📋 Overview
You've received a demand letter claiming a guest was injured at your trampoline park or indoor recreation facility. The signed waiver is your primary defense, but assumption of risk and other doctrines provide additional protection.
⚠ Locate the Waiver
The signed waiver is your most critical defense document. Locate and preserve it immediately, whether digital or paper.
🕒 Preserve Footage
Security camera footage is essential. Most systems overwrite within 7-30 days. Issue immediate preservation order.
💰 Inherent Risk Activity
Trampolining is an inherent risk activity. Guests who participate voluntarily assume the risks of falls, collisions, and landing injuries.
Common Trampoline Park Injury Claims
- Broken bones - Ankle, wrist, and leg fractures from falls and landings
- Spinal injuries - Failed flips, landing on head/neck
- Collision injuries - Multiple jumpers on same trampoline
- Foam pit injuries - Landing on hidden objects or other jumpers
- Wall injuries - Contact with trampoline court edges
- Dodgeball injuries - Impact injuries during games
Legal Services Pricing
- 📄 Demand letter: Flat fee $450
- ⏱ Extended negotiation: $240/hr
- 📊 Contingency: 33-40% for strong claims
📝 Waiver Defense
Trampoline parks require signed waivers for good reason - they are the primary legal defense against injury claims.
Waiver Enforceability
Courts in most states enforce properly drafted trampoline park waivers because:
- Trampolining is a voluntary recreational activity
- Participants choose to engage knowing the risks
- Waivers are signed before participation
- The activity is not a public necessity
- There is no unequal bargaining power
💡 California Waiver Law
California enforces exculpatory agreements for recreational activities where: (1) the release is clear and unambiguous, (2) the activity is recreational and voluntary, and (3) the release does not violate public policy. (See Tunkl v. Regents, Civil Code 1668.)
What Waivers Protect Against
- Ordinary negligence claims
- Injuries from normal trampoline use
- Collisions with other jumpers
- Falls and landing injuries
- Contact with equipment during normal use
What Waivers Do NOT Protect Against
- Gross negligence - Reckless disregard for safety
- Intentional misconduct - Deliberate harm
- Equipment defects - Broken or defective trampolines
- Fraud - Misrepresentation of safety
- Statutory violations - Failure to meet safety codes
⚠ Minor Waivers
For minor injuries, ensure the waiver was signed by a parent or legal guardian. In California, parental waivers are generally enforceable for recreational activities. Verify the signatory's relationship to the minor and their legal authority to sign.
🛡 Additional Defense Strategies
Beyond the signed waiver, multiple legal doctrines protect trampoline park operators.
Primary Assumption of Risk
Trampolining involves inherent risks that cannot be eliminated without destroying the activity. Jumping, landing, falling, and contact with other jumpers are fundamental to the experience. Guests who voluntarily participate assume these inherent risks.
Contributory/Comparative Negligence
If the injured guest was violating rules - double-bouncing, attempting stunts beyond their ability, ignoring capacity limits, or jumping while intoxicated - their own negligence caused or contributed to the injury.
ASTM F2970 Compliance
Demonstrating compliance with ASTM F2970 Standard Practice for trampoline park operations establishes that the facility met industry safety standards. This includes court design, padding, supervision ratios, and signage requirements.
Adequate Warnings
Posted rules and warnings, safety briefings, and the waiver itself all establish that guests were fully informed of the risks. This supports both the waiver defense and assumption of risk.
Proper Supervision
Maintaining appropriate staff-to-guest ratios and having trained court monitors demonstrates reasonable care. Document supervisor positions, training records, and intervention protocols.
🚨 High-Risk Claims
- Spinal injuries - Catastrophic damages; verify all protocols followed
- Equipment failure - Must show proper maintenance and inspection
- Staff negligence - Actions outside waiver protection
- Child injuries - Verify parental waiver properly signed
🔍 Evidence to Preserve
Strong documentation is essential for defending trampoline park claims.
Critical Documents
- Signed waiver - The most important document; locate immediately
- Waiver timestamp and IP (digital) - Proof of when/how signed
- Surveillance footage - All cameras covering the incident area
- Incident report - Staff documentation of what happened
- First aid records - Treatment provided on-site
Facility Documentation
- Daily equipment inspection logs
- Trampoline maintenance and replacement records
- Staff training and certification records
- Supervisor schedules and positions for that day
- Photos of posted warning signs and rules
- Safety briefing video (if shown to guests)
Witness Information
- Court monitor who witnessed the incident
- Front desk staff who processed the waiver
- Other guests who may have witnessed events
- First aid responders
💡 Digital Waiver Systems
If you use a digital waiver system, retrieve the complete record including IP address, timestamp, device information, and the exact version of waiver language that was signed. This metadata can defeat claims that the waiver was forged or that the guest didn't read it.
📝 Sample Response Letters
🚀 Next Steps
Step 1: Locate Waiver
Find and preserve the signed waiver - this is your primary defense document.
Step 2: Preserve Footage
Issue litigation hold for all security camera footage from the incident date.
Step 3: Notify Insurance
Report the claim to your general liability carrier immediately.
Step 4: Legal Review
Have attorney assess waiver validity and prepare formal response.
Need Professional Assistance?
Get expert help defending against trampoline park injury claims.
Schedule Consultation - $450Resources
- ASTM F2970: Standard Practice for Trampoline Courts
- IATP: International Association of Trampoline Parks
- California Civil Code 1668: Exculpatory contract limitations
- Tunkl v. Regents: Waiver enforceability factors