🎯 The Complete Defending Playbook: Pre-Depo to Post-Depo
Remote deposition defense requires more pre-work than in-person. You can't read body language as easily, you can't pass notes, and technology adds variables outside your control. But remote format also offers advantages: your witness is in a familiar environment, you can have case materials at hand without opposing counsel seeing them, and travel fatigue is eliminated.
The playbook below walks through every phase: 72-48 hours before, day-of technical setup, on-record protocols, and post-deposition preservation.
📅 Phase 1: 72-48 Hours Before
The work that determines whether your remote deposition runs smoothly happens well before you log in.
- Confirm witness technology: Test Zoom/Teams on their actual device, check camera angle, audio quality, internet stability
- Establish backup communication: Exchange cell numbers for use if primary platform fails (NOT for substantive communication during testimony)
- Verify exhibit protocol with opposing counsel: Pre-mark vs. live-mark, numbering convention, delivery method
- Send witness remote deposition instructions: Where to sit, what to have available, what NOT to have visible
- Confirm reporter capabilities: Can they handle screen share exhibits? Do they need pre-marked copies?
- Review break protocol: How will breaks be requested and logged? Is there a private breakout room?
- Prepare witness for remote-specific issues: No off-camera help, no second devices, identification of all persons present
- Send calendar invitation with all links: Confirm witness received and can access
Instruct your witness on these environmental factors:
- Background: Plain wall or professional virtual background. No personal photos, whiteboards with notes, or windows showing location details
- Lighting: Light source in front of face, not behind. Natural light from a window behind causes silhouette effect
- Camera height: Lens at eye level. Looking down at a laptop camera creates unflattering angle and can appear evasive
- Audio: Wired headset preferred over laptop speakers. Reduces echo and ensures clear audio capture
- Desk setup: Only have documents you've reviewed together visible. No phones, tablets, or second computers visible on camera
- Door: Locked or sign posted. Interruptions look terrible on video
💻 Phase 2: Day-Of Technical Setup
- Join early: Be in the waiting room 10-15 minutes before start time
- Test your audio/video: Confirm you can be heard and seen clearly
- Have backup device ready: Phone or tablet logged into platform as fallback
- Close unnecessary applications: Notifications, email, Slack---anything that could interrupt
- Have exhibits loaded: Pre-marked exhibits open in separate window, ready for screen share if needed
- Open case materials: Key documents, deposition outline, prior discovery responses
- Confirm witness status: Quick text or call to verify they're ready and technology is working
- Mute notifications: Phone on silent, computer on Do Not Disturb
🎙 Phase 3: On-Record Protocol
The first 5 minutes of recorded testimony set the tone. Establishing ground rules on the record creates a foundation you can reference if issues arise later.
- Confirm witness identity: Ask witness to state name for the record
- Confirm witness is alone: Ask if anyone else is in the room; if so, identify them on the record
- Confirm no off-camera communication: Ask witness to confirm no messaging apps open, no second devices in use
- Establish camera visibility: Request camera shows witness from chest up with hands visible when practical
- Confirm exhibit protocol: State agreed protocol for exhibit handling
- Establish break procedure: State how breaks will be requested and logged
- Confirm technical failure procedure: State agreed procedure if audio/video fails
- Identify all remote participants: Get on record who is attending and from where
Do NOT:
- Text or message your witness during testimony. Even innocuous messages can be characterized as coaching if discovered
- Forget you're on camera during breaks. If video stays on during breaks, anything you do can be seen
- Have substantive case materials visible on screen when screen sharing. Use a separate clean window for exhibits
- Assume technical failures excuse testimony. Everything said before the failure is still on the record
- Let informal break conversations happen on the record. Confirm you're off the record before discussing anything with your client
🛡 Phase 4: Active Defense During Examination
Remote format changes how you defend in subtle but important ways:
- Objections feel different: You can't use body language or physical presence to slow down a rapid-fire examination. Your voice and pacing become your primary tools
- You can't easily confer: In person, you might lean over and whisper to your witness during a break. Remote requires breaks to be formally taken and off the record
- Visual cues are limited: Watch for signs of witness fatigue or confusion in their face---you won't feel the energy shift like you would in person
- Mute discipline matters: Stay muted unless speaking to avoid audio overlap. Unmute smoothly when objecting
