Podcast/YouTube Ownership Dispute Demand Letters

Co-Creator Conflicts | Revenue Splits, Channel Control & IP Rights

Podcast/YouTube Ownership Overview
🎬 Co-Creator Problem: When multiple creators launch a podcast or YouTube channel together without clear ownership agreements, breakups create chaos: Who owns the channel? Who controls the accounts? How is revenue split? Who owns the back catalog? These disputes escalate quickly when one party locks out the other or keeps all the money.
Default Ownership Rules (No Agreement)

If no written agreement exists, default rules apply:

Asset Ownership Rule Why
YouTube channel Whoever created/registered the account owns it YouTube ToS: account owned by registrant; can't be "jointly owned"
Podcast RSS feed Whoever registered with hosting platform owns it Account ownership determines control
Show name/trademark First to use in commerce (or whoever registered trademark) Trademark law: rights vest in first user or registrant
Episode content (copyright) Joint authors IF both contributed copyrightable expression Copyright law: joint authorship requires intent to merge contributions
Revenue (ad revenue, sponsorships) Whoever receives payment (account holder) No implied revenue-sharing unless partnership agreement
Social media accounts Whoever created/controls login credentials Platform ToS: personal account ownership
🚨 Platform Control = Power: Whoever controls the YouTube channel admin, podcast hosting account, or social media logins has de facto control - they can lock out co-creators, keep revenue, delete content. Technical access often determines outcome, regardless of "fair" ownership. Secure your access rights FIRST.
Joint Authorship vs. Individual Ownership

Joint work (17 U.S.C. § 101):

  • Definition: "Work prepared by two or more authors with the intention that their contributions be merged into inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole"
  • Requirements: (1) Each author contributed independently copyrightable expression, (2) Authors intended joint work at time of creation, (3) Contributions merged into unitary whole
  • Rights: Joint authors are co-owners with equal undivided interests; each can license/exploit work, subject to duty to account to other co-owners for profits
  • Example: Two podcast co-hosts each write and perform their own segments, intending to merge into single episode = joint work

NOT joint work (individual ownership):

  • One creator makes copyrightable content, other provides non-copyrightable input: Host writes/performs show, co-host just provides ideas or feedback = Host owns copyright (ideas not copyrightable)
  • Contributions not merged: Two creators make separate videos posted to one channel = each owns their video separately
  • Work-for-hire: One creator pays other as contractor to create content = paying party owns (if work-for-hire agreement signed)
  • No intent to merge: Creators didn't intend joint ownership at time of creation
Partnership vs. No Partnership

If partnership exists (even without written agreement):

  • Formation: Partnership = "association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit" (UPA § 202)
  • Can be informal: No written agreement required; actions and intent determine existence
  • Equal ownership default: Partners own partnership assets equally (unless agreement says otherwise)
  • Profit sharing: Partners share profits equally (unless agreement specifies different split)
  • Fiduciary duties: Partners owe each other loyalty, care, good faith; can't compete or self-deal
  • Liability: Partners jointly liable for partnership debts/obligations

Evidence of partnership:

  • Sharing profits and losses
  • Joint control over business decisions
  • Holding out as partners to public/sponsors
  • Equal contribution of labor, skills, or capital
  • Using "we/our" language in show description, social media

NOT a partnership:

  • Employee/contractor: One creator employs other for salary/fee (no profit share, no joint control)
  • Guest appearances: Host invites guests on show; guests don't share ownership
  • Licensor/licensee: One creator licenses content to other's channel for fee
Revenue Rights

Common revenue sources & ownership issues:

Revenue Source Payment Goes To Sharing Obligation
YouTube AdSense Google AdSense account holder (channel owner) If partnership/joint work, must share with co-creators per agreement or 50/50 default
Podcast ad networks (Megaphone, Podcorn) Account holder who signed up Must share if partnership; individual keeps if no partnership
Sponsorships (direct brand deals) Whoever signed deal with brand (often both parties sign) Split per deal terms or partnership agreement
Patreon/membership platforms Account holder Must share if partnership or if show is joint work
Merchandise sales Store account owner (Shopify, etc.) Must share if using show IP owned jointly
Affiliate commissions Affiliate account holder Must share if partnership or if promoted on jointly-owned show
Common Co-Creator Structures
Structure Ownership Revenue Split Control
Equal partnership (handshake) 50/50 on all assets 50/50 on all revenue Joint decisions on major issues
Majority/minority split e.g., 60/40 or 70/30 Same as ownership % Majority owner has final say
Founder + contributor Founder owns channel/IP; contributor has no ownership Contributor paid salary/fee (no profit share) Founder controls; contributor is employee/contractor
LLC or Corp Entity owns channel/IP; creators own % of entity Per operating agreement/bylaws Per operating agreement/bylaws
Host + network Host creates content; network provides distribution/promotion Revenue split per network deal (often 70/30 or 80/20 to host) Network controls distribution; host controls content
Common Ownership Disputes
1. Lockout Disputes

Scenario: One co-creator locks other out of accounts after falling-out

Example: Alex and Jordan co-host podcast "The Daily Deep Dive." Alex registered podcast hosting account, YouTube channel, and social media in Alex's personal name. After disagreement, Alex changes passwords, locks Jordan out, continues producing show solo.

