Comprehensive guide to resolving conflicts over family business interests, inherited business ownership, and inter-generational succession disputes in California.
Family businesses combine the complexity of business disputes with the emotion of family conflict. When parents pass away, when siblings disagree about management, or when one family member feels squeezed out by others, the resulting disputes can tear families apart and destroy businesses. Early intervention through a well-crafted demand letter can sometimes resolve these conflicts before they escalate to litigation.
The unique challenge: Family business disputes involve both legal rights (as shareholders, partners, or beneficiaries) and family relationships. A demand letter must be firm on legal rights while recognizing that these are often people who will continue to be family - and ideally continue to work together.
Common Family Business Scenarios
Post-Death Inheritance Disputes
Parent dies, leaving business interests to multiple children. Common problems:
One child ran the business and wants to continue; others want to be bought out
Disagreement about the business's value
Active sibling refuses to share financial information with inactive siblings
Operating sibling takes excessive compensation, leaving nothing for distributions
Questions about what happened before the parent died - was the business already depleted?
Active vs. Inactive Owner Conflicts
One family member works in the business full-time; others own shares but don't work there:
Working owner takes high salary, no distributions to others
Non-working owners feel excluded from information and decisions
Disputes about perks, benefits, and related-party transactions
Inactive owners want liquidity; active owner doesn't want to sell or borrow
Generational Transition Disputes
Parent is retiring or has died; children disagree about succession:
Who should run the company going forward?
Should siblings who don't work there get equal ownership?
Is the succession plan fair to all family members?
Did the departing generation make promises that weren't documented?
Squeeze-Out Situations
Majority owners use their control to disadvantage minority family members:
Firing family members from employment
Diluting ownership through new share issuances
Eliminating distributions while majority takes salary
Making decisions that benefit majority at expense of minority
Why Send a Demand Letter?
Purpose
Why It Matters
Asserts legal rights
Many family members don't realize they have legal rights as minority owners - your letter educates them
Requests information
Shareholders and partners have rights to financial information; a formal demand starts the clock
Proposes solutions
Often the first concrete proposal for resolution - buyout, restructure, mediation
Preserves relationships
A private letter is less inflammatory than filing suit; leaves room for negotiation
Creates record
Documents attempts to resolve before litigation, which courts appreciate
Key Questions to Answer First
What entity type? Corporation, LLC, partnership - each has different rules
What documents exist? Bylaws, operating agreement, shareholder agreement, buy-sell agreement
What's your ownership percentage? Determines voting rights and certain remedies
Who controls the business? Board, managers, majority owners
What do you want? Buyout? Information? Change in management? Dissolution?
Check for arbitration clauses: Many business agreements require disputes to go to arbitration rather than court. Review all governing documents for dispute resolution provisions before sending a demand letter or filing suit.
California Legal Framework
Corporation Laws
California Corporations Code governs closely held corporations:
§ 1601: Right to inspect and copy corporate records
§ 1602: Right to annual financial statements
§ 1800: Involuntary dissolution for deadlock, fraud, or abuse of authority
§ 2000: Buyout election in lieu of dissolution
Shareholder Inspection Rights
Any shareholder may demand inspection of:
Accounting books and records
Minutes of shareholder and board meetings
Shareholder list
Financial statements
The demand must be in writing, state the purpose, and be for a purpose reasonably related to the shareholder's interest.
