📋 Overview

A bad faith allegation is one of the most serious claims an insurer can face. Under California law, insurers owe a duty of good faith and fair dealing to their insureds. Breach of this duty can result in consequential damages far exceeding policy limits, plus punitive damages under Civil Code 3294.

⚠ Punitive Damages Risk

Bad faith claims can result in punitive damages if conduct was oppressive, fraudulent, or malicious. No policy limits apply.

🕒 Immediate Response Required

Bad faith allegations require immediate escalation to management and coverage counsel for strategic response.

💰 Consequential Damages

Emotional distress, lost business opportunities, and attorney fees may all be recoverable beyond contract damages.

Types of Bad Faith Claims

  • First-party bad faith - Insured claims insurer wrongfully denied or delayed their own claim
  • Third-party bad faith - Insured claims insurer failed to properly defend or settle liability claim
  • Failure to investigate - Inadequate investigation before denial
  • Unreasonable delay - Unjustified delay in claims handling
  • Lowball offers - Offers not reflecting reasonable claim value
$450
Professional Response Letter

Bad faith analysis, defense documentation, and formal response on attorney letterhead.

Schedule Review

🔍 Bad Faith Elements

Understanding what the claimant must prove helps you prepare your defense.

Elements of First-Party Bad Faith (Gruenberg v. Aetna)

Element Claimant Must Prove Defense Focus
Benefits due Policy benefits were owed Show legitimate coverage dispute
Withholding Insurer withheld benefits unreasonably Document reasonable basis
Knowledge/Recklessness Insurer knew or recklessly disregarded lack of basis Show good faith belief
Damages Resulting damages beyond contract Challenge causation

🚨 Critical: The "Genuine Dispute" Doctrine

Under Chateau Chamberay v. Associated International, an insurer is not liable for bad faith if there was a genuine dispute over coverage or the amount of benefits owed. The dispute must be based on facts known at the time, not hindsight.

Common Bad Faith Allegations

Unreasonable Denial

Denying claim without proper investigation or legitimate coverage basis.

Delayed Payment

Failing to promptly pay undisputed portions while investigating disputed amounts.

Inadequate Investigation

Failing to thoroughly investigate before making coverage decisions.

Misrepresentation

Misrepresenting policy terms or claim requirements to insured.

🛡 Key Defenses

California law provides several defenses to bad faith claims.

Genuine Dispute Doctrine

If there was a genuine dispute over coverage or claim value based on evidence available at the time, no bad faith exists. Document the objective basis for your position.

When to use: Complex coverage interpretation, conflicting medical evidence, disputed liability.

Reasonable Investigation

An insurer that conducts a thorough, reasonable investigation before denying a claim is protected from bad faith liability even if the denial is ultimately wrong.

When to use: Comprehensive claim file shows all reasonable steps were taken.

Reliance on Expert Opinions

Good faith reliance on reasonable expert opinions (medical, engineering, legal) supports defense against bad faith. Experts must be qualified and objective.

When to use: IME, coverage counsel opinion, forensic expert report supported decision.

Prompt Payment of Undisputed Amounts

Paying undisputed portions promptly while investigating disputed amounts demonstrates good faith, even if the overall claim is contested.

When to use: Partial payments made while investigation continued.

No Benefits Due

If no benefits were actually owed under the policy, there can be no bad faith in withholding them. Coverage exclusions or policy conditions may apply.

When to use: Clear policy exclusion, condition precedent not met, fraud in application.

⚠ Beware: These Are NOT Defenses

  • "We followed company procedures" - Procedures may themselves be unreasonable
  • "Other insurers do the same thing" - Industry practice doesn't justify bad faith
  • "We eventually paid" - Delay itself can constitute bad faith
  • "Claim was complex" - Complexity requires more investigation, not less

📄 Documentation Requirements

Your claim file is your primary defense. Document thoroughly.

📄 Investigation Documentation

  • ✓Complete investigation notes
  • ✓All documents reviewed
  • ✓Expert reports obtained
  • ✓Witness statements

📝 Decision Documentation

  • ✓Basis for coverage position
  • ✓Policy provisions cited
  • ✓Supervisor review documented
  • ✓Alternative theories considered

📊 Bad Faith Exposure Analysis

Example: Denied $100,000 property claim

Contract damages (if claim valid)$100,000
Consequential damages$50,000+
Emotional distress$25,000-$250,000
Attorney fees (Brandt fees)$75,000+
Punitive damages (if malice found)$300,000+
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE$550,000+

📝 Sample Responses

Professional response templates for bad faith allegations.

Denial of Bad Faith - Genuine Dispute
We have reviewed your allegations of bad faith and categorically deny any wrongdoing. Our handling of [INSURED'S] claim was at all times reasonable and in good faith. As documented in our claim file, a genuine dispute exists regarding [coverage/damages/liability]. Specifically, [describe basis for dispute - e.g., policy exclusion language, conflicting evidence, etc.]. Under California law, including Chateau Chamberay v. Associated International, an insurer is not liable for bad faith when a genuine dispute exists. Our investigation included [describe investigation steps]. Based on the evidence obtained, we concluded in good faith that [explain position]. Our position was supported by [expert opinion/policy language/case law]. We remain willing to discuss resolution of the underlying claim, but reject any characterization of our conduct as bad faith.
Response to Delay Allegation
We deny the allegation that we unreasonably delayed handling [INSURED'S] claim. The claim presented complex issues requiring thorough investigation, including [describe complexities]. Throughout our handling, we: - Acknowledged the claim within [X] days of receipt - Requested necessary documentation on [DATE] - Kept the insured informed of claim status on [DATES] - Made our coverage determination within [X] days of receiving complete information The timeline was reasonable given the claim's complexity. Any perceived delay resulted from [waiting for medical records/conducting necessary investigation/awaiting expert opinions], not any failure on our part to act diligently.
Good Faith Reconsideration Offer
While we maintain our position was reasonable, we are committed to fair claims handling. In an effort to resolve this matter, we have undertaken a complete re-evaluation of the claim. Upon further review, and without any admission of wrongdoing, we are prepared to [pay additional benefits of $X / reconsider our denial / submit to appraisal]. This offer is made in the spirit of good faith and is not an admission that our prior handling was unreasonable. We believe our original position was supportable, but recognize that reasonable minds may differ on [valuation/coverage interpretation]. We request that you advise whether this resolution is acceptable within [14] days.

🚀 Next Steps

Immediate actions when facing bad faith allegations.

Step 1: Escalate

Immediately notify management and coverage counsel. Bad faith claims require specialized handling.

Step 2: Preserve

Issue litigation hold. Preserve all claim files, emails, notes, and recordings.

Step 3: Review

Conduct thorough file review. Identify all strengths and weaknesses in claim handling.

Step 4: Evaluate

Assess exposure and consider early resolution. Bad faith cases are expensive to defend.

Litigation Considerations

  • Bifurcation motion - Consider seeking to bifurcate bad faith from contract claims
  • Punitive damages - Financial condition discovery can be invasive
  • Claims file privilege - Work product and attorney-client issues arise
  • Pattern evidence - Similar claims may be discoverable

Facing Bad Faith Allegations?

Get professional assistance with your response strategy and documentation.

Schedule Consultation - $450

California Legal Resources

  • Insurance Code 790.03: Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
  • Civil Code 3294: Punitive Damages
  • CACI 2330-2337: Jury Instructions - Bad Faith
  • Gruenberg v. Aetna (1973): Seminal bad faith case