The Classification Problem
Why the beauty industry is under intense scrutiny
If you operate a spa, salon, or hire massage therapists, you are in one of the most heavily audited industries for worker misclassification. State agencies, the IRS, and the Department of Labor have identified "booth rental" arrangements and independent contractor relationships in this sector as frequently problematic.
The Dynamex Decision Changed Everything
In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903, the California Supreme Court adopted the "ABC test" for determining worker classification under California's wage orders. This fundamentally changed how businesses must structure their contractor relationships.
Under the ABC test, a worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity can prove all three of the following:
- (A) The worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in performing the work, both under the contract and in fact;
- (B) The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and
- (C) The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.
The "Prong B" Problem for Salons and Spas
Here is the critical issue: if you run a hair salon and you hire a hairstylist as an independent contractor, Prong B likely fails. The hairstylist's work (cutting hair) is not "outside the usual course" of your business (a hair salon). The same logic applies to massage therapists at spas, estheticians at skincare clinics, and nail technicians at nail salons.
Many salon owners believe that "booth rental" arrangements automatically create an independent contractor relationship. This is not true. Booth rental is a business model, not a legal classification. Whether a booth renter is truly an independent contractor still depends on passing the applicable classification test (ABC in California, or the common law test in other states). Calling someone a "booth renter" on paper while exercising control over their work will not survive an audit.
AB5 Codified the ABC Test (With Some Exemptions)
California's Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), effective January 1, 2020, codified the Dynamex ABC test into statute. AB5 also created specific exemptions for certain professions. Unfortunately, hairstylists, barbers, estheticians, and massage therapists are not among the exempt professions for the ABC test.
However, licensed manicurists and certain other beauty professionals may qualify for a referral agency exemption under Business and Professions Code Section 9562 and Labor Code Section 2750.3, if specific conditions are met. This is a narrow exception that requires careful structuring.
While the ABC test applies to wage order claims (minimum wage, overtime, meal breaks), the older S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 test still applies to other employment-related claims, including workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and certain tax matters. Borello uses a multi-factor "right to control" analysis. You may pass one test but fail the other, creating liability exposure.
Not Sure How Your State Treats This?
Worker classification rules vary dramatically by state. What works in Texas may be illegal in California. Get a quick professional review of your specific arrangement.
Request a Quick ReviewPick Your State
Click your state to see the applicable classification test and key requirements
- A - Freedom from Control: Worker is free from control and direction in performing work
- B - Outside Usual Course: Work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business
- C - Independently Established: Worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade or business
Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903
S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341
- Right to control the manner and means of work
- Furnishing of tools and equipment
- Method of payment (hourly vs. job-based)
- Right to hire and fire
- Intent of the parties
Texas Workforce Commission rules (40 TAC 815.134)
Limestone Products Distribution v. McNamara (Tex. 2002)
- Nature and degree of control
- Opportunity for profit or loss
- Investment in facilities and equipment
- Permanency of the relationship
- Skill required for the work
Florida Statute 440.02 (definitions for workers' compensation)
Florida Statute 443.036 (unemployment compensation)
- Common law control test (degree of direction and control)
- Economic realities factors
- ABC test for unemployment insurance purposes
- Special rules for construction industry
NY Labor Law Article 25-B
Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Associates (NY App. Div.)
- Common law control test (general employment)
- ABC test for unemployment compensation
- FLSA economic realities test for wage claims
43 P.S. Section 753 (Unemployment Compensation Law)
Universal Am-Can Ltd. v. WCAB (Pa. 2010)
- A: Free from control or direction
- B: Service outside employer's usual business OR outside employer's place of business
- C: Customarily engaged in independent business or trade
N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6) (Unemployment Compensation Law)
2020 amendments strengthened enforcement
- A: Free from control and direction
- B: Service performed outside usual course of employer's business
- C: Customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business
M.G.L. c. 149, Section 148B
Coverall North America v. Commissioner of Division of Unemployment Assistance (Mass. 2013)
- Common Law Control Test: Most states (traditional, focuses on control)
- ABC Test: CA, MA, NJ, VT, CT, IL (for certain purposes), and growing
- Economic Realities Test: Federal FLSA standard, adopted by some states
- Hybrid Tests: Some states combine elements
- Different tests may apply for different purposes (wage law vs. unemployment vs. workers' comp)
- State law is evolving rapidly in this area
- Federal law (IRS, DOL) adds another layer
Red Flags Checklist
Interactive checklist: How many of these control factors are present in your arrangement?
Control Factors That Suggest Employee Status
This checklist is educational, not legal advice. The presence of any single factor does not automatically mean misclassification, and the absence of all factors does not guarantee IC status. Classification depends on the totality of circumstances under the applicable state test. In ABC test states, even zero red flags may not save an arrangement that fails Prong B.
Want to Know If Your Current Arrangement Passes Muster?
