Life & Disability Insurance Claim Denial Letters

Fight back against wrongful denials for misrepresentation, lapse, own-occupation disputes & bad faith

Common Reasons Life Insurance Claims Are Denied

Life insurance provides critical financial protection for your loved ones. When insurers wrongfully deny death benefit claims, beneficiaries face devastating financial consequences on top of grief. Understanding common denial reasons is the first step to fighting back.

Typical Life Insurance Denial Reasons

Denial Type Insurer's Theory Counter-Strategy
Misrepresentation (health, smoking, occupation) "Insured lied on application; we wouldn't have issued policy or would have charged higher premiums" Challenge materiality; show agent completed application; highlight ambiguous questions; prove insurer knew or should have known facts
Lapse / non-payment of premiums "Policy lapsed before death due to non-payment" Prove payments were made; show late-payment acceptance history; invoke CA grace period and notice requirements (Ins. Code §§ 10113.71-.72)
Suicide exclusion (typically 2 years) "Insured died by suicide within contestability period" Challenge cause of death determination; obtain independent autopsy; show accidental death evidence; argue ambiguity
Excluded activity (e.g., aviation, hazardous sport) "Death occurred during excluded activity" Narrow interpretation of exclusion; show activity wasn't primary cause; argue ambiguity in policy language
Beneficiary dispute "Wrong beneficiary submitted claim" Produce beneficiary designation forms; show no subsequent changes; invoke interpleader if multiple claimants

Contestability Period: 2-Year Window for Misrepresentation Claims

Most life insurance policies include a contestability period (typically 2 years from policy issuance). During this period, the insurer can:

  • Investigate statements made on the application
  • Rescind the policy if it discovers material misrepresentations
  • Deny death benefits based on fraud or material misstatement

After the contestability period expires, the policy becomes incontestable except for non-payment of premiums. The insurer generally cannot deny benefits based on misrepresentations, even if they were material.

Example: John applies for life insurance on January 1, 2022, and the policy is issued February 1, 2022. He dies on March 1, 2024. The insurer cannot contest the claim based on application misrepresentations because more than 2 years have passed. If he died in 2023 (within 2 years), the insurer could investigate and potentially rescind for material misrepresentation.

California's Grace Period & Lapse Protection: The McHugh Rule

In California, Insurance Code §§ 10113.71 and 10113.72 provide strong protections against improper policy lapses:

  • 60-day minimum grace period: Even if you miss a payment, the policy remains in force for at least 60 days
  • Mandatory pre-lapse notice: Insurer must send written notice to the policy owner AND any designated person at least 30 days before lapse
  • Strict notice requirements: Notice must be sent via first-class mail to last known address
  • McHugh v. Protective Life (2017): California Supreme Court held that failure to comply with notice requirements voids the lapse—the policy remains in effect
McHugh Changed the Game: Before McHugh, insurers routinely denied claims for lapse without proper notice. Now, if the insurer failed to send required pre-lapse notices, the policy did NOT lapse—even if premiums weren't paid. This is a powerful tool for beneficiaries.

Challenging Misrepresentation Rescissions

When an insurer rescinds a policy for misrepresentation, it must prove:

  1. False statement: The insured made a factually incorrect statement
  2. Materiality: The statement was material to the insurer's decision to issue the policy or set premiums
  3. Intent to deceive (in some jurisdictions): The misstatement was intentional, not an innocent mistake

Common defenses:

  • Agent error: The agent filled out the application incorrectly; insured signed but didn't understand errors
  • Ambiguous questions: Policy application questions were unclear or confusing
  • Insurer knowledge: Insurer knew or should have known the true facts (e.g., medical records were ordered during underwriting)
  • Not material: Even if the statement was false, it wouldn't have changed the insurer's decision
  • No reliance: Insurer didn't actually rely on the statement (e.g., didn't review that section of application)

How Disability Insurers Evaluate 'Own Occupation' and 'Any Occupation' Claims

Disability insurance provides income replacement when illness or injury prevents you from working. Insurers frequently deny claims by mischaracterizing the level of disability or misapplying policy definitions.

