Guide to Foreign Asset Protection Trusts

Published: June 15, 2023 • Incorporation

Foreign Asset Protection Trusts Guide | Offshore Trusts Explained

Foreign Asset Protection Trusts
Complete Guide for High-Net-Worth Individuals

A comprehensive attorney-level resource covering offshore trusts, jurisdictions, costs, benefits vs domestic trusts, formation process, and when FAPTs make sense for serious asset protection

What is a Foreign Asset Protection Trust?

🌍 In Simple Terms
A Foreign Asset Protection Trust (FAPT) is an irrevocable trust established in a foreign jurisdiction with debtor-friendly laws, designed to protect assets from future creditors, lawsuits, and judgments. The trust is governed by foreign law that does not recognize U.S. court judgments and makes it extremely difficult and expensive for creditors to reach the assets.

🏛️ Legal Definition & Structure

Core Concept: A FAPT (also called an “offshore APT” or “offshore asset protection trust”) is an irrevocable, self-settled discretionary spendthrift trust formed in a foreign jurisdiction with protective trust law, where:

Key Features:

Settlor as Beneficiary: You (the settlor) can be a discretionary beneficiary—a structure historically void in the U.S. as to your own creditors
Independent Foreign Trustee: A licensed trustee in the foreign jurisdiction controls all distributions and trust decisions
Protective Foreign Law: The governing law (Cook Islands, Nevis, Belize, etc.) expressly:
- Rejects recognition and enforcement of foreign (U.S.) judgments
- Shortens limitation periods for fraudulent transfer claims (often 1-2 years)
- Raises creditor’s burden of proof (often “beyond reasonable doubt” or “clear and convincing”)
- Requires creditors to post substantial bonds ($25k-$50k+) before filing suit
- Mandates local counsel and litigation in the foreign jurisdiction

⚠️ Historical Context: Traditionally, U.S. law prohibited “self-settled spendthrift trusts” (where you create a trust for yourself and claim it’s protected from your creditors). FAPTs are a deliberate workaround using foreign jurisdictions that allow such structures. Some U.S. states (Alaska, Nevada, South Dakota, Delaware) now also allow domestic APTs (DAPTs), but they have significant limitations compared to offshore trusts.

📜 Evolution: From Traditional Trusts to FAPTs

The Traditional Rule: Under common law, you couldn’t create a trust to shield your own assets from your own creditors. This was the “spendthrift trust” limitation—spendthrift protections only worked for third-party beneficiaries, not the settlor.

The Offshore Solution (1980s-1990s):

1984: Cook Islands enacts first modern asset protection trust statute
1990s: Nevis, Belize, Bahamas, and others follow with protective trust laws
Key Innovation: These jurisdictions explicitly allow self-settled trusts and refuse to recognize U.S. judgments

The Domestic Response (1997-Present):

1997: Alaska becomes first U.S. state to allow domestic asset protection trusts (DAPTs)
2000s-2020s: ~17-20 states enact DAPT statutes (Nevada, South Dakota, Delaware, Wyoming, Tennessee, etc.)
The Problem: DAPTs remain vulnerable to:
- Full Faith and Credit challenges (other states’ courts may not honor them)
- Federal bankruptcy lookback (10 years under 11 U.S.C. § 548(e))
- Public policy exceptions and judicial skepticism

Today’s Landscape: FAPTs remain the “gold standard” for serious asset protection because foreign jurisdictions are not bound by U.S. Full Faith and Credit, federal bankruptcy rules are harder to enforce internationally, and the practical barriers for creditors are enormous.

🔑 How It Actually Works: A Practical Example

Scenario: Dr. Sarah Martinez, a California surgeon, is concerned about potential malpractice claims despite carrying insurance. She has $8M in liquid assets she wants to protect.

What She Does:

Forms a Cook Islands Trust with a licensed Cook Islands trustee
Transfers $5M in brokerage accounts and liquid assets to the trust
Structures herself as a discretionary beneficiary—the trustee can distribute to her, but has no obligation to do so
Creates an underlying Cook Islands LLC owned 100% by the trust, which actually holds the brokerage accounts
Names herself LLC manager for day-to-day investment decisions, but the trustee owns the LLC

What Happens If She Gets Sued:

Plaintiff wins $10M judgment in California: The California judgment is NOT automatically enforceable in Cook Islands
To reach the trust assets, creditor must:
- Hire Cook Islands attorney (no contingency fees)
- Post $25k-$50k bond to file suit
- Litigate entirely in Cook Islands courts under Cook Islands law
- Prove beyond reasonable doubt that the transfer was fraudulent (extremely high bar)
- Do all of this within 1-2 years of the original transfer (statute of limitations)
Practical Result: Most creditors settle for pennies on the dollar rather than spend $100k-$500k+ for an uncertain outcome in a foreign court

✅ Key Point: FAPTs don’t make you “judgment proof”—U.S. courts can still enter judgments against you. But they make those judgments practically unenforceable against the trust assets, creating enormous settlement leverage.

