Overview
You've received a demand letter claiming your product caused injury. California product liability law, established in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, allows injured consumers to recover from manufacturers, distributors, and retailers under multiple theories. This guide helps you understand your exposure and respond strategically.
Notify Your Insurer
Product liability insurance (often part of general liability or CGL policies) may cover this claim. Notify your carrier immediately.
Preserve Evidence
If possible, obtain and preserve the product, packaging, and any instructions or warnings. Issue a litigation hold on relevant documents.
Supply Chain Matters
Liability may flow up or down the distribution chain. Identify manufacturers, component suppliers, and distributors for potential indemnification.
Three Theories of Product Liability
- Strict Liability - Product was defective and caused injury; no negligence required
- Negligence - Defendant failed to use reasonable care in design, manufacture, or warnings
- Breach of Warranty - Express or implied warranties were breached (Commercial Code 2314-2315)
Types of Product Defects
- Manufacturing defect - Product deviated from intended design during production
- Design defect - Entire product line has inherent dangerous characteristics
- Warning defect - Inadequate warnings or instructions for safe use
Product liability analysis, defense evaluation, and professional response to protect your business.
Evaluate the Claim
Product liability claims require proving multiple elements. Analyze each to assess the strength of the claim against you.
Elements They Must Prove
| Element | Requirement | Defense Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Defect Existed | Product was defective when it left your control | Challenge defect existence |
| Your Role | You are in the chain of distribution | Identify other responsible parties |
| Causation | Defect caused the injury | Alternative causes possible |
| Proper Use | Product used as intended or foreseeable | Misuse defense |
| Damages | Actual harm and quantifiable losses | Verify and challenge damages |
Product Investigation
- check Obtain and inspect the product
- check Review design specifications
- check Check manufacturing batch records
- check Review warning labels and instructions
Claim History
- check Prior complaints about this product
- check Any recalls or safety bulletins
- check Similar claims or lawsuits
- check CPSC or FDA reports
Expert Analysis May Be Needed
Product liability cases often require expert testimony on product design, manufacturing processes, and causation. Consider engaging an expert early to evaluate the claim's technical merits before committing to a position.
Your Defenses
California law recognizes several defenses to product liability claims.
No Defect Existed
The product was not defective when it left your control. It met design specifications, manufacturing standards, and included appropriate warnings.
Product Misuse / Alteration
The plaintiff used the product in a way that was not intended or reasonably foreseeable, or materially altered the product after purchase.
Comparative Fault
The plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injuries. Under California's comparative fault system, damages are reduced by their percentage of fault.
State of the Art
The product met the state of the art at the time of manufacture. Scientific knowledge at the time did not reveal the risk. (Limited applicability in California)
Component Part Defense
Component manufacturers may not be liable if they provided a component that was not defective and the injury resulted from the finished product's design.
Statute of Limitations
Personal injury claims must be filed within 2 years of discovery of the injury and its cause (CCP 335.1). Property damage has a 3-year limit.
Defenses That Are Limited
- "We're just the retailer" - Retailers are in the chain of distribution and face strict liability
- "We followed FDA/CPSC regulations" - Compliance is evidence but not a complete defense
- "No one else was injured" - Doesn't prove product wasn't defective
- "They assumed the risk" - Limited application in product liability cases
Response Options
Based on your evaluation, choose the appropriate response strategy.
Product Liability Exposure Analysis
Example: Moderate injury from consumer product
Class Action and Mass Tort Risk
A single product liability claim may indicate broader exposure. Review your product complaint history, consider whether other consumers could bring similar claims, and evaluate potential recall obligations. Early resolution of individual claims can help manage broader risk.
Sample Responses
Copy and customize these response templates for your situation.
Next Steps
Actions to take after receiving a product liability demand letter.
Step 1: Preserve Evidence
Obtain the product if possible. Preserve all design documents, manufacturing records, quality control reports, and complaint history.
Step 2: Notify Insurance
Report the claim to your product liability or general liability carrier. Many policies require prompt notice.
Step 3: Identify Chain of Distribution
Determine all parties in the distribution chain who may share liability or owe indemnification.
Step 4: Assess Recall Obligations
If the defect is real, evaluate whether a voluntary recall or CPSC/FDA report is required.
Regulatory Considerations
- CPSC Reporting - Manufacturers must report products that create substantial product hazard within 24 hours
- FDA Compliance - Medical devices, food, and drugs have specific reporting requirements
- Voluntary Recall - May be advisable to limit ongoing liability exposure
- Document Retention - Issue litigation hold to preserve all relevant records
Insurance Considerations
- Policy limits - Know your product liability coverage limits
- Defense costs - Most policies cover defense costs in addition to limits
- Multiple claims - Consider aggregate limits if facing multiple claims
- Umbrella coverage - Review excess coverage for catastrophic claims
Get Professional Help
Product liability claims can threaten your business. Get a professional response that protects your interests.
Schedule Consultation - $450California Resources
- Greenman v. Yuba Power (1963): Landmark case establishing strict product liability
- CACI 1200-1243: California jury instructions for product liability
- Commercial Code 2314-2315: Implied warranties of merchantability and fitness