Own Occupation vs Any Occupation

Most disability policies have a two-stage definition of disability:

Stage Definition What It Means Typical Duration
Own Occupation Unable to perform the material and substantial duties of your own occupation You can't do YOUR job (e.g., surgeon can't perform surgery) even if you could do OTHER jobs First 24 months of disability
Any Occupation Unable to perform any occupation for which you're reasonably suited by education, training, or experience You can't do ANY job you're qualified for; much harder standard to meet After 24 months (or from beginning in some policies)
Example: Dr. Smith, a surgeon, suffers nerve damage in her hands. She can't perform surgery but could work as a medical consultant. Under "own occupation," she's disabled (can't do surgery). Under "any occupation," she may not be disabled (can do consulting). If her policy provides own-occ coverage for 24 months, she's entitled to benefits for at least 2 years.

Common Disability Claim Denial Reasons

  • "Not disabled": Insurer claims you CAN perform your job duties based on cherry-picked medical opinions or surveillance
  • Pre-existing condition exclusion: Insurer claims your disability stems from a condition you had before coverage started
  • Mental/nervous limitation: Many policies cap benefits for mental health conditions at 24 months; insurer may misclassify physical conditions as "mental"
  • "Self-reported symptoms": Insurer denies claims for conditions without "objective" medical findings (e.g., chronic pain, fibromyalgia, CFS)
  • Failed to provide "satisfactory proof": Insurer claims you didn't submit sufficient medical documentation (often a moving target)
  • Social Security offset disputes: Insurer reduces benefits based on SSDI award; disputes over amounts or timing

ERISA vs Individual Disability Policies

The legal framework differs dramatically depending on whether your policy is employer-sponsored (ERISA) or individually purchased:

Issue ERISA Group LTD Individual Disability Policy
Governing Law Federal ERISA law exclusively State insurance law + contract law
Bad Faith Claims? NO—ERISA preempts state bad faith law YES—can sue for bad faith and extra-contractual damages
Remedies Limited to benefits owed + attorney's fees; no punitive damages Benefits + bad faith damages + emotional distress + punitive damages
Jury Trial? NO—judge decides based on administrative record YES—state court jury trial available
Discovery Very limited; usually just claim file review Full discovery: depositions, interrogatories, documents
Appeal Requirements MUST exhaust internal appeals before suing (29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1) Check policy; some require internal appeal, others don't
ERISA Limits Your Rights: Group LTD policies provided by employers are almost always ERISA plans, which severely limits your remedies. You cannot recover punitive damages, pain and suffering, or emotional distress. This is why individual disability policies (though more expensive) provide stronger protection for high-income earners.

Using Medical and Vocational Evidence to Support Your Demand

To overcome a disability claim denial, you need strong evidence:

  • Treating physician statements: Detailed letters explaining your functional limitations, restrictions, and why you cannot perform job duties
  • Functional capacity evaluations (FCE): Objective testing by physical/occupational therapists documenting your physical limitations
  • Vocational expert opinions: Analysis of your occupation's material and substantial duties; whether you're capable of performing them
  • Job description: Formal written description of your actual job duties (not generic DOT descriptions)
  • Medical records: Complete records documenting diagnosis, treatment, ongoing symptoms, and prognosis
  • SSDI award: Social Security disability determination (though not binding on insurer, it's persuasive evidence)
Attack the IME: Insurers often rely on "independent medical examinations" (which are neither independent nor thorough). Challenge IME reports by showing: (1) brief exam (30 minutes vs years of treatment by your doctors), (2) doctor is hired gun who routinely denies claims, (3) doctor ignored key medical records, (4) specialty mismatch (e.g., orthopedist reviewing neurological condition).

Legal Framework: Contestability, Grace Periods & Bad Faith

Life Insurance Legal Doctrines

Incontestability Clause

Standard in all life insurance policies. After the contestability period expires (typically 2 years), the insurer cannot challenge the policy based on misrepresentations in the application, except for:

  • Fraudulent impersonation (someone else took the medical exam)
  • Non-payment of premiums
  • Lack of insurable interest

California Grace Period Statutes

Insurance Code § 10113.71: Every life insurance policy must provide a grace period of at least 60 days for premium payment. During the grace period, the policy remains in full force.

