← Terms.Law CA Virtual Practice Hub 6 guides

Part of the California Virtual Practice Hub (6 guides + tools)

Defending Remote Depositions: The California Attorney's Complete Playbook

The definitive resource for California attorneys defending depositions via Zoom, Teams, and other platforms. From CRC 3.1010 authority to on-record objection scripts, this is everything you need to protect your witness without being in the room.

Updated Nov 2025 ~25 min deep read Guide 2 of 6

📜 The Complete Authority Map for Remote Depositions in California

Bottom Line Quick Summary

Yes, remote depositions are expressly permitted in California civil practice. CRC 3.1010 provides blanket authorization for oral depositions conducted by telephone, videoconference, or other remote electronic means. The only procedural requirements relate to notice, exhibit handling, and physical presence demands by opposing parties.

The critical issues in practice aren't about permission---they're about execution: How do you handle exhibits when everyone's on Zoom? What do you do when opposing counsel alleges coaching? How do you make the record when technology fails? This guide covers all of it.

Key takeaway: Remote depositions are standard practice in California. Your job is to know the protocols cold so you can protect your witness regardless of format.

📑 The Core Authority Stack

California's remote deposition framework rests on four primary authorities. Understanding what each governs helps you respond confidently when opposing counsel objects or demands something outside the rules.

📌 Key Authority: CRC 3.1010 - Remote Depositions Permitted

California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1010 provides the foundational permission for remote depositions in California civil cases:

"A party may take an oral deposition by telephone, videoconference, or other remote electronic means."

This rule establishes that remote depositions are not an exception or accommodation---they are a standard, expressly authorized method of discovery. The rule applies to all civil cases in California superior courts.

Key provisions:

  • CRC 3.1010(a)(1): Remote depositions permitted as a matter of right
  • CRC 3.1010(a)(2): The deposition officer (court reporter) may administer the oath remotely
  • CRC 3.1010(a)(3): A party may demand physical presence at the deponent's location with 5 court days' written notice

View CRC 3.1010 on courts.ca.gov

📌 Key Authority: CCP 2025.310 - Officer Remote Attendance

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2025.310 addresses the deposition officer's attendance and the deponent's physical location:

"If a deposition is taken by telephone, videoconference, or other remote electronic means, the deposition officer may be in a different location than the deponent."

Practical implications:

  • The court reporter does not need to be physically present with the witness
  • Remote oaths are valid and enforceable
  • The deponent can be located anywhere with adequate technology
  • This statute removed the historical requirement that the officer administer oaths in person

This provision is critical for California attorneys with witnesses located out of state or internationally---the deposition can proceed remotely without requiring the reporter to travel.

View CCP 2025.310 on leginfo.ca.gov

📌 Key Authority: CCP 2025.420 - Protective Orders for Deposition Conduct

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2025.420 authorizes courts to issue protective orders limiting deposition conduct, including remote-specific conditions:

"Before, during, or after a deposition, any party, any deponent, or any other affected natural person or organization may promptly move for a protective order."

Remote-specific protective orders may address:

  • Who may be present in the room with the deponent
  • Technology requirements and backup procedures
  • Exhibit handling protocols
  • Recording restrictions beyond the official transcript
  • Limitations on physical presence demands that constitute harassment
  • Privacy protections for deponent's location (e.g., home office)

Standard for relief: The court may issue a protective order "to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense."

View CCP 2025.420 on leginfo.ca.gov

📌 Key Authority: CCP 2025.470 - Suspension for Bad Faith Examination

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2025.470 provides the nuclear option for defending counsel: suspending the deposition when opposing counsel's conduct becomes unreasonable.

"If a deponent or party objects to a deposition question and believes the question is being asked in bad faith or in a manner intended to harass or intimidate, the deponent or party may suspend the deposition for the time necessary to make a motion for a protective order."

When to invoke CCP 2025.470:

  • Repeated badgering questions after sustained objections
  • Examination designed to intimidate rather than discover
  • Opposing counsel's conduct that would warrant termination if in-person
  • Technical manipulation (e.g., deliberately poor audio, unauthorized recording)
  • Refusal to honor reasonable accommodations for remote format

Procedure: Announce on the record that you are suspending the deposition pursuant to CCP 2025.470. State the specific conduct and your intent to seek a protective order. You then have the burden to actually file and pursue the motion---don't invoke this lightly.

