I'm Sergei Tokmakov, a California attorney. If you're selling SaaS and enterprise procurement is asking for an MSA, DPA, security addendum, AI policy, and BAA, you need the full stack delivered at once, not redrafted by counsel three times. I deliver a procurement-ready package that clears enterprise security review.
A procurement-ready SaaS legal stack includes an MSA, TOS, Privacy Policy (CCPA Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100, CPRA, and GDPR-aligned), a DPA with Article 28 processor terms and Standard Contractual Clauses for international transfers, a CCPA/CPRA addendum, an AI usage policy and DPIA template if generative AI is in the product, and Business Associate Agreements where Protected Health Information is in scope. Enterprise buyers in 2025-2026 read the documents before signing; templates fail at procurement. The package is interlocking by design so each document references the others without contradiction.
Master Services Agreement plus Data Processing Addendum is the core. I tune both to the actual data the SaaS handles, not boilerplate.
EU customer footprint triggers GDPR Article 28 and Standard Contractual Clauses. I wire the DPA + SCC so the SaaS can sign EU deals without bespoke negotiations every time.
GDPR + SCCCalifornia privacy law has specific disclosure, opt-out, and contact requirements. I build the privacy policy and consumer-rights flow to actual compliance, not template.
Civ. § 1798.100 et seq.Indemnity caps and limitation-of-liability are where SaaS deals leak risk. I balance them to the deal economics so the SaaS is not signing unlimited downside.
A SaaS legal package is not boilerplate, the MSA, DPA, and privacy stack are tuned to the actual data flow and the customer footprint.
This authority gives California consumers rights to access, delete, correct, and opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. § 1798.140 defines "personal information" broadly. The Privacy Policy must disclose categories collected, sources, business purposes, third-party recipients, retention periods, and the rights mechanism. The Civil Rights Department and California Attorney General enforce.
(effective 2023) created the California Privacy Protection Agency, added sensitive personal information categories with their own treatment, extended limitation rights, and required a Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information link in the website footer. Service-provider and contractor terms became more specific; the DPA addresses each requirement.
This authority requires a written contract between controller and processor specifying processing scope, duration, nature, purpose, categories of data, and processor obligations on confidentiality, security, sub-processors, breach notification, and assistance to the controller. The 2021 Standard Contractual Clauses (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/914) replaced the older versions and are the default international-transfer mechanism.
(effective July 10, 2023) restored a self-certification path for US data importers, replacing the prior Privacy Shield invalidated in Schrems II. Companies self-certify with the US Department of Commerce. SCCs remain the alternative.
At 45 CFR 164.504(e) requires a Business Associate Agreement between a covered entity and any business associate handling PHI. California's Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), Cal. Civ. Code § 56 et seq., adds state-level requirements and a private right of action.
(Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) became enforceable in tiers starting February 2025, with full applicability by August 2026. The Act classifies AI systems by risk (prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk) and imposes obligations accordingly. SaaS providers serving EU customers in high-risk verticals (employment, education, critical infrastructure, justice administration) need to address Act obligations in the MSA and AI Addendum.
The package is built from a structured intake. Before drafting starts, I ask for the following:
If you don't have everything, send what you have. I tell you what's missing and what affects scope before quoting.
For $349 (case memo):
For $2,500 (full SaaS package):
Healthcare BAA and EU AI Act high-risk overlays are scoped separately.
Email a paragraph + key documents.
I map the facts to the CA statute.
Attorney letter on letterhead.
Two revision rounds included.
USPS certified + email delivery.
Three negotiation responses included.
Email me a short paragraph about your product, customers, and what enterprise procurement is asking for. I'll respond same day with a scoped flat-fee quote.
Email owner@terms.law