What Is Material Misrepresentation?
Material misrepresentation is one of the most common reasons life insurance companies deny death benefit claims. The insurer claims that the person who died (the insured) lied or omitted important information on their insurance application, and uses this as grounds to deny the claim or rescind (cancel) the policy entirely.
For a misrepresentation to be "material," it must have been significant enough that the insurer would have made a different decision about issuing the policy - either by denying coverage, charging higher premiums, or excluding certain conditions. Not every inaccuracy on an application is material.
The Two-Part Test for Material Misrepresentation
To deny a claim based on misrepresentation, an insurer typically must prove:
- The statement was false - The information provided was actually incorrect or incomplete
- The statement was material - The insurer would have acted differently if given the true information
Some states also require the insurer to prove the applicant knew the statement was false (intent to deceive), while others only require that the false statement was made.
Common Examples of Alleged Misrepresentations
- Medical history: Failure to disclose previous diagnoses, hospitalizations, or treatments
- Prescription medications: Not listing medications that were prescribed
- Tobacco use: Claiming to be a non-smoker when the insured used tobacco products
- Alcohol or drug use: Understating substance use history
- Family medical history: Not disclosing family history of certain conditions
- Hazardous activities: Failing to mention high-risk hobbies or occupations
- Previous insurance: Not disclosing prior applications or denials
The Contestability Period: Your Key Protection
Life insurance policies have a "contestability period" - typically two years from the policy's effective date. During this period, the insurer can investigate and potentially deny claims based on application misrepresentations. After the contestability period expires, the insurer's ability to deny claims based on misrepresentation is severely limited.
Under California Insurance Code Section 10113.5, after a life insurance policy has been in force for two years during the insured's lifetime, the insurer cannot contest the policy or deny claims based on misrepresentation - except for non-payment of premiums or fraud in obtaining the policy with intent to deceive.
This means that in California, even intentional misrepresentations cannot be used to deny a claim after two years, unless the insurer can prove actual fraud with intent to deceive. The burden of proof is on the insurer.
What Happens During Contestability
If a death occurs within the contestability period, expect the insurer to investigate. They will:
- Order the deceased's medical records from doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies
- Review the original application for any inconsistencies
- Look for evidence of undisclosed conditions, treatments, or risk factors
- Interview family members, beneficiaries, or the deceased's physician
Some insurers try to deny claims even after the contestability period has passed, arguing "fraud." Don't accept this at face value. In most states, the insurer must prove actual fraud with intent to deceive - a much higher bar than simple misrepresentation.
Fighting a Misrepresentation Denial
If your life insurance claim has been denied based on alleged misrepresentation, you have options. Many such denials can be successfully challenged.
Step 1: Get the Full Denial in Writing
Request a detailed written explanation of exactly what misrepresentation the insurer is alleging. They should identify the specific application question, the answer given, and what information they believe was withheld or false.
Step 2: Review the Original Application
Obtain a copy of the original insurance application. Examine exactly what questions were asked and how they were answered. Sometimes insurers mischaracterize what was disclosed, or the questions were ambiguous.
Step 3: Gather Medical Evidence
Collect the deceased's medical records to understand what conditions they actually had and when they were diagnosed. Key questions include:
- Was the condition actually diagnosed before the application date?
- Did the deceased know about the condition at application time?
- Was the condition mentioned by a different name or in a different context?
- Is the insurer's characterization of the medical history accurate?
Step 4: Challenge Materiality
Even if information was technically incorrect, it may not have been material. Argue that:
- The undisclosed condition had no bearing on the cause of death
- The insurer would have issued the policy anyway (perhaps at a different rate)
- Similar applicants with the disclosed condition are regularly insured
- The omission was innocent and the applicant didn't understand the question
If the undisclosed condition had nothing to do with the cause of death, this significantly weakens the insurer's position. For example, if the insured failed to disclose treated high blood pressure but died in an automobile accident, the misrepresentation argument is much harder to sustain.
Step 5: Check the Contestability Period
Verify when the policy was issued and when the death occurred. If the contestability period has passed, the insurer's ability to deny based on misrepresentation is limited. In most states, they can only deny for fraud with intent to deceive after contestability expires.
Common Insurer Tactics in Misrepresentation Cases
Overly Broad Medical Record Requests
Insurers may fish through years of medical records looking for anything that could be characterized as undisclosed. A minor visit years ago may be spun into a "failure to disclose a pre-existing condition."
Mischaracterizing Medical Records
Sometimes insurers misread or overstate what medical records show. A notation that the patient "reported occasional headaches" might be characterized as an undisclosed "neurological condition."
Claiming "Should Have Known"
Insurers may argue the deceased "should have known" about a condition even if they were never formally diagnosed. This is often a weak argument, as you cannot disclose what you don't know.
Rescission vs. Denial
Watch whether the insurer is denying the claim or rescinding (canceling) the entire policy. In rescission, they typically return the premiums paid and act as if the policy never existed. This has different legal implications than a simple claim denial.
In California, rescission requires the insurer to prove the misrepresentation was made with actual intent to defraud. Under California Insurance Code Section 331, concealment (whether intentional or unintentional) entitles the insurer to rescind, but only if the concealment was of a fact that the applicant knew to be material. The burden is on the insurer to prove these elements.
When to Seek Legal Help
Misrepresentation denials are often contestable, but they require careful legal analysis. Consider consulting an attorney if:
- The claim involves a significant death benefit ($50,000+)
- The insurer has rescinded the policy entirely
- You believe the misrepresentation allegation is false or exaggerated
- The death occurred after the contestability period
- The alleged undisclosed condition is unrelated to the cause of death
- The insurer is being unresponsive or providing vague explanations
Many attorneys who handle life insurance denials work on contingency (they only get paid if you win), so the financial risk to you may be minimal.
Related Guides
Life Insurance Claim Denied?
I help beneficiaries fight wrongful life insurance denials based on misrepresentation and other unfair tactics. Get a professional review of your denial letter and a strategy to pursue the benefits your family deserves.