Output ownership across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, ElevenLabs, Suno, Copilot, and the rest is governed by 14 different sets of provider terms — each with carve-outs for free vs paid, training-data rights, indemnification, and revenue thresholds. I read those terms, map them to your product, and tell you exactly where the risk lives.
Flat fees. Direct work with me. No hourly surprises unless you specifically request the custom-drafting tier.
One AI tool, one product, one clear answer on what you can and can't do with the outputs.
PaypalButtons.contractReview349 when /shared/paypal-buttons.js lands.
Your full AI stack reviewed. Provider terms mapped. License clauses drafted for your product. Risk memo with citations.
Bespoke work: AI clauses for MSAs, model-output license riders, vendor pushback, output-rights schedules.
A scannable breakdown of every artifact you receive. Each one is written for your specific stack and product, not a template.
Every primary AI tool you use, mapped to ownership terms, training-data carve-outs, indemnification, and tier-specific differences. Cited to current provider language as of the engagement date.
Plain-English risk assessment for your specific use case. Active litigation flagged: Bartz v. Anthropic, NYT v. OpenAI, Disney/Universal v. Midjourney, BMG v. Anthropic, and the music industry suits.
Drafted clauses you can drop into your ToS, MSA, or platform terms. Survives upstream provider terms. Aligned with how you actually deploy AI — embedded feature, agency deliverable, or fine-tuned model.
Recommendations on C2PA watermarking, content credentials, attribution, and disclosures — tied to FTC guidance and platform requirements (Runway, Pika, Canva, Adobe).
Stable Diffusion's $1M revenue rule, Midjourney's pro-tier requirements, Suno's distribution tiers — flagged so you know when your business outgrows its current AI tooling and needs to switch tiers or providers.
One mid-engagement (after the ToS map is done) to align on scope. One delivery call to walk through the memo and revised clauses.
If any of the scenarios below describe your business, the audit pays for itself the moment a client, vendor, or insurer asks "do you actually have the rights to that?"
Your client buys a campaign or video. They ask whether your imagery is copyrightable and whether they can sublicense it. The answer depends on which tier you use and whether you added human authorship.
Workspace integration, training opt-out, Vertex AI indemnification, and free-tier carve-outs make this question different from a creator. The audit maps it to your agency's actual deployment.
Provider terms cascade. Your platform terms have to clear ownership, indemnify your users (or not), and survive the provider's training-data carve-outs. This is the audit's core sweet spot.
Stable Diffusion's RAIL-M license, Llama's commercial restrictions, the $1M threshold, and downstream user obligations all need to be reconciled with how you ship the artifact.
BMG v. Anthropic and the UMG/Concord lawsuits make audio AI the highest-risk modality right now. Distribution rights, sample clearance, and voice-clone consent all sit in the same memo.
A four-column snapshot. The full 14-platform comparison covers every variant in detail.
Send me a one-paragraph description of how you use AI in your business. I'll tell you whether the $349 review is enough or whether the audit makes more sense.
Email me directlyBefore you decide between the $349 review and the $1,500 audit, run the AI Output Rights Risk Calculator. Composite score plus a four-part breakdown (ToS exposure, ownership clarity, customer disclosure, cross-jurisdiction) and an estimated dollar exposure tied to your AI revenue.
Each answer resolves in one sentence before the expansion. Click any question for the full answer.
Real questions from the Terms.Law forum where founders, freelancers, and tenants worked through situations like yours.
Email me a one-paragraph description of your AI stack and product. I'll send back a scope confirmation and the PayPal invoice within one business day.
Email me to start →Disclaimer. The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page or contacting me does not create an attorney-client relationship. AI-output-rights law is evolving rapidly and the analysis provided in any engagement is current as of the engagement date. Sergei Tokmakov is licensed in California (CA Bar #279869); AI output-rights matters that don't require state-specific litigation are handled nationwide. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.