Team Chat Apps ToS Comparison

Team communication platforms power modern workplaces. We analyzed the terms of service from leading chat applications to help you understand data retention, privacy policies, and employer access rights.

4
Platforms Analyzed
55
Avg Score
Google Chat
Best in Category

About This Category

Team chat applications have become essential for workplace communication, storing sensitive business conversations, files, and personal messages. These platforms control vast amounts of corporate and personal data, with terms covering employer monitoring rights, data retention policies, and what happens when employees leave. Understanding these terms is crucial for both organizations selecting platforms and individual employees using them.

Quick Comparison

Platform Score Grade Data Retention Admin Access
Google Chat Best in Category 65 B- Workspace admin Full admin access
Discord 58 C+ User-controlled Server owner
Microsoft Teams 52 C Admin-controlled Full admin access
Slack Lowest in Category 45 C- Employer-set Full admin access

Detailed Platform Reviews

Google Chat Best in Category

65 B-

Part of Google Workspace. Extensive data collection combined with Workspace admin access creates privacy concerns.

Read Full Review →

Discord

58 C+

Originally for gamers, now used by communities and teams. Better user control but extensive data collection for personalization.

Read Full Review →

Microsoft Teams

52 C

Integrated with Microsoft 365. Enterprise admin controls allow full message access and compliance monitoring.

Read Full Review →

Slack Lowest in Category

45 C-

Leading enterprise chat platform. Employers have extensive message access rights and data retention control.

Read Full Review →

How We Grade Team Chat Apps

Our analysis evaluates terms of service based on data retention policies, employer/admin access rights, message export capabilities, end-to-end encryption options, data portability, and what happens to your messages when you leave an organization. Team chat platforms receive particular scrutiny for privacy implications in professional contexts.

A
80-100
B
65-79
C
50-64
D
35-49
F
0-34