Making Objections Effectively
In remote depositions, objection technique requires adjustment:
- Unmute before speaking: The half-second delay between clicking unmute and being heard can cut off your first word
- State objection clearly: "Objection, [ground]" is sufficient. Don't speak over the question---wait for the question to complete
- Don't over-object: Remote format makes frequent objections more disruptive to the flow. Reserve objections for matters that actually matter for the record
- Instruction not to answer: Use sparingly and only for privilege, work product, or privacy grounds. State your grounds clearly on the record
✅ Phase 5: Post-Deposition
- Confirm transcript ordering: Request your copy directly from the reporter before ending the call
- Preserve any recordings: If video recorded, confirm preservation and access to copies
- Collect exhibits: Ensure you have copies of all exhibits used, including any marked during the deposition
- Debrief with witness: After formally concluding, discuss how it went and any concerns
- Note any technical issues: Document any audio/video problems for potential later disputes
- Calendar transcript review deadline: Track deadline for errata sheet if corrections needed
📄 Exhibit Handling & Recording Protocols
Exhibit handling is where remote depositions most commonly go sideways. Without a clear protocol established before the deposition, you'll waste time on the record arguing about how to show documents, whether the witness can see clearly, and what constitutes a proper exhibit.
The solution: establish your protocol in advance, confirm it on the record at the start, and have contingency plans for technical failures.
📂 Choose Your Exhibit Protocol
There are three main approaches to remote exhibit handling. Choose based on case complexity and exhibit volume.
Pre-Mark Protocol
Best for: Document-heavy depositions, complex commercial cases, situations where you want maximum control and minimum procedural disputes.
How it works:
- All anticipated exhibits are pre-numbered and exchanged 48-72 hours before deposition
- Numbering convention agreed in advance (e.g., "Plaintiff's Exhibit 1" vs. "Exhibit A-1")
- All parties and the witness have identical physical or digital copies before start
- Screen share used for reference only---everyone can follow along on their own copy
- Court reporter receives pre-marked exhibits for the official record
Advantages:
- Eliminates disputes about what document the witness is viewing
- No risk of technical failure preventing exhibit use
- Witness can take time to review without waiting for screen share
- Reporter has clean copies for the record
Disadvantages:
- Requires advance preparation and exchange
- Reduces impeachment opportunities with surprise documents
- May telegraph your examination strategy
Sample stipulation language:
"The parties stipulate that all exhibits have been pre-marked and exchanged. Plaintiff's exhibits are numbered 1 through [X]. Defendant's exhibits are numbered 101 through [Y]. Each party confirms receipt of all pre-marked exhibits."
Live Mark Protocol
Best for: Short depositions with few exhibits, impeachment-focused examinations, situations where you want flexibility.
How it works:
- Exhibits are marked in real-time during the deposition
- Examining counsel screen shares the document
- Reporter marks exhibit when introduced ("Let the record reflect this is now Exhibit 3")
- Digital copy provided to reporter via email or platform chat
- All parties acknowledge they can see the document on screen
Advantages:
- Preserves impeachment opportunities
- No advance preparation required
- Flexible---can use any document during examination
Disadvantages:
- Dependent on technology working properly
- Can create delays as documents are found and shared
- Higher risk of disputes about document visibility or clarity
- Multi-page documents harder to navigate on screen
Sample stipulation language:
"The parties agree that exhibits will be marked during the deposition. Examining counsel will screen share each exhibit and provide a digital copy to the reporter. All parties will confirm on the record that they can see the exhibit before examination on that document begins."
Hybrid Protocol
Best for: Most litigation depositions. Provides structure with flexibility.
How it works:
- Core documents pre-marked and exchanged (document requests, key contracts, prior testimony)
- Reserved exhibit numbers held for live-marked impeachment documents
- Clear on-record statement of which exhibits are pre-marked vs. reserved
- Both parties have right to introduce additional documents with live marking
Advantages:
- Efficient handling of known documents
- Preserves impeachment capability
- Reduces but doesn't eliminate technical dependencies
- Professional appearance---shows preparation while maintaining flexibility
Sample stipulation language:
"The parties have pre-marked and exchanged Exhibits 1 through 25. Exhibit numbers 26 and above are reserved for documents to be marked during the deposition. Either party may introduce additional exhibits using the reserved numbers."
