Skip to Specimen Lab
On this page Lab Mistakes Tips Hire me FAQ ~ 8 min read
Field Guide · Vol. 01 · Apr 19, 2026 · Updated May 11

Claude Design for Lawyers.Six working law-firm interfaces, generated with Claude Design in April 2026 by one California attorney. Each one ships with the exact prompt. Copy what works for your firm.

By Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. CA Bar #279869 terms.law
What this is

Claude Design is Anthropic's research-preview UI generator, you write a prompt, it returns a working HTML interface. I am a transactional California attorney, not a designer. I used it to draft six law-firm interfaces in April 2026. Each ships with the exact prompt. Copy what works for your firm.

Specimen Lab.

Live preview, prompt, watch-outs
Specimen 01 · Live Open ↗
demand-letter-landing.html · source 
Loading…
Specimen 01

Recover what you're owed.

A flat-fee demand letter, drafted and certified-mailed under my California bar license.

$575 flat
Specimen 01 of 06

Demand Letter, as a product page.

Flat-fee landing surface with outcome ladder, specimen excerpt, and ethics disclosure baked in.

Open full specimen ↗ Best viewed on desktop · 1024px+
Specimen 01 of 06

Demand Letter, as a product page.

Flat-fee landing surface with outcome ladder, specimen excerpt, and ethics disclosure baked in.

Collections $575 flat Ship as-is
Share on LinkedIn ↗ Copy deep link

Watch outDon't promise recovery timelines. The outcome ladder is 0 to 30 day behavior, not a guaranteed result.

Prompt used · 01
Design a landing page for a solo-attorney demand-letter service priced at a flat $575 per letter. The page must read like a product page, not a brochure. Above the fold: headline, outcome ladder (what happens 0 to 30 days after the letter), flat-fee chip, and a calendar embed for a $240 Written Attorney Consultation. Include a specimen demand letter excerpt rendered as a document, not a screenshot. Include ethics disclosures about attorney-client relationship timing. Mobile-first. Serif display font for headlines; geometric sans for UI. No stock photography; rely on typography and layout.
Did this prompt work for you?
Logged. Thank you.
§ B · Watchtower

Mistakes lawyers will make with Claude Design.

Six I've already watched happen in attorney Slacks this month. A few link out to the longer write-up on AI for Lawyers, my parent hub.

Generating a case-study carousel.

Claude builds them cleanly. Most state bars don't allow them. Skip.

Labeling AI output "legal advice."

It isn't. Brand it "attorney-supervised analysis" and mean it. The $2,500 audit covers the policy language.

Removing ethics disclosures to look modern.

Clean design plus missing 1.18 disclosure equals the worst possible aesthetic.

Putting "$240 Written Attorney Consultation" back on the page.

Flat-fee is the entire point. If it scares prospects, they weren't buyers.

Shipping under your own bar for a practice you don't do.

Rule 7.1 doesn't care that the design is beautiful.

One giant page trying to do every practice area.

Ship a specimen per product. The design system is the shared brand.

Or hire me to ship one of these for your firm.

Three flat-fee tiers. No retainer, no free-consultation pitch, paid time only.

$575 · Demand Letter

Recover what you're owed.

$575
USPS certified plus email, drafted under my California bar license. Request demand letter $575 · Contract Review

Risk-leveled annotations.

$575
Paste a contract, get a marked-up redline with citations. Three business days. Request contract review $2,500 · AI Audit

Written policy + one shipped page.

$2,500
Policy, vendor diligence, one production specimen rebuilt for your practice. Email me about AI
§ C · Tips

Three tips that kept my pages thin.

A page survives launch only if it commits. The longer write-up on AI Implementation for Law Firms covers how I do this with clients.

Tip 01

Prompt for "product page," not "landing page."

The word "product" makes Claude write a page that closes. "Landing" makes it write a brochure.

Tip 02

Always include one ethical constraint in the prompt.

"No free-consultation language," or "ABA 1.18 posture," and you'll get a surface a state bar won't reject on sight.

Tip 03

Iterate against a real price, not a placeholder.

$575 produces different UI than $TBD. Numeric commitment sharpens every copy decision downstream.

All six prompts, in one block · copy any ›
§ D · Hire me

Three things I ship, flat fee.

No hourly creep, no free-consultation funnel, no retainer. The chatbox in the bottom-right of every Terms.Law page is the same intake surface you see in Specimen 03.