Insurance Code § 10113.72: Before a policy lapses for non-payment, the insurer must mail a notice of lapse or intent to lapse at least 30 days before the effective date of lapse. Notice must be sent to:

  • The policy owner at their last known address
  • Any designated person the owner has requested receive notices

Failure to comply = policy did NOT lapse. (McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co., 3 Cal. 5th 965 (2017))

McHugh Takeaway: If your loved one's policy was denied for lapse, immediately investigate whether the insurer sent proper pre-lapse notices. Obtain proof of mailing dates and addresses used. If the insurer failed to comply with § 10113.72, the lapse is void and the policy remains in effect.

Materiality in Misrepresentation Cases

To rescind a policy for misrepresentation, the insurer must prove the false statement was material—i.e., it would have affected the insurer's decision to issue the policy or the premium charged.

California Insurance Code § 334 states that a misrepresentation is material if:

  • The insurer would not have issued the policy in the same amount or at the same premium if the true facts were known, OR
  • Knowledge of the true facts would have led the insurer to decline to issue any policy

Insurer must prove materiality through underwriting evidence—e.g., underwriting guidelines showing the condition would have been rated or declined.

Disability Insurance Legal Doctrines

ERISA "Full and Fair Review" (29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1)

For group disability plans, same requirements as health insurance appeals:

  • Claimant must receive notice of denial with specific reasons
  • Claimant has right to full and fair review
  • Insurer must provide access to claim file and all adverse medical opinions
  • Decision on appeal within 45 days for disability claims
  • Procedural violations may entitle claimant to de novo review in court

Bad Faith in Individual Disability Policies

For non-ERISA individual policies, insurers owe a duty of good faith and fair dealing. Bad faith occurs when the insurer:

  • Unreasonably denies or delays payment of benefits
  • Fails to conduct a thorough and objective investigation
  • Ignores or misrepresents evidence favorable to the insured
  • Relies on biased IME doctors without considering treating physicians

Damages for bad faith: Emotional distress, economic losses beyond policy benefits, punitive damages (if conduct was egregious), attorney's fees.

Bad Faith Red Flags (Life & Disability)

Red Flag Why It Suggests Bad Faith
Denial without adequate investigation Insurer must thoroughly investigate before denying; cursory review suggests pretext
Contradicting prior approvals If insurer previously approved claims/premiums, sudden reversal without new facts is suspicious
Ignoring treating physicians Giving undue weight to one-time IME over years of treatment records
Requesting same documents repeatedly Delay tactic; unreasonable burden on claimant
Blanket denial letters Generic, template denials suggest no individualized review
Misrepresenting policy language Citing provisions that don't apply or ignoring favorable terms

Sample Life & Disability Insurance Demand Letters

Sample 1: Life Insurance Lapse Denial (CA Grace Period Violation)