View CCP 2025.470 on leginfo.ca.gov

📋 Authority Comparison Table

Quick reference for which rule governs what:

Rule/Statute What It Governs Key Provision When You'll Cite It
CRC 3.1010 Remote format permission Depositions may be taken by phone, video, or remote electronic means Opposing counsel argues remote format is improper
CRC 3.1010(a)(3) Physical presence demands 5 court days' written notice required to demand physical presence Opposing counsel demands last-minute in-person attendance
CCP 2025.310 Reporter location flexibility Deposition officer may attend from different location than deponent Questions about reporter remote attendance or remote oath validity
CCP 2025.420 Protective orders Court may limit deposition conduct to prevent harassment or undue burden Need pre-deposition protocol orders or mid-deposition relief
CCP 2025.470 Suspension authority Deponent/party may suspend to seek protective order if bad faith exam Opposing counsel conduct becomes unreasonable; need to terminate
Red Flag: Last-Minute Physical Presence Demands

The trap: Opposing counsel sends an email the day before the deposition demanding that you or the witness appear in person, citing CRC 3.1010(a)(3).

The rule: CRC 3.1010(a)(3) requires 5 court days' written notice to demand physical presence at the deponent's location. A last-minute demand fails this requirement on its face.

Your response script: "Your demand for physical presence was made [X] days before the scheduled deposition. CRC 3.1010(a)(3) requires 5 court days' written notice for such demands. Your demand is untimely and we will proceed remotely as originally noticed."

If they persist: You can seek a protective order under CCP 2025.420 if the physical presence demand appears designed to harass, create undue burden, or prevent the deposition from occurring.

🧩 Tactical Note: Remote Oath Validity

Some opposing counsel (especially those less familiar with remote practice) may challenge whether a remotely-administered oath is valid. The answer under California law is clear:

  • CCP 2025.310 expressly allows the deposition officer to be in a different location than the deponent
  • The oath is valid as long as the officer can observe the witness and verify identity
  • Video depositions satisfy the identification requirement; telephone depositions may require additional identity verification

If challenged, respond: "CCP 2025.310 expressly authorizes the deposition officer to administer the oath remotely. This deposition is proceeding in full compliance with California law."

🏛 Federal Court Practice in California

When defending depositions in federal cases sitting in California, the authority framework shifts:

Federal Court Remote Deposition Authority FRCP Rules

FRCP 30(b)(4) governs remote depositions in federal court:

"The parties may stipulate---or the court may on motion order---that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote means."

Key difference from California state court: Federal rules technically require stipulation or court order for remote depositions. However, in practice:

  • Most federal courts in California have standing orders permitting remote depositions without specific motion
  • Post-COVID, remote depositions have become presumptively acceptable in most federal districts
  • Check local rules (N.D. Cal., C.D. Cal., S.D. Cal., E.D. Cal.) for any specific requirements
  • If opposing counsel objects, propose a stipulation or meet-and-confer before motion practice

FRCP 30(d)(1) provides similar suspension authority to CCP 2025.470: "At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party."

💡 Practitioner Insight: Authority Mastery = Confidence

I've defended dozens of remote depositions for California attorneys, and here's what separates smooth depositions from contentious ones: the defending attorney's command of the authority.

When you can cite CRC 3.1010(a)(3) from memory, when you know that CCP 2025.470 is your suspension authority, when you don't hesitate before responding to procedural objections---opposing counsel recalibrates. They realize they're not going to steamroll you on procedural issues, and the deposition becomes about substance, not format fights.

Conversely, hesitation or uncertainty about basic authority invites more aggressive procedural objections. Know this authority cold.

🎯 The Complete Defending Playbook: Pre-Depo to Post-Depo

Bottom Line Quick Summary

Remote deposition defense requires more pre-work than in-person. You can't read body language as easily, you can't pass notes, and technology adds variables outside your control. But remote format also offers advantages: your witness is in a familiar environment, you can have case materials at hand without opposing counsel seeing them, and travel fatigue is eliminated.

The playbook below walks through every phase: 72-48 hours before, day-of technical setup, on-record protocols, and post-deposition preservation.

📅 Phase 1: 72-48 Hours Before

The work that determines whether your remote deposition runs smoothly happens well before you log in.

📋 Pre-Deposition Preparation Checklist (72-48 Hours) Printable
  • Confirm witness technology: Test Zoom/Teams on their actual device, check camera angle, audio quality, internet stability
  • Establish backup communication: Exchange cell numbers for use if primary platform fails (NOT for substantive communication during testimony)
  • Verify exhibit protocol with opposing counsel: Pre-mark vs. live-mark, numbering convention, delivery method
  • Send witness remote deposition instructions: Where to sit, what to have available, what NOT to have visible
  • Confirm reporter capabilities: Can they handle screen share exhibits? Do they need pre-marked copies?
  • Review break protocol: How will breaks be requested and logged? Is there a private breakout room?
  • Prepare witness for remote-specific issues: No off-camera help, no second devices, identification of all persons present
  • Send calendar invitation with all links: Confirm witness received and can access
🧩 Tactical: Optimizing Witness Environment

Instruct your witness on these environmental factors:

  • Background: Plain wall or professional virtual background. No personal photos, whiteboards with notes, or windows showing location details
  • Lighting: Light source in front of face, not behind. Natural light from a window behind causes silhouette effect
  • Camera height: Lens at eye level. Looking down at a laptop camera creates unflattering angle and can appear evasive
  • Audio: Wired headset preferred over laptop speakers. Reduces echo and ensures clear audio capture
  • Desk setup: Only have documents you've reviewed together visible. No phones, tablets, or second computers visible on camera
  • Door: Locked or sign posted. Interruptions look terrible on video

💻 Phase 2: Day-Of Technical Setup

📋 Day-Of Technical Checklist (30 Minutes Before) Printable
  • Join early: Be in the waiting room 10-15 minutes before start time
  • Test your audio/video: Confirm you can be heard and seen clearly
  • Have backup device ready: Phone or tablet logged into platform as fallback
  • Close unnecessary applications: Notifications, email, Slack---anything that could interrupt
  • Have exhibits loaded: Pre-marked exhibits open in separate window, ready for screen share if needed
  • Open case materials: Key documents, deposition outline, prior discovery responses
  • Confirm witness status: Quick text or call to verify they're ready and technology is working
  • Mute notifications: Phone on silent, computer on Do Not Disturb

🎙 Phase 3: On-Record Protocol

The first 5 minutes of recorded testimony set the tone. Establishing ground rules on the record creates a foundation you can reference if issues arise later.

📋 On-Record Opening Checklist Say These Things
  • Confirm witness identity: Ask witness to state name for the record
  • Confirm witness is alone: Ask if anyone else is in the room; if so, identify them on the record
  • Confirm no off-camera communication: Ask witness to confirm no messaging apps open, no second devices in use
  • Establish camera visibility: Request camera shows witness from chest up with hands visible when practical
  • Confirm exhibit protocol: State agreed protocol for exhibit handling
  • Establish break procedure: State how breaks will be requested and logged
  • Confirm technical failure procedure: State agreed procedure if audio/video fails
  • Identify all remote participants: Get on record who is attending and from where
Red Flag: Common Remote Defense Mistakes

Do NOT:

  • Text or message your witness during testimony. Even innocuous messages can be characterized as coaching if discovered
  • Forget you're on camera during breaks. If video stays on during breaks, anything you do can be seen
  • Have substantive case materials visible on screen when screen sharing. Use a separate clean window for exhibits
  • Assume technical failures excuse testimony. Everything said before the failure is still on the record
  • Let informal break conversations happen on the record. Confirm you're off the record before discussing anything with your client

🛡 Phase 4: Active Defense During Examination

💡 Practitioner Insight: Remote Defense Adjustments

Remote format changes how you defend in subtle but important ways:

  • Objections feel different: You can't use body language or physical presence to slow down a rapid-fire examination. Your voice and pacing become your primary tools
  • You can't easily confer: In person, you might lean over and whisper to your witness during a break. Remote requires breaks to be formally taken and off the record
  • Visual cues are limited: Watch for signs of witness fatigue or confusion in their face---you won't feel the energy shift like you would in person
  • Mute discipline matters: Stay muted unless speaking to avoid audio overlap. Unmute smoothly when objecting

Making Objections Effectively

In remote depositions, objection technique requires adjustment:

  • Unmute before speaking: The half-second delay between clicking unmute and being heard can cut off your first word
  • State objection clearly: "Objection, [ground]" is sufficient. Don't speak over the question---wait for the question to complete
  • Don't over-object: Remote format makes frequent objections more disruptive to the flow. Reserve objections for matters that actually matter for the record
  • Instruction not to answer: Use sparingly and only for privilege, work product, or privacy grounds. State your grounds clearly on the record

Phase 5: Post-Deposition

📋 Post-Deposition Checklist Wrap Up Right
  • Confirm transcript ordering: Request your copy directly from the reporter before ending the call
  • Preserve any recordings: If video recorded, confirm preservation and access to copies
  • Collect exhibits: Ensure you have copies of all exhibits used, including any marked during the deposition
  • Debrief with witness: After formally concluding, discuss how it went and any concerns
  • Note any technical issues: Document any audio/video problems for potential later disputes
  • Calendar transcript review deadline: Track deadline for errata sheet if corrections needed

📄 Exhibit Handling & Recording Protocols

Bottom Line Quick Summary

Exhibit handling is where remote depositions most commonly go sideways. Without a clear protocol established before the deposition, you'll waste time on the record arguing about how to show documents, whether the witness can see clearly, and what constitutes a proper exhibit.

The solution: establish your protocol in advance, confirm it on the record at the start, and have contingency plans for technical failures.

📂 Choose Your Exhibit Protocol

There are three main approaches to remote exhibit handling. Choose based on case complexity and exhibit volume.

Select your exhibit protocol:

Pre-Mark Protocol

Best for: Document-heavy depositions, complex commercial cases, situations where you want maximum control and minimum procedural disputes.