Grounds for Involuntary Dissolution (§ 1800)
Directors or those in control are deadlocked and business cannot be conducted
Directors or those in control have committed fraud, mismanagement, or abuse of authority
Liquidation is reasonably necessary for protection of shareholders' rights or interests
Assets are being wasted or diverted for non-corporate purposes
LLC Laws
California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (Corp. Code §§ 17701.01-17713.13):
§ 17704.10: Member's right to information - may obtain from LLC information reasonably required for proper exercise of rights
§ 17707.03: Judicial dissolution for conduct that makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on business
§ 17704.04: Fiduciary duties of managers in manager-managed LLC
§ 16401: Each partner has right to information about partnership business
§ 16404: Duty of loyalty and care
§ 16801: Grounds for dissolution - unlawful to carry on business, or not reasonably practicable per partnership agreement
Fiduciary Duties in Closely Held Businesses
California recognizes heightened fiduciary duties in closely held businesses:
Duty of loyalty: Must act in good faith in the interest of all owners
Duty of care: Must manage competently
No self-dealing: Cannot put personal interests above the business or other owners
Fair dealing: Must treat minority owners fairly
Jones v. H.F. Ahmanson & Co.: California courts have recognized that majority shareholders in closely held corporations owe minority shareholders a fiduciary duty of fairness. Majority cannot use control to benefit themselves at minority's expense.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims
When controlling family members breach fiduciary duties, minority owners may sue for:
Return of improperly taken compensation or benefits
Accounting of all transactions
Damages for diminished value of ownership interest
Appointment of receiver to protect assets
Removal of directors/managers
Involuntary dissolution or court-ordered buyout
Valuation Standards
When disputes lead to buyout, valuation becomes critical:
Fair market value: Price a willing buyer would pay willing seller
Fair value: Pro rata share of enterprise value (often used in statutory buyouts)
Discounts: Courts differ on whether to apply minority or marketability discounts
California approach: In involuntary dissolution context (§ 2000), courts generally don't apply minority discounts
Common Family Business Disputes
1. Information Access Disputes
Non-managing family members are denied access to financial information about the business they own.
Typical scenario: One sibling runs the family business. Others own shares but are never told how the business is doing, what they're entitled to, or how their shares are being valued.
Your rights:
Shareholders: Corp. Code § 1601 - right to inspect books and records
LLC members: Corp. Code § 17704.10 - right to information for proper purposes
Partners: Corp. Code § 16403 - right to inspect partnership records
Response: Formal demand for inspection with specific categories of documents requested.
2. Excessive Compensation / No Distributions
Controlling family member pays themselves large salaries and benefits, leaving nothing for distributions to non-working owners.
Typical scenario: Business generates $500K profit. CEO-sibling pays themselves $450K salary plus benefits. Other siblings who own 40% collectively receive nothing.
The problem: This effectively excludes minority owners from any return on their investment while majority takes everything through salary.
Your rights:
Fiduciary duty claim for self-dealing
Claim for breach of implied covenant of fair dealing
Demand for fair distribution policy
Potential dissolution petition if pattern continues
3. Squeeze-Out Tactics
Majority owners take actions designed to force minority out on unfavorable terms.
Common tactics:
Terminating minority's employment
Diluting ownership through new issuances
Entering transactions that benefit majority
Refusing to provide information
Making lowball buyout offers
Your rights: California courts provide remedies for freeze-out of minority shareholders in closely held corporations. You may have claims for breach of fiduciary duty, and potentially involuntary dissolution.
4. Buyout Valuation Disputes
Family agrees someone should buy out others, but can't agree on price.
Issues that arise:
What valuation method to use (income, asset, market comparable)
Whether to apply minority or marketability discounts
How to value goodwill
Adjustments for excess compensation already taken
Whether real estate should be valued separately
Resolution approaches:
Agreed-upon appraiser
Baseball arbitration (each side proposes value, arbitrator picks one)
Buy-sell agreement formula if one exists
Court determination in dissolution proceeding
5. Related-Party Transactions
Controlling owners direct business to companies they own or benefit from personally.
Examples:
Leasing property from family member at above-market rent
Buying supplies from company owned by controller
Paying consulting fees to controller's spouse
Loans to family members at favorable rates
The problem: These transactions transfer value from the business (and all owners) to the controlling owner, diluting minority's value.
6. Disputed Inheritance / Succession
Parent dies and children disagree about business ownership or management.
Common issues:
Was the business supposed to go to one child or all?
Were there promises made that weren't in the will?
Did one child already receive their share during parent's lifetime?
How should the business be valued for estate purposes?
Who should run the business going forward?
Resolution Options
Buyout
One family member (or group) buys out others' interests.
Pros: Clean break, allows business to continue
Cons: Often difficult to agree on price; buyer may not have funds
Structured Distributions
Agree to regular distributions to all owners proportional to ownership.
Pros: Keeps family together, provides return to all owners
Cons: Reduces capital available for business; ongoing relationship required
Sale of Business
Sell to outside party and divide proceeds.
Pros: Clean break, market-based valuation
Cons: May not get full value; ends family legacy; tax consequences
Mediation
Neutral third party helps family reach agreement.
Pros: Preserves relationships, creative solutions possible
Cons: Requires good faith from all parties; non-binding
Litigation / Dissolution
Court resolves dispute through involuntary dissolution or damages.
Family business disputes require financial documentation and evidence of the controlling parties' conduct.