Jordan's claims:

  • Partnership dissolution: We were partners; you can't unilaterally keep partnership assets
  • Joint authorship: I co-created episodes; I own copyright too; you can't use episodes without my consent
  • Conversion: You took joint property (revenue, access) for yourself exclusively
  • Breach of fiduciary duty: As partner, you owed me loyalty; locking me out and keeping revenue is breach

Alex's defenses:

  • Account ownership: I registered all accounts in my name; I own them per platform ToS
  • No partnership: You were contributor/guest, not partner; no profit-sharing agreement existed
  • Individual copyright: I wrote scripts and produced; your contribution was minimal/not copyrightable

Resolution paths:

  1. Restore access + negotiate buyout: Jordan regains access; parties negotiate Jordan's exit and buyout of interest
  2. Immediate injunction: Jordan files for emergency court order requiring Alex to restore access and preserve revenue pending resolution
  3. Revenue accounting + damages: Alex keeps control but pays Jordan share of revenue earned during dispute
  4. Forced dissolution: Court orders show shut down or sold, proceeds split
2. Revenue Withholding

Scenario: One co-creator receives all platform revenue, doesn't share with other

Example: Taylor and Sam co-host YouTube channel. Taylor controls AdSense account; receives all ad revenue ($10k/month). Taylor claims Sam only deserves payment for "time spent" (3 hours/week × $50/hr = $600/month), not 50% profit share.

Sam's claims:

  • Partnership accounting: We're partners; entitled to 50% of profits (absent agreement specifying different split)
  • Breach of contract: We agreed to split revenue equally (prove via texts, emails, verbal agreement)
  • Unjust enrichment: Taylor unjustly enriched by keeping revenue from jointly-created content

Taylor's defenses:

  • No agreement to split: Never agreed to 50/50; Sam was compensated guest/contractor
  • Unequal contribution: I do 90% of work (editing, production, sponsorships); Sam just shows up to record
  • I own channel: I created channel, built audience, control monetization; Sam contributed later

Resolution:

  • If partnership proven: Taylor must account for all revenue and pay Sam's share (likely 50/50 default)
  • If no partnership: Sam may still recover under unjust enrichment or quantum meruit (reasonable value of services)
  • Going forward: Formalize split (could be 50/50, 60/40, or other based on contributions)
3. Departure/Buyout Disputes

Scenario: One co-creator wants out; other won't buy them out or disputes valuation

Example: Casey and Morgan co-created podcast. Casey wants to leave and demands buyout of $100k (50% of what Casey values show at). Morgan offers $10k. Stalemate.

Casey's position:

  • Show generates $15k/month; worth $300k (20× monthly revenue industry standard); my 50% = $150k; willing to accept $100k
  • I built audience, negotiated major sponsors; deserve fair buyout
  • If you won't buy me out, sell the show and split proceeds

Morgan's position:

  • You want to leave; not my problem; find your own buyer for your share
  • Show value speculative; most of value is my personal brand, not the "show" itself
  • I'll give you $10k and full release to leave quietly; otherwise you get nothing

Resolution options:

  1. Forced buyout: Court-ordered appraisal + one party must buy other out at appraised value
  2. Shotgun clause (if in agreement): One party names price; other must buy or sell at that price
  3. Liquidation: Shut down show, sell assets (channel, back catalog, social accounts), split proceeds
  4. Deadlock dissolution: Court dissolves partnership, appoints receiver to liquidate assets
  5. Competing shows: Both parties leave, each starts new show (if no non-compete), show shuts down
4. Use of Name/IP After Split

Scenario: After split, one party continues using show name or IP the other claims to own

Example: Chris and Pat co-created "Tech Talk Daily" podcast. They split up. Chris continues producing "Tech Talk Daily" solo. Pat demands Chris stop using the name.

Pat's claims:

  • Trademark infringement: I co-own "Tech Talk Daily" name; you can't use without my consent
  • Unfair competition: Consumers confused into thinking your solo show is our original joint show
  • Breach of partnership: Show name is partnership asset; you can't take for yourself

Chris's defenses:

  • I registered trademark: I filed trademark in my name; I own it
  • I created the name: I came up with name before you joined; you contributed nothing to brand
  • You abandoned interest: You left; I'm keeping show going; you can't stop me now

Resolution:

  • If joint ownership of name/trademark: Neither can use without other's consent OR court orders co-exclusive use (both can use) OR one buys out other's interest in name
  • If one party has superior trademark rights: That party can enjoin other from using name
  • Common settlement: Departing party gets paid transition period (6-12 months) while continuing party phases out their involvement; continuing party keeps name
5. Back Catalog / Archive Disputes

Scenario: After split, dispute over who owns old episodes and can monetize them

Example: Drew and Riley created 200 podcast episodes together over 3 years. They split. Drew (who controls hosting account) keeps all 200 episodes live, earning $3k/month from ads. Riley demands episodes be taken down or revenue shared.

Riley's claims:

  • Joint authorship: I co-created all episodes; I own copyright; you need my consent to continue distributing
  • Right of publicity: My voice/likeness in episodes; you can't use commercially without my consent
  • Partnership assets: Back catalog is partnership asset; you can't monetize for yourself post-dissolution

Drew's defenses:

  • Joint authorship = joint rights: As joint author, I can license/exploit work without your consent (subject to accounting to you for profits)
  • Implied license: We both intended episodes to be publicly distributed; you granted implied license
  • Estoppel: You participated in creating and distributing episodes for years; can't object now

Resolution:

  • Continue distribution, split revenue: Episodes stay live; Drew pays Riley 50% of ad revenue from old episodes
  • Buyout of back catalog: Drew pays Riley lump sum for Riley's interest in old episodes; Drew keeps 100% going forward
  • Take down old episodes: Remove from all platforms to avoid ongoing dispute (lose revenue but clean break)
  • Archive episodes (no monetization): Episodes stay available but ads/monetization removed
Revenue Splits & Buyout Valuations
Determining Revenue Split (No Agreement)