⚖️ Legal Foundation: Why This Works

The jurisdictional arbitrage:

1. No Full Faith and Credit

U.S. Constitution requires states to honor each other’s judgments
Foreign countries have no such obligation—Cook Islands courts don’t care about California judgments
Creditor must start litigation from scratch in the foreign jurisdiction

2. Favorable Fraudulent Transfer Laws

U.S. Law (UVTA/UFTA): Creditors typically have 4+ years to challenge transfers made with intent to defraud
Cook Islands / Nevis: Only 1-2 years from transfer, with much higher burden of proof
Federal Bankruptcy: 10-year lookback under 11 U.S.C. § 548(e), but harder to enforce against offshore assets

3. Procedural Barriers

Requirement to post bonds ($25k-$50k+)
No contingency fee arrangements (creditor’s lawyer must be paid upfront)
Local counsel requirement (expensive)
Travel and litigation costs in remote jurisdictions

4. High Evidentiary Standards

Cook Islands: often requires proof “beyond reasonable doubt” (criminal standard)
Nevis: “clear and convincing evidence” at minimum
U.S. Standard: typically “preponderance of evidence” (much lower)

Benefits of FAPTs vs Domestic Asset Protection

📊 FAPT vs DAPT vs Traditional Planning: Comparison

Feature	Foreign APT (FAPT)	Domestic APT (DAPT)	Traditional Planning
Self-Settled Protection	✅ Strong (foreign law allows)	⚠️ Limited (vulnerable to challenges)	❌ Not available
Full Faith & Credit	✅ Not subject (foreign jurisdiction)	❌ Subject (can be challenged in other states)	N/A
Fraudulent Transfer Window	✅ 1-2 years (very short)	⚠️ 4+ years (state UVTA) + 10 years (federal § 548(e))	4+ years (UVTA/UFTA)
Creditor Burden of Proof	✅ Very high (beyond reasonable doubt / clear & convincing)	⚠️ Moderate (preponderance + heightened in some)	Preponderance of evidence
Litigation Barriers	✅ Enormous (foreign litigation, bonds, local counsel, no contingency)	⚠️ Modest (still U.S. courts)	Minimal
Settlement Leverage	✅ Very high (creditors often settle cheaply)	⚠️ Moderate (some deterrence)	Low
Setup Cost	❌ $15k-$50k+	⚠️ $5k-$15k	✅ $2k-$10k
Annual Fees	❌ $3.5k-$10k+	⚠️ $1k-$5k	✅ $500-$2k
Tax Complexity	❌ High (Forms 3520/3520-A, FBAR, FATCA)	✅ Low (treated as domestic)	✅ Minimal
Reputational Optics	❌ “Offshore” stigma	⚠️ Some skepticism	✅ Neutral
Track Record in Court	✅ Strong (hard to reach in practice)	❌ Mixed (many unfavorable rulings)	N/A
Best For	$5M-$10M+ net worth, high litigation risk, willing to pay for serious protection	$1M-$5M net worth, moderate risk, want some protection at lower cost	Basic estate planning, probate avoidance, no asset protection needs

✅ Five Core Advantages of FAPTs Over DAPTs

🌍 Why Go Offshore Instead of Domestic

1️⃣

Jurisdictional Insulation
Cook Islands, Nevis, Belize, and other offshore jurisdictions do not recognize U.S. judgments. A creditor with a $10M California judgment must start completely over in Cook Islands court, hiring local counsel, posting bonds, and litigating under Cook Islands law. DAPTs, by contrast, are subject to Full Faith and Credit—a Nevada DAPT can be challenged by a California creditor in California court under California law.

2️⃣

Extremely Short Fraudulent Transfer Windows
Offshore jurisdictions typically give creditors only 1-2 years from the date of transfer to challenge it as fraudulent. After that, even if the transfer was made with questionable intent, the creditor is barred. Compare to U.S. state law (4+ years) and federal bankruptcy law (10 years for self-settled trusts under 11 U.S.C. § 548(e)).

3️⃣

Crushing Procedural Hurdles
Offshore jurisdictions stack the deck against creditors:

Bond Requirements: Often $25k-$50k+ just to file suit
No Contingency Fees: Creditor’s lawyer must be paid upfront (expensive)
Local Counsel Required: Must hire Cook Islands / Nevis attorney
In-Person Litigation: Creditor must travel to remote islands for hearings
High Evidentiary Burden: “Beyond reasonable doubt” or “clear and convincing” standard for fraudulent intent

Result: Most creditors give up or settle for pennies rather than spend $100k-$500k on an uncertain foreign lawsuit.

4️⃣

No Public Policy Exceptions
U.S. courts have shown hostility to DAPTs, with judges in non-DAPT states refusing to honor them as “against public policy.” Cook Islands and Nevis courts don’t care about U.S. public policy—they’re designed explicitly to protect settlors from foreign creditors. This makes FAPTs far more predictable and defensible than DAPTs.

5️⃣

Settlement Forcing Mechanism
FAPTs aren’t magic shields that make you “judgment proof.” What they do is create massive economic disincentives for creditors to pursue trust assets. In practice:

DAPTs are often ignored or easily penetrated—they’re “symbolic” protection
FAPTs are “functional” shields—assets are practically unreachable, forcing settlements
Creditors with $10M judgments routinely settle for $500k-$2M rather than chase offshore assets

This settlement leverage is the real value of FAPTs for high-net-worth individuals.