Ownership Documents
☐ Articles of incorporation / Articles of organization
☐ Bylaws / Operating agreement
☐ Shareholder agreement / Membership agreement
☐ Buy-sell agreement
☐ Stock certificates / Membership interest records
☐ Stock ledger / Capital account records
☐ Transfer records
Financial Records
☐ Annual financial statements (3-5 years)
☐ Tax returns (corporate/partnership returns)
☐ K-1s issued to owners
☐ Bank statements
☐ Profit and loss statements
☐ Balance sheets
☐ General ledger
☐ Records of distributions to owners
Compensation Evidence
☐ Salary history for controlling family members
☐ Bonus records
☐ Benefits documentation
☐ Expense reimbursements
☐ Auto allowances / company vehicles
☐ Retirement plan contributions
☐ Comparison to market rates for similar positions
Related-Party Transaction Evidence
☐ Lease agreements with family members
☐ Vendor contracts with family-owned companies
☐ Loans to or from family members
☐ Consulting agreements
☐ Comparison to arm's length terms
Meeting Records
☐ Board meeting minutes
☐ Shareholder/member meeting minutes
☐ Written consents
☐ Notices of meetings
Information Demand Strategy
Statutory Inspection Demand
For corporations, your demand under Corp. Code § 1601 should:
Be in writing
State a proper purpose related to your interest as shareholder
Specifically describe documents requested
Allow reasonable time (at least 5 business days)
Offer to pay reasonable copying costs
Proper Purpose Examples
Evaluating the value of your shares
Investigating suspected mismanagement
Determining whether to sell or seek buyout
Verifying accuracy of information provided
Preparing for shareholder action
If Inspection Is Refused
You may petition the court for order compelling inspection. The court may also award attorney's fees if the refusal was without justification.
Valuation Considerations
Methods to Propose
Income approach: Discounted cash flow, capitalized earnings
Market approach: Comparable company transactions
Asset approach: Adjusted book value, liquidation value
Issues to Address
Normalization of excessive compensation
Add-back of personal expenses run through business
Treatment of related-party transactions
Separate valuation of real estate
Goodwill (personal vs. enterprise)
Discounts (minority, marketability) - often disputed
Demand Letter Templates
Template 1: Demand for Books and Records Inspection
Use when: You're being denied access to financial information about the business.
Re: Demand for Inspection of Corporate Records
[Company Name]
Dear [Officer/Controlling Shareholder]:
I represent [Client Name], a shareholder of [Company Name] holding [X]% of the outstanding shares. Pursuant to California Corporations Code § 1601, [he/she] hereby demands inspection and copying of the corporation's books and records.
SHAREHOLDER STATUS
[Client Name] is a shareholder of record, having acquired [his/her] shares [describe how - inherited, purchased, gift, etc.] on or about [date]. [He/She] currently owns [number] shares, representing approximately [X]% of the outstanding shares.
PURPOSE OF INSPECTION
[Client Name]'s purpose in requesting this inspection is to:
1. Evaluate the current value of [his/her] shares
2. Determine whether the corporation is being properly managed
3. Verify that [his/her] ownership interest is being fairly treated
4. Assess whether distributions are appropriate given corporate earnings
5. Evaluate potential sale of shares or other options
These purposes are directly related to [his/her] interests as a shareholder.
RECORDS REQUESTED
[Client Name] requests inspection and copying of the following records:
FINANCIAL RECORDS (for the past 5 fiscal years):
• Annual financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow)
• General ledger
• Monthly or quarterly financial reports
• Bank statements for all corporate accounts
• Tax returns (Forms 1120/1120S/1065 and all schedules)
• K-1s issued to shareholders
• Records of all distributions to shareholders
COMPENSATION RECORDS:
• Salary, bonus, and benefits paid to all officers and directors
• Employment agreements
• Expense reimbursement records for officers
• Vehicle and equipment provided to officers
CORPORATE RECORDS:
• Shareholder ledger showing all current shareholders
• Minutes of all board and shareholder meetings
• Written consents in lieu of meetings
• All contracts exceeding $[amount]
• Leases and real property records
• Loan agreements
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
• All agreements with shareholders, officers, directors, or their family members
• All transactions with entities owned or controlled by insiders
INSPECTION LOGISTICS
[Client Name] [or his/her representative] is available to conduct the inspection at the corporation's principal office beginning [date - at least 5 business days out] or such other date as is mutually convenient.