A quick review of your existing contractor relationships can identify risks before an auditor does. Get practical guidance on what to fix and how.
Request an Arrangement ReviewWhat Your Agreement MUST Include
Section-by-section breakdown of essential clauses for independent contractor agreements
A well-drafted independent contractor agreement is necessary but not sufficient. The agreement must accurately reflect the actual working relationship. Courts and agencies look past the paperwork to the reality of how work is performed. That said, having proper documentation is the foundation.
This clause establishes the parties' intent to create an independent contractor relationship, not employment. While intent alone is not determinative, it sets the framework for interpreting the agreement.
Best Practices:
- Include acknowledgment that contractor understands the tax implications (self-employment tax, no withholding)
- Reference that contractor is responsible for their own licenses and insurance
- Specify that contractor controls the manner and means of performing services
Define what services the contractor will provide. Be specific enough to be clear, but avoid over-specification that implies control over methods.
Best Practices:
- Focus on outcomes, not processes
- Do not include detailed procedures or protocols that contractor must follow
- Clarify that contractor maintains professional discretion in service delivery
This is the heart of independent contractor status. The agreement must establish that the contractor controls when, where, and how work is performed.
Best Practices:
- Explicitly state contractor sets their own schedule
- Confirm no exclusivity requirement (contractor can work for others)
- Avoid any language about required hours, shifts, or attendance
- If booth rental, specify that space is leased, not assigned by company directive
How payment is structured significantly affects classification analysis. Independent contractors typically bear economic risk and control their own revenue.
Best Practices:
- Avoid percentage-of-revenue splits that look like commission (suggests employment)
- Fixed booth rental fees are stronger than variable payments
- If contractor collects from clients directly, specify this clearly
- Include that no taxes will be withheld; contractor handles own tax obligations
- Specify payment is by invoice, not payroll
Independent contractors typically provide their own tools and absorb their own business expenses.
Best Practices:
- List specific items contractor must provide (shears, massage table, products, etc.)
- If company provides any equipment, characterize it as a rental or licensed use
- Contractor should bear cost of consumable supplies they use
A key indicator of independent contractor status is the right to hire others or send substitutes to perform work.
Best Practices:
- Even if rarely exercised, the right to substitute is valuable
- Clarify that company can require substitutes meet licensing/insurance standards
- If substitution is prohibited, this is a red flag for employee status
True independent contractors carry their own insurance and assume liability for their work. This is both a classification factor and essential risk management.
Best Practices:
- Specify minimum coverage amounts appropriate for the profession
- Require proof of insurance before contractor begins work
- For massage therapists, professional liability is essential
- Include mutual indemnification where appropriate
Independent contractors are responsible for maintaining their own professional licenses and business registrations.
Best Practices:
- Specify the exact licenses required for contractor's profession
- Require contractor to have their own business license or EIN
- Verify licenses before contractor begins and periodically thereafter
- Include right to terminate if license lapses
Define the duration of the relationship and how either party can end it. Open-ended relationships can suggest permanency (an employee characteristic), while project-based terms support contractor status.
Best Practices:
- Avoid indefinite terms without any endpoint consideration
- Include provisions for renewal or extension as separate engagements
- Specify what happens to existing client appointments upon termination
- Consider whether notice period should differ for termination with cause
This is a nuanced area. Overly restrictive non-compete or non-solicitation clauses can undermine contractor status by suggesting control over the contractor's business.
Best Practices:
- True ICs should generally be able to take clients with them (this supports Prong C)
- Broad non-competes are inconsistent with IC status and may be unenforceable
- Focus non-solicitation on employees/staff, not clients
- Consider whether protecting "your" clients is worth the classification risk
Get Your Agreement Right
Choose the option that fits your needs
- Basic independent contractor template
- Customize with your own details
- Suitable for simple arrangements
- No legal review included
- Use our template generator
- Attorney review of your completed agreement
- State-specific compliance check
- Written feedback and red flags identified
- One round of follow-up questions
- Custom agreement drafted for your business
- Full consultation on your specific arrangement
- State-specific compliance for your jurisdiction
- Industry-specific provisions
- Ongoing support for questions
Related Resources
Tools and guides to help you get contractor relationships right
Independent Contractor Agreement Generator
Create a customized independent contractor agreement with our free template generator. Includes provisions for service providers across industries.
Generate Agreement →California Labor Code Section 2750.3
The statutory codification of AB5 and the ABC test. Essential reading for California businesses.
View Statute →IRS Form SS-8
Use this IRS form to request a determination of worker status for federal tax purposes. Useful if you need clarity on federal classification.
View IRS Form →Contract Library
Browse our full library of legal document generators for businesses, including employment agreements, NDAs, and service contracts.
Browse Templates →This page provides general legal information, not legal advice for your specific situation. Worker classification law is complex, varies by state, and is actively evolving. The information here is current as of December 2025 but may change. For advice on your specific contractor arrangements, consult with a licensed attorney in your state.