📋 What is Defamation?
Defamation is a false statement of fact, published to a third party, that injures the reputation of another person. In California, defamation is defined by Civil Code sections 44-48 and includes both libel (written defamation) and slander (spoken defamation).
When to Use This Guide
Use this guide if someone has made false statements about you that have harmed your reputation through:
📰 Online Posts
False statements on social media, review sites, forums, blogs, or websites that damage your reputation
🔊 Spoken Statements
False oral statements made to third parties about your character, business, or professional competence
📰 Print Publications
False statements in newspapers, magazines, books, or other written materials
📺 Broadcast Media
False statements on television, radio, podcasts, or video platforms
💡 Libel vs. Slander
California distinguishes between two forms of defamation:
- Libel (Civil Code 45): Defamation in a fixed, permanent form - writing, printing, pictures, or broadcasts. Libel is actionable without proving special damages.
- Slander (Civil Code 46): Oral (spoken) defamation. Generally requires proof of special damages UNLESS it falls into one of the slander per se categories.
Defamation Per Se vs. Per Quod
⚠ Defamation Per Se (No Special Damages Required)
▼Certain statements are so harmful that damages are presumed without proof of actual financial loss. Under California law, defamation per se includes false statements that:
- Charge commission of a crime: Falsely accusing someone of criminal conduct
- Impute a loathsome disease: Historically, sexually transmitted diseases
- Attack professional reputation: False statements about someone's fitness for their trade, profession, or business
- Impute unchastity (women): False statements imputing sexual misconduct (Civil Code 46(4))
For libel per se (Civil Code 45a), the statement must be defamatory on its face without needing additional context.
💰 Defamation Per Quod (Special Damages Required)
▼If the defamatory statement does not fall into a per se category (for slander) or is not defamatory on its face (for libel), you must prove "special damages" - actual pecuniary losses such as:
- Lost business or clients
- Lost employment or job opportunities
- Lost contracts or deals
- Other quantifiable financial harm directly caused by the defamation
General reputational harm or emotional distress alone is insufficient for slander per quod claims.
⚠ Anti-SLAPP Warning
California has one of the nation's strongest anti-SLAPP laws (CCP 425.16). If the defamatory speech relates to a matter of public concern or was made in a public forum, the defendant may file an anti-SLAPP motion. If successful, your case is dismissed AND you must pay the defendant's attorney's fees (typically $50,000-$200,000+). Assess SLAPP risk carefully before filing any lawsuit. See our Anti-SLAPP Strategy Guide.
⚠ Time is Critical - 1-Year Statute of Limitations
California has only a 1-year statute of limitations for defamation claims under Code of Civil Procedure 340(c). The clock starts from the date of publication. For online statements, the "single publication rule" means the limitations period runs from when the statement was first posted, not from when you discovered it. Act quickly to preserve your rights.
⚖ Legal Basis
California's defamation law is primarily codified in Civil Code sections 44-48. Understanding these statutes is essential for building a strong defamation claim.
Key California Statutes
Civil Code Section 44 - Defamation Defined
Defamation is effected by either: (1) Libel, or (2) Slander. This section establishes the two categories of defamatory statements under California law.
Civil Code Section 45 - Libel
Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or causes him to be shunned or avoided, or has a tendency to injure him in his occupation.
Civil Code Section 46 - Slander
Slander is a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which: (1) Charges crime, (2) Imputes disease, (3) Tends to injure in profession/trade/business, (4) Imputes impotence or unchastity, or (5) By natural consequence causes actual damage.
Civil Code Section 48a - Retraction Demand
Before suing a newspaper, magazine, or broadcast outlet for libel, you must serve a written demand for retraction within 20 days of learning of the publication. If the outlet publishes a retraction, your recovery is limited to special damages only (no general damages).
Code of Civil Procedure Section 340(c)
Establishes a one-year statute of limitations for defamation claims, running from the date of publication.
Elements You Must Prove
- False statement of fact - The statement must be provably false and presented as fact (not opinion)
- Publication - The statement was communicated to at least one third party
- Unprivileged - The statement is not protected by an absolute or qualified privilege
- Fault - The defendant acted with negligence (private figure) or actual malice (public figure)
- Damages - You suffered harm (presumed for per se; must be proven for per quod)
💡 Public Figure vs. Private Figure Standards
The fault standard depends on your status:
- Private figures: Must prove defendant was negligent in publishing the false statement
- Public figures: Must prove "actual malice" - defendant knew the statement was false OR acted with reckless disregard for truth (New York Times v. Sullivan standard)
Public figures include celebrities, politicians, and "limited purpose public figures" who voluntarily inject themselves into public controversies.
Common Defenses and Privileges
💬 Truth (Complete Defense)
▼Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. If the statement is substantially true, there is no defamation - even if the statement is damaging to reputation. The statement need not be literally true in every detail, only substantially true in its "gist or sting."
💡 Opinion (Protected Speech)
▼Pure opinions are not actionable as defamation. Statements like "I think he's a bad doctor" may be protected opinion, while "He killed three patients through malpractice" is a factual claim. The test is whether a reasonable reader would understand the statement as opinion or fact. Context matters significantly.
⚖ Absolute Privileges (Civil Code 47)
▼Certain statements have absolute immunity regardless of falsity or malice:
- Litigation privilege (47(b)): Statements made in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings
- Legislative privilege: Statements in legislative proceedings
- Statements to spouse (47(c)): Communications between spouses
🛠 Qualified/Conditional Privileges
▼Some statements are protected unless made with malice:
- Common interest privilege: Statements to those with legitimate interest (e.g., job references)
- Fair comment: Commentary on matters of public concern
- Fair report: Accurate reports of official proceedings
✅ Evidence Checklist
Gather these documents before sending your demand letter. Click to check off items as you collect them.
