The Fundamental Difference: Criminal vs. Civil Defamation
In most Western legal systems, defamation is a civil matter. If someone defames you, you can sue for monetary damages. The defendant might lose money, but they will not go to prison. Thailand is fundamentally different.
Criminal Prosecution, Not Lawsuits
In Thailand, defamation is criminalized under the Penal Code. A person found guilty of defamation can be sentenced to imprisonment for up to two years, fined up to 200,000 THB, or both. This applies to statements made in person, in writing, on social media, in reviews, or anywhere else.
This creates a dramatically different risk profile for foreigners. Activities that might result in a nasty letter from a lawyer in California or London can result in arrest, criminal prosecution, and imprisonment in Thailand. The complainant does not need to prove monetary damages; they need only convince the court that their reputation was harmed.
Why This Catches Foreigners Off Guard
Most foreigners arrive in Thailand with assumptions shaped by their home legal systems:
- They assume negative reviews are protected speech
- They believe truth is an absolute defense to defamation claims
- They think civil remedies (money) are the maximum consequence
- They assume police will not get involved in what seems like a private dispute
All of these assumptions are wrong under Thai law.
The Relevant Statutes: Penal Code Sections 326-333
Thailand's defamation laws are found in the Thai Penal Code, specifically Sections 326 through 333. Understanding these provisions is essential for anyone who might criticize a person or business in Thailand.
Section 326: Basic Defamation
Penal Code Section 326
"Whoever imputes anything to another person before a third party in a manner likely to impair the reputation of such person or to expose such person to hatred or contempt is said to commit defamation, and shall be punished with imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine not exceeding twenty thousand Baht, or both."
The key elements are:
- Imputation: Making a statement about someone
- Third party: The statement must be communicated to at least one other person
- Reputation harm: The statement is likely to damage reputation or cause hatred/contempt
Section 328: Defamation by Publication
Penal Code Section 328
"If the offense of defamation is committed by means of publication of a document, drawing, painting, cinematograph film, picture, or letters made visible by any means, phonograph record or another recording instrument, recording picture or letters, or by broadcasting or spreading picture, or by propagation by any other means, the offender shall be punished with imprisonment not exceeding two years and a fine not exceeding two hundred thousand Baht."
This section is critical for online speech. Any written or broadcast defamation including social media posts, blog entries, online reviews, videos, podcasts, or any other published medium falls under Section 328, which doubles the maximum imprisonment to two years and increases the maximum fine tenfold.
Online Speech = Enhanced Penalties
- Social media posts fall under Section 328 (publication)
- Online reviews on Google, TripAdvisor, etc. qualify as publication
- YouTube videos, blog posts, and forum comments are covered
- Maximum penalty: 2 years prison + 200,000 THB fine
Section 329: Exceptions (Limited)
Section 329 provides limited exceptions to defamation liability:
- Expression of opinion or statement in good faith for self-justification or protection of legitimate interests
- Fair comment on public matters
- Fair comment on court proceedings made in good faith
However, these exceptions are narrowly interpreted and rarely protect foreigners making complaints about businesses or individuals.
Truth Is NOT a Complete Defense
This is the single most important concept for foreigners to understand. In many Western jurisdictions, truth is an absolute defense to defamation. If what you said is true, you cannot be found liable for defamation. Thai law is different.
Section 330: The Truth Defense Limitation
Under Thai Penal Code Section 330, proving that your statement was true provides a defense ONLY if you can also prove that the statement was made in the public interest. Private complaints, business disputes, and personal grievances, even if factually accurate, may still constitute criminal defamation.
Penal Code Section 330
"In the case of defamation, if the person prosecuted for defamation can prove that the imputation made by him is true, he shall not be punished. But he shall not be allowed to prove the truth if such imputation concerns personal matters, and the proof will not be benefit to the public."
What This Means in Practice
Consider a scenario: A foreigner stays at a hotel and has a genuinely terrible experience. The room was dirty, staff was rude, and they were overcharged. All of this is true and can be documented. The foreigner leaves a detailed negative review on Google, describing exactly what happened.
Under Thai law, this review could still constitute criminal defamation because:
- It was published (online), triggering Section 328
- It damages the hotel's reputation
- Even if everything stated is true, it concerns "personal matters" (a private business transaction)
- The court may determine that public interest does not require this information to be published
This does not mean all negative reviews result in prosecution, but it means truthfulness alone does not guarantee protection.
Common Scenarios That Get Foreigners in Trouble
Understanding how defamation complaints typically arise helps foreigners avoid these situations.
Scenario 1: The Negative Online Review
A tourist has a bad experience at a restaurant, hotel, or tour company. They leave a detailed negative review on Google, TripAdvisor, or Facebook. The business owner files a criminal defamation complaint. Police contact the reviewer, who may still be in Thailand or may be asked to return. Even if the review was accurate, the foreigner faces potential prosecution under Section 328.
Scenario 2: The Business Dispute Gone Public
A foreigner has a dispute with a Thai business partner, landlord, or service provider. Frustrated, they post about the dispute on social media or in expat forums. The Thai party files a defamation complaint. The posts, even if factually accurate, expose the foreigner to criminal liability.
Scenario 3: The Employee-Employer Conflict
A foreigner is fired from a job or leaves under bad circumstances. They post about the experience on LinkedIn, Glassdoor, or social media. The former employer files a defamation complaint. Work permit and visa complications may compound the legal problems.
Scenario 4: The Personal Relationship Fallout
A romantic relationship ends badly. One party posts about the other on social media, in dating apps, or in community groups. The aggrieved party files a defamation complaint. Personal matters receive less protection under Section 330.