⚠️ Why DAPTs Often Fail in Practice

Despite 20+ states offering domestic APTs, they have serious vulnerabilities:

1. Full Faith and Credit Challenges

U.S. Constitution requires states to recognize each other’s judgments and laws
If you live in California but form a Nevada DAPT, California courts may apply California law and ignore Nevada’s protection
Courts in non-DAPT states have repeatedly refused to honor DAPTs as “against public policy”

2. Federal Bankruptcy Override

11 U.S.C. § 548(e) allows bankruptcy trustees to void transfers to self-settled trusts made within 10 years with intent to defraud
This federal law preempts state DAPT statutes in bankruptcy
Many DAPT jurisdictions have no case law showing successful defense in bankruptcy

3. Judicial Skepticism

Judges are hostile to the idea that you can shield your own assets from your own creditors
Courts scrutinize DAPTs closely and often find ways to penetrate them (retained control, fraudulent intent, public policy exceptions)
Published cases show DAPTs failing more often than succeeding

4. Practical Example: In re Huber (2013)

Washington state residents formed Alaska DAPT
Filed bankruptcy in Washington
Bankruptcy court in Washington applied Washington law (not Alaska law) and voided the trust
Result: DAPT provided zero protection

🚨 Bottom Line on DAPTs: Domestic APTs may have some value for moderate-risk planning in the $1M-$5M range, but they should not be relied upon as serious asset protection for high-net-worth individuals or high-risk professions. For real protection, you need a foreign jurisdiction not subject to U.S. courts’ jurisdiction and policy preferences.

Offshore Trust Jurisdictions: Where to Form Your FAPT

🏝️ Comprehensive Jurisdiction Comparison

Jurisdiction	Foreign Judgment Recognition	Fraudulent Transfer Window	Creditor Burden & Bond	Trust Industry & Stability	Typical Setup Cost	Annual Fees	Notes & Recommendations
Cook Islands	Foreign money judgments not directly enforceable. Creditor must re-litigate under Cook Islands law	Very short, typically 1-2 years from cause of action or transfer	High evidentiary standard (often beyond reasonable doubt). Courts can require substantial security deposit	Longest APT track record (since 1984), mature trust industry, widely used in U.S. planning. Politically stable	$20k-$50k+	$5k-$10k+	Considered “gold standard” for FAPTs. Most case law and professional infrastructure. Best for high-value ($5M+) cases
Nevis	Does not recognize foreign judgments against Nevis trusts. Creditor must litigate locally from scratch	Short limitation periods, 1-2 years after which claims barred	Very high burden (often beyond reasonable doubt for fraudulent intent). Creditor must post significant bond ($25k+) to file	Active APT jurisdiction, somewhat newer than Cook Islands but very protective statutes. Reasonably stable island economy	$15k-$30k	$3.5k-$7.5k	Cost-effective alternative to Cook Islands with similar statutory protections. Popular for mid-market APT planning ($2M-$10M)
Belize	Strong firewall provisions restricting recognition of foreign judgments	Short limitation periods under trust legislation	Elevated standard on creditor. May require security to pursue claims	Active offshore trust industry but less U.S. APT case law than Cook or Nevis. Somewhat more political risk	$15k-$25k	$3k-$6k	Often used for lower to mid-range APT budgets. Good option when client has existing Belize relationships
Cayman Islands	Firewall statutes limiting foreign judgments, though more nuanced than Cook/Nevis	Protective but sometimes slightly longer than Cook or Nevis	Strong asset protection provisions	Major international trust center with deep professional infrastructure. High political/regulatory stability but subject to global pressure	$25k-$60k+	$6k-$12k+	“Blue chip” financial center feel. Often used when client wants mainstream credibility, not niche APT focus
Bahamas	Firewall legislation limiting foreign judgment enforcement	Protective trust laws with reasonable limitation periods	Elevated burden on creditors	Established offshore trust center with strong professional industry. Politically stable with mature regulatory framework	$20k-$45k	$5k-$10k	Strong reputation, proximity to U.S. Widely used for offshore trusts and banking
Jersey / Guernsey	Firewall provisions, though embedded in broader European context	Favorable limitation periods	Professional trust industry standards	Major international trust centers (Crown Dependencies). Very high regulatory standards and political stability	$25k-$70k+	$7k-$15k+	Often used for ultra-high-net-worth clients wanting European sophistication. Higher costs, more regulatory oversight
Nevada / South Dakota (DAPT comparator)	Subject to Full Faith and Credit within U.S.	State statutes favorable but can be overridden by other states and bankruptcy courts. 10-year federal lookback (§ 548(e))	Better than baseline U.S. law but still within U.S. policy framework	Growing DAPT industry with some unfavorable outcomes for out-of-state debtors. Very stable politically and regulatory	$5k-$15k	$1k-$3k	Useful comparison point. Lower cost but significantly weaker protection than offshore. Only consider if offshore is not feasible

🎯 How to Choose the Right Jurisdiction

Key factors to consider:

1. Net Worth & Risk Level

$2M-$5M, moderate risk: Nevis or Belize (cost-effective, strong protection)
$5M-$20M, high risk: Cook Islands or Nevis (gold standard, deep case law)
$20M+, ultra-high-net-worth: Cook Islands, Cayman, or Jersey/Guernsey (maximum protection and sophistication)

