C&D Response Center

How to Respond to a Cease-and-Desist Letter

Complete playbook with templates, state-law levers, and strategic response options - from immediate triage to declaratory judgment

A C&D Letter Is NOT What You Think

"It's a court order - I must comply"

A C&D is just a letter. It has no legal force. Only a court can order you to do anything.

"They're definitely going to sue"

Most C&D letters never become lawsuits. Many are sent to intimidate or establish a paper trail.

"Their lawyer must be right"

Lawyers send aggressive letters for clients all the time. The legal claims may be weak or meritless.

"I need to respond immediately"

Take time to assess. Hasty responses often make things worse. Most deadlines are arbitrary.

Back to Response Hub

First 24 Hours Checklist

Evidence preservation and litigation hold steps you should take immediately upon receiving a C&D letter.

1

Preserve the envelope - Note date received, sender info, and delivery method (certified mail matters for SOL)

2

Screenshot everything - Capture any content they're complaining about before you change anything

3

Issue litigation hold - Notify IT/team to preserve emails, files, and communications related to the dispute

4

Identify witnesses - Who knows about the facts? Document their contact info now

5

Check insurance - Review GL, E&O, D&O, and media liability policies for coverage

6

DO NOT respond yet - No calls, emails, or social media posts about the matter until you have a strategy

🔍

Issue Spotter: What Type of C&D?

The legal theory behind the C&D determines your response strategy. Click to explore defenses for each type.

Your 6 Strategic Options

Every C&D response falls into one of these six archetypes. Choose based on the strength of their claims, your risk tolerance, and business objectives.

1

Acknowledge + Comply (No Admission)

You stop the complained-of conduct but without admitting liability. Preserve your position while removing the immediate issue.

Best when: The cost of compliance is low, the claim has some merit, or you want to avoid distraction.
2

Deny + Demand Proof

Challenge the factual or legal basis. Request evidence of ownership, registration, actual confusion, or damages before you'll even discuss it.

Best when: Claims are vague, legally deficient, or you have strong defenses (fair use, prior use, parody).
3

Partial Comply + Cure Period

Agree to modify (not stop) your conduct. Propose a phase-out period, disclaimer addition, or scope limitation that addresses their concerns.

Best when: You can address their concern without major business disruption, or need time to transition.
4

Negotiate License / Settlement

Propose a business deal: license the IP, pay a settlement, or enter a coexistence agreement that lets both parties continue.

Best when: The IP has value to you, litigation would be expensive, or you want a long-term resolution.
5

Counter-Demand (Bad Faith)

Go on offense. Demand withdrawal of the C&D, threaten Anti-SLAPP, cite bad faith, or raise your own claims against them.

Best when: The C&D is clearly frivolous, violates their ethical obligations, or you have counterclaims.
6

File First (DJ / Anti-SLAPP)

Seize the initiative. File a declaratory judgment action in your preferred forum or an Anti-SLAPP motion to shift fees and chill the threat.

Best when: They're dragging their feet on filing, you want forum choice, or the claim targets protected speech.
💡

Leverage Points: Your Legal Weapons

These legal doctrines can flip the script, making the C&D sender think twice about pursuing litigation.

⚖ Declaratory Judgment

When someone threatens to sue but doesn't, you can file first and ask a court to declare your conduct lawful. This lets you choose the forum and force their hand.

28 U.S.C. § 2201 | MedImmune v. Genentech (2007)

🚫 Anti-SLAPP Motions

If the C&D targets speech on public interest matters, you may be able to strike their lawsuit early and recover attorney fees. California's statute is particularly strong.

CA CCP § 425.16 | 33 states have Anti-SLAPP laws

📋 DMCA Counter-Notice

If they filed a DMCA takedown, you can file a counter-notice to restore your content. They then have 14 days to sue or lose.

17 U.S.C. § 512(g) | Lenz v. Universal (fair use)

💰 Fee-Shifting Risks

In copyright, trademark, and Anti-SLAPP cases, the loser may pay the winner's fees. This risk cuts both ways and affects settlement math.

15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) | 17 U.S.C. § 505
🔗

C&D Response Guides

Step-by-step guides for specific C&D types with templates, defenses, and California-specific strategies.

🔧

Interactive Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to respond to a cease and desist letter?
No. A C&D is just a letter, not a court order. However, ignoring it has pros and cons. On the upside, you don't give them ammunition or make admissions. On the downside, they may claim you acted "willfully" after notice, and you lose a chance to resolve it pre-litigation. The best approach is usually to respond professionally without admitting liability.
What happens if I ignore a cease and desist letter?
Nothing automatically happens. The sender's options are: (1) do nothing, (2) send another letter, (3) file a lawsuit, or (4) file a DMCA/platform complaint. Most senders don't sue - litigation is expensive and time-consuming. However, if they do sue, your silence could be used to show you knowingly continued after being put on notice, potentially increasing damages.
How long do I have to respond to a C&D?
There's no legal deadline to respond to a C&D letter. The deadlines they set are arbitrary and not legally binding. That said, if you plan to respond, 2-3 weeks is reasonable. If you need more time, you can request an extension - most will grant it. Don't let their artificial urgency pressure you into a hasty response.
Should I hire a lawyer to respond to a C&D?
It depends on the stakes. For minor matters (someone wants a review removed), you can often respond yourself. For serious claims (patent assertions, trade secret allegations, significant trademark disputes), or claims exceeding $10,000, an attorney response carries more weight and protects you from making admissions. At minimum, consult an attorney before responding.
Can I sue them first for sending a baseless C&D?
Generally no - a C&D letter is typically protected pre-litigation communication. However, you can: (1) file a declaratory judgment asking the court to rule in your favor, (2) file an Anti-SLAPP motion if they sue you over protected speech, (3) report ethics violations if the letter contains knowing misrepresentations, or (4) in rare cases involving abuse of process or malicious prosecution after a lawsuit, sue them.
What is an Anti-SLAPP motion and when can I use it?
Anti-SLAPP laws (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) let defendants quickly dismiss lawsuits that target protected speech (reviews, political speech, reporting on public matters). If the plaintiff can't show likely success, the case is dismissed AND they pay your attorney fees. California's law (CCP 425.16) is particularly strong. Check if your state has Anti-SLAPP protection.
The C&D says I have to pay their attorney fees - is that true?
Not from the C&D alone. Attorney fees generally require a court order after litigation. However, some statutes (Copyright Act, Lanham Act) allow fee-shifting to the prevailing party. This cuts both ways - if you win, you might recover your fees. The fee-shifting threat is often used to pressure settlement but rarely applies until there's an actual lawsuit.
What's a declaratory judgment and when should I file one?
A declaratory judgment (DJ) asks a court to declare that your conduct is lawful, essentially letting you sue first. Consider filing when: (1) you want to choose the forum (your home court vs. theirs), (2) they're threatening but not filing, (3) you need legal certainty to continue operations, or (4) you want to call their bluff. The downside is cost and the risk they counterclaim.
Professional Legal Guidance

When Should You Get Attorney Help?

Many C&D letters can be handled yourself, but some situations benefit from professional legal assistance:

Claims exceed $25,000 potential exposure
Patent or complex IP claims
Trade secret misappropriation allegations
From a large company with litigation history
Involves core business operations
Considering filing first (DJ/Anti-SLAPP)
You've already been sued
Insurance coverage questions