How to Respond to IP Demand Letters

Published: November 26, 2025 • Dispute Resolution

IP Demand Letter Response Guide | Intellectual Property Infringement

IP Demand Letter Response Guide

Strategic legal guidance for responding to intellectual property infringement claims including copyright, trademark, patent, and trade secret disputes

85% Resolve Before Litigation

10 Days Typical DMCA Response Window

$150K Max Statutory Copyright Damages

$2M+ Avg Patent Litigation Cost

⚖️ Understanding IP Demand Letters

An intellectual property demand letter is formal notice that someone believes you’re infringing their IP rights. These letters typically demand that you cease the allegedly infringing activity and may also seek monetary damages, destruction of infringing materials, or other remedies.

Critical Importance: IP demand letters create serious legal exposure. Ignoring them can result in enhanced damages, loss of defenses, and immediate injunctions that shut down your business operations. Even baseless claims require strategic response.

Why You Received This Letter

Pre-Litigation Requirement: Many laws require pre-suit notice before filing infringement lawsuits
Settlement Leverage: Sender wants to resolve without expensive litigation
Evidence Building: Creates paper trail showing you were aware of infringement claim
Damages Limitation: For some IP types, stopping after notice limits damages exposure
Good Faith Attempt: Courts favor parties who tried reasonable settlement before suing
DMCA Safe Harbor: For online platforms, notice triggers safe harbor requirements

Common Demands in IP Letters

🛑

Cease & Desist

Immediate stop to all infringing uses, often with specific deadlines ranging from 10-30 days

💰

Monetary Damages

Payment for past infringement, often calculated as lost profits, actual damages, or statutory amounts

📦

Destruction of Materials

Removal or destruction of infringing inventory, products, marketing materials, or digital assets

📝

Accounting of Profits

Detailed financial disclosure showing revenues and profits from allegedly infringing products/services

⚖️

Attorney’s Fees

Reimbursement for sender’s legal costs, often $10K-$50K+ even for simple matters

🤝

License Agreement

Negotiated licensing arrangement allowing continued use with royalty payments

First Steps Within 24 Hours: Preserve all evidence related to the disputed IP. Engage IP litigation counsel immediately. Do NOT destroy potentially infringing materials. Do NOT contact the sender directly. Review your insurance policies for IP coverage.

📚 Types of IP Infringement Claims

Understanding which type of intellectual property is at issue determines your response strategy, potential defenses, damages exposure, and litigation timeline.

Copyright Infringement

Protects: Original works of authorship including software code, written content, photographs, videos, music, architectural works, and artistic creations.

Element	Details	Defense Opportunities
Registration	US registration required before filing lawsuit; strengthens damages claims	Check if work is actually registered; timing of registration matters
Ownership	Must prove they own copyright; work-for-hire issues common	Challenge chain of title; investigate work-for-hire relationships
Copying	Need access + substantial similarity to protected expression	Show independent creation; argue dissimilarity; prove no access
Damages	$750-$30K statutory per work ($150K if willful); or actual damages + profits	Innocent infringement reduces to $200; challenge willfulness
Fair Use	Transformative use, criticism, commentary, education may be protected	Strong defense if genuinely transformative or minimal use

DMCA Safe Harbor: Online platforms that expeditiously remove infringing content upon notice can avoid liability. Must comply strictly with 17 USC §512 requirements including designating agent and implementing repeat infringer policy.

Trademark Infringement

Protects: Brand names, logos, slogans, product designs, and trade dress that identify commercial source and prevent consumer confusion.

Element	Details	Defense Opportunities
Valid Mark	Must be distinctive (arbitrary, fanciful, suggestive) not merely descriptive	Challenge distinctiveness; argue mark is generic or descriptive
Priority	First user in commerce owns rights; registration not required but helps	Prove you used first; show their mark is weak or abandoned
Likelihood of Confusion	Would consumers confuse source? Considers similarity, proximity of goods, channels	Show marks are different; goods/services are unrelated; no actual confusion
Damages	Actual damages + defendant’s profits; up to 3x for willful; attorney’s fees possible	Challenge willfulness; show no profits attributable to mark
Injunction	Preliminary injunction can immediately shut down business	Show you’ll prevail on merits; irreparable harm to you outweighs theirs

Dilution Claims: Famous marks (Nike, Apple, Coca-Cola) get extra protection against dilution even without confusion. Blurring weakens distinctive quality; tarnishment harms reputation. Federal registration + fame required.

