Reproductive Health Data Risk Checker
Reproductive-health data creates a different risk profile because it can combine health status, location, timing, search behavior, app activity, and third-party advertising infrastructure on the same user record. A generic privacy policy usually does not answer the My Health My Data Act questions. This tool triages your product against Chapter 19.373 RCW and returns a risk score, the specific exposure points, and the recommended next step.
Reproductive-health data risk score
Reproductive-health classification
Specific exposure points
Per-se CPA exposure (RCW 19.373.090)
Recommended next step
Send these inputs to me for MHMDA reviewThis is a triage tool, not legal advice. Confirm the live statutory text against the source and the specific facts before relying on this output. MHMDA compliance review is regulatory advisory work under California license.
How the score is calculated
The score weighs the elements that drive reproductive-health MHMDA exposure. Weights total 100 points.
- Product type: up to 18 points. Fertility, period, abortion-adjacent, and pregnancy products score highest because the data set is reproductive by design.
- Geofencing exposure (location + SDK + clinic-proximity): up to 28 points. The 2,000-foot prohibition under RCW 19.373.080 is categorical and there is no consent override.
- Adtech and retargeting in reproductive context: up to 18 points. Prong (3) of RCW 19.373.080 reaches notifications, messages, and advertisements related to consumer health data or healthcare services.
- Sharing without separate consent: up to 14 points. RCW 19.373.030 requires affirmative opt-in for collection and a separate, distinct consent for sharing.
- Sale-authorization gap: up to 12 points. RCW 19.373.070's nine-element authorization is rarely fully implemented.
- Washington-user nexus and deletion-process posture: up to 10 points.
The four verdict bands are 80 to 100 (Significant exposure; remediation required before continued operation), 60 to 79 (Material gaps in geofence, consent, or sale posture), 30 to 59 (Discrete gaps to close), and 0 to 29 (Compliant or out of scope on the current record).
Authority notes
Citations from RCW 19.373.010 (definitions including geofence and consumer health data), RCW 19.373.020 (separate privacy policy and homepage link), RCW 19.373.030 (two-layer consent), RCW 19.373.040 (consumer rights and 45-day deletion window), RCW 19.373.060 (processor obligations), RCW 19.373.070 (nine-element written authorization for sale), RCW 19.373.080 (2,000-foot geofence prohibition), and RCW 19.373.090 (per-se CPA bridge).
For background, see my Washington My Health My Data Act resource and the cluster pages: Fertility apps, Period-tracking apps, Reproductive-health geofencing ban, Geofencing risk for adtech.