Master guide to pre-suit notice requirements under Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Cal. Civ. Code ยงยง 1750โ1785 โ California's primary consumer protection statute prohibiting 25+ specific unfair practices in consumer transactions.
| Violation | Consumer Examples |
|---|---|
| (a)(5) โ Misrepresenting characteristics | ๐ Sold "new" car that's refurbished ๐ "Luxury condo" is actually converted motel |
| (a)(7) โ Misrepresenting quality/grade | ๐ฑ "Premium" phone is knockoff ๐ "Professional" service is amateur |
| (a)(9) โ Bait-and-switch | ๐ช Venue shows ballroom, delivers warehouse ๐ธ Photographer portfolio is stolen photos |
| (a)(14) โ False warranty/refund promises | ๐ฏ "Satisfaction guarantee" then refuses refunds ๐ "Full refund for COVID cancellations" then claims fine print |
| (a)(16) โ Disparaging competitors falsely | ๐ช Store lies about competitor's products being dangerous |
| (a)(19) โ Unconscionable contract terms | ๐ "No refunds ever, even if we breach" โ๏ธ "Arbitration only, you waive all rights" |
โ Notice required for:
โ Notice NOT required for:
๐ก Strategy: Many plaintiffs file for injunctive relief immediately (no notice required), then amend complaint after 30 days to add damages claims once notice period expires.
| Event | Business Reaction | Your Position |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ง Informal email request | Often ignored or rejected | No legal consequence for ignoring |
| ๐ CLRA 30-day notice | Takes seriously; legal dept involved | Clock starts; business has 30 days to cure or face litigation + fees |
| โฐ Day 31 (no cure) | Exposed to full damages + attorney fees | Can file lawsuit; settlement pressure maximized |
| โ๏ธ Lawsuit filed | Paying lawyer $300-$500/hr to defend | Discovery begins; can subpoena internal docs, take depositions |
๐ก Reality: Most businesses settle during 30-day window or shortly after to avoid litigation costs.
This section sets strict procedural requirements. Miss even one = your damages claims dismissed. Follow this checklist exactly.
๐ฆ How to do it:
Send to defendant's:
You can send to multiple addresses simultaneously (belt-and-suspenders approach).
โ WRONG (too vague):
"You engaged in unfair business practices under the CLRA. I demand a refund."
โ CORRECT (specific):
"You violated California Civil Code ยง 1770(a)(5) by representing the product as new when it was refurbished, and ยง 1770(a)(7) by misrepresenting the product as 'commercial grade' when it is consumer grade."
How to identify violations:
Statute requires you demand: "appropriate correction, repair, replacement, or other remedy"
What's "appropriate"?
Examples of appropriate demands:
What makes cure "appropriate"?
After 30 days, you can file lawsuit seeking:
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Email]
[Phone]
[Date]
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tracking No.: _______________
[Business Name]
[Attention: Legal Department / General Counsel]
[Business Address]
[City, State ZIP]
Re: CLRA 30-Day Pre-Suit Demand โ [Brief Description of Transaction]
Dear [Business Name]:
This letter constitutes formal notice under California Civil Code ยง 1782 of violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act arising from your unfair and deceptive practices in connection with [describe transaction].
I. TRANSACTION DETAILS
II. CLRA VIOLATIONS (Cal. Civ. Code ยง 1770)
Your conduct violates the following provisions of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act:
A. Section 1770(a)(__) โ [Violation Name]
[Describe specific violation. Example:]
You violated ยง 1770(a)(5) by representing the [product/service] as having characteristics it does not have. Specifically, your website and marketing materials stated [quote false claim], when in fact [describe reality]. This material misrepresentation induced me to purchase the [product/service].
B. Section 1770(a)(__) โ [Additional Violation]
[Continue for each violation...]
III. DAMAGES
As a direct result of your CLRA violations, I have suffered the following damages:
IV. DEMAND FOR APPROPRIATE REMEDY (Cal. Civ. Code ยง 1782)
Pursuant to Civil Code ยง 1782, I demand the following appropriate remedy within 30 days of your receipt of this notice:
Total payment demanded: $[sum]
V. CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE REMEDY
This letter serves as the mandatory 30-day pre-suit notice required by Civil Code ยง 1782. If you fail to provide an appropriate remedy within 30 days of receipt of this notice, I will pursue all available legal remedies, including:
Given the CLRA's one-way attorney fee provision, your litigation exposure will far exceed the amount in dispute. I strongly encourage you to resolve this matter promptly.