2. Creditor Profile

Sophisticated institutional creditors: Cook Islands (longest track record, most case law)
Individual plaintiffs, contingency lawyers: Nevis (bond requirements and cost barriers extremely effective)
Government claims, regulatory: Consider multiple jurisdictions or specialized counsel

3. Industry Relationships & Banking

Some jurisdictions have better banking infrastructure and easier KYC/AML for U.S. clients
Cayman and Bahamas often easier for mainstream U.S. banks to work with
Cook Islands and Nevis more “boutique” but highly specialized for APTs

4. Professional Network

Your U.S. attorney’s relationships with offshore trustees matter enormously
Stick with jurisdictions where your counsel has established trustee relationships and track record

5. Regulatory & Political Stability

Most Stable: Cook Islands (trust industry is main economy), Cayman, Jersey/Guernsey (Crown Dependencies)
Moderate: Nevis, Bahamas (stable but smaller economies)
Higher Risk: Belize (more political volatility, though trust laws remain strong)

💡 My Recommendation: For most U.S. clients with $5M+ in serious litigation exposure, I typically recommend either Cook Islands (if budget allows and risk is very high) or Nevis (if seeking strong protection at moderate cost). Belize is a solid budget option for $2M-$5M clients. Cayman/Bahamas/Jersey are for clients who need mainstream credibility or have ultra-high net worth.

📊 Jurisdiction “Report Card”

Quick comparison on key metrics (scale: ⭐ = Weak to ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Excellent):

Jurisdiction	Asset Protection Strength	Case Law Track Record	Cost-Effectiveness	Banking Ease	Political Stability	Overall Value
Cook Islands	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Best for high-value)
Nevis	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Best cost-value ratio)
Belize	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Good budget option)
Cayman	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Blue-chip option)
Nevada DAPT	⭐⭐	⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐ (Weak protection)

Types of Foreign Trust Structures

🏗️ Main FAPT Structure Types

There are several common architectures for offshore asset protection trusts:

1. Classic Offshore APT (Trust Only)

Irrevocable, self-settled, spendthrift trust in Cook Islands/Nevis/Belize
Independent licensed offshore trustee controls all assets and distributions
Settlor is discretionary beneficiary (trustee MAY distribute, not MUST)
Trust owns assets directly (brokerage accounts, investment portfolios in trust name)

Pros: Simplest structure, lower formation cost
Cons: Less day-to-day control for settlor, all decisions require trustee approval

2. Offshore Trust + Underlying LLC (Most Common)

Trust owns 100% of an offshore LLC (often same jurisdiction or complementary)
LLC holds actual assets (brokerage accounts, investment portfolios, possibly real estate equity)
Settlor often named as LLC manager for day-to-day operational decisions
Trustee maintains ultimate control over LLC membership interests

Pros: Separates control (manager) from ownership (trustee), allows settlor more practical management while maintaining protection
Cons: More complex, higher setup costs, requires coordination between trust and LLC documentation

3. Hybrid / Bridge Trust

Starts as domestic trust for U.S. tax purposes (meets court/control tests)
Registered offshore (e.g., Cook Islands) from inception
Can “flip” to full offshore status upon trigger event (lawsuit filed, duress clause activated)
Attempts to be “foreign for protection, domestic for tax”

Pros: Simpler U.S. tax reporting before flip, marketed as “best of both worlds”
Cons: More legally complex, uncertain whether courts will respect the hybrid nature, may be challenged as substance-over-form

4. Non-Self-Settled Offshore Trusts

Third-party beneficiary offshore trusts (for children, heirs, not settlor)
Formed offshore for privacy, long-term asset protection, dynasty planning
Structurally safer from fraudulent transfer issues (settlor not primary beneficiary)

Pros: Cleaner from fraudulent transfer standpoint, strong multi-generational protection
Cons: Settlor cannot be beneficiary, so no access to funds during lifetime

💡 Recommended Structure: For most U.S. clients seeking practical asset protection, I recommend Structure #2: Offshore Trust + Underlying LLC. This allows the settlor to remain as LLC manager for investment decisions and day-to-day operations, while the offshore trustee owns the LLC membership interests, providing the necessary legal separation and protection.

🔧 How the Trust + LLC Structure Actually Works

Detailed example architecture:

Parties & Roles:

Dr. Martinez = Settlor and discretionary beneficiary of trust; Manager of LLC
Cook Islands Trust Company Ltd = Independent trustee of the trust; Owner of 100% of LLC membership interests
“Martinez Holdings LLC” (Cook Islands LLC) = Entity owned by trust, managed by Dr. Martinez

Asset Flow & Control:

Dr. Martinez forms “The Martinez Asset Protection Trust” (irrevocable Cook Islands trust)
Dr. Martinez forms “Martinez Holdings LLC” (Cook Islands LLC) owned 100% by the trust
Dr. Martinez transfers $5M in liquid assets to LLC bank/brokerage accounts
Dr. Martinez, as LLC Manager, makes day-to-day investment decisions (buy/sell stocks, rebalance portfolio, etc.)
Cook Islands trustee, as LLC owner, maintains ultimate authority over major decisions (distributions, changes to LLC operating agreement, removal of manager)

What Happens in Lawsuit:

Duress Clause Activates: When lawsuit filed or judgment entered, trust deed instructs trustee NOT to repatriate assets or comply with U.S. court orders
Dr. Martinez Loses Manager Role (if needed): Trustee can remove Dr. Martinez as LLC manager and appoint independent manager to demonstrate lack of control
Assets Remain Offshore: LLC accounts held at offshore banks or brokerages that don’t recognize U.S. judgments
Creditor Must Sue in Cook Islands: No shortcut via U.S. courts

⚠️ Control vs Protection Trade-off: The more control you retain (manager powers, investment discretion, ability to force distributions), the more vulnerable the structure becomes to judicial attack. Courts can find that you have “de facto control” and order repatriation under contempt powers. The structure must balance practical management with legal separation.