How it works:

  • All anticipated exhibits are pre-numbered and exchanged 48-72 hours before deposition
  • Numbering convention agreed in advance (e.g., "Plaintiff's Exhibit 1" vs. "Exhibit A-1")
  • All parties and the witness have identical physical or digital copies before start
  • Screen share used for reference only---everyone can follow along on their own copy
  • Court reporter receives pre-marked exhibits for the official record

Advantages:

  • Eliminates disputes about what document the witness is viewing
  • No risk of technical failure preventing exhibit use
  • Witness can take time to review without waiting for screen share
  • Reporter has clean copies for the record

Disadvantages:

  • Requires advance preparation and exchange
  • Reduces impeachment opportunities with surprise documents
  • May telegraph your examination strategy

Sample stipulation language:

"The parties stipulate that all exhibits have been pre-marked and exchanged. Plaintiff's exhibits are numbered 1 through [X]. Defendant's exhibits are numbered 101 through [Y]. Each party confirms receipt of all pre-marked exhibits."

Live Mark Protocol

Best for: Short depositions with few exhibits, impeachment-focused examinations, situations where you want flexibility.

How it works:

  • Exhibits are marked in real-time during the deposition
  • Examining counsel screen shares the document
  • Reporter marks exhibit when introduced ("Let the record reflect this is now Exhibit 3")
  • Digital copy provided to reporter via email or platform chat
  • All parties acknowledge they can see the document on screen

Advantages:

  • Preserves impeachment opportunities
  • No advance preparation required
  • Flexible---can use any document during examination

Disadvantages:

  • Dependent on technology working properly
  • Can create delays as documents are found and shared
  • Higher risk of disputes about document visibility or clarity
  • Multi-page documents harder to navigate on screen

Sample stipulation language:

"The parties agree that exhibits will be marked during the deposition. Examining counsel will screen share each exhibit and provide a digital copy to the reporter. All parties will confirm on the record that they can see the exhibit before examination on that document begins."

Hybrid Protocol

Best for: Most litigation depositions. Provides structure with flexibility.

How it works:

  • Core documents pre-marked and exchanged (document requests, key contracts, prior testimony)
  • Reserved exhibit numbers held for live-marked impeachment documents
  • Clear on-record statement of which exhibits are pre-marked vs. reserved
  • Both parties have right to introduce additional documents with live marking

Advantages:

  • Efficient handling of known documents
  • Preserves impeachment capability
  • Reduces but doesn't eliminate technical dependencies
  • Professional appearance---shows preparation while maintaining flexibility

Sample stipulation language:

"The parties have pre-marked and exchanged Exhibits 1 through 25. Exhibit numbers 26 and above are reserved for documents to be marked during the deposition. Either party may introduce additional exhibits using the reserved numbers."

🖥 Screen Share Best Practices

🧪 Tech Note: Zoom Screen Share Settings

If using Zoom for the deposition, configure these settings in advance:

  • Enable "Multiple participants can share simultaneously" if both sides may need to share exhibits
  • Disable "Annotation" unless you want opposing counsel marking up documents on screen
  • Use "Share Portion of Screen" to share only the document window, not your entire desktop (protects against accidentally showing case notes)
  • Pre-load documents in a separate window before sharing to avoid navigation delays
  • Consider PDF viewer over Word for cleaner display of multi-page documents

📹 Recording Considerations

🎥 Video Recording in Remote Depositions Know Your Rights

Official Video Recording

Under CCP 2025.330, a party may specify in the deposition notice that the deposition will be recorded by audio or video technology. For video depositions:

  • The operator must be present and competent to operate the equipment
  • The recording must begin with an on-camera statement of the date, time, case caption, and identification of the deponent
  • All participants must be identified on camera
  • The recording must be preserved in its original format

Platform Recording (Zoom, Teams, etc.)

Many remote depositions are also recorded through the platform's built-in recording function. Key considerations:

  • Stipulate to recording: Get on-record agreement about who may record, how recordings will be preserved, and who receives copies
  • Cloud vs. local recording: Cloud recordings may implicate security concerns for sensitive matters
  • Recording notice: California is a two-party consent state---all participants must consent to recording (which is satisfied by participation in a noticed deposition)

Unauthorized Recording Concerns

If you have concerns about unauthorized recording (screen capture, phone recording of screen, etc.):

  • Request on-record confirmation that no unauthorized recording devices are in use
  • For particularly sensitive matters, consider seeking a protective order limiting recording
  • Note that you cannot prevent someone from recording their own screen, but you can establish record consequences
Red Flag: Exhibit Visibility Disputes

Common problem: Opposing counsel claims the witness couldn't clearly see a screen-shared exhibit, or the witness claims a document was too small to read on screen.

Prevention:

  • Always ask on the record: "Can you see the document clearly? Do you need me to zoom in?"
  • For important documents, have witness confirm each page they're reviewing
  • Use high-quality PDF scans, not photos or low-resolution copies
  • If witness claims visibility issues, offer to email the document directly during a break

On-record response: "Let the record reflect that the witness confirmed at [time] that they could see Exhibit [X] clearly. If the witness now has concerns about visibility, we can take a break and provide a direct copy."

