Hit the weekly Claude Design generation limit on this one — prompt is shipped, UI is not.
Flat-fee landing surface with outcome ladder, specimen excerpt, and ethics disclosure baked in.
Watch outDon't promise recovery timelines; the outcome ladder is 0–30 day behavior, not guaranteed results.
Six I've watched happen already in attorney Slacks this month.
Claude builds them cleanly. Most state bars don't allow them. Skip.
It isn't. Brand it "attorney-supervised analysis" and mean it.
Clean design + missing 1.18 disclosure = the worst possible aesthetic.
Flat-fee is the entire point. If it scares prospects, they weren't buyers.
Rule 7.1 doesn't care that the design is beautiful.
Ship a specimen per product. The design system is the shared brand.
The word "product" makes Claude write a page that closes. "Landing" makes it write a brochure.
"No free-consultation language" or "ABA 1.18 posture" — you'll get a surface a state bar won't reject on sight.
$575 produces different UI than $TBD. Numeric commitment sharpens every copy decision downstream.
California attorney since 2011. I run Terms.Law — a static-HTML law firm that ships product pages instead of brochure pages. This field guide is what I wish someone had handed me when Claude Design entered research preview.
$575 flat fee. USPS certified mail with signature requested, plus email. No free-consultation pitch — paid time only.