Planning & Implementation: How FAPTs Are Built

🛠️ Formation Process: Step-by-Step

✅ How a FAPT is Actually Created

1️⃣

Risk & Suitability Analysis
Attorney reviews: net worth, creditor profile, timing (distance from any claims), jurisdictions involved, asset types, tax tolerance. Critical: ensure not being used to evade existing/imminent creditors (fraudulent transfer risk).

2️⃣

Jurisdiction & Trustee Selection
Choose Cook Islands/Nevis/Belize based on risk, budget, banking needs. Engage licensed, regulated offshore trustee. Review fee schedules and regulatory standing.

3️⃣

Draft Trust Deed & LLC Documents
Trust deed includes: spendthrift clauses, anti-duress provisions (trustee instructed not to comply with foreign court orders), choice of law (offshore jurisdiction), protector provisions, letters of wishes. LLC operating agreement coordinates with trust.

4️⃣

Form Underlying LLC
Incorporate LLC in same or companion jurisdiction. Transfer LLC membership interests (100%) into trust. Appoint settlor as LLC manager for day-to-day control.

5️⃣

Funding & Account Setup
Establish offshore bank/brokerage accounts in LLC name. Transfer liquid assets (stocks, bonds, cash) into LLC accounts. Document transfer dates carefully (starts fraudulent transfer clock).

6️⃣

U.S. Tax Classification & Reporting Setup
Determine if foreign trust for tax (typically yes). Obtain EIN for trust. Set up systems for Forms 3520, 3520-A, FBAR, FATCA compliance.

7️⃣

Ongoing Governance
Establish procedures: annual trustee accountings, beneficiary communications, investment management protocols, distribution request procedures, amendment process.

💰 Realistic Cost Expectations

Setup Costs (One-Time):

Legal Fees (U.S. Attorney): $15,000 – $35,000
- Simple offshore APT: $15k-$20k
- Standard trust + LLC structure: $25k-$35k
- Complex/high-value cases: $40k-$100k+
Offshore Trustee Setup Fee: $3,000 – $8,000
LLC Formation: $1,500 – $3,500
Banking/Account Setup: $1,000 – $3,000

Total Typical Range: $20,000 – $50,000

Annual Ongoing Costs:

Offshore Trustee Annual Fee: $3,500 – $10,000+
LLC Annual Renewal: $800 – $2,000
U.S. Tax Preparation (Forms 3520/3520-A/FBAR): $2,000 – $5,000
Legal Review/Updates: $1,000 – $3,000

Total Annual: $7,000 – $20,000+

💡 ROI Perspective: If a FAPT forces a $10M creditor to settle for $1M-$2M (90-80% reduction), the $50k setup + $150k over 10 years = $200k total cost produces $8M-$9M in value. For serious high-stakes litigation, the economics are compelling.

Exposed Net Worth (USD): Risk Profile: Current Threat Status:

💡 Common Use Cases: Who Needs a FAPT?

Ideal candidates for offshore asset protection trusts:

1. Physicians & Surgeons

High malpractice exposure despite insurance
$5M-$50M+ net worth in investments and real estate
Concern about catastrophic claims exceeding policy limits
Example: Orthopedic surgeon with $15M net worth wants to protect assets accumulated over 25-year career from potential future claims

2. Real Estate Developers

Personal guarantees on development loans
Construction defect liability exposure
Partnership disputes and litigation
Example: Developer personally guaranteed $20M in loans; wants $8M liquid portfolio protected if project fails

3. Business Owners Pre-Liquidity Event

Expecting company sale or IPO in 2-5 years
Want to lock up portion of existing wealth before event creates target
Concerned about future product liability or employment claims
Example: SaaS founder with $10M in Bitcoin/stocks expects $50M exit in 3 years; protects current assets now before becoming visible target

4. High-Net-Worth in Plaintiff-Friendly States

California, Florida, Texas residents with large estates
Concerned about liability from rental properties, car accidents, etc.
Umbrella insurance insufficient for total exposure

5. Crypto/Public Equity Concentrated Wealth

Sudden wealth from cryptocurrency or stock grants
High public profile creates litigation target
Want to protect windfall from future unknown claims

⚠️ Not Suitable For:

Net worth under $2M (cost doesn’t justify benefit)
Existing judgment or imminent lawsuit (too late, fraudulent transfer issues)
Unwilling to handle foreign reporting compliance
Public company executives or regulated professionals where optics matter more than protection

Limitations, Risks & Compliance Requirements

⚠️ How U.S. Courts Actually Treat FAPTs

FAPTs are not magic shields. U.S. courts have tools to pressure debtors:

1. Contempt & “Impossibility” Doctrine

Key Cases:

FTC v. Affordable Media (Anderson) – Ninth Circuit upheld contempt sanctions when settlors claimed “impossibility” because Cook Islands trustee refused to repatriate under duress clause. Court didn’t care that offshore law prevented compliance.
In re Lawrence – 11th Circuit upheld long-term incarceration for civil contempt when debtor claimed inability to repatriate from Jersey APT.

