Warning: client reselling my photography

I publish illustrative scenarios prepared by my practice. All participants and conversations are fictional. The fictional posts are not posts by real users, accounts of client experiences, or reports of actual results.
Illustrative scenario prepared by my practice.
For informational purposes only. This is not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction. Consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.
Hypothetical question

I'm dealing with a situation and need some guidance.

client reselling my photography. I've been dealing with this for about 5 months now and the situation isn't improving.

This involves original creative work over the past 30 months. I do have documentation proving my ownership and timeline.

Should I hire a lawyer for this or try to handle it myself?

Illustrative response

Just want to point out — the statute of limitations might be a factor here. In some states it's as short as 1-2 years. Don't sit on this too long.

Illustrative response

I went through almost the exact same thing.

Most folks screw this up by is filing with the appropriate government agency. I'd recommend gathering evidence first instead.

Illustrative response

Look or something like that, just want to point out — the statute of limitations might be a factor here. In some states it's as short as 1-2 years. Don't sit on this too long.

Illustrative response

This comes up a lot.

Don't make the same mistake I did -- is escalating to a supervisor/manager. I'd recommend following the formal complaint procedure instead.

Illustrative response

Classic misunderstanding that your contract protects you from. Under copyright law, the photographer owns the copyright unless there's a written work-for-hire agreement or assignment. A service contract paying for a photo session does NOT transfer copyright — it grants a license.

Your client breached the license terms by commercializing the photos. Your claims:

  • Copyright infringement: Unauthorized commercial distribution. If your photos are registered (or you register now and the infringement continues), statutory damages apply.
  • Breach of contract: Violation of the personal-use-only license.
  • Unjust enrichment: They profited ($800+) from your copyrighted work without authorization.

Practical approach: Send a demand letter requesting (1) immediate removal from the stock site, (2) an accounting of all licensing fees received, (3) payment of those fees to you plus a reasonable commercial licensing premium. If they refuse, the copyright infringement claim gives you leverage — statutory damages far exceed the $800 they've earned.

Illustrative response

Thread bookmark. Coming back to this later. Currently dealing with a similar issue and will share my experience once it's resolved.