Claude Design is Anthropic's research-preview UI generator, you write a prompt, it returns a working HTML interface. I am a transactional California attorney, not a designer. I used it to draft six law-firm interfaces in April 2026. Each ships with the exact prompt. Copy what works for your firm.
Tap a question for an instant, free answer (no email needed), or describe what you want to ship and the analyst points you to the right specimen, prompt, or next step. Answers cover copying the prompts, the ethics constraints that keep an AI-built page bar-compliant, and how to adapt these surfaces outside California.
Common questions, always free
A flat-fee demand letter, drafted and certified-mailed under my California bar license.
$575 flatFlat-fee landing surface with outcome ladder, specimen excerpt, and ethics disclosure baked in.
Open full specimen ↗ Best viewed on desktop · 1024px+Flat-fee landing surface with outcome ladder, specimen excerpt, and ethics disclosure baked in.
Watch outDon't promise recovery timelines. The outcome ladder is 0 to 30 day behavior, not a guaranteed result.
Six I've already watched happen in attorney Slacks this month. A few link out to the longer write-up on AI for Lawyers, my parent hub.
Claude builds them cleanly. Most state bars don't allow them. Skip.
Tap to flip back ↻It isn't. Brand it "attorney-supervised analysis" and mean it. The $2,500 audit covers the policy language.
Tap to flip back ↻Clean design plus missing 1.18 disclosure equals the worst possible aesthetic.
Tap to flip back ↻Flat-fee is the entire point. If it scares prospects, they weren't buyers.
Tap to flip back ↻Rule 7.1 doesn't care that the design is beautiful.
Tap to flip back ↻Ship a specimen per product. The design system is the shared brand.
Tap to flip back ↻Three flat-fee tiers. No retainer, no free-consultation pitch, paid time only.
A page survives launch only if it commits. The longer write-up on AI Implementation for Law Firms covers how I do this with clients.
The word "product" makes Claude write a page that closes. "Landing" makes it write a brochure.
"No free-consultation language," or "ABA 1.18 posture," and you'll get a surface a state bar won't reject on sight.
$575 produces different UI than $TBD. Numeric commitment sharpens every copy decision downstream.
No hourly creep, no free-consultation funnel, no retainer. The chatbox in the bottom-right of every Terms.Law page is the same intake surface you see in Specimen 03.
A demand letter, drafted and sent under my California bar license.
Paste a contract, get a marked-up redline with risk levels and citations.
For firms ready to formalize their AI use. Two weeks, three deliverables, no retainer.
California attorney since 2011. I run Terms.Law, a static-HTML law firm that ships product pages instead of brochure pages. I am a transactional attorney; I don't litigate. This field guide is what I wish someone had handed me when Claude Design entered research preview.