📷 Documentation of Statements
- ✓ Screenshots of all defamatory posts (with URLs and dates)
- ✓ Archived copies (use archive.org or screenshot tools)
- ✓ Recordings of oral statements (if available and legal)
- ✓ Copies of written publications, emails, or letters
👥 Publication Evidence
- ✓ Evidence of who saw/heard the statements
- ✓ Witness names and contact information
- ✓ View counts, shares, or engagement metrics
- ✓ Documentation of where statement was published
🔍 Evidence of Falsity
- ✓ Documents proving the statements are false
- ✓ Records contradicting the defamatory claims
- ✓ Witness declarations supporting truth
- ✓ Expert opinions if relevant
💰 Damages Documentation
- ✓ Lost business or client documentation
- ✓ Employment records (if job affected)
- ✓ Communications showing harm (clients leaving, deals falling through)
- ✓ Medical records if emotional distress claim
👤 Defendant Information
- ✓ Full name and contact information
- ✓ Social media profiles and usernames
- ✓ Employer information (if relevant)
- ✓ Evidence of defendant's knowledge of falsity
📅 Timeline Documentation
- ✓ Date of first publication
- ✓ Date you discovered the statements
- ✓ Timeline of republications or spread
- ✓ Statute of limitations calculation
🔒 Preserve All Evidence Immediately
Online content can be deleted at any time. Screenshot everything immediately and use web archiving services like archive.org. For oral statements, write down exactly what was said, when, where, and who heard it while your memory is fresh. Consider having witnesses provide written statements.
💰 Calculate Your Damages
Defamation damages in California fall into several categories. What you can recover depends on whether the defamation is per se or per quod.
| Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Special Damages | Actual pecuniary losses - lost business, lost employment, lost contracts. Required for slander per quod and libel per quod claims. |
| General Damages | Harm to reputation, shame, humiliation, mental anguish. Presumed for defamation per se; need not be proven with specificity. |
| Presumed Damages | In per se cases, damages are presumed without proof of actual harm. Jury determines appropriate amount. |
| Punitive Damages | Available if defendant acted with actual malice (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard). Requires clear and convincing evidence. |
💡 Retraction Demand Effect on Damages (Civil Code 48a)
If you sue a newspaper, magazine, or broadcast outlet for libel:
- You MUST serve a retraction demand within 20 days of learning of the publication
- If they publish a retraction, your recovery is limited to special damages only
- If they refuse to retract, you can recover both general and special damages
This requirement does not apply to private individuals, websites, or social media posts.
📊 Sample Damages Calculation
Example: Business owner defamed by false fraud accusations on review site
💰 Punitive Damages Potential
If the defendant knew the statements were false or made them with reckless disregard for the truth, punitive damages may be available. In California, punitive damages require clear and convincing evidence of malice, oppression, or fraud. Awards can be substantial - often multiples of compensatory damages.
📝 Sample Language
Copy and customize these paragraphs for your demand letter. Note: Be careful with aggressive language if anti-SLAPP risk is present.
🚀 Next Steps
What to do after sending your demand letter.
Expected Timeline
Days 1-7
Defendant receives demand and evaluates response options
Days 7-21
Response period - defendant may remove content, offer settlement, or refuse
Days 21-30
Evaluate response and determine next steps (settlement negotiation or litigation)
If They Don't Comply
-
Assess Anti-SLAPP Risk Before Filing
This is critical in California. If the statements were made in a public forum about a matter of public concern, you face substantial SLAPP risk. Consult an attorney experienced in anti-SLAPP defense before filing any lawsuit. A lost anti-SLAPP motion means paying defendant's fees.
-
Consider Alternative Remedies
Sometimes non-legal approaches are more effective: platform reporting (most sites have abuse policies), search engine removal requests (right to be forgotten), reputation management, or public response with evidence of truth.
-
File Lawsuit If Appropriate
If you have a strong case with clear falsity, provable damages, and low SLAPP risk, file a defamation complaint in California Superior Court. Filing fee is approximately $435. Remember the 1-year statute of limitations.
⚠ Anti-SLAPP Reality Check
Before filing any defamation lawsuit in California, honestly assess:
- Was the statement made in a public forum (social media, review site, public meeting)?
- Does it relate to a matter of public concern (business practices, consumer issues, public figures)?
- Can you prove falsity with admissible evidence (not just "I know it's false")?
- Do you have documented special damages?
If the speech is protected and you cannot prove probability of prevailing, you risk paying $50,000-$200,000+ in defendant's attorney's fees. See our Anti-SLAPP Strategy Guide.
⚠ Anonymous Defendants
If the defamer is anonymous, you may need to file a "Doe" lawsuit and subpoena the platform (social media site, website host) for identifying information. This adds complexity and cost. Courts require a showing that the speech is actionable before ordering disclosure of anonymous speakers.
Need Legal Help?
Defamation cases require careful strategy, especially in California with anti-SLAPP risks. Get a 30-minute strategy call with an attorney to evaluate your case.
Book Consultation - $125California Resources
- California Courts Self-Help: selfhelp.courts.ca.gov - Forms and instructions
- State Bar Lawyer Referral: calbar.ca.gov/Public/Need-Legal-Help
- Civil Code 44-48: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov - Defamation statutes
- CCP 425.16: Anti-SLAPP statute text
- Small Claims Limit: $12,500 (individuals) - but defamation is complex for small claims