Lesson: While offshore law may hold, U.S. courts will pressure YOU personally via contempt as long as they believe impossibility is self-created.

2. Bankruptcy Code Override

11 U.S.C. § 548(e): 10-year lookback for transfers to self-settled trusts with actual intent to defraud
Bankruptcy courts routinely apply this aggressively to APTs regardless of offshore location
Cases like In re Mortensen show courts piercing offshore structures in bankruptcy

3. Substance-Over-Form Challenges

Courts hostile where debtor retains de facto control (signatory powers, protector with broad authority, side letters)
Transfers made after claims reasonably foreseeable = high scrutiny
Best Practice: Real control must be surrendered, structure implemented early (3-5+ years before any claim)

💡 Reality Check: Offshore trusts work best when (1) formed early, before specific claims arise, (2) real control surrendered to independent trustee, (3) client willing to accept contempt risk if needed. They’re settlement-forcing mechanisms, not absolute shields.

🚨 Fraudulent Transfer Risk

The biggest legal risk with FAPTs:

When Transfers Are Vulnerable:

After claim arises: Transferring assets after lawsuit filed, demand letter received, or incident occurred = strong presumption of fraudulent intent
“Reasonably foreseeable” claims: Doctor who had prior malpractice suit, developer on failing project, business owner facing obvious liability
Insolvency: Transferring assets when insolvent or becoming insolvent as result of transfer

Safe Harbor (Best Timing):

5+ years before any claim: Generally safe from fraudulent transfer challenges
3-5 years: Moderate risk depending on foreseeability
1-3 years: High scrutiny if claim was foreseeable
After demand/lawsuit: Almost certainly fraudulent transfer

🚨 Critical Timing Rule: FAPTs must be implemented as proactive planning, not reactive crisis management. If you’re calling because you just got sued, it’s too late. The time to set up offshore protection is when everything is calm—5 years before you need it.

📊 U.S. Tax Classification & Reporting

Complex U.S. tax and reporting requirements:

1. Foreign vs Domestic Trust for Tax (Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-7)

Court Test: Primary supervision by U.S. court?
Control Test: U.S. persons control all substantial decisions?
If BOTH tests met = domestic trust (U.S. person for tax)
Otherwise = foreign trust
Most FAPTs: Foreign trusts because offshore trustee controls substantial decisions

2. Grantor Trust Rules (IRC §§ 671-679)

§ 679: If U.S. grantor + U.S. beneficiaries = grantor trust for U.S. tax purposes
Result: You (settlor) report all trust income on your personal return (Form 1040)
No separate trust-level income tax while you’re alive and beneficiary

3. Mandatory Filings

📋

Form 3520 (Annual Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts)
Filed by U.S. person who: created foreign trust, received distributions from foreign trust, or made transfers to foreign trust. Due with personal return (April 15 or extension).

📋

Form 3520-A (Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust with U.S. Owner)
Filed by the foreign trust itself (prepared by trustee or U.S. owner). Provides detailed trust income, deductions, distributions. Due March 15.

📋

FinCEN Form 114 (FBAR)
Report foreign financial accounts if aggregate value exceeds $10,000 at any time during year. Due April 15 (automatic extension to October 15).

📋

Form 8938 (FATCA – Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets)
If total foreign assets exceed threshold ($50k-$600k depending on filing status). Filed with Form 1040.

4. Penalties for Non-Compliance

🚨 Severe Penalties:

Form 3520: Greater of $10,000 or 35% of gross reportable amount
Form 3520-A: $10,000 + $10,000 for each 30-day period after IRS notice (uncapped!)
FBAR: $10,000+ per violation (willful = 50% of account balance or $100k per violation)
Form 8938: $10,000 + continuing penalties

Bottom Line: Non-compliance can exceed the value of the planning. Must budget $2k-$5k annually for proper tax preparation.

⚠️ Warning About “No Reporting” Pitches: If an offshore promoter tells you “no Forms 3520, no FBAR, no taxes,” they’re either lying or structuring tax evasion. Legitimate FAPTs require full U.S. reporting. The value is asset protection, not tax avoidance.

FAPT Services & Qualification

👨‍⚖️ Lawyer-Led Service
I personally guide each client through offshore asset protection planning, providing customized legal advice tailored to your specific risk profile, jurisdiction needs, and compliance requirements. This is sophisticated planning that requires experienced counsel—not a DIY project or document service.