[He/She] is prepared to pay reasonable copying costs for documents [he/she] selects.
RESPONSE DEADLINE
Please confirm the inspection date within 10 days. If you believe any requested documents are not subject to shareholder inspection, please identify them and state your legal basis.
CONSEQUENCES OF REFUSAL
Corporations Code § 1603 provides that if the corporation refuses to permit inspection without justification, a shareholder may seek a court order compelling inspection, together with attorney's fees and costs.
[Client Name] hopes this matter can be resolved cooperatively. Please contact me to arrange the inspection.
[Attorney Name]
[Contact Information]
Template 2: Excessive Compensation / Distribution Dispute
Use when: Controlling family member is taking excessive pay while others receive nothing.
Re: Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Excessive Compensation and Failure to Distribute
[Company Name]
Dear [Controlling Shareholder/Officer Name]:
I represent [Client Name], a [X]% shareholder of [Company Name]. This letter addresses serious concerns about your conduct as the controlling shareholder and chief executive officer.
THE PROBLEM
[Client Name] has received no distributions from the company despite [his/her] substantial ownership interest. Meanwhile, you have paid yourself compensation far exceeding reasonable market rates, effectively extracting all company profits for yourself.
Based on information available to us:
COMPENSATION YOU HAVE TAKEN:
• Salary: $[amount] per year
• Bonus: $[amount]
• Auto allowance/vehicle: $[amount]
• Other benefits: $[amount]
• Total annual compensation: $[amount]
COMPANY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE:
• Approximate annual revenue: $[amount]
• Approximate annual net income before owner compensation: $[amount]
DISTRIBUTIONS TO OTHER SHAREHOLDERS: $0
THE DISPROPORTION
For a company of this size in this industry, reasonable CEO compensation would be approximately $[amount] per year. You are taking approximately $[amount] more than reasonable compensation annually.
This excess - which should be profit available for distribution to all shareholders - flows entirely to you. [Client Name]'s [X]% ownership entitles [him/her] to [X]% of distributable profits. Instead, [he/she] receives nothing.
LEGAL VIOLATIONS
Your conduct constitutes:
1. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY: As a controlling shareholder and officer, you owe fiduciary duties to minority shareholders. Paying yourself excessive compensation while making no distributions breaches your duty of loyalty.
2. SELF-DEALING: You are on both sides of the compensation decision, voting yourself a salary that leaves nothing for other owners.
3. OPPRESSION OF MINORITY: Your conduct has the effect (if not the intent) of freezing out minority shareholders from any return on their investment.
DEMAND
[Client Name] demands:
1. REDUCTION OF COMPENSATION: Reduce your total compensation to a reasonable market rate of approximately $[amount] annually
2. RETROACTIVE ADJUSTMENT: Return to the company $[amount], representing excess compensation taken over the past [X] years
3. DISTRIBUTION POLICY: Implement a policy of distributing at least [X]% of net profits to shareholders proportionally
4. IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION: Distribute $[amount] to all shareholders, representing [Client Name]'s share of profits improperly retained
5. FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY: Provide quarterly financial statements to all shareholders
ALTERNATIVE: BUYOUT
If you are unwilling to operate the company fairly for all shareholders, [Client Name] is willing to discuss sale of [his/her] shares at fair market value. Any such valuation must normalize your compensation to market rates.
DEADLINE
Respond to this demand within 21 days with either:
(a) Acceptance of the demands above; or
(b) A reasonable buyout proposal; or
(c) An alternative resolution proposal
CONSEQUENCES
If we do not receive a satisfactory response, [Client Name] will:
• File suit for breach of fiduciary duty
• Seek appointment of provisional director
• Petition for involuntary dissolution under Corporations Code § 1800
• Seek damages including return of excess compensation
[Attorney Name]
Template 3: Buyout Demand
Use when: You want to exit the family business and be bought out at fair value.
Re: Demand for Buyout of Ownership Interest
[Company Name]
Dear [Other Owner(s)]:
I represent [Client Name], owner of [X]% of [Company Name]. [He/She] wishes to exit the company and demands that [his/her] ownership interest be purchased at fair value.
BACKGROUND
[Client Name] has owned [his/her] interest in the company since [date], having [inherited it from [Parent]/purchased it/received it as gift]. For [X] years, [he/she] has been a [passive owner/employee/etc.].
