MSP & IT-Services Contract Review

MSP and IT-Services Contract Review: Your MSA and SOW

A flat $575 attorney review of your Master Service Agreement and Statement of Work, before you send it to a client or sign a client's paper.

$575
Flat fee, MSA + SOW ?
2
Documents, read as a pair ?
3
Email revision rounds
🤖 AI Legal Analyst

Ask my AI Legal Analyst about your MSA and SOW

It scopes your MSP contract and points you to the right path: the $575 flat-fee attorney review of your MSA and SOW, or, if you have a live dispute instead of a contract, the right demand-letter tier. A full attorney review of your facts or documents is the engagement itself or the $240 Written Attorney Consultation, not this chat. AI-generated legal information, not legal advice.

This is a page-aware service-routing workflow built on my actual MSP and IT-services contract-review playbook, not a generic chatbot. Pricing and scope questions below answer instantly and free; the AI is for matching your situation to the right engagement.

Pricing & scope free · instant · no email

An attorney redline of the MSA and the SOW, written comments on the key risks with suggested revisions, and up to three rounds of email revisions. The flat fee assumes a normal-length MSA and SOW. Unusually long or heavily negotiated work runs at $240 per hour, disclosed before it starts.

An MSP contract is a pair. The MSA sets the legal framework (liability cap, indemnity, data responsibility, IP, termination); the SOW sets the actual scope, deliverables, service levels, and price. A tight liability cap in the MSA does not help you if the SOW promises an open-ended service level, and clean IP language in the MSA does not help you if the SOW hands a client your reusable tooling. I read them against each other so the gap does not become your exposure.

A first redline is usually ready 3 to 5 business days after I receive the MSA, the SOW, and payment. Rush 24 to 48 hour turnaround may be available for an added fee.

Send the MSA and the SOW (or the client's paper, if you are signing theirs), plus any order form, pricing schedule, or SLA exhibit they reference. If there is a deadline or a client waiting on signature, tell me. Upload them in the chat or attach them when you start the intake.

That is exactly when a second set of eyes matters most. When you draft your own template, the gaps are the ones you cannot see, because you wrote toward what you intended, not toward how a hostile reader or a future dispute will read it. The review hardens the language you already have rather than rewriting your business model.

Ask the AI about your contract

Attorney-supervised AI · general information, not legal advice. A full review of your facts or documents is the paid engagement or the $240 Written Attorney Consultation. Sergei Tokmakov, Esq., CA Bar #279869.

Back to Contract Review
🔍 The MSP issue-spot map Tap any card to flip it: front is the clause, back is why it bites an MSP and what I check. +

These are the clauses I read first in a Managed Service Provider MSA and SOW. The front of each card names the clause; the back tells you why it matters to an MSP and what I check during the review. None of this is legal advice; it is the map I work from.

How to read this: these are issues I look for, not a verdict on your contract. Whether any clause is a problem for you depends on whether you are sending the paper to a client or signing the client's, your size, and your risk tolerance. That is what the review sorts out.
👀 Why your own template needs a second set of eyes You drafted it, so the gaps are the ones you cannot see. The review hardens the MSA and the SOW as a pair. +

If you built your MSP from the ground up, you probably also built your contract: borrowed a template, bolted on the clauses a client once asked for, and shipped it. That is normal, and it usually works, right up until it does not. The problem is structural, not a knock on your drafting.

You wrote toward intent, not toward dispute

When you draft your own paper, you write toward what you meant. A reviewer reads toward how a hostile party, or a judge, will read the same words when there is money on the table. Those are different jobs. The gaps in a self-drafted contract are almost always the ones the author could not see, because they already knew what they intended the clause to do.

The pattern I see most: the MSA looks fine in isolation and the SOW looks fine in isolation, but read together they contradict each other. The MSA caps liability while the SOW promises an uptime the cap cannot survive. The MSA keeps your IP while the SOW assigns "all work product" to the client. The gap between the two documents is where the exposure lives.