🖥 Screen Share Best Practices
If using Zoom for the deposition, configure these settings in advance:
- Enable "Multiple participants can share simultaneously" if both sides may need to share exhibits
- Disable "Annotation" unless you want opposing counsel marking up documents on screen
- Use "Share Portion of Screen" to share only the document window, not your entire desktop (protects against accidentally showing case notes)
- Pre-load documents in a separate window before sharing to avoid navigation delays
- Consider PDF viewer over Word for cleaner display of multi-page documents
📹 Recording Considerations
Official Video Recording
Under CCP 2025.330, a party may specify in the deposition notice that the deposition will be recorded by audio or video technology. For video depositions:
- The operator must be present and competent to operate the equipment
- The recording must begin with an on-camera statement of the date, time, case caption, and identification of the deponent
- All participants must be identified on camera
- The recording must be preserved in its original format
Platform Recording (Zoom, Teams, etc.)
Many remote depositions are also recorded through the platform's built-in recording function. Key considerations:
- Stipulate to recording: Get on-record agreement about who may record, how recordings will be preserved, and who receives copies
- Cloud vs. local recording: Cloud recordings may implicate security concerns for sensitive matters
- Recording notice: California is a two-party consent state---all participants must consent to recording (which is satisfied by participation in a noticed deposition)
Unauthorized Recording Concerns
If you have concerns about unauthorized recording (screen capture, phone recording of screen, etc.):
- Request on-record confirmation that no unauthorized recording devices are in use
- For particularly sensitive matters, consider seeking a protective order limiting recording
- Note that you cannot prevent someone from recording their own screen, but you can establish record consequences
Common problem: Opposing counsel claims the witness couldn't clearly see a screen-shared exhibit, or the witness claims a document was too small to read on screen.
Prevention:
- Always ask on the record: "Can you see the document clearly? Do you need me to zoom in?"
- For important documents, have witness confirm each page they're reviewing
- Use high-quality PDF scans, not photos or low-resolution copies
- If witness claims visibility issues, offer to email the document directly during a break
On-record response: "Let the record reflect that the witness confirmed at [time] that they could see Exhibit [X] clearly. If the witness now has concerns about visibility, we can take a break and provide a direct copy."
📊 Exhibit Protocol Comparison Table
| Factor | Pre-Mark | Live Mark | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prep time required | High (48-72 hrs) | Low | Medium |
| Impeachment flexibility | Low | High | Medium |
| Technical dependency | Low | High | Medium |
| Dispute risk | Low | High | Medium |
| Best for | Complex commercial, document-heavy | Short depos, few exhibits | Most litigation |
⚠ When Remote Depositions Go Sideways: Problem Scenarios
Remote depositions introduce unique failure modes that don't exist in person. Technology can fail. Opposing counsel can allege coaching. Witnesses can be distracted by their environment. The key is having pre-planned responses for each scenario so you're not improvising on the record.
🗣 Scenario 1: Coaching Allegations
Warning Signs Opposing Counsel May Cite
- Unusually long pauses before answers
- Witness eyes tracking to something off-camera
- Typing or clicking sounds during questions
- Witness repeating questions verbatim before answering (buying time)
- Answers that sound "coached" or overly legalistic for a lay witness
If You're Accused of Coaching
Do not get defensive. Respond professionally:
"For the record, I am not communicating with the witness through any means other than what appears on this video. No one is in the room with the witness other than those identified at the start of the deposition. If counsel has specific concerns, they may state them for the record."
If the allegation continues:
- Offer to have the witness do a 360-degree camera pan of the room
- Have the witness confirm what devices are in the room
- If appropriate, note your willingness to demonstrate your own setup
Do not:
- Get into an argument on the record
- Refuse reasonable requests that would demonstrate there's no coaching
- Make accusations back at opposing counsel without basis
If You Suspect the Other Side Is Coaching
Document your observations on the record:
"Let the record reflect that the witness paused for approximately [X] seconds before answering, and appeared to be looking at something below the camera. Counsel, can you confirm that the witness is not receiving communications from anyone during this testimony?"
