gathering before the demand is critical include complex financial disputes where you need time to fully understand the accounting, cases requiring expert analysis to establish causation or damages, or disputes where you suspect the other party has evidence that will be difficult to obtain, making it important to lock in your strongest position before they can craft responses. In particularly complex cases, consulting with an attorney before sending the demand letter can help you identify what evidence is truly necessary versus merely helpful.

The danger of sending a premature demand letter with weak evidence is that you make claims you cannot adequately support, which damages credibility and may allow the other side to dismiss your demands as baseless. But the danger of excessive delay is that you miss opportunities for quick resolution, allow the dispute to escalate unnecessarily, or give the other side time to build defenses or destroy evidence. Finding the right balance requires assessing both the strength of what you currently have and the risks of waiting longer.