[Your Name, Beneficiary] [Your Address] [City, State ZIP] [Phone] [Email] [Date] [Insurance Company Name] Claims Department [Address] RE: Demand for Payment of Death Benefit – Wrongful Lapse Denial Policy Number: [POLICY#] Insured: [DECEASED'S NAME] Date of Death: [DATE] Policy Death Benefit: $[AMOUNT] Dear Claims Manager: I am the beneficiary of the above life insurance policy insuring [Deceased's Name], who died on [DATE]. Your denial letter dated [DENIAL DATE] states the policy lapsed on [LAPSE DATE] due to non-payment of premiums. This denial is factually and legally incorrect under California law. FACTS [Deceased] purchased this life insurance policy from your company on [POLICY ISSUE DATE] with a death benefit of $[AMOUNT]. Premium payments were $[AMOUNT] [monthly/quarterly/annually]. [Deceased] passed away on [DATE] due to [cause]. I submitted a death claim on [CLAIM DATE] with all required documentation, including the death certificate, policy documents, and proof of beneficiary designation. Your company denied the claim, asserting that the policy lapsed on [LAPSE DATE] for non-payment of the premium due [PREMIUM DUE DATE]. YOUR DENIAL VIOLATES CALIFORNIA LAW Under California Insurance Code §§ 10113.71 and 10113.72, your company was required to: 1. **Provide a 60-day grace period** for premium payment (§ 10113.71) 2. **Send written notice of intent to lapse at least 30 days before the lapse date** to the policy owner and any designated person (§ 10113.72) Your company failed to comply with these mandatory requirements. **Failure to Provide Proper Notice:** I have reviewed [Deceased]'s mail and records, and [he/she] never received any pre-lapse notice from your company. I submitted a written request on [DATE] asking you to provide proof of the date, address, and manner in which any lapse notice was sent. You have failed to provide this proof. California Insurance Code § 10113.72 requires you to mail the notice via first-class mail to the policy owner's last known address at least 30 days before the lapse date. The statute places the burden on YOU to prove compliance. Under California Supreme Court precedent in *McHugh v. Protective Life Insurance Co.*, 3 Cal. 5th 965 (2017), **failure to comply with the notice requirements of § 10113.72 voids the purported lapse.** The policy remains in effect as if no lapse occurred. Because you failed to send proper notice, the policy did NOT lapse on [LAPSE DATE]. It remained in full force and effect on [DEATH DATE] when [Deceased] died. You owe the full death benefit of $[AMOUNT]. ALTERNATIVE ARGUMENT: PREMIUMS WERE PAID Even if proper notice had been sent (it was not), the policy did not lapse because premiums were paid. [Choose applicable scenario:] [OPTION A: Payment was made] I have enclosed proof (Exhibit A: [cancelled check / bank statement / payment confirmation]) showing that a premium payment of $[AMOUNT] was made on [DATE], within the grace period. [OPTION B: History of late-payment acceptance] Your company has a history of accepting late payments on this policy without enforcing lapse provisions. Premium payments were made late on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], and you accepted them without objection (Exhibit A: payment records). By waiving timely payment repeatedly, you cannot now claim lapse for late payment without notice and an opportunity to cure. DEMAND FOR PAYMENT I demand immediate payment of the full death benefit of $[AMOUNT], plus policy interest from [DEATH DATE] to the present. California law is clear: your failure to comply with mandatory grace period and notice requirements means the policy was in force when [Deceased] died. There is no legal basis to deny this claim. BAD FAITH Your denial appears to constitute bad faith. You denied this claim without adequately investigating whether you complied with California's lapse notice requirements—requirements the California Supreme Court has held are strictly enforced. Denying a claim based on a void lapse constitutes unreasonable claim handling under California Insurance Code § 790.03(h). If you do not tender payment within 30 days, I will pursue litigation for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claims practices. I will seek not only the policy death benefit but also extra-contractual damages, punitive damages, and attorney's fees. DEADLINE Please confirm payment of $[AMOUNT] within 30 days. Contact me at [PHONE] or [EMAIL]. Sincerely, [Your Signature] [Your Printed Name] [Relationship to Deceased: Spouse / Child / Beneficiary] Enclosures: - Death Certificate - Policy Documents - [Payment records / Proof of address / Correspondence]

Sample 2: Disability Insurance Denial – Own-Occupation Dispute (ERISA Appeal)

[Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State ZIP] [Phone] [Email] [Policy/Certificate #: XXXXXXX] [Date] [Insurance Company / Plan Administrator] Disability Claims Appeals [Address] RE: Appeal of Long-Term Disability Claim Denial Claimant: [Your Name] Claim Number: [CLAIM#] Policy/Group Number: [POLICY#] Date of Disability: [DATE] Occupation: [YOUR OCCUPATION, e.g., "Registered Nurse – ICU"] Dear Appeals Coordinator: I appeal the denial of my long-term disability claim dated [DENIAL DATE]. Your denial asserts I am not disabled under the policy's "own occupation" definition. This conclusion is medically and legally incorrect. PROCEDURAL REQUESTS (ERISA § 503 / 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1) Pursuant to ERISA, I request: 1. A full and fair review of my claim 2. Copies of ALL documents in my claim file, including: - All medical opinions, reports, and reviews (including any IME reports) - Internal claim notes and communications - Policy provisions, guidelines, and criteria applied - Vocational assessments or job analyses 3. The identity and qualifications of any medical or vocational reviewers 4. At least 180 days to submit additional evidence 5. The opportunity for an oral presentation if this appeal is denied POLICY DEFINITION OF DISABILITY The LTD policy defines "disabled" as: "Unable to perform the material and substantial duties of your own occupation due to sickness or injury." This is an "own occupation" standard. I do not need to be unable to work in ALL occupations—only MY occupation as a [YOUR OCCUPATION]. MY OCCUPATION: MATERIAL AND SUBSTANTIAL DUTIES I work as a [YOUR OCCUPATION]. The material and substantial duties of my position include: - [List 5-8 key job duties specific to YOUR role, e.g.:] - Lifting and repositioning patients (up to 50 lbs) - Standing/walking for 10-12 hour shifts - Fine motor skills for IV insertion, medication administration - Rapid response to medical emergencies - Shift work including nights, weekends, on-call I have attached my formal job description from my employer (Exhibit A) and a vocational assessment from [Vocational Expert Name] (Exhibit B) confirming these duties are material and substantial to the position. MY DISABLING CONDITION I was diagnosed with [CONDITION, e.g., "herniated lumbar discs L4-L5, L5-S1 with radiculopathy"] on [DATE]. Despite treatment including [physical therapy, injections, medications], my condition has not improved. My restrictions, per my treating physician Dr. [Name], include: - No lifting over 10 lbs - No prolonged standing (max 30 minutes at a time) - No bending, twisting, or stooping - Frequent position changes required - No shift work due to medication side effects (drowsiness, cognitive impairment) Dr. [Name]'s detailed letter (Exhibit C) explains that I am **unable to perform the material and substantial duties of my nursing position** due to these restrictions. I cannot safely lift patients, stand for 12-hour shifts, or perform the physical demands of ICU nursing. WHY YOUR DENIAL IS WRONG Your denial relies on a "peer review" by Dr. [IME Doctor Name], who concluded I am "capable of sedentary work" and therefore not disabled. This conclusion is medically and legally flawed: **1. Wrong Standard Applied:** Dr. [IME Doctor] opined that I could do "sedentary work." That is irrelevant. The policy asks whether I can do MY job as an ICU nurse, not whether I can do some other sedentary job. Sedentary work is not nursing. The own-occupation standard does not require me to be unable to work in all occupations. **2. Dr. [IME Doctor] Never Examined Me:** This "peer review" was a paper review by someone who has never met me, examined me, or observed my functional limitations. Dr. [IME Doctor] is not a specialist in [relevant specialty]. In contrast, my treating physician, Dr. [Treating Doc Name], is a board-certified [specialty] who has treated me for [X months/years] and conducted multiple in-person examinations. **3. Ignored Functional Capacity Evaluation:** I underwent a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) on [DATE] with [Physical Therapist Name], a licensed physical therapist (Exhibit D). The FCE objectively documented that I cannot lift over 10 lbs, cannot stand more than 30 minutes, and am limited to sedentary work capacity. Your denial letter does not mention the FCE—an objective, standardized assessment. This suggests you cherry-picked only the opinions that supported denial. **4. Ignored Employer Job Description:** My actual job duties, per my employer's written job description, require frequent lifting, prolonged standing, and physical stamina. You cannot replace my employer's description with a generic occupational database (DOT) entry. ERISA requires individualized assessment of MY job, not a hypothetical job. **5. No Vocational Analysis:** You provided no vocational expert opinion analyzing whether I can perform the specific duties of MY position. I have provided such an analysis (Exhibit B: Vocational Expert Report), which concludes I cannot perform my own occupation. You cannot ignore this evidence. TREATING PHYSICIAN RULE While ERISA plans are not bound by the "treating physician rule," courts give significant weight to treating physicians over one-time reviewers. Dr. [Treating Doc] has treated me extensively, ordered diagnostic testing, and observed my functional decline. Dr. [IME Doctor] reviewed records for 30 minutes and never laid eyes on me. Any reasonable review would credit Dr. [Treating Doc]'s opinion. ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE SUBMITTED I am submitting the following additional evidence with this appeal: - Exhibit A: Employer job description - Exhibit B: Vocational Expert Report - Exhibit C: Treating physician letter (updated [DATE]) - Exhibit D: Functional Capacity Evaluation - Exhibit E: MRI reports and imaging studies - Exhibit F: Pharmacy records (documenting ongoing pain management) - Exhibit G: Statement from supervisor confirming job duties ERISA PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS Your denial letter fails to: - Provide the specific policy provision or guideline supporting the conclusion I can do my job - Address the FCE or vocational evidence - Explain why Dr. [IME Doctor]'s opinion is given greater weight than Dr. [Treating Doc]'s These omissions violate ERISA's requirement to provide a clear explanation of the factual and legal basis for denial. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL I request immediate approval of my LTD claim and payment of benefits retroactive to [DISABILITY DATE]. I am unable to work in my own occupation and meet the policy definition of disabled. If you deny this appeal, I will pursue litigation under ERISA § 502(a), seeking benefits, attorney's fees, and all available relief. Given the procedural deficiencies in your review, a court would likely apply de novo review rather than deferring to your decision. Please respond within 45 days as required by 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1. Sincerely, [Your Signature] [Your Printed Name] Enclosures: Exhibits A-G

