Audit Rights
Establishes the disclosing party's right to verify the receiving party's compliance with confidentiality obligations through inspections, document reviews, and security assessments.
Medium ComplexityEstablishes the disclosing party's right to verify the receiving party's compliance with confidentiality obligations through inspections, document reviews, and security assessments.
Medium ComplexityAn audit rights clause grants the disclosing party the ability to verify that the receiving party is actually complying with confidentiality obligations. This may include reviewing security policies and procedures, inspecting physical and logical access controls, examining logs and records related to confidential information handling, and conducting technical security assessments. The clause typically specifies how audits are initiated, who conducts them, what the scope covers, how often they can occur, and how findings are addressed.
Courts generally enforce reasonable audit provisions as written. However, overly broad or invasive audit rights may be challenged as unreasonable or impractical. Key considerations include proportionality (audit scope should match information sensitivity), specificity (clear procedures reduce disputes), and protection of the audited party's own confidential information. Many organizations prefer to satisfy audit requirements through third-party certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) rather than direct access, which is often acceptable if properly documented. Audit rights provisions should also address who bears the cost of audits and what happens if deficiencies are found.
Provisions allowing audits "at any time without notice" can be used to disrupt operations and may violate your obligations to other clients. Always require reasonable advance notice except in genuine emergency situations.
Open-ended audit rights without frequency limits could result in continuous audits that consume resources and distract from actual security work. Negotiate for annual limits with exceptions for suspected breaches.
Audit provisions covering "any systems, policies, and personnel" regardless of connection to the confidential information expose your entire operation. Scope should be limited to relevant areas.
Requiring the receiving party to bear all audit costs regardless of outcome incentivizes excessive auditing. Costs should be shared or allocated based on whether non-compliance is found.
Audit results contain sensitive information about your security posture. Without confidentiality protections, findings could be shared inappropriately, potentially exposing vulnerabilities or competitive information.
Audit rights should enable verification without creating operational burden or exposing your confidential information. Balance access with practical limitations.
Ask an Attorney