If no written agreement specifies revenue split, courts consider:

Factor Analysis
Partnership existence If partnership, default = equal split (50/50) unless proven otherwise
Contribution levels Unequal contributions may justify unequal split (but burden on party claiming unequal)
Prior course of dealing If parties previously split revenue 60/40, that becomes implied agreement
Communications about split Texts/emails discussing "50/50" or other split = evidence of agreement
Industry custom Podcast/YouTube co-hosts typically split equally absent contrary agreement

Contribution-based split arguments:

  • Claiming larger share: "I do 70% of work (editing, production, booking guests, social media); partner just shows up to record; I deserve 70% of revenue"
  • Defense: "Partnership default is equal split regardless of who does more work; if you wanted different split, should have documented it; my on-air talent is what drives audience"
  • Court analysis: Difficult to prove unequal split without written agreement; equal presumption strong; but if contribution disparity extreme (e.g., 95/5), court may adjust
Valuing Podcast/YouTube Channel for Buyout

Common valuation methods:

Method Calculation When Used
Revenue multiple 12-36 months of revenue × multiplier (1-3×) Established show with consistent revenue
Profit multiple 12-24 months of net profit × multiplier (2-5×) Show with significant expenses
Subscriber/listener value Number of subscribers/listeners × per-user value ($1-$10 depending on niche) Fast-growing channel with low current revenue but valuable audience
Comparable sales Price similar channels sold for Active market for podcast/channel acquisitions in your niche
Asset-based Value of back catalog + email list + social accounts + equipment Show being shut down; liquidation value
Future cash flow (DCF) Present value of projected future earnings High-growth show with clear trajectory

Example valuations:

PODCAST: "Business Insights Daily" • Monthly revenue: $12,000 (sponsorships + ads) • Monthly expenses: $2,000 (editing, hosting, promotion) • Net monthly profit: $10,000 • Annual profit: $120,000 Valuation methods: 1. Revenue multiple: $144k annual revenue × 2 = $288,000 2. Profit multiple: $120k annual profit × 3 = $360,000 3. Average: ~$320,000 50% buyout: $160,000 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: "Tech Review Bros" • Subscribers: 500,000 • Monthly AdSense: $15,000 • Annual revenue: $180,000 • Expenses: $30,000/year • Net profit: $150,000/year Valuation: • Profit multiple: $150k × 2.5 = $375,000 • Subscriber value: 500k × $2/sub = $1,000,000 (high for engaged tech audience) • Blended: ~$500,000-$700,000 50% buyout: $250,000-$350,000
Buyout Negotiation Strategies

For departing co-creator (seeking maximum buyout):

  • Hire appraiser: Get professional valuation to anchor negotiation high
  • Emphasize your contribution: Document your role in building audience, landing sponsors, creating content
  • Threaten alternatives: "If you won't buy me out, I'll compete with you (launch rival show) or force sale of entire show"
  • Highlight growth trajectory: Show revenue increasing, use future projections to justify higher multiple
  • Lock up leverage: If you control accounts/access, don't give up until paid

For continuing co-creator (minimizing buyout cost):

  • Challenge value: "Revenue declining; sponsors leaving; audience loyalty is to ME not the show"
  • Emphasize your contribution: "You're leaving because I do all the work; show won't exist without me"
  • Offer earn-out: "I'll pay you percentage of revenue for next 12 months instead of lump sum (reduces risk for me)"
  • Highlight risks: "Show could fail without you; I'm taking all the risk continuing; discount justified"
  • Lowball + walk away alternative: "Take $X or get nothing; I'll rebrand and start over"
Buyout Payment Structures
Structure Terms Pros/Cons
Lump sum Single payment at closing Departing: Clean break. Continuing: Large cash outlay
Installments Monthly/quarterly payments over 12-36 months Departing: Spread out risk. Continuing: Manage cash flow
Earn-out Percentage of revenue for X months (e.g., 25% of revenue for 12 months) Departing: Share in success. Continuing: Pay only if show succeeds
Retained interest Departing party keeps X% ownership (e.g., 10% forever as silent partner) Departing: Ongoing income. Continuing: Simpler than buyout
Hybrid $X lump sum + Y% of revenue for Z months Balances immediate payment with future upside
Sample Buyout Scenarios

Scenario 1: Equal partners, amicable split

Show value: $400k (agreed via appraisal) Departing partner's 50%: $200k Terms: • $50k at signing • $50k at 6 months • $50k at 12 months • $50k at 18 months • Total: $200k over 18 months Departing partner agrees: • Transfer all ownership interest • Non-compete for 12 months (can't launch competing show) • Promote continuing partner's version of show to audiences for 3 months (transition period) • Social media posts announcing departure (scripted jointly)

Scenario 2: Unequal partners, hostile split

Majority partner (60%): Wants to buy out minority (40%) Show value disputed: Majority says $200k; Minority says $500k Settlement: • Majority pays minority $100k (40% of $250k compromise valuation) • $50k at signing • $25k at 6 months • $25k at 12 months Minority agrees: • Relinquish all rights to show name, content, accounts • 24-month non-compete (can't launch competing show in same niche) • Remove all references to show from personal social media • No disparagement clause