📋 FAPT Consultation & Analysis

$2,500

Risk assessment & jurisdiction recommendation

✅ Comprehensive risk & suitability analysis
✅ Fraudulent transfer timing review
✅ Jurisdiction comparison (Cook Islands, Nevis, etc.)
✅ Structure recommendation (trust only vs trust+LLC)
✅ Cost-benefit analysis for your situation
✅ Tax & reporting requirements overview
✅ Written opinion letter

Schedule Consultation

⭐ MOST COMMON

🏝️ Complete Cook Islands or Nevis FAPT

$28,500

Full offshore trust + LLC structure

✅ U.S. legal counsel (planning, drafting, coordination)
✅ Offshore trustee engagement & setup
✅ Trust deed with duress provisions & asset protection clauses
✅ Offshore LLC formation & operating agreement
✅ Account opening coordination (offshore bank/brokerage)
✅ U.S. tax structuring & compliance guidance
✅ Funding instructions & transfer documentation
✅ First-year compliance support

Get Started

💼 Premium / Complex FAPT Planning

$45,000+

High-value or multi-jurisdictional structures

✅ Everything in Complete Package, PLUS:
✅ Multiple offshore entities (layered protection)
✅ Multi-jurisdictional planning (Cayman, Jersey, etc.)
✅ Coordination with existing domestic trusts
✅ Business succession & entity restructuring
✅ International tax planning
✅ Ongoing governance & trustee liaison

Discuss Your Case

📅 Schedule Confidential FAPT Consultation

Discuss your specific situation, risk profile, and whether offshore asset protection makes sense for you. Completely confidential.

📞 Contact Information

Email: owner@terms.law

Serving clients nationwide for offshore asset protection planning

Working with Counsel: What to Expect

📋 The FAPT Planning Process

✅ Step-by-Step Engagement

1️⃣

Initial Consultation (60-90 minutes)
We discuss your assets, creditor profile, timing, goals. I explain jurisdiction options, structure choices, costs, tax implications. You decide if offshore planning makes sense.

2️⃣

Risk Analysis & Written Opinion
I prepare detailed risk analysis: fraudulent transfer timing, jurisdiction recommendation, structure design, cost-benefit. You receive written opinion letter you can rely on.

3️⃣

Trustee Selection & Engagement
I coordinate with licensed offshore trustees I’ve worked with (Cook Islands, Nevis). You meet trustee, review fees, establish relationship.

4️⃣

Document Drafting
I draft: trust deed, LLC operating agreement, letters of wishes, funding instructions. Offshore counsel reviews for compliance with local law. Typically 3-4 weeks.

5️⃣

Execution & Formation
You sign trust deed (typically via notary). Offshore trustee executes. LLC formed. Accounts opened. Typically 2-4 weeks.

6️⃣

Funding & Transfer
You transfer assets to LLC accounts per funding instructions. I document transfer dates and amounts (critical for fraudulent transfer clock). Typically 1-2 weeks.

7️⃣

Tax Compliance Setup
I coordinate with your CPA (or refer one experienced in offshore trusts) to set up Forms 3520/3520-A/FBAR systems. First year most complex; subsequent years routine.

8️⃣

Ongoing Governance & Support
Annual trustee accountings. Annual U.S. tax filings. Periodic review calls. Available for questions as they arise.

⏱️ Typical Timeline: From initial consultation to funded, operational FAPT: 8-12 weeks. Can be expedited if needed, but best not to rush (looks reactive if litigation emerges shortly after formation).

🤝 Why Work with Experienced FAPT Counsel

Offshore asset protection is complex, high-stakes planning. Here’s what matters:

1. Established Offshore Relationships

I work with vetted, licensed trustees in Cook Islands and Nevis I’ve used for years
Direct relationships mean faster setup, better fees, responsive service
Avoid “promoter” arrangements where you’re funneled to whoever pays highest referral fee

2. U.S. Court Experience

Understanding how U.S. courts actually treat FAPTs (contempt risk, substance-over-form challenges)
Structuring to withstand judicial scrutiny, not just offshore law compliance
Knowing when offshore protection is worth the risk vs when it’s overkill or too late

3. Tax & Compliance Integration

Proper U.S. tax structuring from day one (grantor trust status, Forms 3520/3520-A)
Coordination with your existing CPA or referral to offshore-experienced tax counsel
Avoiding structures that create tax evasion red flags or IRS scrutiny

4. Honest Risk Assessment

I’ll tell you if offshore planning is overkill for your situation (and save you $50k)
I’ll tell you if timing is bad (too close to a claim = fraudulent transfer)
I’ll tell you if a DAPT or traditional planning is more appropriate

✅ You Want a Counselor, Not a Salesman: Promoters push offshore trusts to everyone. Good counsel tells you when you DON’T need one. My goal is the right solution for your risk profile and budget, not maximum fees.

Is a Foreign Asset Protection Trust Right for You?

✅ Strong FAPT Candidates

You are likely a good candidate if:

✅ Net worth $5M-$10M+ in exposed liquid assets
✅ High-risk profession (doctor, developer, business owner with guarantees)
✅ No current or imminent claims/lawsuits (planning 3-5+ years ahead)
✅ Willing to handle foreign reporting compliance (Forms 3520, FBAR, etc.)
✅ Comfortable with $20k-$50k setup + $7k-$20k annual costs
✅ Want serious protection, not symbolic planning

❌ Not Good FAPT Candidates

Offshore planning is NOT right for you if:

❌ Net worth under $2M (cost doesn’t justify benefit—use insurance, LLCs, DAPTs)
❌ Lawsuit already filed or demand letter received (too late—fraudulent transfer)
❌ Claims reasonably foreseeable within 1-2 years (tight timing, high risk)
❌ Unwilling to handle foreign reporting or annual compliance costs
❌ Public company executive, politician, or role where “offshore” optics matter more than protection
❌ Looking for tax avoidance (FAPTs don’t reduce U.S. taxes, only protect assets)

💡 Use the Interactive Qualification Tool: Visit the Services tab for an interactive qualification wizard that analyzes your specific situation and recommends whether a FAPT makes sense for you.

