1. Quick Comparison Table
This comprehensive comparison shows how Stripe, PayPal, and Square handle disputes, fund holds, and merchant rights. Use this table to quickly understand the key differences.
| Factor | Stripe | PayPal | Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Fund Hold Period | 90-120 days typical (can extend) | Up to 180 days after limitation | 90-120 days rolling reserve |
| Reserve Type | Rolling reserve (10-25%) | Full balance hold possible | Rolling reserve (10-30%) |
| Account Termination Notice | Often little/no warning | Often no warning | Variable - sometimes warning |
| Appeal Process | Limited - often automated decisions | Resolution Center - limited effectiveness | Support ticket - variable results |
| Small Claims Carve-Out | Yes - small claims exempt | Yes - small claims exempt | Yes - small claims exempt |
| Arbitration Required | Yes - AAA arbitration | Yes - JAMS arbitration | Yes - AAA arbitration |
| CFPB Complaint Response | Generally responsive | Very responsive | Generally responsive |
| Chargeback Fee | $15 per dispute | $20 per dispute | None (absorbed by Square) |
| Chargeback Time to Respond | 7-21 days depending on card network | 10-20 days | 7 days |
| Demand Letter Effectiveness | Moderate - escalation helps | Moderate to Good | Moderate |
| Corporate Location | San Francisco, CA | San Jose, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| State Regulator | CA DFPI (primary) | CA DFPI (primary) | CA DFPI (primary) |
| Overall Dispute Friendliness |
Key Takeaway: None of these processors are particularly "dispute friendly." All use mandatory arbitration (with small claims carve-outs), have broad contractual rights to hold funds, and rely heavily on automated risk decisions. However, there are meaningful differences in how they handle disputes and how effective various escalation strategies are.
2. Account Termination Policies
Understanding how each processor terminates accounts helps you assess risk and prepare for potential disputes.
Stripe
Automated risk-based terminations
Termination Triggers
- High chargeback rates (typically >1%)
- Sudden volume increases
- "High-risk" business classification
- Terms of Service violations
- Identity verification failures
What Happens
- Account suspended with little/no warning
- Funds held for reserve period (90-120 days typical)
- New payments blocked immediately
- Limited appeal options through support
PayPal
Notorious for sudden limitations
Termination Triggers
- Risk algorithm flags
- Multiple customer disputes
- Prohibited business activities
- Unusual transaction patterns
- Association with other limited accounts
What Happens
- "Account limitation" - full freeze
- 180-day hold on all funds
- Vague explanation in Resolution Center
- Appeals often denied without clear reason
Square
Moderate termination policies
Termination Triggers
- Elevated chargeback rates
- Prohibited business types
- Large ticket transactions
- Industry risk classification
- Failed verification
What Happens
- Account deactivation notice
- Rolling reserve continues during hold
- 90-120 day typical hold period
- Support escalation possible
Verdict: Account Termination
Best: Square - generally provides somewhat clearer communication and more reasonable hold periods.
Worst: PayPal - the 180-day hold policy and vague explanations make them the harshest on terminations.
3. Fund Hold Policies (Reserves & Delays)
Fund holds are the most painful aspect of payment processor disputes. Understanding the differences can help you plan and respond effectively.
Types of Holds by Processor
| Hold Type | Stripe | PayPal | Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Reserve | 10-25% of each transaction, released after 90-120 days | Not typically used (full balance holds instead) | 10-30% of each transaction, released after 90-120 days |
| Full Balance Hold | On account termination only | Common - up to 180 days | On account deactivation |
| Payment-Specific Holds | Large transactions, new merchants | 21-day holds on individual payments | High-ticket transactions flagged |
| Payout Delays | Can extend from 2-day to 7-14 day rolling | Up to 21 days standard for new sellers | Generally next-day unless flagged |
| Post-Termination Hold | 90-120 days typical | 180 days | 90-120 days |
The PayPal 180-Day Problem: PayPal's User Agreement explicitly allows them to hold funds for up to 180 days after account limitation. This is significantly longer than Stripe or Square's typical 90-120 day reserves. For businesses dependent on cash flow, this can be devastating.