Scenario 3: Deadlock, forced sale

Neither partner can buy out other; court orders sale Process: • Hire business broker to sell channel/podcast • List for sale; field offers • Both parties must approve buyer (or court approves if parties can't agree) • Sale proceeds split 50/50 after expenses (broker commission, legal fees) • Buyer gets channel, back catalog, social accounts, IP rights Result: • Show sells for $300k • After 10% broker fee ($30k) and legal ($10k): $260k net • Each partner receives $130k
Sample Ownership Dispute Demand Letters
Sample 1: Locked Out Co-Creator Demanding Access
[Your Name] [Address] [Email] [Date] [Former Co-Creator Name] [Address] Re: Unlawful Lockout from [Show Name] - Immediate Restoration of Access Required Dear [Name]: I am writing regarding your unlawful lockout of me from our jointly-owned podcast/YouTube channel "[Show Name]" and your misappropriation of partnership revenue. PARTNERSHIP RELATIONSHIP: In [Month, Year], you and I formed a partnership to create and operate "[Show Name]." We agreed to: • Co-create content as equal partners • Split all revenue 50/50 • Share decision-making equally • Build the show together as co-owners Evidence of partnership: • We held ourselves out as "co-hosts" and "partners" to sponsors, audiences, and industry • We jointly appeared on all episodes (200+ episodes over 3 years) • We equally participated in content creation, guest booking, sponsor negotiations • We split revenue 50/50 for first 2 years (bank records attached) • All promotional materials listed us as "Co-Hosts" and "Co-Creators" This is a legal partnership under [State] law, with all attendant rights and duties. YOUR UNLAWFUL ACTIONS: On [Date], following our disagreement about [topic], you unilaterally: 1. LOCKED ME OUT OF ALL ACCOUNTS: • Changed YouTube channel login credentials (I can no longer access) • Changed podcast hosting account (Megaphone) password • Changed Instagram, Twitter, TikTok passwords • Removed me as admin from all platforms 2. CONTINUED PRODUCING SHOW WITHOUT ME: • Published Episode [X] on [date] - without my participation or consent • Announced I was "taking break" (false - you locked me out) • Continued booking guests and publishing content 3. MISAPPROPRIATED PARTNERSHIP REVENUE: • Kept all sponsorship revenue from [Sponsor A] ($15,000 - my 50% = $7,500 owed) • Kept all AdSense revenue (estimated $8,000/month for 2 months = $8,000 owed) • Kept Patreon subscriber revenue ($3,000/month × 2 = $3,000 owed) • Total revenue withheld: $18,500 4. USED JOINTLY-OWNED CONTENT WITHOUT CONSENT: • Continued distributing 200 episodes we co-created (I own 50% copyright as joint author) • Used show name, logo, and branding we jointly created • Used our joint social media accounts to promote your solo episodes LEGAL VIOLATIONS: Your conduct violates multiple legal duties: 1. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY: As my partner, you owe me duties of loyalty, care, and good faith. Locking me out, taking partnership assets (accounts, revenue), and operating show for your sole benefit = egregious breach. 2. CONVERSION: You have wrongfully exercised control over partnership property (accounts, revenue) to my exclusion. This is conversion of my property interest. 3. BREACH OF CONTRACT: Our partnership agreement (even if informal) required 50/50 split and joint decision-making. You breached by excluding me and keeping all revenue. 4. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT: I am joint author of all 200 episodes (17 U.S.C. § 101 - joint work). While joint authors can each exploit work, you must account to me for profits. You have not. Also, continuing show without me may create false impression I endorse your new solo episodes (violates my publicity rights). 5. UNFAIR COMPETITION / TRADEMARK: We jointly own "[ Show Name]" trademark rights (through use in commerce). You can't unilaterally exclude me from using it or use it to mislead audiences. DEMAND - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED (within 48 hours): 1. RESTORE MY ACCESS: • Provide login credentials for YouTube channel, podcast hosting, all social media accounts • Restore me as admin/co-owner on all platforms • If you changed passwords, send new passwords immediately 2. ACCOUNTING OF REVENUE: • Provide complete accounting of all revenue received since [lockout date] • Include: sponsorships, AdSense, Patreon, affiliate commissions, merchandise sales 3. PAY MY SHARE: • Wire transfer $18,500 (my 50% of revenue) within 7 days • Provide accounting showing calculation 4. CEASE UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY: • Stop publishing new episodes until we resolve partnership status • Post correction that I did not "take break" but was locked out by you CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE: If you do not restore access within 48 hours and pay revenue within 7 days, I will immediately: 1. FILE EMERGENCY INJUNCTION: • Seek temporary restraining order (TRO) requiring you to restore my access • Request court-appointed receiver to take control of accounts pending resolution • Freeze all revenue accounts 2. FILE LAWSUIT for: • Breach of fiduciary duty • Breach of contract (partnership agreement) • Conversion (taking partnership property) • Copyright infringement (use of jointly-owned content) • Accounting and disgorgement of all profits • Dissolution of partnership • Damages: Lost income, reputation harm, emotional distress • Attorney's fees and costs 3. DMCA TAKEDOWN NOTICES: • File copyright takedown notices with YouTube, podcast platforms for all episodes I co-created • May result in channel strike or termination 4. PUBLIC STATEMENT: • Publish statement to our audience explaining you locked me out unlawfully and kept revenue • They deserve to know the truth I don't want litigation. I want my partnership rights respected. Restore my access and pay what you owe. Then we can have civilized discussion about whether to continue partnership or negotiate buyout. Respond within 48 hours. Sincerely, [Your Signature] [Your Name] Enclosures: • Bank statements showing 50/50 revenue splits (first 2 years) • Screenshots of promotional materials calling us "Co-Hosts" • Social media posts referring to our "partnership" • Revenue accounting spreadsheet
Sample 2: Demanding Revenue Share
[Your Name] [Email] [Date] [Co-Creator Name] [Address] Re: Demand for Revenue Accounting and Payment - [Show Name] Dear [Name]: I am writing to demand accounting and payment of my share of revenue from our jointly-created YouTube channel "[Show Name]." OUR AGREEMENT: When we launched [Show Name] in [date], we agreed to: • Co-create content as equal partners • Split all revenue 50/50 • Both contribute equally to content creation, production, and promotion This is evidenced by: • Text message [date]: You wrote "Let's split everything 50/50 and build this together" • Email [date]: I wrote "Sounds good - equal partners on everything" • Our joint appearances in all [X] videos • Joint promotion on both our social media accounts REVENUE WITHHOLDING: You control the YouTube AdSense account (registered in your name). All ad revenue flows to you. You have failed to pay me my 50% share: Revenue earned (based on Social Blade estimates + sponsorship deals I know about): • YouTube AdSense (last 12 months): ~$120,000 • Sponsorship deals: - [Brand A]: $25,000 - [Brand B]: $15,000 - [Brand C]: $30,000 • Total revenue: ~$190,000 My 50% share: $95,000 Amount paid to me: $0 UNPAID BALANCE: $95,000 YOUR EXCUSES (All Invalid): When I asked for accounting, you claimed: 1. "I do all the editing, so I deserve more": - We agreed 50/50 regardless of who does what tasks - I contribute on-screen talent, audience engagement, sponsor outreach - Your editing is your contribution; my on-screen work is mine - Partnership default is equal split absent written agreement otherwise 2. "I built the channel before you joined": - I joined in [Month Year] when channel had 5,000 subscribers - Now we have 500,000 subscribers - I helped build 99% of audience - Even if you claim pre-existing ownership, I'm entitled to share of growth I contributed to 3. "You can start your own channel if you want money": - Doesn't excuse your obligation to pay me my share of revenue from OUR joint channel - I'm entitled to revenue from content WE created together LEGAL BASIS: 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT: We agreed 50/50 split; you're keeping 100%; this is breach 2. PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNTING: We are partners in business of creating content; you must account for and share profits (UPA § 401) 3. JOINT AUTHORSHIP: I am joint author of all videos; entitled to share of exploitation revenue 4. UNJUST ENRICHMENT: You are unjustly enriched by keeping revenue from jointly-created content DEMAND: Within 14 days: 1. PROVIDE ACCOUNTING: • Complete revenue accounting for last 12 months (all sources: AdSense, sponsorships, affiliate, merchandise) • Show gross revenue, expenses (if any), net profit • Provide AdSense dashboard access or screenshots proving revenue 2. PAY MY SHARE: • Wire $95,000 (my estimated 50% share) • If your accounting shows different revenue, we'll adjust 3. GOING FORWARD: • Set up joint bank account for all show revenue • Split 50/50 monthly • OR I get direct access to AdSense account to verify revenue CONSEQUENCES: If no accounting and payment within 14 days: • File lawsuit for breach of contract, partnership accounting, unjust enrichment • Seek court-ordered accounting of all revenue • Seek dissolution of partnership and split of assets • Damages: My unpaid share + interest + attorney fees • Public disclosure of dispute (audiences deserve to know you're withholding my earnings) I shouldn't have to sue to get what you owe me. Pay my share and let's formalize our arrangement going forward. Respond within 14 days. Sincerely, [Your Name]
Sample 3: Demanding Buyout
[Your Name] [Address] [Date] [Co-Creator Name] [Address] Re: Notice of Intent to Exit Partnership - Buyout Demanded Dear [Name]: I am writing to notify you of my intent to exit our partnership for [Show Name] and to demand buyout of my ownership interest. PARTNERSHIP DISSOLUTION: Due to irreconcilable differences regarding creative direction and business operations, I am exercising my right to dissolve our partnership. Effective [30 days from date], I will cease participating in content creation for [Show Name]. MY OWNERSHIP INTEREST: I own 50% of the partnership, including: • 50% ownership of [Show Name] brand, trademark, and goodwill • 50% copyright in all [X] episodes we co-created • 50% ownership of YouTube channel, podcast feed, social media accounts (even if registered in your name - partnership assets) • 50% ownership of email list, sponsor relationships, back catalog • 50% of all revenue and profits BUYOUT VALUATION: [Show Name] valuation: Current metrics: • Monthly revenue: $25,000 (average last 12 months) • Annual revenue: $300,000 • Subscribers/listeners: [X] • Monthly downloads/views: [X] Valuation (using 2× annual revenue multiple - conservative for profitable media business): $300,000 annual revenue × 2 = $600,000 My 50% interest: $300,000 BUYOUT DEMAND: I demand you buy out my 50% ownership interest for $300,000, paid as follows: Option A - Lump Sum (discount for immediate payment): • $250,000 paid within 30 days • I transfer all ownership rights immediately • Clean break Option B - Installments: • $300,000 paid over 24 months: - $75,000 at signing - $18,750/month for 12 months ($225,000 total) • Secured by promissory note and security interest in show assets Option C - Earn-Out: • $100,000 at signing • 25% of gross revenue for 12 months (estimated $75,000) • 15% of gross revenue for following 12 months (estimated $45,000) • Total estimated: $220,000-$250,000 • I retain oversight/reporting rights during earn-out period ALTERNATIVE - I BUY YOU OUT: If you prefer to exit instead, I will buy your 50% interest on same terms (you choose payment structure from options above). OR - FORCED SALE: If neither of us can/will buy out the other, we will jointly sell the entire show to third party and split proceeds 50/50. YOUR OBLIGATIONS DURING TRANSITION: While we negotiate buyout: • Continue splitting revenue 50/50 • Preserve all partnership assets (don't delete content, close accounts, terminate sponsors) • Provide full accounting of current revenue, contracts, assets • No new major decisions without joint approval (sponsor deals over $10k, rebranding, etc.) CONSEQUENCES OF REFUSAL: If you refuse to negotiate buyout in good faith, I will: 1. FILE LAWSUIT for judicial dissolution of partnership and court-ordered sale/buyout 2. SEEK PARTITION of partnership assets (court will force sale or award to one party with payment to other) 3. STOP PARTICIPATING in show immediately (you can't continue using my likeness, voice, prior contributions without paying me) 4. FILE DMCA takedowns for all episodes containing my copyrighted contributions 5. COMPETE (launch competing show in same niche - I'm not bound by non-compete if we don't have written agreement) I prefer amicable resolution. I built this show with you and want to see it continue successfully (whether you run it or I do). But I need to be bought out fairly. Respond within 14 days with your chosen option or counter-proposal. Sincerely, [Your Signature] [Your Name]
Platform Access & Account Control Issues
The Platform Access Problem
🚨 Technical Control = De Facto Ownership: Whoever controls account logins (YouTube, podcast hosting, social media, AdSense, Patreon) has de facto control of the asset, regardless of legal ownership. Locks and passwords matter more than contracts when conflict arises. Secure your access BEFORE conflicts, not after.
Platform Ownership Rules
Platform Ownership Rule (per ToS) Multi-Admin Support? Recovery Options
YouTube Account owned by Google account holder; can't be jointly owned Yes - multiple channel managers can be added with varying permissions If locked out: Contact YouTube support (rarely successful without original owner cooperation)
Google AdSense Account tied to individual or entity (tax ID); can't be shared Limited - can add users but primary account holder controls Recovery very difficult without account holder cooperation
Podcast hosting (Megaphone, Anchor, etc.) Account owned by registrant Varies - some support multi-user access Platform support may help if you can prove ownership interest
Patreon Creator account owned by registrant Yes - can add team members with permissions Contact Patreon with proof of ownership dispute; may freeze account pending resolution
Instagram/TikTok/Twitter Personal account owned by account creator Limited - Instagram allows adding account access via Business Account Very difficult to recover; platform rarely intervenes in disputes
Spotify (for podcasters) Account owned by registrant Yes - Spotify for Creators allows team access May transfer RSS feed to new host if proven ownership
Securing Access Rights (Before Conflict)

