Understanding Bad Faith Damages

When an insurance company unreasonably denies, delays, or underpays your legitimate claim, you may have a bad faith cause of action. Unlike a simple breach of contract case (where you can only recover the policy benefits), bad faith claims can result in significantly larger recoveries.

The rationale is simple: insurance companies have a special duty of good faith and fair dealing toward their policyholders. When they breach this duty, courts allow policyholders to recover damages beyond the policy limits to deter such conduct.

Key Distinction: In a breach of contract case, you can only recover what the insurance company should have paid under the policy. In a bad faith case, you can potentially recover emotional distress damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees that may far exceed your policy limits.

Types of Damages Available

1. Contract Damages (Policy Benefits)

At minimum, you can recover the benefits that should have been paid under your policy. This forms the foundation of any bad faith claim, though in pure bad faith cases, the contract damages may already be paid by the time of trial.

2. Consequential Damages

These are the real-world financial harms caused by the insurer's bad faith conduct:

3. Emotional Distress Damages

Most states allow recovery for emotional distress caused by bad faith conduct. This recognizes that insurance claims often arise during stressful situations (illness, accidents, property loss), and an insurer's misconduct compounds that stress.

Evidence of emotional distress can include:

California Note

California expressly recognizes emotional distress damages in first-party bad faith cases. The landmark case Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co. (1973) established that emotional distress is a foreseeable consequence of an insurer's breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

California courts have awarded substantial emotional distress damages, particularly in cases involving vulnerable plaintiffs or egregious insurer conduct.

4. Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are designed to punish the insurer and deter future misconduct. They require a showing of conduct more egregious than mere unreasonableness, typically involving:

Punitive damages are not available in all states or require specific proof thresholds.

California Note

Under California Civil Code section 3294, punitive damages require "clear and convincing evidence" that the insurer acted with oppression, fraud, or malice. The damages must bear a reasonable relationship to actual damages, though ratios of 4:1 to 9:1 have been upheld in appropriate cases.

5. Attorney Fees

Attorney fee recovery varies significantly by state:

California Note - Brandt Fees

California allows recovery of attorney fees incurred to obtain policy benefits when the insurer's denial was in bad faith. These are called "Brandt fees" after Brandt v. Superior Court (1985).

Important: Brandt fees are considered compensatory damages for breach of the implied covenant, not a separate fee-shifting provision. This means they can be awarded even when no statute allows fee recovery.

Damages by Category Overview

Damage Type Description Availability
Policy Benefits The amount owed under the insurance contract All states
Consequential Damages Financial losses caused by the bad faith denial Most states
Emotional Distress Mental anguish, anxiety, depression from denial Most states (first-party)
Punitive Damages Punishment for egregious conduct Most states (heightened standard)
Attorney Fees Fees to recover policy benefits (Brandt fees) CA, some other states by statute
Statutory Penalties Fixed penalties under state insurance codes Some states (varies)

Statutory Penalties by State

Some states have enacted specific statutes that impose penalties or create private causes of action for insurance bad faith. These can provide additional remedies beyond common law bad faith claims.

States with Significant Statutory Remedies

California Note

California's Unfair Insurance Practices Act (Insurance Code sections 790-790.15) prohibits unfair claims practices but does not create a direct private right of action (Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund). However, violations of the regulations can serve as evidence of bad faith in common law claims.

The California Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, section 2695.1 et seq.) provide specific standards that, when violated, can support a bad faith claim.

Factors That Increase Damages

Courts consider various factors when assessing bad faith damages, particularly for emotional distress and punitive damages:

Egregious Insurer Conduct

Vulnerability of the Policyholder

Insurer's Financial Position

For punitive damages, courts consider the insurer's net worth to ensure the punishment is meaningful. A multi-billion dollar insurer may face larger punitive awards than a smaller company for similar conduct.

Important:

The U.S. Supreme Court has set constitutional limits on punitive damages. In most cases, punitive damages exceeding a single-digit ratio to compensatory damages may be constitutionally suspect, though exceptions exist for particularly egregious conduct.

Proving Your Damages

To maximize your bad faith recovery, you need solid documentation:

For Consequential Damages

For Emotional Distress

For Punitive Damages

Need Help Evaluating Your Bad Faith Claim?

I can help you understand what damages may be available in your specific situation and develop a strategy to maximize your recovery.

~$450
Demand Letters
$240/hr
General Rate
Schedule a Consultation