How to Reduce Your Risk
For All Processors
- Keep chargeback rate below 0.5%
- Provide clear refund policies
- Ship/deliver quickly with tracking
- Respond to disputes within 24 hours
- Maintain consistent transaction patterns
- Keep documentation of all orders
Processor-Specific Tips
- Stripe: Complete identity verification early, notify them before volume increases
- PayPal: Keep multiple payment options, don't rely 100% on PayPal
- Square: Build history with smaller transactions before large ones
What to Do When Funds Are Held
- Document immediately - Export all transaction data, screenshot balances, save all communications
- Request specific explanation - Ask for written reason for hold
- Provide documentation proactively - Business licenses, fulfillment records, low chargeback history
- Calculate actual risk - Compare hold amount to actual chargeback exposure
- Send formal demand letter - After exhausting standard support
- File CFPB complaint - Highly effective escalation path
4. Chargeback Handling Comparison
How each processor handles chargebacks significantly impacts your dispute experience and costs.
| Factor | Stripe | PayPal | Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chargeback Fee | $15 per dispute | $20 per dispute | $0 (Square absorbs) |
| Response Time | 7-21 days (card network dependent) | 10-20 days | 7 days only |
| Evidence Submission | Dashboard upload - detailed | Resolution Center - limited | Dashboard - simplified |
| Win Rate Support | Good documentation tools | Limited support | Basic support |
| Chargeback Threshold Impact | >1% triggers review/reserves | Multiple disputes trigger limitation | >1% triggers review |
| Fraud Protection | Stripe Radar (AI-based) | Seller Protection program | Limited built-in protection |
Square's No-Fee Advantage: Square is unique in not charging chargeback fees - they absorb this cost. This makes Square more attractive for businesses in higher-dispute industries, though they may offset this with stricter account holds.
Chargeback Response Best Practices
Respond Immediately
Don't wait until the deadline. Respond within 24-48 hours while evidence is fresh and accessible.
Chargeback Abuse TemplatesProvide Complete Evidence
Include: customer communications, shipping proof, delivery confirmation, order details, refund policy acceptance.
Evidence GuideAddress the Specific Reason
Tailor your response to the chargeback reason code. "Product not received" requires different evidence than "unauthorized transaction."
Consider Customer Outreach
Sometimes contacting the customer directly can resolve the dispute faster than the formal process.
Verdict: Chargeback Handling
Best for Fees: Square (no chargeback fees)
Best for Tools: Stripe (detailed evidence submission, Radar fraud protection)
Most Challenging: PayPal (highest fees, limited support, vague processes)
5. Small Claims Court & Arbitration Clauses
All three processors have mandatory arbitration clauses, but all also have small claims court carve-outs. Understanding these options is crucial for pursuing disputes.
Arbitration Comparison
| Factor | Stripe | PayPal | Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbitration Provider | AAA (American Arbitration Association) | JAMS | AAA |
| Small Claims Carve-Out | Yes - can sue in small claims | Yes - can sue in small claims | Yes - can sue in small claims |
| Class Action Waiver | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Governing Law | California | Delaware/California | California |
| Arbitration Fees | Company pays most fees per AAA rules | Company pays most fees per JAMS rules | Company pays most fees per AAA rules |
Small Claims Court Is Your Friend: For disputes up to $12,500 (individuals in California) or the limit in your state, small claims court bypasses arbitration entirely. You can sue Stripe, PayPal, or Square directly in small claims. They must send a representative, and many disputes settle before the hearing.
Small Claims Viability by Processor
Stripe in Small Claims
San Francisco-based, CA courts
Pros
- California location means CA small claims rules apply
- Corporate HQ is in a major metro area
- Generally sends representative to hearings
- May settle to avoid court appearance
Considerations
- Must sue in proper venue (where they're located or contract performed)
- Need strong documentation of disproportionate holds
- Should exhaust other remedies first (CFPB, demand letter)
PayPal in Small Claims
San Jose-based, CA courts
Pros
- Small claims carve-out clearly stated in User Agreement
- Documented history of PayPal settling before hearings
- California courts familiar with PayPal cases
- Can reference state money transmitter violations
Considerations
- 180-day hold may exceed small claims timeline
- PayPal may contest venue in some cases
- Document all attempts to resolve through PayPal first
Square in Small Claims
San Francisco-based, CA courts
Pros
- Same venue as Stripe (San Francisco)
- Block, Inc. is a public company - reputation sensitive
- Generally reasonable about settling clear-cut cases
- Hold periods typically shorter than PayPal
Considerations
- May need to sue Block, Inc. (parent company)
- Document that holds exceed actual risk exposure
- Consider timing around reserve release dates
When to Choose Arbitration vs. Small Claims
Choose Small Claims When:
- Dispute is under your state's small claims limit
- You want faster resolution (30-70 days)
- You can appear in person or the processor is in your state
- You want to avoid arbitration filing fees
- Case is straightforward with clear documentation
Best For: Fund holds under $12,500 (CA) with clear disproportionate amounts
Choose Arbitration When:
- Dispute exceeds small claims limit
- You need discovery (document requests)
- Case is complex and requires legal arguments
- Processor is in a different state and won't participate in your local small claims
- You've already hired an attorney
Best For: Larger disputes, complex cases, need for formal legal process
6. Regulatory Oversight & Complaints
Filing regulatory complaints is one of the most effective ways to escalate payment processor disputes. All three processors respond to regulatory inquiries to maintain their licenses.
