Newsletter Platforms ToS Comparison

Newsletter platforms enable writers to build audiences and monetize content. We analyzed the terms of service from leading platforms to help creators understand content rights and revenue policies.

4
Platforms Analyzed
55
Average Score
Revue
Best in Category

About This Category

Newsletter platforms provide email distribution, subscriber management, and monetization tools for writers and content creators. These services control your relationship with subscribers and often take a percentage of paid subscription revenue. Their terms of service govern content ownership, subscriber data access, payment processing, and what happens to your audience if you migrate to another platform.

Quick Comparison

Platform Score Grade Revenue Share List Portability
Revue Best in Category 65 B- Discontinued Export only
Buttondown 58 C+ 0% (paid plans) Full export
Ghost 52 C 0% Full export
Substack Lowest in Category 45 C- 10% Limited

Detailed Platform Reviews

Revue

65 B-

Twitter-owned platform discontinued in 2023. Score reflects terms at shutdown - export your data if you haven't already.

Read Full Review →

Buttondown

58 C+

Indie-friendly newsletter platform with straightforward terms and full subscriber portability. No revenue share on paid plans.

Read Full Review →

Ghost

52 C

Open-source publishing platform with strong content ownership. Self-hosting option available for maximum control.

Read Full Review →

Substack

45 C-

Popular platform with built-in network effects but 10% revenue share and complex subscriber data terms.

Read Full Review →

How We Grade Newsletter Platforms

Our analysis evaluates terms of service based on content ownership, subscriber list portability, revenue sharing terms, payment processing, and content moderation policies. Newsletter platforms receive particular scrutiny for what control you have over your subscriber relationships.

A
80-100
B
65-79
C
50-64
D
35-49
F
0-34