Commercial Real Estate / Property Management

California Property Management Agreement Review: 12 Clauses That Decide Whether You Get a Fair PMA.

A working attorney's walkthrough of the most negotiated terms in commercial PMAs, written for owners of strip centers, shopping centers, mixed-use buildings, and other small-format commercial properties. Particular focus on the two issues that cost owners the most: listing-commission tails and insurance thresholds.

What this guide covers

  1. Scope of authority and PM's agency
  2. Management fee structure
  3. Leasing commissions and the "tail" clause
  4. Renewal and expansion commissions
  5. Insurance requirements and thresholds
  6. Trust accounts and operating reserves
  7. Maintenance, capex, and spending caps
  8. Indemnification
  9. Term length and termination
  10. Audit rights and reporting
  11. Conflicts of interest and self-dealing
  12. Dispute resolution and venue

01Scope of authority and PM's agency

The PMA is an agency contract. The PM owes the owner a fiduciary duty of loyalty, care, and full disclosure. Spell out exactly what the PM can do without owner consent and what requires written approval. Vague "all acts reasonably necessary to manage the Property" language is what creates fights two years in when the PM signed a vendor contract you would never have approved.

What to negotiate

Red flagOpen-ended scope language ("manage the Property in the manner customary in the industry") with no enumerated approvals and no spending cap. That language hands the PM discretion you would not give a stranger over your strip center.

02Management fee structure

Commercial PM management fees in California typically run 3% to 6% of monthly gross collections for stabilized strip centers, sometimes higher for distressed or value-add. Watch the base. "Gross collections" should mean rent and CAM actually collected, not billed. Otherwise you pay management fees on rent the PM never recovered.

What to negotiate

03Leasing commissions and the "tail" clause

This is the single most-negotiated clause in commercial PMAs and the one I look at first. The standard PM draft entitles the PM to a leasing commission on any lease signed during the agreement period, regardless of who procured the tenant. That language is broad enough to pay the PM on tenants you found yourself, on tenants your prior broker brought in, and on tenants the PM has had nothing to do with. The fix is to tie commission entitlement to actual leasing activity by the PM, anchored in procuring cause.

What to negotiate

Red flag"PM is entitled to a commission on any lease executed during the Term, regardless of procuring cause." That language is one-sided. A neutral version reads: "PM is entitled to a commission only on Leases for which PM was the procuring cause as determined by the standards of the National Association of Realtors or, if any dispute, by binding arbitration." Better yet, list the excluded prospects on signing.
Model "procuring cause" languagePM shall be entitled to a leasing commission on a Lease only if PM was the procuring cause of the Lease. PM shall not be entitled to a commission on (a) any Lease executed with a tenant introduced to the Property by Owner; (b) any Lease executed with a tenant on the Excluded Prospect List attached as Exhibit A; (c) any renewal, extension, expansion, or modification of a Lease executed before the Effective Date; or (d) any Lease procured by a third-party broker engaged by Owner. PM bears the burden of demonstrating procuring cause by a preponderance of contemporaneous written evidence.

For dispute scenarios where the PM tries to collect on a lease they did not procure, see my demand letter framework for property-manager listing-commission overrides. The procuring-cause analysis there applies whether you're negotiating the PMA up front or fighting the commission after the fact.

04Renewal and expansion commissions

Most PMA forms pay the PM a renewal commission every time a tenant renews, regardless of who negotiated the renewal or whether anyone negotiated it at all. If your tenants have built-in renewal options that exercise automatically, you can end up paying a PM commission on a renewal nobody worked. Negotiate accordingly.

What to negotiate

05Insurance requirements and thresholds

The PM should carry insurance appropriate to a fiduciary handling rent collections, vendor contracts, and tenant relationships. The owner should also be named as an additional insured on the PM's policies, and both parties should waive subrogation. This is where I see the most "looks-standard-but-isn't" language. Below is what I think of as the floor for a strip-center PMA.

PM-side coverage

Owner-side coverage

Endorsement and proof-of-insurance language

Red flagInsurance threshold language that looks reasonable but the policy form is wrong. CGL of $1M is fine on paper, but if the additional-insured endorsement is on the CG 20 26 ("designated person or organization") instead of CG 20 11 ("managers or lessors of premises") for a property-manager engagement, the coverage may not respond to the typical claims that arise from PM activities. The endorsement form matters as much as the limit.
Red flagDeductibles passed to the owner. Some PMA drafts include language that the owner pays the PM's deductible on any claim where the PM is named. That converts the PM's insurance into your insurance, with a $25,000 self-insured retention. Strip it out.