Key Regulators
CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
The most effective regulator for all three processors. Companies must respond within 15 days. Creates a formal record that can support future legal action.
File CFPB ComplaintCalifornia DFPI
All three processors are headquartered in California and licensed by DFPI. State-level complaints can be very effective.
File CA DFPI ComplaintYour State's Financial Regulator
Each processor holds money transmitter licenses in most states. Your state regulator can investigate license compliance.
BBB (Better Business Bureau)
Less formal but still tracked by companies. PayPal and Square particularly respond to maintain ratings.
File BBB ComplaintCFPB Effectiveness by Processor
| Factor | Stripe | PayPal | Square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response Rate | High - typically responds within deadline | Very High - extensive CFPB history | High - generally responsive |
| Resolution Quality | Moderate - may release funds or explain position | Moderate to Good - often triggers escalated review | Moderate - case-by-case basis |
| Best For | Disproportionate reserves, unclear terminations | 180-day holds, arbitrary limitations | Rolling reserve disputes, deactivation appeals |
| Complaint Volume (Historical) | Lower (smaller merchant base historically) | Very High (well-documented issue patterns) | Moderate |
CFPB Complaint Strategy: File your CFPB complaint after sending a demand letter and getting no response. Include your demand letter, all documentation, and a clear statement of what resolution you seek. The CFPB tracks company response patterns, so poor handling can impact the processor's regulatory standing.
Legal Arguments for Regulatory Complaints
- Money Transmitter Violations: All three are licensed as money transmitters. Unreasonable fund holds may violate license conditions requiring timely settlement.
- Unfair or Deceptive Practices: Holding funds without clear justification, failing to provide specific reasons, or implementing disproportionate reserves may violate state UDAP laws.
- Good Faith Violations: Contractual rights must be exercised in good faith. Arbitrary or punitive holds may breach implied covenants.
- California Consumer Protection: All three are California companies subject to California's strong consumer protection laws, including the UCL.
7. Demand Letter Effectiveness
Formal demand letters can be effective, but success rates vary by processor and situation.
When Demand Letters Work
Likely to Succeed
- Clear disproportionate hold (hold >> chargeback history)
- Documented legitimate business with low dispute rates
- Sent after exhausting standard support
- Threatens specific regulatory action (CFPB)
- Professional tone with clear deadline
- Includes specific legal arguments
Unlikely to Succeed
- High chargeback rate (>1%)
- Genuine policy violations
- Vague or emotional demands
- No documentation of business legitimacy
- Sent before trying normal channels
- Unrealistic demands (e.g., damages beyond actual funds held)
Demand Letter Effectiveness by Processor
Stripe
Moderate effectiveness
Key Points to Include
- Specific account ID and amounts
- Comparison of hold to actual chargeback history
- Reference to CA money transmitter obligations
- Clear deadline (14 days)
- Stated intention to file CFPB complaint
Send To
Stripe, Inc., Attn: Legal Department
354 Oyster Point Boulevard
South San Francisco, CA 94080
PayPal
Moderate to good effectiveness
Key Points to Include
- Account email and limitation date
- Documentation of legitimate business
- Challenge to 180-day hold proportionality
- Reference to EFTA and state MTL laws
- Request for specific explanation
Send To
PayPal, Inc., Attn: Executive Escalations
2211 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95131
Also: executive.office@paypal.com
Square
Moderate effectiveness
Key Points to Include
- Account details and reserve amounts
- Rolling reserve vs. actual risk comparison
- Business history and fulfillment records
- Reference to Block, Inc. as parent
- Clear resolution request
Send To
Block, Inc. (Square), Attn: Legal / Executive Escalations
1455 Market Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94103
8. Overall Dispute Friendliness Ratings
Based on our analysis of termination policies, fund holds, chargeback handling, regulatory responsiveness, and dispute resolution options, here are our overall ratings.