🤔 Common “Should I or Shouldn’t I?” Scenarios

Scenario 1: “I’m a surgeon with $8M net worth, no current claims, but I’m worried about future malpractice.”
✅ Strong candidate. High risk profession, sufficient assets, proactive timing. Offshore trust makes sense.

Scenario 2: “I’m a landlord with $3M in rental properties and $500k liquid. No lawsuits.”
⚠️ Borderline. Consider DAPT (Nevada, South Dakota) or strong LLC + insurance. FAPT may be overkill unless you have specific high-risk properties.

Scenario 3: “I just got sued for $5M. I have $2M in stocks. Can I protect them with a FAPT?”
❌ Too late. Transferring assets after lawsuit = fraudulent transfer. Focus on defense and settlement, not asset protection planning.

Scenario 4: “I’m selling my business in 2 years for $20M. No current issues, but I’ll be a visible target after the sale.”
✅ Excellent timing. Set up FAPT NOW with current modest assets. After sale, transfer portion of proceeds. 2+ year gap before liquidity event = strong fraudulent transfer defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Can I access my money if it’s in an offshore trust?

Yes, but indirectly through trustee. You don’t have direct signatory authority (that would defeat the protection). But as a discretionary beneficiary, you can request distributions for living expenses, investments, etc. The trustee has discretion to approve. In practice, trustees approve routine requests. The structure is designed so you have practical access under normal circumstances, but a creditor cannot force distributions.

❓ What if the trustee steals my money or goes rogue?

Work only with licensed, regulated trustees. Cook Islands and Nevis trustees are government-licensed, bonded, and regulated. They have professional indemnity insurance and regulatory oversight. Additionally:

Use trustees your U.S. attorney has long-term relationships with
Include “protector” provisions allowing you to remove and replace trustee (carefully scoped to not give you too much control)
Annual accountings provide transparency
Assets held at major offshore banks/brokerages (not with trustee directly)

Risk of trustee malfeasance is very low if you use established, vetted trustees rather than promoters or fly-by-night operators.

❓ How is this different from just hiding money in a secret offshore account?

Completely different—and legal vs illegal.

FAPT: Fully disclosed to IRS (Forms 3520, FBAR), all income reported and taxed, assets in trust with independent trustee, legal structure recognized by offshore jurisdiction
Secret offshore account: Undisclosed, unreported income, tax evasion, violates FBAR/FATCA, criminal penalties

FAPTs are legitimate asset protection planning with full U.S. tax compliance. Anyone who tells you “no reporting, no taxes” is selling tax evasion, not asset protection.

❓ Can a FAPT protect me from IRS or criminal charges?

No. FAPTs protect against civil creditors (lawsuits, judgments from private parties). They do NOT protect against:

IRS tax claims
Criminal restitution orders
Child support or alimony
Federal forfeiture

Attempting to use FAPTs to evade these obligations is criminal obstruction. FAPTs are for legitimate civil asset protection only.

❓ What happens if I get held in contempt for not repatriating assets?

This is the real risk with FAPTs. Cases like FTC v. Affordable Media (Anderson) show U.S. courts will incarcerate debtors for civil contempt if they refuse to repatriate offshore assets. The debtor’s claim of “impossibility” (trustee won’t comply due to duress clause) may not save you.

Reality:

Most cases settle before contempt becomes issue (creditors prefer $1M settlement to years of litigation)
If you go to trial and lose, court may order repatriation
If you refuse and claim impossibility, contempt risk is real
Some clients accept limited jail time rather than surrender $5M-$10M

This is why FAPTs are for serious cases only. You must be willing to accept contempt risk in exchange for forcing settlement. Not suitable for risk-averse individuals.

❓ Can I set up a FAPT myself with online forms?

Absolutely not. FAPTs are among the most complex planning structures:

Requires coordination between U.S. and offshore counsel
Must navigate fraudulent transfer laws, U.S. tax rules, offshore trust law
Improper structure = worthless (easily pierced) or worse (tax evasion charges)
Must be tailored to your risk profile, timing, assets

Online forms and promoter packages are dangerous. Work only with experienced U.S. counsel who has established offshore relationships and understands how U.S. courts treat these structures.

❓ How long does it take to set up?

Typically 8-12 weeks from initial consultation to funded trust.

Consultation & risk analysis: 1-2 weeks
Trustee selection & engagement: 1-2 weeks
Document drafting & review: 3-4 weeks
Execution, formation, account opening: 2-4 weeks
Funding: 1-2 weeks

Can be expedited if needed, but best not to rush (looks reactive if litigation emerges shortly after).

❓ Still have questions?

Schedule a confidential consultation to discuss your specific situation.

Email Your Question Schedule Consultation