Best practices for co-creators:

  1. Multi-admin access: Both co-creators have admin/owner access to ALL accounts from day one (YouTube channel managers, podcast hosting logins, social media business accounts)
  2. Separate business entity: Create LLC; register all accounts under LLC email (not personal); both co-creators are LLC managers with access to LLC email
  3. Shared password manager: Store all passwords in shared 1Password/LastPass vault accessible to both parties
  4. Written agreement specifying access: "Both parties shall at all times maintain full administrative access to all Platform accounts. Neither party may remove other party's access without 30 days notice."
  5. Regular access audits: Monthly check that both parties still have access; if one discovers they've been removed, immediate red flag
  6. Platform account transfers in writing: If one party holds primary account, written agreement: "Primary account holder acknowledges they hold account in trust for partnership and will not revoke co-creator's access or transfer account without consent"
Regaining Access After Lockout

Immediate steps if locked out:

  1. Document the lockout: Screenshot attempts to log in; record exact date/time you discovered lockout; save any communications from co-creator about it
  2. Demand restoration (email + certified mail): "You have locked me out of [accounts]. This violates my partnership rights. Restore my access within 48 hours or I will seek emergency court relief."
  3. Platform support (low success but try): • YouTube: Report via TeamYouTube Twitter or support form; explain ownership dispute • Google: Submit account recovery request citing ownership dispute • Podcast hosts: Contact support with proof of ownership interest • Instagram/Facebook: Report hacked account (may work if you previously had access) • Most platforms won't intervene without court order
  4. Emergency court relief (TRO/preliminary injunction): • File motion for temporary restraining order requiring co-creator to restore access • Argue immediate irreparable harm (losing revenue, audience, can't operate business) • Request court order compelling disclosure of passwords • If granted, co-creator must comply or face contempt
  5. Appointment of receiver: Request court appoint neutral third party to take control of accounts pending resolution of dispute
  6. DMCA counter-strategy: If you're joint copyright owner, threaten DMCA takedown of all episodes you co-created unless access restored (nuclear option - may get entire channel terminated)
Platform-Specific Strategies

YouTube Channel Recovery:

  • If you previously had channel manager access, YouTube may have record - cite this in support request
  • If you appear in videos, cite copyright ownership in your appearance/performance
  • If channel terminates due to dispute, both parties lose - use as negotiation leverage
  • Court order is most effective: Judge orders account holder to provide access or transfer ownership

Podcast RSS Feed Control:

  • RSS feed ownership depends on hosting platform account
  • If locked out of hosting account, can't update/control feed distribution to Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc.
  • Strategy: Contact hosting provider, explain dispute, request they freeze account or require court order before changes
  • Nuclear option: Create NEW podcast feed under your control, contact Apple/Spotify to transfer subscribers (requires proving ownership - difficult)

Social Media Account Disputes:

  • Personal accounts (Instagram, Twitter, TikTok) nearly impossible to recover without original owner cooperation
  • Business accounts (Facebook Page, Instagram Business) may have multiple admins - harder to lock out
  • If locked out: (1) Try platform account recovery, (2) Legal demand + threaten trademark infringement claim if account uses show name you co-own, (3) Court order is best option
  • Practical reality: May need to start fresh on new account and rebuild following
Sample Court Filing - Emergency TRO for Access
[Caption for Motion for Temporary Restraining Order] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER REQUIRING RESTORATION OF ACCESS TO PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNTS Plaintiff [Your Name] moves for temporary restraining order requiring Defendant [Co-Creator] to immediately restore Plaintiff's access to the following accounts operated as partnership assets: 1. YouTube channel "[Show Name]" (account: [email]) 2. Podcast hosting account (Megaphone - account: [email]) 3. Instagram account @[showname] 4. Google AdSense account [ID] 5. Patreon account "[Show Name]" GROUNDS: 1. LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON MERITS: • Plaintiff and Defendant are partners in podcast/YouTube business • Plaintiff has ownership interest in all partnership assets including accounts • Defendant breached fiduciary duty by locking Plaintiff out • Plaintiff will prevail on claims for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, partnership dissolution 2. IRREPARABLE HARM: • Plaintiff losing $10,000+ per month in income from revenue split • Plaintiff's reputation damaged by inability to participate in show bearing Plaintiff's name/likeness • Partnership business deteriorating due to Plaintiff's inability to access accounts • Monetary damages inadequate - partnership opportunities lost forever • Harm occurring NOW and will continue daily until access restored 3. BALANCE OF HARDSHIPS: • Plaintiff: Losing livelihood, reputation, business interest • Defendant: Minimal hardship from restoring access Plaintiff is entitled to • Defendant can still operate accounts - just must share access with rightful co-owner 4. PUBLIC INTEREST: • Enforcing partnership rights and preventing one partner from misappropriating partnership assets serves public interest REQUESTED RELIEF: Court order requiring Defendant to immediately (within 24 hours of order): • Provide Plaintiff with login credentials to all accounts listed above • Restore Plaintiff as admin/manager/co-owner with full permissions • Refrain from changing passwords, removing Plaintiff's access, or transferring accounts • Preserve all account assets pending resolution of underlying dispute [Supporting declaration with evidence of partnership, lockout, harm]
Attorney Services - Podcast/YouTube Disputes
Co-Creator Locked You Out? Revenue Dispute?

I represent content creators in podcast and YouTube ownership disputes. Services include: emergency access restoration, partnership dissolution, buyout negotiations, revenue accounting, and litigation for breach of fiduciary duty and conversion.

Services Offered
  • Emergency TRO/injunction to restore account access after lockout
  • Partnership dissolution and asset division
  • Buyout negotiation and valuation
  • Revenue accounting demands and enforcement
  • Copyright/joint authorship disputes
  • Trademark ownership and use disputes
  • Platform account recovery assistance
  • Drafting co-creator agreements (before conflicts arise)
  • Business entity formation (LLC/Corp for channels)
Representative Matters
  • Obtained TRO restoring co-host's access to podcast accounts within 72 hours of lockout; negotiated $180k buyout
  • Represented YouTube co-creator in revenue dispute; recovered $95k in withheld AdSense revenue
  • Negotiated podcast channel sale for $425k; split proceeds 50/50 between deadlocked co-creators
  • Dissolved partnership and divided assets: one co-creator kept channel, paid other $200k buyout
  • Defended client against false partnership claim; proved client was sole owner; plaintiff recovered nothing
Why Content Creator Dispute Experience Matters
Unique Expertise: Podcast/YouTube disputes combine partnership law, copyright law, platform ToS, and content valuation. I understand both the legal framework and the creator economy realities (how channels are valued, what buyers pay, industry standard splits, platform access issues).
Fee Structures
  • Emergency TRO filing: Flat fee ($3,500-$7,500) for emergency motion + hearing
  • Demand letter: Flat fee $450
  • Buyout negotiation: Hourly ($300-$500/hr) or percentage of buyout achieved (5-10%)
  • Revenue accounting + recovery: Contingency (33-40% of recovered revenue)
  • Partnership dissolution litigation: Hourly ($300-$500/hr) or hybrid (reduced hourly + percentage of recovery/buyout)
  • Co-creator agreement drafting: Flat fee ($2,000-$5,000 depending on complexity)
  • Channel valuation: Flat fee ($1,000-$2,500) for detailed appraisal report
Schedule a Call

Book a call to discuss your podcast/YouTube dispute. Whether you've been locked out, partner won't share revenue, or you need help negotiating a buyout, I'll assess your situation and recommend strategy.