REASONS FOR EXIT
[Client Name] wishes to liquidate [his/her] investment for the following reasons:
• [Select applicable reasons: No distributions despite profitable operations]
• [Inability to participate in management decisions]
• [Disagreement with current direction of the company]
• [Personal financial needs requiring liquidity]
• [Breakdown in family relationships making continued ownership untenable]
RIGHT TO EXIT
[If buy-sell agreement exists:]
The Buy-Sell Agreement dated [date] provides for [describe buyout provisions]. [Client Name] hereby invokes [his/her] rights under that agreement.
[If no buy-sell agreement:]
Although no formal buy-sell agreement exists, [Client Name] has the right to exit [his/her] investment. If the remaining owners are unwilling to purchase [his/her] interest at fair value, [he/she] may seek involuntary dissolution under Corporations Code § 1800, triggering buyout rights under § 2000.
VALUATION
[Client Name]'s [X]% interest should be valued at fair value - [his/her] proportionate share of the entire enterprise value - without minority or marketability discounts.
Based on preliminary analysis, [Client Name] believes the company's enterprise value is approximately $[amount], making [his/her] [X]% interest worth approximately $[amount].
This valuation is based on:
• [Briefly describe basis - multiple of earnings, comparable sales, etc.]
• Normalization of above-market compensation currently being taken
• [Other adjustments]
[Client Name] is prepared to engage a qualified business appraiser to determine fair value if necessary.
PROPOSED TERMS
[Client Name] proposes the following buyout terms:
1. PURCHASE PRICE: $[amount], representing fair value of [his/her] [X]% interest
2. PAYMENT TERMS: [Options:]
a. Lump sum at closing; OR
b. 20% down, balance over 5 years at [prime + X]% interest with monthly payments
3. SECURITY: If financed, secured by company assets and personal guarantees of remaining owners
4. CLOSING: Within 60 days of agreement on terms
5. RELEASES: Mutual releases of all claims
RESPONSE
Please respond within 30 days with:
(a) Acceptance of this proposal;
(b) A counter-proposal; or
(c) Commitment to engage in good-faith buyout negotiations
If we cannot reach agreement, [Client Name] will pursue involuntary dissolution and exercise buyout rights under Corporations Code § 2000.
[Attorney Name]
Template 4: Post-Inheritance Dispute
Use when: Parent died and siblings disagree about inherited business interests.
Re: [Decedent Name]'s Interest in [Company Name]
Demand for Accounting and Fair Treatment
Dear [Sibling Name]:
I represent [Client Name], your [brother/sister] and co-owner of [Company Name] following the death of [Parent Name].
CURRENT SITUATION
When [Parent Name] passed away on [date], [his/her] ownership interest in [Company Name] passed to [describe distribution - e.g., "equally to all children" or "according to the terms of the trust"].
As a result, [Client Name] now owns [X]% of the company. You own [X]% and [if others, describe].
Since [Parent's] death, you have continued to operate the company. However, [Client Name] has received no information about the company's operations, finances, or [his/her] interest.
CONCERNS
[Client Name] has the following concerns:
1. NO FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Despite [his/her] ownership interest, [he/she] has received no financial statements, tax documents, or other information about the company.
2. NO DISTRIBUTIONS: [He/She] has received no distributions despite the company's continued operation.
3. UNKNOWN COMPENSATION: [He/She] does not know what compensation you are taking or whether it is reasonable.
4. NO INVOLVEMENT: [He/She] has not been included in any decisions about the company [he/she] partly owns.
5. [If applicable:] PRE-DEATH CONCERNS: There are questions about transactions that occurred before [Parent's] death that may have affected the value of the estate's interest.
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
As the managing owner, you owe fiduciary duties to [Client Name] as a fellow owner. These include:
• Duty to share financial information
• Duty not to self-deal or take excessive compensation
• Duty to operate the company for the benefit of all owners
• Duty of loyalty and fair dealing
DEMAND
[Client Name] demands:
1. FULL ACCOUNTING: Complete financial statements for the past [3] years, including:
• Income statements, balance sheets, cash flow statements
• Tax returns
• Bank statements
• Records of your compensation and benefits
• Records of any distributions
2. ONGOING INFORMATION: Monthly or quarterly financial reports going forward
3. DISTRIBUTION POLICY: Establishment of regular distributions to all owners
4. GOVERNANCE: Inclusion in significant business decisions
5. [If applicable:] INVESTIGATION: An accounting of all transactions between you and the company (or [Parent]) in the year before [his/her] death
RESOLUTION OPTIONS
[Client Name] is open to discussing various resolutions:
• Continued joint ownership with fair governance and distributions
• Your buyout of [his/her] interest at fair value
• [His/Her] buyout of your interest at fair value
• Sale of the company to third party
• Other arrangements that fairly compensate all owners
DEADLINE
Please respond within 30 days with the requested financial information and a proposal for how to treat [Client Name] fairly going forward.