Patent Infringement

Protects: Novel and non-obvious inventions including utility patents (functional innovations), design patents (ornamental designs), and plant patents.

Element	Details	Defense Opportunities
Valid Patent	Must be novel, non-obvious, useful; properly issued by USPTO	Challenge validity with prior art; show patent is obvious
Infringement	Product/process meets each claim element literally or under doctrine of equivalents	Show claim limitations are missing; distinguish your technology
Damages	Reasonable royalty minimum; can be lost profits if proven; up to 3x for willful	Challenge royalty rate; show no causal nexus; argue no willfulness
Costs	Patent litigation averages $2-5M through trial due to technical complexity	Early settlement often economically necessary even with strong defenses
Marking Requirement	Patentee must mark products to recover pre-suit damages; notice required	Check if products were properly marked; limits pre-notice damages

Inter Partes Review (IPR): Patent Trial and Appeal Board can invalidate patents. Much cheaper than district court litigation ($250K-$500K vs $2M+). Must file within one year of receiving suit notice. Success rate around 60-70% for petitioners.

Trade Secret Misappropriation

Protects: Confidential business information including customer lists, formulas, manufacturing processes, pricing strategies, and proprietary algorithms that provide competitive advantage.

Element	Details	Defense Opportunities
Existence of Secret	Info must be secret (not generally known), valuable, and subject to reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy	Show info is publicly available; no reasonable secrecy measures
Misappropriation	Acquired through improper means (theft, breach of confidence, espionage) or improper disclosure	Prove independent development; reverse engineering; public sources
DTSA vs State Law	Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act + state laws (CUTSA in CA); similar but different procedures	May prefer state court; different remedies and procedures
Ex Parte Seizure	In extraordinary circumstances, can seize materials without notice under DTSA	Challenge whether extraordinary circumstances exist; bond requirements
Damages	Actual loss + unjust enrichment; reasonable royalty alternative; up to 2x for willful/malicious; attorney’s fees for bad faith	Challenge causal connection; show no use of alleged secrets

Criminal Exposure: Economic Espionage Act makes trade secret theft a federal crime with up to 10 years imprisonment and $5M fines. State laws also criminalize theft. Criminal referrals possible in egregious cases involving departing employees or foreign entities.

🎯 Strategic Response Options

Critical First 48 Hours: Implement litigation hold immediately on all potentially relevant documents and communications. Do NOT delete anything, even if it seems incriminating. Engage IP litigation counsel before responding. Assess insurance coverage. Do NOT contact sender without counsel approval.

Six Response Strategies

Strategy	When Appropriate	Pros	Cons
Immediate Cease	Infringement is clear; you’re willing to stop; minimal investment in current use	Avoids enhanced damages; shows good faith; may avoid lawsuit entirely; limits exposure	Loses ability to use IP; may need to redesign; admits validity of claim
Negotiated License	You want to continue using IP; reasonable royalty acceptable; sender willing to license	Legitimizes use; avoids litigation; predictable ongoing costs; maintains business operations	Ongoing royalty payments; may include audit rights; validates their IP rights
Challenge Validity	Weak IP rights (descriptive mark, obvious patent, no originality in copyright)	If successful, eliminates claim; can recover attorney’s fees in some cases	Expensive; uncertain outcome; may provoke immediate litigation
Assert Non-Infringement	Strong defenses (no access, dissimilar, different goods, fair use, independent creation)	May dissuade litigation; establishes record; protects continued operations	Reveals defense theories; may not prevent lawsuit; requires investigation costs
Declaratory Judgment	Reasonable apprehension of suit; want to choose forum/timing; strong non-infringement case	Control litigation venue; strike first; force their hand; resolve uncertainty	Expensive; may escalate unnecessarily; burden of proof issues
Redesign & Rebrand	Infringing element is peripheral; easy to design around; low switching costs	Avoids litigation entirely; maintains operations; future-proofs business	Short-term costs; lost brand equity; customer confusion; admission of problem

