ERISA vs State Law Claims

If you have health insurance through your employer, a federal law called ERISA may drastically limit your legal options. Understanding the difference between ERISA and state law claims is crucial before pursuing any health insurance dispute.

What Is ERISA?

ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) is a federal law that governs most employer-sponsored benefit plans, including health insurance. While ERISA was intended to protect employees, its "preemption" provision has an unexpected consequence: it blocks most state law claims against insurers and severely limits the damages you can recover.

This means if your employer-sponsored health plan wrongfully denies a claim - even in bad faith - you may be limited to recovering only the cost of the denied benefit itself. No punitive damages. No emotional distress damages. No attorney fee recovery in most cases.

Why This Matters: The ERISA Problem

Under ERISA, even if an insurer acts in obvious bad faith - denying a clearly covered treatment, causing you serious harm - your recovery is typically limited to the value of the denied benefits. Critics call this the "deny first, ask questions later" incentive, because insurers face little financial consequence for wrongful denials.

ERISA vs. State Law: Key Differences

The type of health insurance you have determines which legal framework applies:

Factor ERISA (Federal) State Law
Applies To Most employer-sponsored plans Individual plans, some government plans, church plans
Damages Available Limited to denied benefits only Contract damages + bad faith + punitive + emotional distress
Bad Faith Claims Generally preempted (blocked) Available in most states
Punitive Damages Not available Available for egregious conduct
Attorney Fees Court discretion (often denied) Often recoverable under state law
Jury Trial No right to jury trial Jury trial available
Court Filing Federal court (usually) State or federal court
Review Standard Often "abuse of discretion" (deferential) "De novo" (fresh review by court)
The Practical Impact

If an insurer wrongfully denies a $50,000 surgery, under state law you might recover the $50,000 plus six figures in bad faith damages and punitive damages. Under ERISA, even if you win, you likely recover only the $50,000 - and maybe not even your attorney fees. This makes finding an attorney for ERISA cases much harder.

Federal Preemption Explained

ERISA Section 514(a) contains broad "preemption" language stating that ERISA "supersedes" any state laws that "relate to" employee benefit plans. Courts have interpreted this very broadly, blocking most state law claims against ERISA plans.

What Gets Preempted (Blocked)

What Is NOT Preempted

The "Savings Clause" Exception

ERISA has a "savings clause" that preserves state laws that "regulate insurance." However, this exception has been narrowly interpreted. Fully insured plans (where the employer buys insurance from a carrier) may be subject to some state insurance regulations, while self-funded plans (where the employer pays claims directly) generally are not.

Is Your Plan Governed by ERISA?

The first question in any health insurance dispute is whether ERISA applies. Here is how to determine this:

ERISA Applies To:

ERISA Does NOT Apply To:

How to Check Your Plan

Look at your Summary Plan Description (SPD) or plan documents. If they reference ERISA, your plan is likely governed by it. You can also ask your HR department whether your employer's health plan is "self-funded" or "fully insured" and whether ERISA applies.

🐻 California Note

California has strong insurance consumer protections, including the right to sue insurers for bad faith (Insurance Code Section 790.03). However, these protections are largely unavailable if your plan is governed by ERISA.

For California state government employees, plans are NOT subject to ERISA, so state law remedies are available. Similarly, if you purchased an individual plan through Covered California, ERISA does not apply.

Your Rights Under ERISA

While ERISA limits your remedies, it does provide some protections:

Administrative Exhaustion Requirement

Before suing under ERISA, you must "exhaust" the plan's internal appeals process. This means filing an internal appeal and, in most cases, receiving a final denial before going to court. Failing to exhaust can result in your case being dismissed.

Right to Plan Documents

You have the right to receive copies of your Summary Plan Description (SPD), the full plan document, and documents relevant to your claim. The plan must provide these within 30 days of request, or face penalties of up to $110 per day.

Right to Full and Fair Review

ERISA requires plans to provide a "full and fair review" of claim denials, including:

Build Your Record During Appeals

In ERISA cases, the court often reviews only the "administrative record" - the documents submitted during the appeals process. This means you must submit all supporting evidence during your internal appeal. New evidence may be excluded later.

Strategies for ERISA Claims

While ERISA limits your options, strategic approaches can improve your chances:

1. Build a Strong Administrative Record

Submit all medical records, doctor letters, clinical guidelines, and supporting evidence during the internal appeal. The court record is often limited to what was before the plan administrator.

2. Look for Procedural Violations

If the plan failed to follow proper procedures - like not providing required notices, missing deadlines, or failing to consult appropriate medical professionals - you may be able to argue the claim should be reviewed "de novo" (fresh) rather than under the deferential "abuse of discretion" standard.

3. Check for Conflicts of Interest

If the same entity both decides claims and pays them (a "structural conflict of interest"), courts may give less deference to the denial decision.

4. Identify Non-ERISA Claims

Some claims may fall outside ERISA preemption, such as claims against healthcare providers (medical malpractice) or claims under other federal laws. An experienced attorney can help identify these alternatives.

5. Consider the ACA External Review

Even for ERISA plans, the Affordable Care Act provides for external review by an independent organization. This can be a faster path to resolution than litigation.

🐻 California Note

California's Independent Medical Review (IMR) process through the Department of Managed Health Care applies to most fully insured ERISA plans in California. While ERISA preempts state law claims, the IMR process may still be available as a faster alternative to federal court litigation.

When to Consult an Attorney

ERISA cases are complex and often require specialized knowledge. Consider consulting an attorney if:

Related Guides

Dealing With an ERISA Plan Denial?

ERISA cases require careful strategy from the very first appeal. I can help you understand your options, build a strong administrative record, and determine whether litigation makes sense in your situation.

~$450
Demand Letters
$240/hr
General Rate
Schedule a Consultation