06Trust accounts and operating reserves

The PM should hold tenant security deposits in a segregated trust account, separate from operating funds. California real estate law requires brokers handling trust funds to maintain them in a separate trust account; PM companies that operate under a broker's license are bound by the same requirements (B&P Code § 10145 and related). For non-broker PMs, the PMA should impose the equivalent contractual obligation.

What to negotiate

07Maintenance, capex, and spending caps

The PM handles maintenance and routine repairs within a dollar cap; capex needs separate owner approval. Define both clearly.

What to negotiate

08Indemnification

Indemnity is where the PM tries to shift risk back to you. The default standard is mutual indemnification for third-party claims arising in the ordinary course of property management, with no indemnification flowing from the owner to the PM for the PM's own gross negligence, willful misconduct, intentional acts, fraud, or breach of the PMA.

What to negotiate

09Term length and termination

PM-friendly drafts run 2-3 years with limited owner termination rights. Push for the opposite.

What to negotiate

10Audit rights and reporting

You cannot manage what you cannot see. The PMA should give the owner unfettered access to property records.

What to negotiate

11Conflicts of interest and self-dealing

The PM cannot use the agency relationship to enrich themselves at the owner's expense. The PMA should require advance disclosure and owner consent for any conflict.

What to negotiate

12Dispute resolution and venue

Most PMA forms include mandatory arbitration. Whether that's good for you depends on the size of the property and the type of dispute you might bring. For small strip centers, court can be cheaper than arbitration. For larger properties or complex disputes, arbitration is sometimes faster.

What to negotiate

Want me to review your PMA?

I review commercial property management agreements for California owners: strip centers, shopping centers, mixed-use, small office, light industrial. I read every clause, comment on every issue, and help you respond to the PM company's pushback until the agreement is signed. Direct attorney work, no associates, no hourly creep.

Full review
$349 flat
I read the full PMA, mark up every issue with comments, and send you a written memo with the negotiation positions I recommend. One pass, no back-and-forth with the PM company.
Request review
Review + revision
$599+ flat
Everything in the Full Review tier, plus I respond directly to the PM company's redlines and counter-comments until the agreement is signed. Best for negotiated PMAs.
Request review + revision

Frequently asked

Does a property manager get a commission on a lease they did not procure?
Many commercial property management agreements include language entitling the PM to a leasing commission on any lease signed during the term, with no requirement that the PM actually procured the tenant. That language is negotiable and, in my view, almost always one-sided. The fix is to tie commission entitlement to procuring cause: the PM must have introduced the tenant, conducted negotiations, or otherwise been the proximate cause of the lease. California does not codify procuring cause for property managers the way it touches real estate brokers, so the contract language controls.
What insurance requirements should I expect from a property manager?
Commercial general liability of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate, errors and omissions of at least $1,000,000, workers' compensation per California Labor Code, a fidelity bond, and the owner named as additional insured on the CGL policy. The additional-insured endorsement should be on ISO CG 20 11 or equivalent, and the policy should include a waiver of subrogation. Watch for endorsement-form mismatches that look fine on the certificate but won't actually respond to PM-related claims.
How long should a property management agreement run?
I recommend a one-year initial term with automatic month-to-month renewal, terminable on 30 to 60 days written notice without cause. PMs often push for three-year terms with 90 days notice and a termination fee; those terms benefit the PM, not the owner.
Can a property manager collect a commission on a renewal of an existing tenant?
Only if the PMA says so. Negotiate renewal commissions to apply only when the PM originally procured the tenant AND the PM materially negotiated the renewal terms. Avoid commissions on automatic renewals where the tenant exercises a unilateral option already in the lease.
What is a property management commission tail?
A "tail" is post-termination commission language entitling the PM to commissions on leases that close after the PMA ends, typically when the PM had introduced or been negotiating with the tenant before termination. Standard tail periods run 60-180 days. Limit to 60-90 days, restrict to tenants on a written prospect list delivered after termination, and require the PM to demonstrate active negotiations.
Can a property manager indemnify themselves out of negligence?
They can try, but California courts disfavor it and you should not agree to it. Indemnity should be mutual. The owner should not indemnify the PM for the PM's gross negligence, willful misconduct, intentional acts, fraud, or breach of the PMA.
Disclaimer This article is informational content, not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Reviewing this page or emailing me does not retain me as your attorney; representation begins only when a signed engagement letter is in place. Property management agreements vary significantly, and the right answer for any specific clause depends on facts I cannot see from a public guide. For matters specific to your PMA, retain counsel for a paid review. Sergei Tokmakov, California State Bar #279869.