Evaluating Settlement Value

Settlement makes economic sense when defense costs plus risk-adjusted damages exceed settlement amount. Consider these factors:

Litigation Costs

Risk-Adjusted Damages

Expected damages × likelihood you lose. Factor in statutory minimums, willfulness multipliers, attorney’s fees exposure.

Business Disruption

Management time, document production, depositions, confidential information exposure, impact on fundraising/M&A.

Injunction Risk

Preliminary injunction probability × cost of business shutdown or workaround. Can be existential for some businesses.

Settlement Negotiation Tips: Start with non-monetary terms (license, covenant not to sue). Emphasize weaknesses in their case without insulting them. Propose earnout or milestone payments if cash constrained. Include mutual releases and confidentiality. Always get warranty of ownership and no other claims.

What to Include in Written Response

Professional Tone: Avoid hostility even if claim is frivolous; maintain settlement optionality
Preserve Defenses: Reserve all rights, defenses, and claims without waiver
Specific Responses: Address each alleged act of infringement individually with supporting facts
Challenge Validity: Raise questions about IP ownership, validity, or enforceability
Assert Defenses: Fair use, first sale, independent creation, prior use, abandonment, laches
Demand Evidence: Request proof of registration, ownership chain, actual use dates
Propose Resolution: If open to settlement, suggest discussion framework
Set Deadline: Give them deadline to provide evidence or withdraw claim

What NOT to Include: Admissions of copying or knowledge of IP rights. Speculative damages calculations. Emotional reactions or personal attacks. Unsupported factual assertions. Detailed financial information. Waiver of any legal defenses or privileges. Commitments you may not keep.

⏱️ Response Timeline & Deadlines

IP demand letters typically specify response deadlines ranging from 10-30 days. Understanding critical timeframes helps you respond strategically while meeting legal requirements.

Day 1: Receipt & Immediate Actions

Critical Actions: Issue litigation hold to preserve all documents. Do NOT delete anything. Forward letter to IP litigation attorney. Check D&O and commercial general liability insurance. Do NOT respond or contact sender directly. Stop producing/selling accused products if clearly infringing.

Days 1-3: DMCA-Specific Actions (If Applicable)

For Online Platforms: If you’re hosting allegedly infringing content, DMCA safe harbor requires expeditious removal (typically within 1-3 business days). Notify user of removal. User has 10-14 days to file counter-notice. If counter-notice filed, you must wait 10-14 business days before restoring content.

Days 2-7: Initial Investigation

Key Tasks: Attorney analyzes demand letter and IP registrations. Verify ownership and validity of IP rights claimed. Identify specific products/services accused. Assess infringement claims and available defenses. Preliminary damages and settlement value analysis. Determine if immediate cease makes business sense.

Days 7-14: Evidence Collection

Build Your Defense: Collect development documentation (showing independent creation). Gather prior art for patent/trademark challenges. Document dates of first use and development. Compile evidence of other uses (for genericness/abandonment). Calculate your sales and profits from accused products. Review contracts with designers/developers.

Days 14-21: Expert Consultation (If Needed)

Technical Analysis: For patent claims, engage patent attorney for claim construction and invalidity analysis. For complex copyright, retain expert on originality and fair use. For trademark likelihood of confusion, consider consumer survey expert. For damages, consult forensic accountant.

Days 21-25: Response Drafting

Prepare Response: Draft written response incorporating investigation findings. Develop settlement proposal if appropriate. Client review and approval. Final revisions based on any new developments. Consider whether cease makes sense vs. fighting.

Day 28-30: Response Delivery

Send Response: Deliver response via certified mail and email to establish proof. Meet deadline specified in demand letter or negotiate extension. Include specific responses to each allegation. Propose settlement if appropriate. Set expectations for next steps.