If concerns persist:
- Request a room scan
- Ask the witness directly: "Is anyone helping you answer these questions?"
- Note the conduct for potential motion for protective order or sanctions
- In extreme cases, consider suspension under CCP 2025.470
💻 Scenario 2: Technology Failures
Types of Technical Failures
| Failure Type | Immediate Response | If Unresolved |
|---|---|---|
| Audio drops (brief) | Ask for repeat; confirm everyone heard | Switch to phone audio backup |
| Video freeze | Proceed with audio only if brief | Consider if video is required; may need to reschedule |
| Complete disconnect | Use backup phone number to coordinate | Reconvene after technical resolution |
| Screen share failure | Email exhibit directly; continue | If repeated, use pre-marked exhibits only |
| Platform crash | Switch to backup platform | Reschedule if no backup available |
On-Record Documentation
When technical issues occur, always document on the record:
- Time the issue began
- Nature of the issue (audio, video, both)
- What testimony, if any, may have been affected
- Agreement to proceed, pause, or reschedule
- Time the issue was resolved
Stipulation for Technical Issues
Consider proposing this stipulation at the start of every remote deposition:
"The parties stipulate that if technical difficulties interrupt the deposition, we will go off the record, attempt to resolve the issue, and reconvene. Any testimony given immediately before an undetected technical failure that was not captured on the record may be re-asked upon reconvening. Neither side will use technical failures to claim testimony was not given or heard."
⚡ Scenario 3: Hostile Opposing Counsel
Common Aggressive Tactics in Remote Depositions
- Interrupting objections: Speaking over your objections
- Rapid-fire questions: Not allowing witness time to think
- Refusing breaks: Denying reasonable break requests
- Off-camera intimidation: Making faces or gestures the witness can see
- Recording manipulation: Claiming you can't see their video when you can
De-escalation Responses
For interrupting objections:
"Counsel, I need to complete my objection for the record. [State objection.] You may now ask your next question."
For rapid-fire questions:
"The witness is entitled to a reasonable time to consider each question before answering. Please allow the witness to complete their answer before asking your next question."
For refusing reasonable breaks:
"We're taking a five-minute break. We'll reconvene at [time]. [To reporter:] Please go off the record."
Note: You have the right to take reasonable breaks. You don't need opposing counsel's permission, though you should not take breaks during pending questions.
When to Invoke CCP 2025.470
Consider suspension if opposing counsel's conduct:
- Rises to the level of harassment or intimidation
- Continues after on-record objections and warnings
- Would warrant termination if conducted in person
- Creates a hostile environment preventing fair testimony
Suspension statement:
"I am suspending this deposition pursuant to CCP 2025.470 based on counsel's conduct, specifically [describe conduct]. We will seek a protective order from the court before this deposition resumes. Let the record reflect the time is [time]."
📍 Scenario 4: Witness Location Issues
Common Location Issues
- Noisy environment: Construction, pets, family members
- Unprofessional background: Messy room, inappropriate items visible
- Interruptions: People entering the room, phone calls
- Public location: Coffee shop, airport, car
Responses
For environmental noise:
- If brief, wait it out and note on record
- If persistent, request break to address
- For ongoing issues, may need to reschedule
For unprofessional background:
- Suggest virtual background if platform allows
- If witness is yours, brief them in advance on appropriate setup
- Note that background isn't substantive---don't make it a bigger issue than it is
For public locations:
- Consider whether privacy concerns warrant rescheduling
- If proceeding, confirm on record that witness understands they're in a public place and testimony may be overheard
- For sensitive matters, may need protective order preventing public location depositions
🔏 Scenario 5: Authentication and Document Integrity
The Problem
In remote depositions, witnesses see digital copies of documents. Opposing counsel may later challenge authentication by claiming the witness couldn't verify they were seeing the original or a true copy.