VI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Nothing in this letter waives any legal claims, defenses, or remedies. This notice is provided solely to comply with Civil Code ยง 1782 pre-suit requirements. I reserve all rights to pursue additional claims and remedies under state and federal law.
Please contact me at [email] or [phone] within 30 days to arrange payment or discuss resolution.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
[Your Typed Name]
Enclosures:
cc: [If applicable: California Attorney General Consumer Protection Division, Better Business Bureau, etc.]
Common ยง 1770 violations to cite:
| Your Situation | Cite This Violation |
|---|---|
| Product sold as "new" but was refurbished/used | ยง 1770(a)(5) โ misrepresenting as original/new |
| False quality claims ("professional," "luxury," "premium") | ยง 1770(a)(7) โ misrepresenting quality/grade |
| Bait-and-switch (advertised X, delivered Y) | ยง 1770(a)(9) โ advertising with intent not to sell as advertised |
| False "satisfaction guarantee" or "full refund" promise | ยง 1770(a)(14) โ misrepresenting rights/remedies |
| "Nonrefundable" or "no warranty" clause buried in fine print | ยง 1770(a)(19) โ unconscionable provision |
| False claims about competitor's products | ยง 1770(a)(16) โ disparaging competitors |
ยง 1782(b) standard: Defendant must provide "appropriate correction, repair, replacement, or other remedy" within 30 days. If they do, it cuts off CLRA damages and attorney fees (but not injunctive relief claims).
| Violation | Appropriate Cure | Inadequate "Cure" |
|---|---|---|
| Sold defective product | โ Full refund OR working replacement | โ Store credit only โ 10% discount on next purchase |
| Misrepresented service quality | โ Re-performance by qualified provider OR full refund | โ "We'll try again" (after multiple failures) โ Partial refund ($500 on $5K service) |
| False refund guarantee | โ Honor the refund as promised | โ "We'll give you 50% instead of 100%" |
| Bait-and-switch (wrong product delivered) | โ Deliver advertised product OR full refund + consequential damages | โ "Keep the wrong product, here's 20% off" |
Courts hold that cure must be unconditional. Attaching onerous conditions = no cure = you can still sue for damages + fees.
Effect: Not a cure. You can sue on Day 31.
Your response: "Your position is noted. I will proceed with litigation on [date]."
Analysis: Is $X close to what you demanded? If 70-80%+ of full demand, might be "appropriate." If token amount (10-20%), likely inadequate.
Your response: "I will accept $[counter amount] as full settlement. If not acceptable, I will proceed with litigation."
Effect: Conditional cure = no cure. You can sue.
Your response: "I will accept refund without conditions. CLRA cure cannot be contingent on release of unrelated claims or gag order. Provide unconditional refund by Day 30 or I will file suit."
Effect: โ Appropriate cure. Cuts off damages and attorney fees.
Your options:
Effect: No cure. File suit Day 31.
Your move: Hire attorney or file in small claims/superior court
CLRA notices are technical legal documents with strict procedural requirements. A mistake (wrong mailing method, vague violation identification, improper timing) can torpedo your entire case. Attorney-drafted demands carry weight and ensure compliance.
Demand letter: Flat fee $450
Hourly rate: $240/hr
Contingency: 33-40%
Facts: Client paid $8K deposit for wedding venue. Venue cancelled 4 months before event (gave date to higher-paying client). Refused refund, citing "nonrefundable" clause. Client paid $12K for replacement venue (last-minute premium).
CLRA violations identified:
Strategy:
Result: Settled for $11,000 refund (92% of demand) before trial. Venue paid my attorney fees separately: $9,600 (40 hours litigation work). Client net recovery: $11,000 (full damages with no fee deduction).
Discuss your CLRA claim with an attorney experienced in California consumer protection law. I'll review your transaction, identify statutory violations, draft a compliant 30-day demand, and handle negotiations to maximize your recovery.
๐ง Contact: owner@terms.law