Days 30-60: Settlement Negotiation

Post-Response Period: If sender responds favorably, engage in settlement discussions. Exchange term sheets for license or settlement. Conduct due diligence on ownership and prior licenses. Negotiate final agreement terms. If no response or rejection, prepare for potential litigation.

Critical Statutory Deadlines

IP Type	Key Deadlines	Consequences of Missing
Copyright (DMCA)	Platform must remove expeditiously (1-3 days); User has 10-14 days for counter-notice	Lose safe harbor protection; face direct liability; statutory damages up to $150K/work
Patent (IPR)	Must file IPR within 1 year of lawsuit; estoppel after trial	Stuck in expensive district court litigation; can’t challenge validity via PTAB
Trademark	No specific statute but laches defense if unreasonable delay	Continued infringement may be deemed willful after notice; treble damages
Trade Secret	Ex parte seizure must be challenged within days; TRO hearings immediate	Seizure stands; irreparable harm from business disruption; competitive info exposed

Willfulness Timeline: After receiving demand letter, continued infringement may be deemed willful, triggering enhanced damages (2x-3x). Document good faith efforts to investigate and respond. If you continue operations after demand, have strong legal opinion supporting non-infringement or invalidity.

⚠️ Risk Exposure & Litigation Costs

IP litigation is among the most expensive and business-disruptive legal disputes. Understanding your exposure helps make informed settlement decisions.

Damages by IP Type

IP Type	Damages Available	Enhanced Damages	Attorney’s Fees
Copyright	$750-$30K statutory per work; OR actual damages + infringer’s profits; OR $200-$150K if willful/innocent	Up to $150K per work if willful infringement	Discretionary; typically awarded to prevailing party
Trademark	Plaintiff’s actual damages + defendant’s profits; statutory damages for counterfeiting ($1K-$2M per mark)	Up to 3x actual damages for willful infringement	Discretionary in “exceptional cases”
Patent (Utility)	Reasonable royalty (minimum); OR lost profits if proven; pre-suit damages only if marked	Up to 3x damages for willful infringement	Only in “exceptional cases” (bad faith, frivolous)
Trade Secret	Actual loss + unjust enrichment; OR reasonable royalty alternative	Up to 2x damages if willful/malicious under DTSA	If bad faith or willful/malicious under DTSA

Litigation Cost Estimates

©️

Discovery: $100K-$250K
Through Trial: $250K-$1M
Appeal: +$150K-$300K

™️

Trademark Litigation

Simple Case: $150K-$500K
Complex Case: $500K-$1.5M
Likelihood of confusion surveys add $50K-$100K

⚙️

Patent Litigation

Simple Patent: $1M-$2.5M
Complex Patent: $3M-$6M+
IPR alternative: $250K-$500K

🔐

Trade Secret Litigation

Standard Case: $500K-$1M
Complex Case: $1M-$2.5M
Emergency TRO proceedings: $50K-$100K

Cash Flow Impact: Defense costs typically front-loaded. Expect to pay $100K-$300K in first 6 months just getting through initial motions and beginning discovery. Many defendants settle not because they’ll lose, but because they can’t afford to win.

Injunctive Relief Risks

Beyond damages, IP owners can seek injunctions that force you to stop using the IP entirely. This can be business-ending for products/services built around the disputed IP.

Preliminary Injunction: Granted early in case if plaintiff shows likelihood of success and irreparable harm; hearing within weeks; can shut down business immediately
eBay Factors: Must show (1) irreparable injury, (2) inadequate monetary remedy, (3) balance of hardships favors plaintiff, (4) public interest; patent cases harder after eBay v. MercExchange
Bond Requirement: Plaintiff must post bond to cover your damages if injunction wrongfully issued; typically just 10-20% of your projected losses
Business Impact: Injunction during litigation can force complete redesign, destroy market position, terminate contracts, and make business unmarketable
Permanent Injunction: After trial, can permanently bar you from ever using the IP; must redesign or exit market entirely

Non-Monetary Risks

🏢

Business Disruption

Document production, depositions, management distraction, employee uncertainty, customer concerns about product availability

