Avvo, LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer - legal marketplaces face unique regulatory constraints. Generic terms don't address attorney-client privilege disclaimers, unauthorized practice concerns, or referral fee compliance.
These clauses separate compliant terms from liability magnets
Communications through the platform may not be privileged. Terms must clarify when privilege attaches, who can access communications, and what protections exist.
Is the platform providing legal advice or just connecting users to attorneys? This distinction has major regulatory implications. Terms must clearly define the platform's role.
Many states regulate attorney referral fees. If the platform receives compensation for referrals, this must be disclosed and comply with state bar rules.
How does the platform verify attorney bar status? Who's liable if an unlicensed person provides services? Terms should allocate this risk clearly.
Legal marketplaces connecting multiple clients to attorneys create conflict risks. Terms should address how conflicts are identified and handled.
If an attorney found through the platform commits malpractice, who's responsible? Platform vs. attorney liability must be explicitly defined.
Beyond legal-specific provisions, I confirm these marketplace essentials are properly addressed
Facilitator vs. provider distinction
Identity and credential checks
Platform fees and attorney fees
Data protection and privacy
User complaint process
Platform exposure caps
Account closure rights
Jurisdiction selection
Paste your Terms of Service below. I'll check legal profession provisions first, then marketplace essentials.
Want the complete picture? My full attorney review catches nuanced issues this scanner can't detect - state bar compliance, UPL risks, and regulatory concerns unique to your platform.
Get Full Attorney Review — $125/30min30-minute Zoom consultation to review your legal marketplace terms in detail.