Stripe: C+ (Fair)
Better than average, but still challenging
Strengths
- Rolling reserves vs. full balance holds
- Good chargeback evidence tools
- Responsive to CFPB complaints
- Reasonable arbitration terms
Weaknesses
- Automated decisions with limited appeal
- Little warning before account actions
- Support can be unhelpful for disputes
PayPal: C- (Below Average)
Most challenging for disputes
Strengths
- Extensive regulatory track record (CFPB effective)
- Executive escalation path exists
- Well-known, so more resources available
Weaknesses
- 180-day hold policy - harshest in industry
- Vague limitation explanations
- Highest chargeback fees ($20)
- Arbitrary account limitations reported
Square: C (Fair)
Middle of the road
Strengths
- No chargeback fees
- Rolling reserves vs. full holds
- Generally faster payouts
- More transparent about reserve terms
Weaknesses
- Short chargeback response window (7 days)
- Reserve percentages can be high (up to 30%)
- Limited fraud protection tools
Bottom Line
None of these processors are "dispute friendly" - they all have significant contractual rights to hold funds and terminate accounts. However, Stripe edges ahead slightly for its rolling reserve approach and better dispute tools, while PayPal is the most challenging due to its 180-day hold policy and vague limitations. Square falls in the middle with no chargeback fees but shorter response windows.
9. Recommendations by Dispute Type
Here's what to do based on your specific situation with each processor.
If Your Account Was Terminated
Stripe Account Terminated
- Export all dashboard data immediately
- Request specific termination reason in writing
- Calculate reserve vs. actual chargeback exposure
- Send demand letter to legal department
- File CFPB complaint after 14 days with no response
- Consider small claims if under limit
Success Rate: Moderate - focus on disproportionate hold argument
PayPal Account Limited
- Screenshot everything - you may lose access
- File appeal through Resolution Center first
- Send demand letter to Executive Escalations
- File CFPB complaint (very effective for PayPal)
- Prepare for potential 180-day wait
- Small claims viable after hold expires if funds not released
Success Rate: Moderate - CFPB complaints often trigger release
Square Account Deactivated
- Export transaction and deposit history
- Contact support for specific explanation
- Document rolling reserve amounts
- Send demand letter to Block, Inc.
- File CFPB and CA DFPI complaints
- Expect 90-120 day hold period
Success Rate: Moderate - shorter holds than PayPal help
If Your Funds Are Held (Account Still Active)
Stripe Reserve Hold
- Request written explanation of reserve basis
- Provide documentation showing low risk profile
- Ask for reserve reduction based on history
- Set up alternative processor for new payments
- If no progress, escalate to demand letter
Best Approach: Demonstrate track record of low chargebacks and request proportionate reserve
PayPal Payment Hold
- Provide tracking information immediately
- Ask customers to confirm receipt
- Build history through consistent fulfillment
- Don't rely solely on PayPal for payments
- Holds usually release after 21 days with delivery proof
Best Approach: Focus on fulfillment documentation and delivery confirmation
Square Rolling Reserve
- Understand the reserve percentage and duration
- Track when reserves will be released
- Maintain low chargeback rates
- Request reserve review after consistent performance
- Consider dedicated merchant account for stability
Best Approach: Plan for cash flow impact and maintain excellent fulfillment
If You're Choosing a Processor
Low-Risk Business
- Physical products with fast shipping
- Established business with history
- Low refund/dispute rates
Recommendation: Any processor works, but Stripe has best tools. Consider traditional merchant account for maximum stability.
Higher-Risk Business
- Digital products, services, subscriptions
- Pre-orders or delayed fulfillment
- High-ticket transactions
Recommendation: Consider high-risk merchant account specialist. If using PayFacs, avoid putting all funds on one platform. Square's no-chargeback-fee policy may help.
New Business
- Limited processing history
- Unpredictable volume
- Building customer base
Recommendation: Start with multiple processors. Keep some funds in reserve yourself. Build history gradually before scaling volume.
The Best Protection: Don't rely on any single payment processor. Use multiple processors, maintain your own cash reserves, and document everything. If one processor freezes funds, you need alternatives to keep your business running while you fight the dispute.
Generate Your Demand Letter
Use our free generators to create a customized demand letter for your specific situation.
File a CFPB Complaint
The CFPB is one of the most effective ways to escalate payment processor disputes.
File Complaint