📊 Exhibit Protocol Comparison Table

Factor Pre-Mark Live Mark Hybrid
Prep time required High (48-72 hrs) Low Medium
Impeachment flexibility Low High Medium
Technical dependency Low High Medium
Dispute risk Low High Medium
Best for Complex commercial, document-heavy Short depos, few exhibits Most litigation

When Remote Depositions Go Sideways: Problem Scenarios

Bottom Line Quick Summary

Remote depositions introduce unique failure modes that don't exist in person. Technology can fail. Opposing counsel can allege coaching. Witnesses can be distracted by their environment. The key is having pre-planned responses for each scenario so you're not improvising on the record.

🗣 Scenario 1: Coaching Allegations

Responding to Coaching Allegations High Stakes

Warning Signs Opposing Counsel May Cite

  • Unusually long pauses before answers
  • Witness eyes tracking to something off-camera
  • Typing or clicking sounds during questions
  • Witness repeating questions verbatim before answering (buying time)
  • Answers that sound "coached" or overly legalistic for a lay witness

If You're Accused of Coaching

Do not get defensive. Respond professionally:

"For the record, I am not communicating with the witness through any means other than what appears on this video. No one is in the room with the witness other than those identified at the start of the deposition. If counsel has specific concerns, they may state them for the record."

If the allegation continues:

  • Offer to have the witness do a 360-degree camera pan of the room
  • Have the witness confirm what devices are in the room
  • If appropriate, note your willingness to demonstrate your own setup

Do not:

  • Get into an argument on the record
  • Refuse reasonable requests that would demonstrate there's no coaching
  • Make accusations back at opposing counsel without basis

If You Suspect the Other Side Is Coaching

Document your observations on the record:

"Let the record reflect that the witness paused for approximately [X] seconds before answering, and appeared to be looking at something below the camera. Counsel, can you confirm that the witness is not receiving communications from anyone during this testimony?"

If concerns persist:

  • Request a room scan
  • Ask the witness directly: "Is anyone helping you answer these questions?"
  • Note the conduct for potential motion for protective order or sanctions
  • In extreme cases, consider suspension under CCP 2025.470

💻 Scenario 2: Technology Failures

🔌 Handling Technical Failures Common Issue

Types of Technical Failures

Failure Type Immediate Response If Unresolved
Audio drops (brief) Ask for repeat; confirm everyone heard Switch to phone audio backup
Video freeze Proceed with audio only if brief Consider if video is required; may need to reschedule
Complete disconnect Use backup phone number to coordinate Reconvene after technical resolution
Screen share failure Email exhibit directly; continue If repeated, use pre-marked exhibits only
Platform crash Switch to backup platform Reschedule if no backup available

On-Record Documentation

When technical issues occur, always document on the record:

  • Time the issue began
  • Nature of the issue (audio, video, both)
  • What testimony, if any, may have been affected
  • Agreement to proceed, pause, or reschedule
  • Time the issue was resolved

Stipulation for Technical Issues

Consider proposing this stipulation at the start of every remote deposition:

"The parties stipulate that if technical difficulties interrupt the deposition, we will go off the record, attempt to resolve the issue, and reconvene. Any testimony given immediately before an undetected technical failure that was not captured on the record may be re-asked upon reconvening. Neither side will use technical failures to claim testimony was not given or heard."

Scenario 3: Hostile Opposing Counsel

🔥 Dealing with Hostile Opposing Counsel De-escalation

Common Aggressive Tactics in Remote Depositions

  • Interrupting objections: Speaking over your objections
  • Rapid-fire questions: Not allowing witness time to think
  • Refusing breaks: Denying reasonable break requests
  • Off-camera intimidation: Making faces or gestures the witness can see
  • Recording manipulation: Claiming you can't see their video when you can

De-escalation Responses

For interrupting objections:

"Counsel, I need to complete my objection for the record. [State objection.] You may now ask your next question."

For rapid-fire questions:

"The witness is entitled to a reasonable time to consider each question before answering. Please allow the witness to complete their answer before asking your next question."

For refusing reasonable breaks:

"We're taking a five-minute break. We'll reconvene at [time]. [To reporter:] Please go off the record."

Note: You have the right to take reasonable breaks. You don't need opposing counsel's permission, though you should not take breaks during pending questions.

When to Invoke CCP 2025.470

Consider suspension if opposing counsel's conduct:

  • Rises to the level of harassment or intimidation
  • Continues after on-record objections and warnings
  • Would warrant termination if conducted in person
  • Creates a hostile environment preventing fair testimony

Suspension statement:

"I am suspending this deposition pursuant to CCP 2025.470 based on counsel's conduct, specifically [describe conduct]. We will seek a protective order from the court before this deposition resumes. Let the record reflect the time is [time]."