Sample 3: Life Insurance Misrepresentation Rescission (Contestability)

[Your Name, Beneficiary] [Your Address] [City, State ZIP] [Phone] [Email] [Date] [Insurance Company Name] Claims Department / Legal Department [Address] RE: Demand for Death Benefit – Improper Rescission Based on Alleged Misrepresentation Policy Number: [POLICY#] Insured: [DECEASED'S NAME] Date of Death: [DATE] Death Benefit: $[AMOUNT] Dear Claims Manager: I am the named beneficiary on the life insurance policy insuring [Deceased], who died on [DATE]. Your letter dated [DENIAL DATE] purports to rescind the policy based on alleged misrepresentations in the application. This rescission is factually and legally unjustified. FACTS [Deceased] applied for life insurance with your company on [APPLICATION DATE]. The policy was issued on [ISSUE DATE] with a death benefit of $[AMOUNT]. [Deceased] paid all premiums timely and the policy was in full force at [his/her] death on [DATE], [X] months after issuance. I submitted a death claim on [CLAIM DATE]. Rather than paying the claim, you initiated a rescission investigation and now claim [Deceased] "misrepresented" [his/her] medical history on the application by failing to disclose [CONDITION, e.g., "a diagnosis of hypertension"]. CONTESTABILITY PERIOD This policy is within the 2-year contestability period, so I acknowledge you have the statutory right to investigate statements in the application. However, to rescind the policy, you must prove: 1. [Deceased] made a false statement of material fact 2. The statement was material to your underwriting decision 3. You relied on the statement in issuing the policy You cannot meet this burden. THE ALLEGED "MISREPRESENTATION" WAS NOT FALSE The application question at issue asked: "[QUOTE THE EXACT APPLICATION QUESTION]." [Deceased] answered [ANSWER GIVEN]. You claim this was false because [Deceased] had been [diagnosed with / treated for] [CONDITION] prior to the application. This answer was NOT false for the following reasons: [CHOOSE APPLICABLE DEFENSES:] [OPTION A: Ambiguous question] The question is ambiguous. It does not clearly define what "diagnosis" or "treatment" means. [Deceased] saw a doctor for [symptom] but was never given a formal diagnosis. [He/She] reasonably interpreted the question to ask about formal diagnosed conditions, not general medical consultations. California law requires ambiguous policy terms—and application questions—to be construed against the insurer and in favor of coverage. [OPTION B: Agent error] The application was completed by your agent, [AGENT NAME], during an in-person meeting. [Deceased] disclosed [his/her] medical history verbally, including [CONDITION]. The agent either failed to record this information or told [Deceased] it was not necessary to disclose. [Deceased] signed the application trusting the agent's expertise. Under California law, knowledge of the agent is imputed to the insurer. Your agent knew or should have known the true facts, and you cannot now claim ignorance. [OPTION C: Immaterial to underwriting] Even if the statement was technically incorrect, it was not material to your decision to issue the policy. [Condition] is a common, manageable condition that does not significantly increase mortality risk. I request that you produce your underwriting guidelines and demonstrate that disclosure of [CONDITION] would have resulted in a declination or premium increase. Without such proof, you cannot establish materiality under California Insurance Code § 334. THE STATEMENT WAS NOT MATERIAL To rescind a policy, you must prove the misrepresentation was material—i.e., you would not have issued the policy, or would have charged higher premiums, had you known the truth. **Evidence of Non-Materiality:** 1. **Underwriting Guidelines:** Your own underwriting guidelines (which I request you produce) likely show that [CONDITION] is an acceptable risk at standard rates. 2. **Common Condition:** [Condition] affects millions of Americans and is routinely insured without premium increases. You have not shown it presents an elevated mortality risk relevant to a [AGE]-year-old applicant. 3. **Death Unrelated to Alleged Condition:** [Deceased] died of [CAUSE OF DEATH], which is entirely unrelated to [CONDITION]. This proves the alleged omission had no bearing on the risk you insured against. YOU HAD KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONDITION Your company ordered a medical records review during underwriting (Attending Physician Statement from Dr. [Name], attached as Exhibit A). Those records documented [CONDITION]. You underwrote the policy WITH KNOWLEDGE of the alleged "undisclosed" condition, issued the policy at standard rates, and accepted premiums for [X] months. You cannot now claim you relied on the application answer when your own underwriting file contains contrary information. This is estoppel: you are barred from rescinding based on information you already knew. NO INTENT TO DECEIVE [Deceased] had no intent to deceive. [He/She] answered the application questions to the best of [his/her] understanding. Any error was innocent and non-material. California law disfavors rescission based on innocent misstatements, particularly where the insurer had access to the true facts. DEMAND FOR PAYMENT I demand immediate payment of the full death benefit of $[AMOUNT], plus interest from the date of [Deceased]'s death. Your rescission is baseless and constitutes bad faith. You have accepted [X months/years] of premiums, issued the policy knowing the medical history, and now seek to avoid payment by seizing on an ambiguous application question. This is the epitome of unfair dealing. If you do not tender payment within 30 days, I will file suit for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair business practices under California Insurance Code § 790.03(h). I will seek the death benefit, extra-contractual damages, emotional distress damages, punitive damages, and attorney's fees. [Deceased]'s family has suffered immeasurable loss. Do not compound that loss by wrongfully denying benefits they are entitled to. Please contact me at [PHONE] or [EMAIL] within 30 days. Sincerely, [Your Signature] [Your Printed Name] Enclosures: - Death Certificate - Policy Documents - Exhibit A: Attending Physician Statement from Underwriting File - [Other supporting documents]

