Terms.Law Forum

Security deposit deducted $2,800 for ‘normal wear’: California and I'm losing my mind

I publish illustrative scenarios prepared by my practice. All participants and conversations are fictional. The fictional posts are not posts by real users, accounts of client experiences, or reports of actual results.
Illustrative scenario prepared by my practice.
This discussion is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
Hypothetical question

I lived in my apartment in Sacramento for four years. I kept it in great shape, cleaned it thoroughly before moving out, and even hired a professional cleaning service. My security deposit was $3,200.

I just got the landlord's deduction statement and he's keeping $2,800. The charges include $1,400 for "carpet replacement," $900 for "full repaint," and $500 for "general cleaning and repairs." I'm getting back $400 out of $3,200.

After four years, carpet and paint are normal wear and tear. The carpet wasn't stained or damaged — it was just old. The paint wasn't marked up, it was just the original paint from when I moved in. And I have the receipt from the professional cleaner.

This feels like theft. What can I do?

Illustrative response

Yeah thank you. A few follow-up questions: I did take photos at move-out but I didn't do a formal walk-through inspection with the landlord. He offered one but I was in a rush on moving day. Does that hurt me?

Also, the itemized statement didn't include any receipts. It just listed the charges with dollar amounts. Is that a problem for him?

Illustrative response

Not doing the walk-through isn't ideal, but it's not fatal to your case. The pre-move-out inspection is the landlord's obligation to offer under § 1950.5(f), and its purpose is to give tenants a chance to fix issues before move-out. Skipping it doesn't waive your right to dispute deductions.

As for the missing receipts: that's actually a significant problem for the landlord. Under § 1950.5(g)(2), the itemized statement must include copies of documents showing charges for repairs or cleaning. If actual work was done, the landlord must provide receipts or invoices. If the work hasn't been done yet, the landlord must send a good-faith estimate and then provide actual receipts within 14 days of completion.

The fact that he provided no receipts suggests either the work hasn't been done (meaning he's pocketing your deposit) or he's inflating the numbers. Either way, it strengthens your case considerably.

Bottom line: send the demand letter requesting a full refund of $2,800, cite the statute, and give him 14 days to respond. If he doesn't, file in small claims court. The filing fee is minimal and you don't need an attorney for small claims in California.

Illustrative response

Rob, that's really encouraging. I'm going to send the demand letter this week and if he doesn't return the money, I'll file in small claims. I have all my photos backed up and the cleaning receipt in my email.

One more thing — should I ask for the bad faith penalty in my demand letter, or save that for court?

Illustrative response

Landlords who try to use security deposits as a profit center are shooting themselves in the foot. Between bad faith penalties and the time spent in small claims, it always costs more than just doing the right thing.

We use a depreciation schedule for everything. After 4 years on carpet with a 10-year life, the tenant owes 0% if the carpet is simply worn, and at most 60% of replacement cost if there's actual damage beyond wear. For paint, after 4 years with a 3-year expected life, the landlord can't charge anything — it's fully depreciated. These aren't just good practices, they're what the law expects.