📍 Scenario 4: Witness Location Issues

🏠 Witness Location Problems Environment Issues

Common Location Issues

  • Noisy environment: Construction, pets, family members
  • Unprofessional background: Messy room, inappropriate items visible
  • Interruptions: People entering the room, phone calls
  • Public location: Coffee shop, airport, car

Responses

For environmental noise:

  • If brief, wait it out and note on record
  • If persistent, request break to address
  • For ongoing issues, may need to reschedule

For unprofessional background:

  • Suggest virtual background if platform allows
  • If witness is yours, brief them in advance on appropriate setup
  • Note that background isn't substantive---don't make it a bigger issue than it is

For public locations:

  • Consider whether privacy concerns warrant rescheduling
  • If proceeding, confirm on record that witness understands they're in a public place and testimony may be overheard
  • For sensitive matters, may need protective order preventing public location depositions

🔏 Scenario 5: Authentication and Document Integrity

📄 Document Authentication Challenges Evidentiary Issues

The Problem

In remote depositions, witnesses see digital copies of documents. Opposing counsel may later challenge authentication by claiming the witness couldn't verify they were seeing the original or a true copy.

Best Practices for Authentication

  • Use Bates-numbered copies: Reference specific Bates numbers on the record
  • Confirm document identity: "I'm showing you a document Bates-stamped ABC-000123 through ABC-000130. Can you see that numbering?"
  • For critical documents: Send physical copies in advance; reference the physical copy the witness has in hand
  • Note original vs. copy: "For the record, this is a copy of [describe document]. Have you seen the original of this document?"

Responding to Authentication Objections

If opposing counsel objects that the witness can't authenticate a screen-shared document:

  • Remind them authentication is for trial, not deposition
  • The witness can still testify about whether they recognize the document
  • If needed, offer to provide physical copy and take break while it's reviewed

📝 On-Record Scripts & Copy-Ready Templates

Bottom Line Quick Summary

Having pre-written scripts saves you from fumbling on the record. These scripts cover the most common remote deposition situations. Copy them, adapt them to your case, and have them ready before every deposition.

💬 Opening Scripts

📝 Opening: Establishing Remote Ground Rules
Before we begin substantive questioning, I'd like to establish some ground rules for this remote deposition. First, please confirm that you are the only person in the room with you right now. [WAIT FOR RESPONSE] Second, please confirm that you do not have any messaging applications, text messages, or email open, and that no one will be communicating with you during this deposition other than through what appears on this video call. [WAIT FOR RESPONSE] Third, please confirm that you do not have any notes, documents, or other materials with you other than what has been provided as exhibits in this deposition. [WAIT FOR RESPONSE] Fourth, if you need to take a break for any reason, please let us know on the record before doing so. Please do not leave the camera view without first going off the record. Fifth, if you experience any technical difficulties---audio cutting out, video freezing, difficulty seeing exhibits---please say so immediately so we can address it on the record. Sixth, please keep your camera on and remain visible throughout the deposition. If you need to turn off your camera for any reason, please advise on the record first. Do you understand and agree to these ground rules? [WAIT FOR RESPONSE] Thank you. Counsel, do you have any additional ground rules you'd like to establish?
📄 Opening: Exhibit Protocol Confirmation
Before we proceed, let's confirm our exhibit protocol for the record. [FOR PRE-MARKED EXHIBITS:] The parties have exchanged pre-marked exhibits. Plaintiff's Exhibits are numbered 1 through [X]. Defendant's Exhibits are numbered 101 through [Y]. All parties confirm they have received copies of all pre-marked exhibits. Do you have your copies of the exhibits in front of you? [TO WITNESS] When I refer to an exhibit, I will reference it by number and share it on screen. Please refer to your copy and confirm you are looking at the same document. [FOR LIVE-MARKED EXHIBITS:] Exhibits will be marked during the deposition as we proceed. When I introduce an exhibit, I will screen share the document and provide the exhibit number. I will send a copy to the court reporter for the record. Please confirm you can see each exhibit clearly before I begin questioning on it. Does everyone understand this protocol?