[Client Name] would prefer to resolve this as family rather than in court. But [he/she] will protect [his/her] legal rights if necessary.
[Attorney Name]
Template 5: Minority Oppression / Squeeze-Out
Use when: Majority owners are taking actions to freeze you out or diminish your interest.
Re: Oppression of Minority Shareholder - [Company Name]
Dear [Majority Shareholders/Controllers]:
I represent [Client Name], a [X]% shareholder of [Company Name]. This letter demands that you cease your oppressive conduct toward [him/her] and that you remedy the harm you have caused.
PATTERN OF OPPRESSION
Since [date/event], you have engaged in a systematic campaign to squeeze [Client Name] out of the company on unfavorable terms. Your conduct includes:
1. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
On [date], you terminated [Client Name]'s employment with the company without cause. This eliminated [his/her] only source of return from [his/her] ownership, since [he/she] relied on salary in lieu of distributions.
2. ELIMINATION OF DISTRIBUTIONS
Although the company remains profitable, you have ceased making any distributions to shareholders. Instead, you [describe how majority extracts value - excessive salary, related-party transactions, etc.].
3. EXCLUSION FROM INFORMATION
You have refused to provide [Client Name] with financial information about the company [he/she] partly owns, despite [his/her] repeated requests.
4. EXCLUSION FROM DECISIONS
Major company decisions are made without notice to or input from [Client Name], including [describe specific decisions if known].
5. LOWBALL BUYOUT OFFER
You offered to purchase [Client Name]'s interest for $[amount], which is [X]% of fair value based on [describe analysis]. This offer appears designed to pressure [him/her] to sell cheaply rather than fairly compensate [him/her].
LEGAL VIOLATIONS
California recognizes that majority shareholders in closely held corporations owe fiduciary duties to minority shareholders. Your conduct violates these duties:
• Freeze-out tactics that deprive minority of any return on investment
• Self-dealing through excessive compensation
• Exclusion from information minority is legally entitled to receive
• Using majority control to benefit yourselves at minority's expense
This conduct provides grounds for:
• Involuntary dissolution under Corporations Code § 1800
• Damages for breach of fiduciary duty
• Court-ordered buyout at fair value under § 2000
DEMAND
[Client Name] demands:
1. Cease all oppressive conduct immediately
2. Reinstate [him/her] to employment [if desired] at prior salary and position
3. Make distributions to all shareholders proportional to ownership
4. Provide complete financial information as demanded separately
5. Either:
a. Purchase [his/her] shares at fair value (not less than $[amount]); or
b. Commit to treating [him/her] fairly as a minority owner going forward
DEADLINE
Respond within 21 days with a concrete proposal to remedy this situation.
CONSEQUENCES
If you continue your oppressive conduct, [Client Name] will:
• File suit for breach of fiduciary duty and minority oppression
• Petition for involuntary dissolution
• Seek appointment of provisional director
• Request court-ordered buyout at fair value without minority discount
• Seek damages for harm already caused
Your treatment of [Client Name] has been unfair. Choose now whether to remedy it voluntarily or have a court order you to do so.
[Attorney Name]
Caught in a Family Business Dispute?
I help family members protect their ownership interests in businesses. Here's what I can do for you:
Review ownership documents and advise on your rights
Draft and send demand letters for information or buyout
Pursue claims for breach of fiduciary duty
Negotiate fair buyouts and valuations
Handle dissolution proceedings when necessary
Coordinate with business valuation experts
Mediate between family members when possible
Litigate when necessary to protect your interests
Typical costs:
• Document review and strategy consultation: ~$450
• Demand letter for records inspection: ~$450
• Demand letter for buyout or fair treatment: $450
• Books and records inspection: ~$240/hour
• Buyout negotiation: ~$240/hour
• Litigation: ~$240/hour
Schedule a Consultation
Book a paid consultation to discuss your situation.