Tier 01 · Letter

Demand Letter

$575flat fee

A demand letter, drafted and sent under my California bar license.

  • USPS certified with signature requested, plus email
  • Three business days from intake
  • Outcome ladder, not a guaranteed result
  • I refuse and refund if it's outside my practice
Request demand letter Or book a $240 written attorney consultation,
Tier 02 · Contract Most requested

Contract Review

$575flat fee

Paste a contract, get a marked-up redline with risk levels and citations.

  • Risk-leveled annotations, low through stop
  • Citations to the operative California rule
  • Three business days from intake
  • Upgrade to $575 Review with Revision in one click
Request contract review Or book a $240 written attorney consultation,
Tier 03 · Firm

AI Implementation Audit

$2,500flat fee

For firms ready to formalize their AI use. Two weeks, three deliverables, no retainer.

  • Written AI-use policy your bar will accept
  • Vendor-diligence sheet for the tools you actually use
  • One production-ready interface, rebuilt for your firm
  • No PayPal link, email-first by design
Email me about AI for my firm Or book a $240 written attorney consultation,
ST

Sergei Tokmakov

California attorney since 2011. I run Terms.Law, a static-HTML law firm that ships product pages instead of brochure pages. I am a transactional attorney; I don't litigate. This field guide is what I wish someone had handed me when Claude Design entered research preview.

CA Bar #279869 · owner@terms.law · Calbar profile
Service
AI Implementation for Law Firms
The $2,500 audit in full. Policy, vendor diligence, one production specimen.
Hub
AI for Lawyers
The parent hub this guide now headlines.
Calculator
Demand Letter ROI
What the demand specimen converts against.

Frequently asked.

What is Claude Design? +
Claude Design is Anthropic's research-preview UI generator. You write a prompt in plain language, it returns a working HTML interface you can deploy or hand to a developer. As of May 2026 it is still in limited preview. I used it to draft six law-firm interfaces in April 2026. Each one ships on this page with its exact prompt so any attorney can copy the prompt, swap in their own bar number, and adapt the surface for their own practice.
Can I copy these prompts for my firm? +
Yes. The prompts are the point of this page. Copy any prompt, paste it into Claude Design or Claude.ai, replace my bar number with yours, replace my prices with yours, and ship. The output is your firm's content. The only thing I ask is that you keep the ethics disclosures in place. Removing them to look more modern is the worst possible aesthetic and the fastest way to draw a state-bar inquiry.
Do you license these specimens? +
Two paths. Path one is free: copy the prompt, generate your own version, ship under your own brand. Path two is paid: I will rebuild the specimen against your firm's actual practice, copy, prices, and ethics posture, then deliver the static HTML and a short prompt-library document. That work falls under my $2,500 AI Implementation Audit tier. Email owner@terms.law if you want a quote that fits your firm's surface area.
Will this work for non-California firms? +
Most of it, yes. The visual system, the prompt structure, and the product-page-not-brochure thesis are jurisdiction-neutral. The pieces you have to swap are the bar-number disclosure, any state-specific rules on advertising and flat fees, and any unauthorized-practice-of-law language. Rule 7.1 has a sibling in every state. Check your own bar's advertising rules before you ship. I am only licensed to give legal advice in California.
What does the $2,500 audit cover? +
A flat-fee engagement that produces three deliverables for your firm. One: a written AI-use policy your bar will accept, with citations to the relevant ethics opinions. Two: a vendor-diligence sheet covering the AI tools you actually use, with data-retention and PII posture noted for each. Three: one production-ready interface like the specimens on this page, rebuilt for your practice. Two weeks. No retainer. Email owner@terms.law to start.
Need a demand letter like this one? +
$575 flat fee. USPS certified mail with signature requested, plus email. No free-consultation pitch, paid time only. I review the facts, draft the letter, send it under my California bar license, and forward you the certified-mail receipt. Turnaround is three business days from intake. If your matter falls outside my practice, I will tell you on intake and refund the deposit. Email owner@terms.law to request a demand letter.
Disclaimer This article is informational content, not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Placeholder names in the specimens ("Jordan R. Hale, SBN 287451," "Hale Litigation Group, LLP") are intentionally fictitious and do not refer to any real California attorney. The six specimens are attorney-supervised UI demonstrations, not automated legal advice. For matters specific to your situation, email owner@terms.law or book a paid consultation. Sergei Tokmakov, CA Bar #279869.
Prompt copied