The MSA and the SOW fail as a pair

An MSP contract is really one instrument in two files. The MSA is the framework: liability, indemnity, IP, data responsibility, term, and termination. The SOW is the operational reality: what you actually do, the service levels, the deliverables, the price, and the acceptance criteria. A clean MSA cannot save a dangerous SOW, and a careful SOW cannot survive a one-sided MSA. That is why I review them together as the standard package, not the MSA alone.

What the review is, and is not: it is a hardening pass on the language you already have. It is not a ground-up rewrite of your business model, and it is not me telling you to be more conservative for its own sake. I flag what would actually hurt you, suggest the revision, and leave the commercial calls to you.
📝 What you get for the flat $575 Attorney redline of the MSA and SOW, written comments with suggested revisions, up to three rounds of email revisions. +
  • An attorney redline of the MSA and the SOW. Tracked-changes markup on both documents, focused on the provisions that actually move your risk, not cosmetic edits.
  • Written comments on the key risks with suggested revisions. A short memo that explains each material issue, why it matters to you as the MSP, and the language I suggest instead, so you understand the change rather than just accepting it.
  • Up to three rounds of email revisions. After the first redline you can come back with questions, client pushback, or new versions, and I work through them with you for up to three rounds.
$575 flat fee · MSA + SOW reviewed together

Unusually long or heavily negotiated work is billed at $240/hour, and I tell you before any hourly time starts, so there are no surprises. No attorney-client relationship is formed until a signed engagement letter is executed and a conflict check clears.

Turnaround: a first redline is usually ready 3 to 5 business days after I receive the MSA, the SOW, and payment. Rush 24 to 48 hour turnaround may be available for an added fee.

Frequently asked questions

Each answer is folded. Tap a question to open it.

💰 How much does it cost to review my MSP MSA and SOW? +

A flat $575 covers an attorney review of your Master Service Agreement and your Statement of Work together: a redline of both, written comments on the key risks with suggested revisions, and up to three rounds of email revisions. Unusually long or heavily negotiated work runs at $240 per hour, and I tell you before any hourly time starts.

🔗 Why review the MSA and the SOW together instead of just the MSA? +

Because they fail as a pair. The MSA sets the legal framework and the SOW sets the operational reality, and the danger usually lives in the gap between them: a tight liability cap in the MSA that an open-ended SLA in the SOW undermines, or clean IP language in the MSA that a broad assignment in the SOW contradicts. I read them against each other so that gap does not become your exposure.

✍️ I drafted the contract myself. Do I still need an attorney to look at it? +

That is exactly when a second set of eyes matters most. When you draft your own template, the gaps are the ones you cannot see, because you wrote toward what you intended, not toward how a hostile reader or a future dispute will read it. The review hardens the language you already have rather than rewriting your business model.

What exactly is included in the $575 review? +

An attorney redline of the MSA and the SOW, written comments on the key risks with suggested revisions, and up to three rounds of email revisions. The flat fee assumes a normal-length MSA and SOW; unusually long or heavily negotiated work is billed at $240 per hour, disclosed before it starts.

⚠️ What are the biggest risks in an MSP master service agreement? +

The recurring pressure points are the limitation of liability and whether data-breach, IP-infringement, and indemnity obligations are carved out of the cap; whether SLA credits are the client's sole and exclusive remedy; who bears data-security and breach responsibility and whether cyber and E&O insurance is required; IP ownership of deliverables and configurations versus your reusable tools and know-how; the scope and mutuality of indemnification; auto-renewal and price escalation; and termination, transition-assistance, and data-return obligations. The SOW adds acceptance criteria and change-order control. The issue-spot map above walks through each one.

⏱️ How fast is the turnaround? +

A first redline is usually ready 3 to 5 business days after I receive the MSA, the SOW, and payment. Rush 24 to 48 hour turnaround may be available for an added fee. Tell me if you have a client waiting on signature.

🌎 Do you only review California contracts? +

I am licensed in California (CA Bar No. 279869), and this is general contract-law work: liability allocation, IP ownership, indemnity, service levels, and scope control are not California-specific concepts. If your MSA names another state's governing law, or a question turns on a specific state's statute, I tell you when something needs local counsel in that state rather than guessing.

$575 flat fee · ready when you are

Send me the MSA and the SOW and I will harden them before you send the paper to a client or sign a client's. Up to three rounds of email revisions included.