Contact Information

Email: owner@terms.law

Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, likely. YouTube ToS says account owned by registrant, but that's between you and YouTube, not determinative of legal ownership between you and co-host. If you're partners in the business of creating content, the channel is a partnership asset regardless of who registered it. Account holder holds legal title, but you own 50% beneficial interest. Evidence to prove partnership: (1) Revenue sharing, (2) Joint decision-making, (3) Equal participation in content creation, (4) Holding out as "co-hosts" or "partners," (5) Both appearing in videos. If partnership proven, you're entitled to: (1) Access as co-owner, (2) 50% of revenue, (3) Buyout of your interest if you leave. Account holder can't keep channel for themselves just because they clicked "register." Court can order transfer of channel or impose constructive trust (account holder holds for benefit of partnership). Get evidence of partnership relationship and assert your rights before account holder claims sole ownership.
Yes, through judicial dissolution. If you and co-creator are deadlocked (you want out, they won't buy you out or sell their share), you can petition court to dissolve partnership under state partnership law. Court will either: (1) Order buyout at judicially-determined fair value (one party must buy other out at appraised price), (2) Order sale of all assets (show sold to third party, proceeds split), or (3) Award assets to one party with payment to other. Process: File petition for dissolution citing deadlock/irreconcilable differences. Court appoints appraiser to value business. Court determines who gets to keep show (usually who can pay buyout or who's more integral to show). If neither can buy out other, court orders liquidation. Shotgun clause (if in written agreement): One party names price; other must either buy at that price or sell at that price (forces resolution). If no written agreement, judicial dissolution is remedy. Takes 6-12 months typically, but forces resolution instead of indefinite stalemate.
Probably yes, unless you have written non-compete. Without written agreement prohibiting competition, you're generally free to start competing show. Exceptions: (1) Fiduciary duty: While partnership still exists and you're trying to resolve dispute in good faith, you may have duty not to compete (consult attorney). (2) Trade secret misappropriation: Can't steal confidential business info (sponsor contacts, proprietary content strategies) to compete. (3) Trademark: Can't use show name if co-owned or other party has superior rights. (4) Copyright: Can't use jointly-created content without permission (though as joint author, you can use subject to accounting for profits to co-author). Strategic considerations: (1) Competing show may strengthen your negotiating position (if you'll succeed anyway, co-creator more motivated to buy you out), (2) May breach fiduciary duty if done while partnership active (wait until formally dissolved or get legal advice), (3) Better to negotiate exit first, then compete if needed. Best approach: Send demand for buyout or dissolution, negotiate exit, THEN start new show once you're no longer partners. Or argue partnership dissolved by co-creator's lockout (they breached, partnership terminated, you're free to compete).
Typical valuation: 1-3× annual revenue for content businesses. Factors: (1) Revenue: Use last 12 months average monthly revenue × 12. Include all sources (ads, sponsorships, memberships, merch). (2) Growth: Growing channel worth more (use higher multiple); declining channel worth less. (3) Niche: Valuable niches (finance, tech, B2B) command higher multiples than entertainment. (4) Revenue diversification: Multiple revenue streams (ads + sponsors + products) more valuable than single source. (5) Audience loyalty: Engaged audience (high watch time, comments, shares) worth more than passive viewers. (6) Transferability: If show depends on specific host's personality, less transferable (lower value); if show is format-based, more transferable. Examples: (1) $10k/month revenue, steady state, entertainment niche = $120k annual revenue × 1.5 = $180k value. (2) $25k/month revenue, growing 20% YoY, B2B niche = $300k annual × 2.5 = $750k value. (3) $5k/month revenue, declining, host-dependent = $60k annual × 0.8 = $50k value. Get professional appraisal if dispute; otherwise negotiate based on comparable sales in your niche. Your 50% = half of total value.
As joint copyright owner, you have nuclear option: DMCA takedown. If you and co-creator jointly created episodes (both contributed copyrightable expression), you're joint authors. Joint authors each have right to exploit work, BUT must account to other joint authors for profits. Your co-creator is violating accounting duty by keeping all revenue. You can file DMCA takedown notices with YouTube, podcast platforms claiming copyright infringement. Platform must take down content unless co-creator files counter-notice claiming they have rights. Risk: (1) Co-creator can counter-notice arguing they're joint author with right to exploit (puts content back up), (2) If you file false DMCA knowing co-creator has joint rights, you may be liable for damages, (3) Takes down content both of you rely on for income - mutually assured destruction. Better strategy: Use DMCA as threat/leverage ("Restore my access and pay my revenue share, or I'll file DMCA and take down all episodes - neither of us earns money then"). Forces negotiation. Only actually file DMCA if: (1) Co-creator won't negotiate at all, (2) You're willing to blow up show to make point, (3) You have lawyer advise it's strategic move. DMCA is nuclear option - use to get to settlement table, not as first move.

Podcast and YouTube Ownership Disputes — When Co-Creators Split Up

Podcasts and YouTube channels started by friends, business partners, or co-hosts often begin without formal agreements about who owns what. When the relationship sours, disputes over channel ownership, episode archives, revenue splits, and the right to continue using the show name become bitter legal battles. Without a written partnership agreement, co-creators may find themselves as joint copyright owners of content—entitling each to exploit the work but requiring an accounting of profits to the other. Resolving these disputes requires understanding copyright law, partnership principles, and platform-specific rules for account access.

Common Podcast and YouTube Co-Creator Disputes

Copyright and Ownership Issues for Joint Creators

Under copyright law, when two people collaborate to create content with the intent that their contributions merge into a single work, they become "joint authors" who co-own the copyright. Each joint author can exploit the work (publish, monetize, license) without the other's permission, but must account to the other for profits. This means a co-host who locks you out of the channel and keeps all revenue is violating their accounting duty—even if they technically have the right to post the content. The nuclear option is DMCA takedowns: as a joint copyright owner, you can file takedown notices forcing platforms to remove content. But this is mutually destructive—use it as leverage to force negotiation, not as a first move.

What Co-Creators Can Recover in Ownership Disputes

Resolving Podcast and YouTube Ownership Disputes

Most creator ownership disputes settle because litigation is expensive and the DMCA nuclear option hurts both parties. Start with a demand letter documenting your contributions to the show, citing joint authorship principles, and demanding: (1) immediate access to accounts, (2) accounting of all revenue since lockout, (3) payment of your share of past revenue, and (4) either a buyout offer or agreement on going-forward revenue split. Set a deadline of 10-14 days before escalating. If the co-creator refuses to negotiate, your options include arbitration, civil litigation for breach of fiduciary duty and accounting, or strategic DMCA takedowns to force them to the table. The threat of taking down content both parties rely on for income is often enough to produce settlement.