💼

Deal Impediments

Active IP litigation tanks fundraising, blocks M&A, destroys valuations, requires extensive disclosure, may trigger MAC clauses

🔍

Confidential Information

Discovery exposes trade secrets, financials, customer lists, pricing, roadmaps; designated “confidential” but opposing party sees all

📰

Reputational Harm

Public court records, press coverage, customer uncertainty, competitor exploitation, “copier” or “infringer” label

Insurance Coverage: Commercial general liability typically excludes IP claims. Media liability/cyber policies may cover copyright/trademark. Errors & omissions might cover trade secrets in limited contexts. Review policies immediately; provide timely notice; insurers can disclaim coverage for late notice.

🛡️ Preventing IP Disputes

Proactive IP management dramatically reduces infringement risk and strengthens your position if disputes arise. Most IP problems are avoidable with proper diligence and documentation.

Pre-Launch IP Clearance

🔍

Trademark Clearance

Search USPTO, state registrations, common law uses, domain names, social media. Hire clearance firm for comprehensive search ($1K-$3K). Review results with IP counsel before launch.

📚

Freedom to Operate

For product features, conduct patent landscape analysis. Identify blocking patents. Evaluate design-around options. Budget for licenses if needed. Document clean-room development.

©️

Verify you own or licensed all content (text, images, videos, code, music). Check stock photo licenses. Review contractor agreements for work-for-hire clauses.

🔐

Trade Secret Protection

Identify what’s confidential. Implement NDAs, access controls, employee agreements. Mark confidential materials. Limit disclosure. Document protection measures.

Securing Your Own IP Rights

Protection Type	How to Secure	Why It Matters
Federal Trademark Registration	File USPTO application ($250-$350 per class + attorney fees); responds to office actions; maintain through use	Nationwide rights; constructive notice; incontestability after 5 years; stronger damages; easier to enforce; domain dispute advantage
Copyright Registration	File with Copyright Office ($65-$125 per work); register within 3 months of publication for max benefits	Required before suing; statutory damages available; attorney’s fees available; strong presumption of validity; customs enforcement
Patent Filing	Provisional ($130-$300) then utility ($400-$3K+ filing) within 1 year; design patents ($180-$2K); hire patent attorney ($5K-$15K+)	20-year monopoly; block competitors; licensing revenue; increased valuation; defensive portfolio; prevent patent trolls
Trade Secret Policies	Written policies; employee/contractor NDAs; exit interviews; access controls; physical/digital security	Prerequisite for enforcement; shows reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy; criminal prosecution possible; no expiration like patents

Contractor & Employee Agreements

Critical Contract Clauses: Without proper written agreements, contractors and employees may own IP they create, leaving you with no rights. California law is especially protective of creator rights.

Work-for-Hire Provisions: Explicitly state all work product is “work made for hire” under copyright law; include assignment as backup
Assignment Language: Employee/contractor assigns all IP rights (patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets) to company; include moral rights waiver
Pre-Existing IP Disclosure: Require disclosure of IP employee/contractor is bringing to relationship; exclude from assignment
Duty to Assist: Obligation to sign documents, testify, cooperate in securing/enforcing IP rights even after termination
California Invention Assignment Restrictions: Cannot assign employee inventions made on own time without employer resources unless related to company business (CA Labor Code §2870)
Confidentiality Provisions: Perpetual obligation not to disclose trade secrets; return of materials on termination

Third-Party Licensing & Usage

License Compliance: Violating license terms can convert authorized use into infringement, eliminating your defenses and creating breach of contract claims.

Open Source Software: Understand GPL, MIT, Apache, BSD requirements; some require code disclosure; maintain compliance documentation; audit dependencies
Stock Photography: Stay within license scope (editorial vs commercial, print vs digital, exclusive vs non-exclusive); attribute if required; don’t exceed user/impression limits
Font Licenses: Verify embedding permissions for web/app use; number of users/pageviews; logo usage restrictions; some require separate licenses per domain
Music Licensing: Need both composition and recording licenses; different rights for streaming vs download vs sync; track PRO affiliations (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC)
API Terms: Comply with rate limits, attribution, acceptable use policies, restrictions on competing services; terms change frequently

Ongoing IP Monitoring

Trademark Watch Services

Monitor USPTO filings, domain registrations, social media accounts. Typical cost: $300-$500/year per mark. Catch infringement early when cease & desist still works.