Evidence Gathering & Strategic Considerations

Life Insurance Claims: Evidence Checklist

Essential Documents:
  • Original policy documents (declarations page, policy form, endorsements)
  • Death certificate (certified copy)
  • Beneficiary designation forms
  • Premium payment records (bank statements, cancelled checks, insurer receipts)
  • All correspondence with insurer (letters, emails, claim forms)
  • Application for insurance (especially if contesting misrepresentation)
  • Medical records from application/underwriting period (APS, exam results)
  • Proof of mailing address (if contesting lapse for failure to send notice)
  • Prior claim correspondence showing late-payment acceptance (if applicable)

Disability Insurance Claims: Evidence Checklist

Essential Documents:
  • Policy or certificate of insurance (group or individual)
  • Claim forms and insurer correspondence
  • Medical evidence: All records from treating physicians, specialists, diagnostic imaging (MRI, X-ray, CT), test results, hospitalization records
  • Treating physician statement: Detailed letter or form explaining diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and functional limitations
  • Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE): Objective testing by licensed PT/OT documenting physical capabilities
  • Job description: Formal written description from employer detailing actual job duties
  • Vocational expert opinion: Analysis of whether you can perform your own occupation (or any occupation, if applicable)
  • Social Security disability records: SSDI/SSI award letter, ALJ decision (if applicable)
  • IME reports: Obtain copies of any independent medical exams the insurer ordered
  • Surveillance videos: Request under ERISA or discovery if insurer conducted surveillance

Strategic Considerations

When to Demand the Claim File

For ERISA plans, you have the right to request and review your complete claim file before filing an appeal. DO THIS. The claim file often reveals:

  • Internal communications showing bias ("find a way to deny this")
  • Evidence the insurer ignored your medical records
  • Conflicts of interest (e.g., insurer both decides claims and pays them)
  • Procedural violations (missed deadlines, failure to share adverse reports)

Treating Physician Letters: What to Include

A strong treating physician letter should address:

  1. Doctor's credentials and specialty: Board certification, years treating this condition
  2. Patient history: How long you've treated the patient; frequency of visits
  3. Diagnosis: Specific medical diagnosis with supporting objective findings (test results, imaging)
  4. Treatment provided: What has been tried; why it failed or had limited success
  5. Functional limitations: What the patient CANNOT do (sit, stand, walk, lift, concentrate, etc.) with specific timeframes and weight limits
  6. Restrictions: Medical restrictions you've imposed (e.g., "no lifting over 10 lbs," "no prolonged standing")
  7. Job-specific analysis: Opinion on whether patient can perform their specific occupation
  8. Prognosis: Is condition permanent? Likely to improve? Expected duration of disability?

