Photography Prohibition
Restricts the use of cameras, smartphones, and recording devices to prevent unauthorized capture of visual confidential information, prototypes, and facilities.
Low ComplexityRestricts the use of cameras, smartphones, and recording devices to prevent unauthorized capture of visual confidential information, prototypes, and facilities.
Low ComplexityA photography prohibition clause restricts the Receiving Party from using cameras, smartphones, tablets, or any device capable of capturing images, video, or audio while on the Disclosing Party's premises or while in possession of confidential materials. This provision addresses the reality that visual information, such as equipment layouts, prototype designs, manufacturing processes, whiteboard notes, and computer screens, can reveal confidential information as effectively as written documents. The clause typically prohibits not just taking photographs but also possessing devices capable of capturing such images.
Photography prohibitions are commonly enforced and are particularly important in industries with significant visual intellectual property, such as manufacturing, product development, entertainment, and research. Under trade secret law, reasonable security measures must be demonstrated to maintain protection, and photography restrictions are a recognized component. Some facilities with government contracts or export-controlled technology are legally required to prohibit photography under ITAR or similar regulations. Violation of photography restrictions can constitute both breach of contract and, in some cases, trade secret misappropriation.
Surrendering expensive devices without secure, documented storage creates risk of loss or damage. Ensure there is a proper check-in system with receipts and secure lockers.
Pre-set damages of $50,000+ per incident for photography may be an unenforceable penalty rather than a reasonable damage estimate. Courts may refuse to enforce grossly disproportionate liquidated damages.
Provisions requiring consent to search your person, clothing, or body go beyond reasonable security measures and raise privacy concerns. This should be limited to bag inspection only.
Photography prohibitions that survive "indefinitely" even after the NDA terminates create ongoing obligations that are difficult to track and may be unreasonable for non-confidential areas or publicly known information.
Prohibitions that extend to areas "near" or "in the vicinity of" facilities without clear boundaries could technically prohibit photographing anything visible from public streets or neighboring properties.
Photography restrictions are common but vary widely in scope. Consider whether the restrictions match the actual sensitivity of what you will see.
Ask an Attorney