Use Google reverse image search, Copyscape, or services like Pixsy. Set up Google Alerts for unique text phrases. DMCA takedowns cost-effective for online infringement.

Patent Monitoring

Track competitor filings in your space. Monitor patent assertions in industry. Consider defensive publications to block competitors. Join defensive patent aggregators.

Trade Secret Vigilance

Exit interviews with departing employees. Monitor where they go (LinkedIn). Audit access logs. Competitive intelligence on new competitor products. Act fast on suspected theft.

Implement Preventive IP Strategy

Most IP disputes are preventable with proper clearance, registration, and monitoring. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of litigation.

Schedule IP Clearance Review

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, you should respond even to seemingly frivolous IP demand letters, but strategically and with counsel. Ignoring the letter can be portrayed as willful infringement, which triggers enhanced damages. Courts sometimes interpret silence as admission. However, your response should be carefully crafted to avoid admissions while asserting strong defenses. Even for clearly baseless claims, a professional response explaining why the claim lacks merit can prevent litigation entirely. The sender may not realize their claim is weak, or they may be testing multiple targets to see who responds. A strong legal response often ends the matter, while silence invites a lawsuit.

Settlement values vary enormously based on strength of claim, your damages exposure, and relative bargaining positions. Weak copyright claims often settle for $5K-$25K. Legitimate trademark disputes might settle for $25K-$100K plus rebranding. Patent demands from non-practicing entities typically seek $50K-$500K depending on your revenue. Trade secret cases involving key employees can be $100K-$1M+. The economic analysis is simple: settlement should be less than (litigation costs + risk-adjusted damages). Since copyright litigation averages $300K, trademark $500K, and patent $2M+, settlements typically range from 10-50% of these amounts depending on case strength. Many defendants pay more than they “should” simply because they can’t afford to prove they’re right.

No. Copyright notice is not required under US law since 1989. Copyright automatically attaches the moment an original work is fixed in tangible form. The © symbol provides evidentiary benefits but its absence doesn’t mean the work is unprotected. Similarly, “All Rights Reserved” isn’t required. Even works without any attribution or notice are fully protected by copyright law. The only exceptions are works clearly in public domain (published pre-1928, or published 1928-1977 without notice/renewal, or government works, or explicitly released to public domain). Never assume something is free to use just because it lacks copyright markings. Always get permission or rely on fair use after careful analysis.

Fair use is a copyright defense for transformative uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Courts evaluate four factors: (1) purpose and character of use (transformative? commercial?), (2) nature of copyrighted work (creative works get more protection), (3) amount and substantiality used (both quantitative and qualitative), and (4) effect on potential market. Fair use is highly fact-specific and unpredictable. Using small portions for commercial purposes is generally not fair use. Parody has strong fair use protection, but satire doesn’t. Educational use isn’t automatically fair use if it supplants market for original. Fair use is an affirmative defense you must prove at trial—it doesn’t prevent being sued. Only rely on fair use after getting legal opinion from IP counsel, and understand you may need to litigate to prevail.

For domain names incorporating your trademark, use ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). It’s faster and cheaper than litigation ($1,500-$3,000 vs $50K-$200K+). You must prove: (1) domain is identical/confusingly similar to your mark, (2) registrant has no legitimate rights in the name, and (3) domain was registered and used in bad faith. Decisions typically within 60 days. Success rate around 90% for trademark owners. For social media handles, platforms have their own trademark infringement processes. Twitter/X, Facebook, Instagram let you report trademark violations. They’ll typically suspend handles that infringe registered marks. Some platforms require court order. Act quickly—delay can imply acquiescence or abandonment. Handles registered before your trademark have stronger defenses.