Challenging IMEs and Peer Reviews

Insurer-hired doctors are often biased. Attack their credibility by showing:

  • Financial bias: Doctor earns significant income from insurer; denied XX% of claims reviewed
  • Brief exam: Spent 30-60 minutes vs your doctor's years of treatment
  • Specialty mismatch: Orthopedist reviewing psychiatric condition
  • Ignored records: Failed to review key medical records, tests, or treating physician opinions
  • Not current: Exam was months ago; condition has worsened since then
  • Conflicts with objective tests: IME opinion contradicts FCE, imaging, or lab results

Attorney Services for Life & Disability Insurance Disputes

Life and disability insurance disputes often involve high stakes, complex policy language, and insurers with vast resources. An experienced attorney can make the difference between a denied claim and full recovery.

Why Hire an Attorney?

  • High-value claims: Life insurance death benefits and long-term disability claims can be worth hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars
  • ERISA complexity: ERISA cases require specialized knowledge; most general litigators are unfamiliar with the nuances
  • Bad faith potential: Individual disability and life policies allow for extra-contractual damages, including punitive damages
  • Record development: Building a strong administrative record (for ERISA) or discovery (for non-ERISA) requires legal and medical expertise
  • Expert witnesses: Attorneys have access to medical experts, vocational experts, and actuaries who can strengthen your case
  • Deadline management: Appeal deadlines, statute of limitations, and procedural requirements are strict; missing them can forfeit your claim

What to Expect in the Legal Process

  1. Initial consultation: Attorney reviews policy, denial letter, medical records, and assesses strength of claim
  2. Administrative appeal (if required): Attorney drafts detailed appeal with medical and legal arguments, expert opinions
  3. Obtain claim file: Request complete claim file from insurer (ERISA) or through discovery (non-ERISA)
  4. Litigation: File complaint in federal court (ERISA) or state court (non-ERISA)
  5. Discovery: Depositions of insurer's doctors, claims examiners; document requests; interrogatories (non-ERISA cases; limited in ERISA)
  6. Expert reports: Retain medical and vocational experts to rebut insurer's position
  7. Settlement or trial: Most cases settle; some proceed to bench trial (ERISA) or jury trial (non-ERISA)

Fee Structures

Fee Type How It Works When It's Used
Contingency Fee Attorney takes percentage of recovery (typically 25-40%); no fee if no recovery Most individual disability and life insurance cases; some ERISA cases
Hourly Fee Client pays attorney's hourly rate ($300-$600+/hour) regardless of outcome Some ERISA cases; high-net-worth clients who prefer this structure
Hybrid Reduced hourly rate + contingency percentage; or hourly with cap + bonus on recovery Complex cases with uncertain outcomes
Fee Shifting Court orders losing insurer to pay attorney's fees (ERISA § 502(g); Brandt fees in CA) Available in many insurance cases; attorney may advance fees expecting to recover from insurer
ERISA Attorney Fees: Under ERISA § 502(g)(1), courts have discretion to award attorney's fees to the prevailing party. If you win, the insurer pays your attorney's fees. This makes ERISA representation affordable even for those who can't afford hourly fees upfront.

Questions to Ask a Prospective Attorney

  1. How many life/disability insurance cases have you handled?
  2. What is your success rate (settlements and trial verdicts)?
  3. Do you specialize in ERISA litigation or non-ERISA bad faith cases (or both)?
  4. Do you work with medical and vocational experts? Who are they?
  5. What is your fee structure? What costs will I be responsible for?
  6. What are the realistic timelines for my case?
  7. What is the likely range of outcomes (best case, worst case, most probable)?
  8. Will you handle my case personally or delegate to associates?

Schedule a Consultation with an Experienced Insurance Attorney

Don't let the insurance company deny you or your loved ones the benefits you paid for. Our attorneys have decades of experience fighting wrongful denials and recovering millions for clients.

We handle ERISA and individual life/disability policies. Contingency fees available for qualifying cases.

Additional Resources