Objection Scripts

Standard Form Objections (Remote-Adapted)
[FORM - COMPOUND] Objection, compound. [TO WITNESS:] You may answer if you understand the question. [FORM - VAGUE] Objection, vague and ambiguous. [TO WITNESS:] If you understand what counsel is asking, you may answer. [FORM - ASSUMES FACTS] Objection, assumes facts not in evidence. [TO WITNESS:] You may answer if you can do so without accepting counsel's characterization. [FORM - CALLS FOR SPECULATION] Objection, calls for speculation. [TO WITNESS:] If you know, you may answer. [FORM - LEADING] Objection, leading. [Note: In deposition, this is preserved for record but witness may answer unless you have specific instruction not to.] [FORM - LACK OF FOUNDATION] Objection, lacks foundation. [TO WITNESS:] If you have personal knowledge, you may answer. [FORM - ASKED AND ANSWERED] Objection, asked and answered. Counsel, the witness has already testified on this point at [reference prior testimony if known]. [PRIVILEGE - ATTORNEY-CLIENT] Objection, attorney-client privilege. Witness, do not answer that question. [Then state basis if challenged.] [PRIVILEGE - WORK PRODUCT] Objection, work product. Witness, do not answer. [State basis if challenged.] [FORM - REMOTE SPECIFIC - INAUDIBLE] I apologize, I didn't hear the full question due to audio issues. Could you please repeat that? [FORM - REMOTE SPECIFIC - EXHIBIT NOT VISIBLE] Objection, the exhibit is not clearly visible on screen. Please zoom in or provide a clearer image before continuing.

🔧 Technical Issue Scripts

🔌 Technical Failure Documentation
[WHEN FAILURE OCCURS] Let the record reflect that at approximately [TIME], we experienced [describe: audio dropout / video freeze / connection loss / screen share failure]. [IF BRIEF AND RESOLVED] The technical issue appears to be resolved. Can everyone confirm they can hear and see properly? [WAIT FOR CONFIRMATION] Counsel, please repeat your last question for the witness. [IF EXTENDED - REQUESTING RECESS] The technical issue is not immediately resolved. I'm requesting we go off the record for [X] minutes to attempt to resolve the issue. The time is now [TIME]. [RETURNING FROM RECESS] Back on the record. The time is [TIME]. We have resolved the technical issue. Before continuing, I'd like to confirm: [Witness name], can you hear me clearly? Can you see my video? Counsel, please repeat the last question, as we cannot confirm whether the witness heard it before the interruption. [IF UNRESOLVABLE] The technical issue cannot be resolved at this time. I move that we suspend this deposition and reconvene at a mutually agreeable time when the technical issues have been addressed. Do the parties so stipulate? Let the record reflect the deposition is suspended at [TIME] on [DATE] due to technical difficulties. The deposition will be continued to [DATE/TIME or "a date and time to be determined"].
👁 Responding to Coaching Allegations
[IF ACCUSED OF COACHING] For the record, I am not communicating with the witness through any means other than what appears on this video call. I have not sent any text messages, emails, chat messages, or other communications to the witness since the deposition began. No one is in the room with the witness other than those identified at the commencement of this deposition. If counsel has specific observations they would like to put on the record, they may do so. Otherwise, I'd ask that we proceed with the examination. [IF OPPOSING COUNSEL CONTINUES] Counsel, I've stated my position clearly for the record. If you have a genuine concern, you may note it for the record and we can address it with the court if necessary. Continued accusations without basis are inappropriate and I'm not going to engage further. Please proceed with your examination. [IF YOU OBSERVE POSSIBLE COACHING BY OTHER SIDE] Let the record reflect that at approximately [TIME], I observed [describe: witness appeared to be reading from something off-camera / witness paused for approximately X seconds while appearing to look at something below the camera / I heard typing sounds during the question / etc.]. [TO OPPOSING COUNSEL:] Can you confirm that the witness is not receiving communications from anyone during this testimony? [TO WITNESS:] Is anyone helping you formulate your answers or providing you with information during this deposition? [REQUESTING ROOM SCAN] Given the observations I've noted, I'd like to request that the witness briefly pan their camera 360 degrees to show the room they're in. This is a reasonable request to ensure the integrity of this testimony. [IF REFUSED] Let the record reflect that counsel has refused a request to have the witness show their surroundings despite my on-record observations of [repeat observations]. I'm preserving this issue for potential motion practice.

🛑 Suspension and Termination Scripts

🛑 CCP 2025.470 Suspension
[FORMAL SUSPENSION STATEMENT] I am suspending this deposition pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2025.470. The basis for this suspension is [describe conduct specifically, e.g.: - Counsel's repeated badgering of the witness after objections - Counsel's continued questioning in a manner designed to harass and intimidate - Counsel's refusal to allow reasonable breaks - Counsel's inappropriate conduct as detailed on the record at approximately [times] - The examination is being conducted in bad faith as evidenced by [describe]] We will be seeking a protective order from the court before this deposition resumes. Let the record reflect that the time is [TIME] and the deposition is suspended. [TO WITNESS:] You should remain available, as this deposition may be continued at a later date. Do not discuss your testimony with anyone other than me. [TO REPORTER:] Please prepare the transcript of today's proceedings as soon as possible, as we will need it for our motion.

