Score Breakdown by Category

How Square's published Payment Terms rate across the methodology's evaluation categories, weighted by real-world impact on a merchant. Automated assessment, as of June 28, 2026.

💰 Fund & Account Control (25%) 33/100

Why this score: the Payment Terms give Square broad contractual discretion over funds and payouts. Section 14 lets Square withhold funds by temporarily suspending or delaying payouts of Proceeds and designate an amount the merchant must maintain in a Reserve, grants Square a security interest and lien on Reserve funds, and authorizes debits from the Reserve or any linked bank account without prior notice. Merchants often experience this as a deactivation, payout hold, reserve, or shutdown.

This is a description of what the published terms permit, not a finding that Square acted unlawfully in any case.

⚖ Dispute Resolution (20%) 42/100

Why this score: Square's terms, like other major processors', route disputes through the company's own dispute-resolution provisions, which generally include arbitration with a class-action waiver. The exact administrator, governing law, any pre-arbitration notice, fee allocation, and any opt-out are version-specific and should be confirmed against the dispute-resolution section of the terms in force for your account before being relied on.

🛡 Liability & Indemnification (20%) 50/100

Why this score: like most processor agreements, Square's terms disclaim indirect, incidental, and consequential damages and cap liability. The practical nuance for a held balance is that the held balance itself is a direct, liquidated amount, not a consequential loss, so a consequential-damages disclaimer generally does not bar a claim for the balance itself. Confirm the specific liability and disclaimer language in the current terms before relying on it.

👁 Transparency & Notice (15%) 52/100

Why this score: Square publishes its Payment Terms with a clear effective date (Last Updated June 1, 2026) and an enumerated reserve and chargeback structure. The opacity is on the risk side: the specific criteria and model outputs that drive a given hold or reserve are not published, which is common across processors.

🔒 Data & Privacy Rights (10%) 48/100

Why this score: covered separately on the companion Square Privacy review. For the fund-hold context, the relevant point is that information and verification gaps are a common stated trigger for moving an account to restricted and pausing payouts.

🚪 Exit Rights (10%) 45/100

Why this score: on deactivation or closure the held balance does not disappear, but Section 14 lets Square continue to hold or delay funds and use a Reserve to satisfy creditor or government process. The held balance remains an amount that is yours subject to Square's stated risk; the question is timing and the risk rationale.

Compare With Other Processors