Below you can build a free demand letter yourself. Before you send anything, find out whether your claim is worth sending at all: tell my AI Legal Analyst what happened, and it maps your claim, your deadlines, and your leverage, reviewed against how I actually run these disputes.
Sergei Tokmakov, California attorney, CA Bar #279869, licensed since 2011.
When a SaaS vendor shuts down your workspace without notice, locks mission-critical data, or ignores GDPR/CCPA portability promises, a targeted demand letter aligns contract rights with data privacy obligations.
| Scenario | Immediate Risk | Demand Focus |
|---|---|---|
| No notice termination | Loss of mission-critical data | Access window, data export in machine-readable format |
| Account downgraded | Limited features, partial data access | Reinstatement or temporary upgrade during investigation |
| Vendor claims policy violation | Reputational harm, suspension of integrations | Specific explanation, evidence review, mutual resolution |
| Data held for unpaid invoices | Vendor refuses export until payment | Challenge as leverage or negotiate payment with guaranteed export |
| Regime | Right | Letter Application |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR Article 20 | Receive personal data in structured, commonly used, machine-readable format | Demand export of customer personal data across CRM, support, or analytics tables. |
| GDPR Article 12/15 | Right of access and transparency | Request detailed explanation of processing and a full copy of records. |
| CCPA/CPRA ยง1798.130 | Access and data portability for California residents | Ask for export in readily usable format and ability to transmit to another controller. |
| FTC Act ยง5 / UDAP | Prohibits deceptive representations | Point out marketing promises about "download anytime" or "ownership of data" if broken. |
I help founders and ops teams unlock SaaS data, negotiate reinstatement, and file targeted complaints when vendors ignore portability commitments.
Reach me at owner@terms.law or via scheduler to discuss strategy.
Generate a professional demand letter, CA court complaint, or arbitration demand
You now have a letter I have never read. A form builder cannot know whether the platform's own terms give you an out, who the right corporate target is, or what number belongs in the demand. If real money is at stake, the $1,200 Demand & Filing-Readiness Package is me screening the claim, drafting the demand on my letterhead with the chronology, damages calculation, and exhibits, sending it certified mail, and reviewing the first response, with a draft complaint where that is the strategically appropriate next step, expressly marked DRAFT - NOT FILED. Claims over roughly $30,000 start at $3,000.
I accept demand matters only after a conflict, jurisdiction, and preliminary merits review. For accepted matters with claims up to about $30,000: the attorney demand on my letterhead with the chronology, damages calculation, and exhibits, certified mail plus email delivery, the appropriate draft complaint or arbitration demand where that is the legally and strategically appropriate next step (expressly marked DRAFT - NOT FILED), review of the first substantive response, and one deadline follow-up.
Request this packageFor claims of roughly $30,000 to $75,000, or disputes with material factual, contractual, or procedural complexity, the same filing-readiness scope starts at $3,000. The starting fee reflects the deeper record, damages, and forum work these disputes need; I confirm the final fixed scope in writing before any work begins.
Request this packageNot sure yet? Send your question, a short factual summary, and the key documents; you get a written attorney response identifying the main legal issues, risks, leverage points, and practical next steps. Not a full redline, demand letter, memo, or filing unless separately agreed.
Request the consultationFees are minimums or starting fees, subject to conflict, jurisdiction, merits, and written scope review. Multi-round negotiation is the separately scoped $1,500 Pre-Litigation Negotiation Phase; filing or appearing as counsel requires separate client authorization and a separate written engagement.
Informational only, not legal advice; no attorney-client relationship until a conflict check and written scope confirmation. Generated letters are unreviewed starting drafts. Sergei Tokmakov, licensed in California, CA Bar #279869 · owner@terms.law