Break Scripts

Requesting and Taking Breaks
[REQUESTING A BREAK - BETWEEN QUESTIONS] Counsel, we'd like to take a brief break. We'll be back in [X] minutes. [TO REPORTER:] Please go off the record. The time is [TIME]. [RETURNING FROM BREAK] Back on the record. The time is [TIME]. We're ready to proceed. [IF OPPOSING COUNSEL OBJECTS TO BREAK] We're entitled to reasonable breaks during a deposition. There's no pending question, and we will return in [X] minutes. [TO REPORTER:] Please go off the record. The time is [TIME]. [IF THERE'S A PENDING QUESTION] Counsel, I understand there's a pending question. Could you allow the witness to answer, and then we'll take a break? [OR, IF THE QUESTION IS OBJECTIONABLE:] Objection [state ground]. After that objection, we'll take a brief break. [TO REPORTER:] Off the record. The time is [TIME]. [IMPORTANT REMINDER TO WITNESS] [Before going off the record:] [Witness name], during this break, please do not discuss your testimony or this case with anyone. When we return, we'll continue where we left off.

Closing Scripts

Deposition Closing
[AFTER EXAMINATION CONCLUDES] [TO REPORTER:] Will you please advise the witness of their rights regarding the transcript? [AFTER REPORTER ADVISES:] [TO WITNESS:] Do you understand your options regarding review and signature of the transcript? [STANDARD CLOSING:] Counsel, do you have any further questions? [IF NO:] We're concluded. Thank you all for your time. [TO REPORTER:] Off the record. The time is [TIME]. [IF RESERVING RIGHTS:] We reserve the right to reconvene this deposition pending review of [documents / other discovery / transcript]. [IF DEPOSITION TO CONTINUE:] This deposition is suspended to be continued on [DATE] at [TIME]. The witness is instructed to remain available and not to discuss their testimony with anyone other than counsel. [EXHIBIT PRESERVATION:] [TO REPORTER:] Please confirm you have copies of all exhibits marked today, numbered [list exhibit numbers]. We'll need certified copies for the record. [RECORDING:] [IF VIDEO:] Please confirm the video recording is being preserved and all parties will receive copies.

🤝 Remote Deposition Defense Services

Who This Is For Service Overview

California attorneys who need remote deposition coverage. Whether you have a scheduling conflict, your client is in a different time zone, or you simply want experienced support for a high-stakes deposition, I provide remote deposition defense services for California civil matters.

I've defended depositions in business disputes, employment matters, real estate litigation, and international commercial cases. My practice focuses on California clients with international business interests, so I'm comfortable with remote proceedings, time zone coordination, and cross-border issues.

🤝
Remote Deposition Defense Coverage
For California attorneys who need backup

What I Can Handle Remotely

  • Defend depositions via Zoom, Teams, Webex, or other platforms
  • Witness preparation sessions (pre-deposition coaching)
  • Document review and exhibit preparation
  • Strategy consultation for complex depositions
  • Second-chair support for high-stakes depositions
  • Emergency coverage for scheduling conflicts
  • International witness depositions (time zone coordination)

What I Need Before the Deposition

  • Deposition notice and case caption
  • Key pleadings (complaint, answer, cross-complaints)
  • Relevant discovery responses (interrogatories, RFAs)
  • Document production with Bates numbering
  • Prior deposition transcripts (if any)
  • Your outline or areas of concern
  • "Do not cross" topics list (privileged areas, etc.)
  • 30-minute strategy call before the deposition

Typical Engagement

Timeline: Ideally 5-7 days before the deposition, though I can accommodate shorter timelines for straightforward matters.

Fee structure: Flat fee or hourly, depending on scope. Includes prep time, deposition attendance, and post-deposition debrief.

Conflicts: I run conflicts before every engagement. Provide party names and related entities when you reach out.

🔗 Related Services

Beyond deposition defense, I provide remote support for other California litigation needs:

🎥 Remote Court Appearances CRC 3.672

For hearings where remote appearance is permitted, I can appear on your behalf or with you. See my Remote Hearings Guide for detailed information on what's permitted.

  • CMC and status conferences
  • Discovery motions
  • Law and motion (where court permits)
  • Ex parte applications (where court permits)
📋 Discovery Support Behind the Scenes

Remote support for discovery preparation and strategy:

  • Drafting and responding to written discovery
  • Discovery motion practice (motions to compel, protective orders)
  • Document review and privilege logging
  • Deposition outline preparation
  • Expert discovery coordination
💼 International Client Matters Cross-Border

My practice focuses on California clients with international business interests. I'm experienced with:

  • Depositions of international witnesses (Hague Convention considerations)
  • Time zone coordination for Asia/Pacific, Europe, and Middle East clients
  • Cross-border discovery issues
  • International contract disputes with California nexus
  • Service of process on foreign defendants
👤 About Sergei Tokmakov

Sergei Tokmakov, Esq. is a California attorney (State Bar #279869) whose practice focuses on supporting international clients with business interests in the United States. He provides remote litigation support, contract drafting, and business formation services for California attorneys and their clients.

Sergei runs a fully virtual practice and has defended depositions remotely since before COVID made it standard. He's written extensively on California remote practice requirements and builds these resources to help other California attorneys navigate the rules.