Members-only forum — Email to join

Can You Sell Adobe Firefly Images? Commercial Rights & IP Safety (2026)

Started by brand_designer_nyc · Feb 8, 2026 · 5 replies
AI image generation terms and IP protections vary by plan. Verify current Adobe terms before commercial use.
BD
brand_designer_nyc OP

Adobe keeps marketing Firefly as "commercially safe" because it was only trained on Adobe Stock images and public domain content. Is this actually true? And what are the exact commercial rights?

  • Can I use Firefly images in client brand work?
  • Does Adobe's IP indemnity actually cover me if someone claims infringement?
  • Firefly in Photoshop (Generative Fill) vs standalone — any license difference?
IA
IP_attorney_NYC Attorney

Adobe Firefly's commercial position is genuinely the strongest in the market:

Training data:

  • Trained exclusively on Adobe Stock licensed images, openly licensed content, and public domain
  • No scraped web images, no copyrighted works without permission
  • This significantly reduces (but doesn't eliminate) IP infringement risk

Commercial rights:

  • All paid Creative Cloud plans: full commercial use of Firefly outputs
  • Free tier: Firefly outputs include a "Generative credits" watermark/metadata — commercial use limited
  • Enterprise: additional contractual IP protections

IP Indemnity:

  • Adobe offers IP indemnification for Firefly outputs generated by paid subscribers
  • If a third party claims your Firefly image infringes their IP, Adobe will defend you
  • This is real indemnification, not just a vague promise — it's in the contract
SC
stock_contributor_2024

As an Adobe Stock contributor whose images were used to train Firefly: Adobe is paying contributors a bonus based on how many of their images were used in training. It's not a lot, but it's more than any other AI company is doing.

The commercially-safe angle is legitimate. Other AI tools scraped the entire internet. Adobe actually licensed their training data. That said, the outputs can still accidentally resemble existing works — no training method eliminates that entirely.

BD
brand_designer_nyc OP

@IP_attorney_NYC Is there any difference between Firefly standalone (firefly.adobe.com) and Firefly features built into Photoshop/Illustrator?

IA
IP_attorney_NYC Attorney

@brand_designer_nyc No meaningful legal difference. Firefly features in Photoshop (Generative Fill, Generative Expand), Illustrator (text-to-vector), and standalone Firefly all use the same models with the same licensing terms. The IP indemnity covers all Firefly-powered features across Creative Cloud.

One practical note: Firefly adds Content Credentials metadata (C2PA) to outputs. This includes a digital record that the content was AI-generated. Some enterprise clients may want this transparency; others may prefer to strip it. Stripping the metadata doesn't affect your license — it's informational, not a legal requirement.

AA
agency_art_director

We switched from Midjourney to Firefly for all client work specifically because of the IP indemnity. The aesthetic quality isn't quite as high as Midjourney for certain styles, but for commercial brand work, the legal safety is worth the tradeoff.

Our clients (Fortune 500 brands) specifically asked for AI tools with licensed training data after the Getty Images v. Stability AI lawsuit. Firefly was the obvious choice.

Want to participate in this discussion?

Email owner@terms.law to request access