Best Practices for Authentication
- Use Bates-numbered copies: Reference specific Bates numbers on the record
- Confirm document identity: "I'm showing you a document Bates-stamped ABC-000123 through ABC-000130. Can you see that numbering?"
- For critical documents: Send physical copies in advance; reference the physical copy the witness has in hand
- Note original vs. copy: "For the record, this is a copy of [describe document]. Have you seen the original of this document?"
Responding to Authentication Objections
If opposing counsel objects that the witness can't authenticate a screen-shared document:
- Remind them authentication is for trial, not deposition
- The witness can still testify about whether they recognize the document
- If needed, offer to provide physical copy and take break while it's reviewed
📝 On-Record Scripts & Copy-Ready Templates
Having pre-written scripts saves you from fumbling on the record. These scripts cover the most common remote deposition situations. Copy them, adapt them to your case, and have them ready before every deposition.
💬 Opening Scripts
✋ Objection Scripts
🔧 Technical Issue Scripts
🛑 Suspension and Termination Scripts
⏸ Break Scripts
✅ Closing Scripts
🤝 Remote Deposition Defense Services
California attorneys who need remote deposition coverage. Whether you have a scheduling conflict, your client is in a different time zone, or you simply want experienced support for a high-stakes deposition, I provide remote deposition defense services for California civil matters.
I've defended depositions in business disputes, employment matters, real estate litigation, and international commercial cases. My practice focuses on California clients with international business interests, so I'm comfortable with remote proceedings, time zone coordination, and cross-border issues.
What I Can Handle Remotely
- ✓ Defend depositions via Zoom, Teams, Webex, or other platforms
- ✓ Witness preparation sessions (pre-deposition coaching)
- ✓ Document review and exhibit preparation
- ✓ Strategy consultation for complex depositions
- ✓ Second-chair support for high-stakes depositions
- ✓ Emergency coverage for scheduling conflicts
- ✓ International witness depositions (time zone coordination)
What I Need Before the Deposition
- ✓ Deposition notice and case caption
- ✓ Key pleadings (complaint, answer, cross-complaints)
- ✓ Relevant discovery responses (interrogatories, RFAs)
- ✓ Document production with Bates numbering
- ✓ Prior deposition transcripts (if any)
- ✓ Your outline or areas of concern
- ✓ "Do not cross" topics list (privileged areas, etc.)
- ✓ 30-minute strategy call before the deposition
Typical Engagement
Timeline: Ideally 5-7 days before the deposition, though I can accommodate shorter timelines for straightforward matters.
Fee structure: Flat fee or hourly, depending on scope. Includes prep time, deposition attendance, and post-deposition debrief.
Conflicts: I run conflicts before every engagement. Provide party names and related entities when you reach out.
🔗 Related Services
Beyond deposition defense, I provide remote support for other California litigation needs:
For hearings where remote appearance is permitted, I can appear on your behalf or with you. See my Remote Hearings Guide for detailed information on what's permitted.
- CMC and status conferences
- Discovery motions
- Law and motion (where court permits)
- Ex parte applications (where court permits)
Remote support for discovery preparation and strategy:
- Drafting and responding to written discovery
- Discovery motion practice (motions to compel, protective orders)
- Document review and privilege logging
- Deposition outline preparation
- Expert discovery coordination
My practice focuses on California clients with international business interests. I'm experienced with:
- Depositions of international witnesses (Hague Convention considerations)
- Time zone coordination for Asia/Pacific, Europe, and Middle East clients
- Cross-border discovery issues
- International contract disputes with California nexus
- Service of process on foreign defendants
Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. is a California attorney (State Bar #279869) whose practice focuses on supporting international clients with business interests in the United States. He provides remote litigation support, contract drafting, and business formation services for California attorneys and their clients.
Sergei runs a fully virtual practice and has defended depositions remotely since before COVID made it standard. He's written extensively on California remote practice requirements and builds these resources to help other California attorneys navigate the rules.
CRC 3.672 deadlines, RA-010 mechanics, county-by-county rules, and how to appear remotely without missing procedural steps.
COPRAC ethics opinions on cloud tools, remote work security requirements, and using AI without violating confidentiality duties.
How to run remote consults safely, conduct conflict checks, and structure engagement letters for virtual practice.