Scenario 5: The Consumer Complaint
A foreigner feels scammed by a business and warns others in expat groups or on review sites. Even if the warning was meant to protect others, and even if the facts were accurate, a defamation complaint can follow. "Protecting consumers" may not qualify as sufficient public interest under Thai interpretation.
Real Cases Involving Foreigners
Defamation cases against foreigners in Thailand are not theoretical; they happen regularly. While specific case details are often not publicly available due to settlement agreements, patterns emerge from news reports and legal community observations.
The Koh Chang Hotel Case (2020-2021)
An American tourist left a negative TripAdvisor review about a Koh Chang hotel, alleging poor service and threatening behavior from staff. The hotel owner filed a criminal defamation complaint. The case received international media attention because the tourist faced potential imprisonment over a review. Eventually, the matter was resolved after the tourist issued an apology and the complaint was withdrawn.
Pattern: Tourist Reviews Leading to Complaints
Legal professionals working in Thailand report that complaints against foreign tourists for online reviews are common. Most do not make international news because they are resolved through settlements or apologies before trial. However, the pattern is clear:
- Complaint filed with local police
- Police investigate and may issue summons
- If the foreigner has left Thailand, an arrest warrant may be issued
- If the foreigner returns or is still present, they must respond to the complaint
- Settlement negotiations often follow
Expat Business Owners
Foreign business owners in Thailand are particularly vulnerable because they cannot simply leave the country. Disputes with Thai partners, employees, or competitors can easily escalate to defamation complaints when discussions become public. The power dynamic of criminal prosecution is often used as leverage in business disputes.
How Defamation Complaints Are Filed
Understanding the process helps foreigners recognize when they are facing a serious legal matter.
Filing the Complaint
The complainant (alleged victim) files a complaint at a local police station. They must provide:
- Evidence of the defamatory statement (screenshots, printouts, recordings)
- Identification of the accused (may require investigation if anonymous)
- Statement explaining how their reputation was damaged
Police Investigation
Police will investigate to determine if there is sufficient evidence to proceed. This may include:
- Contacting the accused for their statement
- Gathering additional evidence
- Requesting IP address information for online posts
- Interviewing witnesses
Summons or Arrest
If police believe the complaint has merit, they may:
- Issue a summons requiring the accused to appear at the police station
- In more serious cases, seek an arrest warrant
- If the accused is a foreigner who has left Thailand, an arrest warrant can remain active
Prosecution
If the matter is not resolved at the police level, prosecutors may file charges. Criminal trials in Thailand can take years, during which the accused may face travel restrictions, bail conditions, or detention.
Settlement and Withdrawal Process
Most defamation cases involving foreigners are resolved through settlement rather than trial. Understanding this process is crucial.
Why Settlement Is Common
Thai criminal defamation is a "compoundable offense," meaning the complainant can withdraw the complaint at any time. This creates a strong incentive structure for settlement:
- The complainant often wants an apology and/or compensation more than imprisonment
- The accused wants to avoid criminal prosecution and its uncertainties
- Both parties can often reach resolution faster than court proceedings
Typical Settlement Elements
| Element |
Description |
| Public Apology |
Written apology posted where the original statement appeared |
| Deletion |
Removal of the defamatory content from all platforms |
| Compensation |
Payment to the complainant (amounts vary widely) |
| Non-Disclosure |
Agreement not to discuss the matter further |
| Withdrawal |
Formal withdrawal of the criminal complaint |
Negotiation Through Lawyers
Settlement negotiations are best conducted through Thai lawyers. Direct negotiation by the accused can lead to admissions that strengthen the complainant's case if settlement fails. A Thai attorney can:
- Communicate with the complainant's side professionally
- Assess the strength of the complaint
- Negotiate terms without prejudicing the accused's position
- Ensure proper documentation of any settlement
- Verify that the complaint is properly withdrawn
Important Warning
Never assume a defamation complaint will "go away" if you leave Thailand. Arrest warrants can remain active indefinitely. Immigration databases may flag your passport upon re-entry. What seems like an escape can become a permanent travel restriction.
Penalties If Convicted
If a defamation case proceeds to trial and results in conviction, the penalties depend on which section applies.
| Section |
Maximum Prison |
Maximum Fine |
| 326 (Verbal) |
1 year |
20,000 THB |
| 328 (Published) |
2 years |
200,000 THB |
| 327 (Imputing Criminal) |
2 years |
200,000 THB |
Courts may impose:
- Imprisonment only
- Fine only
- Both imprisonment and fine
- Suspended sentences (imprisonment waived if conditions met)
For first-time offenders with minor conduct, suspended sentences are possible. However, for foreigners, even a suspended sentence creates immigration problems and may result in deportation and blacklisting.
Practical Advice for Foreigners
Prevention Strategies
- Avoid public criticism: Handle disputes privately through direct communication or lawyers
- Be careful with reviews: Stick to objective facts, avoid emotional language, consider whether posting is worth the risk
- Never post in anger: Wait 24-48 hours before posting anything critical about a person or business
- Keep records: Document disputes with photos, receipts, and written communications in case you need to defend your statements
- Use neutral language: "The room was not as described" rather than "They are liars and cheats"
If You Receive a Complaint
- Take it seriously: Do not ignore summons or police contact
- Contact a lawyer immediately: Thai criminal procedure requires immediate professional guidance
- Do not leave Thailand: If you are in the country, leaving may convert a manageable situation into an arrest warrant
- Do not contact the complainant directly: All communication should go through lawyers
- Preserve evidence: Keep copies of what you posted and any supporting documentation
- Consider settlement: Most cases are resolved without trial, but terms matter
Related Thai Legal Hub Articles