Potentially yes under trade secret law, if you can prove: (1) customer list was secret (not publicly available), (2) provided competitive advantage, (3) you took reasonable measures to keep it secret (NDAs, access restrictions, marked confidential), and (4) employee misappropriated it. Under California’s UTSA and federal DTSA, you can seek injunctions preventing use, return of materials, and damages. However, California strongly protects employee mobility and won’t enforce non-compete agreements (CA Business & Professions Code §16600). Employee can use general knowledge, skills, and information that’s publicly available or in their head. You cannot stop them from competing generally or soliciting customers whose identity is publicly known. The key is proving the customer list was truly secret and they took it rather than remembered it. Act quickly—delay in asserting rights implies information isn’t truly secret. Consider emergency TRO if immediate competitive harm.

Maybe, but prior user rights are narrow and hard to prove. Under 35 USC §273, you have a defense if you commercially used the invention at least one year before the patent’s effective filing date. However, requirements are strict: must show actual reduction to practice (not just conception), commercial use (not just experimental), and continuous use. The defense is personal to you—can’t transfer it. It doesn’t invalidate the patent; just gives you a shield. You still infringe if the patent is valid. Prior user rights don’t help against infringement damages for use after the patent issued. Better defenses usually include invalidity (you can prove public use predating the patent’s priority date, invalidating it entirely) or non-infringement (your product doesn’t meet all claim limitations). Prior user rights should be last resort; focus on invalidating the patent through prior art.

Run a decision tree analysis comparing costs and risks. Option 1 (Fight): litigation costs ($300K-$2M depending on IP type) + risk-adjusted damages (expected damages × probability you lose) + business disruption + injunction risk. Option 2 (Redesign): redesign costs + lost sales during transition + rebranding/marketing + customer confusion + any remaining liability for past infringement. Fight when: (1) strong non-infringement or invalidity defenses, (2) injunction unlikely, (3) redesign would destroy your business model, (4) claim is clearly meritless trolling. Redesign when: (1) infringement is clear, (2) design-around is simple and cheap, (3) you’re early stage with low switching costs, (4) it’s peripheral feature not core to product. Hybrid approach: redesign for future while negotiating retroactive license for past sales. Get IP counsel opinion—if “more likely than not” non-infringement, get insurance for defense costs.

Yes, absolutely. A claim chart maps each element of the patent claims to your accused product. Without it, you can’t properly assess infringement risk. Professional patent plaintiffs always provide claim charts because they strengthen their position by showing specifically how each claim element reads on your product. If they haven’t provided one, they may not have done the analysis or they realize their claims are weak. In your response, request detailed claim charts, identification of each allegedly infringing product/feature, dates of alleged infringement, and calculation of damages methodology. Their response (or refusal to respond) tells you a lot about case strength. Strong patent cases come with extensive technical analysis. Weak cases rely on vague assertions. Many patent trolls send form letters to dozens of companies hoping some will pay rather than investigate. Force them to do the work of proving infringement before you pay anything or engage expensive litigation counsel.

AI-generated content raises complex IP issues still being litigated. Current landscape: (1) AI outputs likely not copyrightable on their own per Copyright Office guidance and recent court decisions, but human authorship elements are protectable; (2) AI companies face lawsuits for training on copyrighted works—this may affect your ability to use outputs if courts find underlying infringement; (3) Your prompts and substantial editing/selection can create copyrightable derivative works; (4) Terms of service matter—some AI tools retain rights or limit commercial use; (5) AI can inadvertently reproduce substantial portions of training data, exposing you to infringement claims. Best practices: review AI tool terms carefully for commercial use rights; document your creative process and modifications; run reverse image searches on AI-generated images; consider AI indemnity insurance (emerging product); have backup non-AI content. Don’t rely on “AI created it so I can use it freely”—that’s not established law yet.

Received an IP Demand Letter?

IP disputes can destroy your business if mishandled. Get experienced intellectual property counsel immediately to evaluate your options and minimize exposure.

Schedule Confidential Consultation

Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. | California Bar #279869 | owner@terms.law